Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"ABSTRAKSejak lebih dari satu dekade yang lalu, persoalan radikalisme dan terorisme terus mendapatkan sorotan publik dari hampir seluruh penjuru dunia. Terorisme telah menimbulkan banyak kerusakan bagi kehidupan manusia. Oleh karena itu, perlu upaya deradikalisasi untuk menanggulangi masalah tersebut. Seluruh elemen masyarakat Indonesia pada dasarnya bertangguung jawab atas upaya deradikalisasi, bukan hanya BNPT saja. Terlebih, BNPT terbukti memiliki berbagai kendala yang tidak bisa dihadapi sendiri. Salah satu elemen masyarakat yang bisa mengambil peranan penting dalam hal ini adalah Lembaga non-pemerintah.

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisa peran dan efektivitas deradikalisasi oleh lembaga non-pemerintah, dengan mengambil studi kasus Yayasan Prasasti Perdamaian dan Search for Common Ground, dua lembaga yang aktif bergerak dalam upaya deradikalisasi.

Penelitian ini dilakukan dengan metode kualitatif melalui wawancara terstruktur, observasi dan studi literatur. Dalam penelitian ini diketahui bahwa dua lembaga non-pemerintah tersebut memiliki tingkat penerimaan yang lebih tinggi oleh narapidana terorisme, daripada program deradikalisasi yang dijalankan oleh BNPT. Namun demikian, masalah koordinasi dengan pemerintah, minimnya sumber daya, dan lemahnya monitoring masih memberi hambatan dalam upaya deradikalisasi.

---

For more than a decade, the issue of radicalism and terrorism continues to get the public's attention from almost all corners of the world. Terrorism has caused a lot of damage to human life. Therefore, it is necessary to properly address the problem. Every element of Indonesian society is basically responsible for efforts to de-radicalization, not just BNPT. Moreover, BNPT has proven to have various obstacles that cannot be faced alone. One element of society that can take an important role in this case is non-governmental institutions.

This study aims to analyze the role and effectiveness of deradicalization by non-governmental institutions, by taking a case study of Yayasan Prasasti Perdamaian and Search for Common Ground, two institutions that are actively engaged in deradicalisation efforts.

This research was conducted with qualitative methods through structured interviews, observation and literature studies. In this study it was known that the two non-government institutions had higher levels of acceptance by prisoners of terrorism, rather than the deradicalisation program run by BNPT. However, the problem of coordination with the government, lack of resources, and weak monitoring still provide obstacles in efforts to de-radicalization.

 

"

"Penelitian ini bertujuan guna mengetahui peluang dan hambatan penerapan disengagement sebagai strategi penanggulangan terorisme di Indonesia. Pendekatan ini merupakan jawaban atas kebuntuan pendekatan deradikalisasi dalam menghadapi anggota kelompok teroris Islam berbasis ideologi agama. Penelitian dengan menggunakan metode kualitatif ini diharapkan dapat memberikan informasi yang mendalam tentang peluang dan hambatan penerapan disengagement di Indonesia.Pada penelitian ini diperoleh sebagian besar narasumber berpendapat bahwa strategi disengagement dapat diterapkan dalam upaya penanggulangan terorisme di Indonesia. Peluang penerapan disengagement lebih dimungkinkan karena mayoritas ummat muslim di Indonesia merupakan kalangan moderat, adanya ikatan kekeluargaan yang kuat, adanya kemungkinan perbedaan pendapat di kalangan kelompok teroris di Indonesia, dan pendekatan humanis yang dilakukan Polri dapat menjadi pintu keberhasilan strategi ini. Walaupun terdapat kendala, namun kendala tersebut dapat diatasi bila ada itikad baik dari seluruh elemen masyarakat dan menjadikan terorisme sebagai musuh bersama.

---

This Purpose of the research is to understand opportunity and barriers of implementation of disengagement as a strategy of counter terrorism in Indonesia. In lower level than deradicalization, this approach is answer to the deadlock of deradicalization approach. The research approach use a qualitative study with depth interview in the primary data collection opinion same interviewer about opportunities and barriers of implementation of disengagement in Indonesia.This research found most interviewer argued that disengagement strategy can be applied to counter terrorism in Indonesia. The opportunities is possible because the majority of Muslim community in Indonesia is among the moderates, the existence of strong family ties, the possibility of disagreements among terrorist groups in Indonesia, and humanis approach of Indonesian Police can be the right way to successful this strategy. Some problem found in this research, but basicly are not an obstacle for the successful of this strategy if we has unity of effort and make terrorism as a common enemy."

"Burnout menjadi masalah yang persisten dan memprihatinkan bagi tenaga keperawatan akibat beban kerja dan tuntutan yang besar. Terdapat sejumlah faktor yang berperan terhadap burnout, salah satunya adalah resiliensi. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk melihat peran resiliensi terhadap burnout pada perawat. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian kuantitatif dengan desain cross-sectional. Partisipan dalam penelitian ini adalah 126 perawat dengan rentang usia 22–53 tahun (M = 33.7; SD = 7.50) dengan minimal lama bekerja 1 tahun. Variabel resiliensi pada penelitian ini diukur menggunakan Connor–Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC-10) dan variabel burnout diukur menggunakan Oldenburg Burnout Inventory (OLBI). Pengambilan data penelitian dilakukan menggunakan kuesioner dan disebarkan pada rumah sakit yang telah menyetujui untuk dijadikan tempat pengambilan data. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa resiliensi mampu memprediksi dan menjelaskan 14.1% varians pada burnout dalam konteks perawat. Oleh karenanya, pihak rumah sakit dapat merancang berbagai metode atau strategi-strategi khusus agar dapat mendorong terbentuknya resiliensi yang tinggi pada perawat.

---

Burnout has become a persistent and concerning issue for nursing staff due to heavy workloads and high demands. However, there are factors that play a role in burnout, one of which is resilience. This study aims to examine the role of resilience in burnout among nurses. It is a quantitative study with a cross-sectional design. The participants in this study were 126 nurses from 22–53 years old (M = 33.7; SD = 7.50) with a minimum work experience of one year. Resilience was measured using the Connor–Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC-10) and burnout was measured using the Oldenburg Burnout Inventory (OLBI). Data collection was conducted using questionnaires distributed in hospitals that had agreed to participate. The data from 126 participants were then analyzed using simple linear regression analysis. The results of this study indicate that resilience can predict and explain 14.1% of the variance in burnout among nurses. Therefore, hospitals can design various methods or specific strategies to foster high resilience among nurses."

"Penelitian ini merupakan jenis penelitian kuantitatif dan desain eksperimental yang bertujuan untuk menguji peran dehumanisasi terhadap pengaruh justifikasi moral terhadap dukungan kebijakan pendekatan keras. Desain penelitian ini adalah penelitian antar subjek posttest saja. DV penelitian ini merupakan dukungan untuk pendekatan keamanan (hard approach). IV (pembenaran moral) dimanipulasi menggunakan indusi teks. Kelompok eksperimen diberikan teks yang berisi pembenaran moral, sedangkan kelompok kontrol akan diberikan teks netral yaitu berita tentang sepak bola. Moderator dalam penelitian ini adalah dehumanisasi. Sebanyak 91 peserta direkrut melalui media sosial Line. Pembagian kelompok dalam eksperimen kali ini gagal membuktikan adanya pengaruh antara justifikasi moral dan dukungan terhadap pendekatan keamanan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa dehumanisasi tidak berinteraksi dengan justifikasi moral untuk mendukung pendekatan keamanan.

---

This research is a type of quantitative research and experimental design which aims to examine the role of dehumanization on the effect of moral justification on hard-approach policy support. The design of this study was a posttest inter-subject study only. The DV of this research is a support for the security approach (hard approach). IV (moral justification) is manipulated using text indusion. The experimental group was given a text containing moral justification, while the control group was given a neutral text, namely news about football. The moderator in this research is dehumanization. A total of 91 participants were recruited through the social media Line. The division of groups in this experiment failed to prove the existence of an influence between moral justification and support for the security approach. The results showed that dehumanization did not interact with moral justification to support a security approach.

"

"Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk melihat bagaimanakah peran dari moral disengagement pada mahasiswa-mahasiswa di Indonesia dalam pengaruh dari religiusitas mereka pada munculnya perilaku kecurangan akademis. Penelitian ini adalah penelitian korelasional. Partisipan dari penelitian ini adalah 286 mahasiswa program Sarjana dan Diploma di Indonesia, dimana mereka berpartisipasi dalam penelitian ini melalui suatu survey online menggunakan tiga alat ukur berbeda, yaitu self-report scale untuk kecurangan akademik oleh Lin & Wen (2007), centrality of religiosity scale oleh Huber & Huber (2012), dan self report scale untuk moral disengagement oleh Detert, Trevino & Sweitzer (2008). Hasil penelitian ini tidak berhasil membuktikan bahwa bahwa moral disengagement memiliki dampak yang signifikan sebagai moderator pada pengaruh dari religiusitas mahasiswa terhadap munculnya perilaku kecurangan akademis, namun hasil penelitian ini dapat mendukung adanya korelasi antara moral disengagement dan kecurangan akademis, dan juga mendukung bahwa religiusitas memiliki peran yang negatif terhadap munculnya perilaku kecurangan akademis. Peneliti menduga bahwa hasil penelitian ini masih terbatas dikarenakan oleh beberapa faktor, seperti korelasi yang dekat antara variabel moral dan religiusitas itu sendiri, ataupun adanya faktor social desirability dalam pengisian tes. Sebagai saran, penelitian kedepannya perlu untuk melihat apakah faktor social desirability memiliki peran yang signifikan dalam penelitian mengenai kecurangan akademik seperti ini.

---

The focus of this study is to discuss the role of moral disengagement in college students in Indonesia as a moderator towards the influence of religiosity on their tendency to commit academic dishonesty. This research is a quantitative research with its research design being descriptive. The participants for this research are 286 college students from Indonesia that participated in this research through an online survey, which utilized three (3) different scales, which are the self-report scale for academic dishonesty by Lin & Wen (2007), centrality of religiosity scale by Huber & Huber (2012), and self report scale for moral disengagement by Detert, Trevino & Sweitzer (2008). The research findings did not succeed in producing any proof on the role of moral disengagement as a moderator for the influence from students' religiosity on their tendency to commit academic dishonesty, however this research managed to support the idea that moral disengagement is correlated with academic dishonesty. The researcher suggests that the result of this research might be limited due to the existence of social desirability factor during the data collection phase. It is suggested for future research in this topic that social desirability be included as an additional measure."

"Terrorism experts continue to debate how and why people become radicalised and commit violence. Significantly less emphasis and coherence of thought has been deployed to understand those processes in reverse. From the perspective of counterterrorism practitioners within both government and civil society, the question has tended to bifurcate around two contrasting conceptual approaches: should the focus be on ‘deradicalization’ (an internal or philosophical outcome seeking change in beliefs, values and attitudes) or ‘disengagement’ (a social or temporal outcome seeking change in behaviours away from violence)? This article seeks to contribute to the debate about how disengagement functions and stands as a practical and effective counterterrorism methodology, and is based on detailed analysis of field work and project implementation in Indonesia. This article and the methodologies implemented and tested are grounded in previous research on disengagement of Indonesian jihadists and countering violent extremism (CVE) projects conducted by several of the authors over many years, and extends and codifies the findings of a valuable body of earlier academic literature. The authors argue that a disengagement process grounded in the social methodology of personal mentoring (defined infra this paper by a process we have called ‘Hearts, Hands and Heads’) can achieve a measurable and meaningful change in how individuals withdraw from violent extremist networks. This article will further show why disengagement programs in Indonesia should prioritise targeting specific at-risk groups, including returned foreign fighters, who have been known to conduct terrorist activities in Indonesia as well as advocate for their cause and recruit more effectively than those that have never been to Syria or other conflict zones. With the proper implementation, disengagement can be an effective preventive tool in Indonesia in addition to preparing the groundwork for later, more formal deradicalization processes and programs."

"Skripsi ini membahas mengenai pendekatan kesejahteraan yang dapat dijadikan kebijakan untuk melepaskan-ikatan (disengagement) antara mantan narapidana teroris dengan kelompok terorisme. Banyak pelaku terorisme di Indonesia yang tertangkap dan dihukum. Namun, penanggulangan terorisme di dalam penjara maupun di luar penjara belum terlaksana dengan maksimal. Banyak mantan narapidana teroris yang sudah menjalani hukuman ternyata terlibat residivis. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif dengan Metode Delphi. Menggunakan konsep pendekatan yang bersifat soft approach, salah satu bentuknya adalah disengagement. Dalam hal ini peneliti lebih berfokus pada pendekatan kesejahteraan terutama kepada mantan narapidana teroris. Hasil penelitian ini bahwa pendekatan kesejahteraan kepada mantan narapidana teroris sebagai upaya pelepasan ikatan (disengagement) dari kelompok teroris memang perlu dilakukan mengingat adanya program deradikalisasi yang belum maksimal sehingga menimbulkan residivisme. Pendekatan kesejahteraan ini perlu mempertimbangkan aspek latar belakang sosial dan sejauh mana keterlibatannya di dalam kelompok terorisme. Pendekatan kesejahteraan berdasarkan penelitian ini akan berhasil dan berjalan baik jika diberikan kepada mantan narapidana teroris yang memiliki kategori tingkatan komitmen pada level passive supporters atau simpatisan serta pendekatan ini perlu pembinaan yang berkesinambungan.

---

This research discusses the welfare approach that can be used to release the policy bonding (disengagement) between the ex-convict terrorists and the terrorist groups. Many perpetrators of terrorism in Indonesia is caught and punished. However, the counter-terrorism in and outside the prison has not been implemented to the fullest. In fact, many of the ex-convict terrorists turn to be involved in the recidivists. This research used a qualitative approach with Delphi Method. It utilized the soft approaches concept in which disengagement concept was applied. In this case, the researcher focused more on welfare approach, especially to the ex-convict terrorists. As the results, since the de-radicalization programs that have not been maximized can cause recidivism, the welfare approach to the ex-convict terrorists is necessary to be done as a bond release (disengagement) from the terrorist groups. This approach needs to take into account the welfare of the social background and the extent of its involvement in the terrorist groups. According to the research, the welfare approach will work well if it is given to the ex-convict terrorists who have the category-level commitment of passive supporters or sympathizers. Therefore, a continuous coaching to this approach is highly suggested."

"ABSTRAKPenelitian ini adalah tipe penelitian cross-sectional yang bertujuan meneliti hubungan antara identifikasi danpelepasan moral individu. Desain penelitian ini non-eksperimental yang membandingkan karakter-karakterdalam tokoh One Piece menjadi tiga karakter. Variabel outcome dalam penelitian ini adalah pelepasan moralindividu, sedangkan variabel predictor dalam penelitian ini adalah identifikasi. Penelitian ini juga berusahamencari mengungkap peran mediasi dari penilaian moral dalam hubungan antara variabel prediktor dan outcome.Responden dalam penelitian ini dibagi secara acak ke dalam tiga kelompok, yaitu kelompok karakter bermoralpaling baik, kelompok karakter bermoral ambigu, dan kelompok karakter paling immoral. Sebanyak 1471responden mengisi penelitian ini dan dianalisis. Identifikasi terbukti berkorelasi secara positif dengan pelepasanmoral individu. Dalam hasil juga terdapat bahwa penilaian moral tidak memediasi hubungan antara identifikasidan pelepasan moral individu.

---

ABSTRACT

This study is cross-sectional research aimed to investigate relationship between identification and moral

disengagement. This study is non-experimental that compares three characters that exist in the story of One

Piece. Outcome variable of these study is moral disengagement, whereas the predictor is identification. Also,

these study try to reveal the mediation model of the predictor and outcome. 1471 respondents randomly assigned

into one of three group character that based on moral continuum which are most morally, morally ambiguous,

and most immoral character. The result shows that identification positively correlate with moral disengagement,

but the mediation which explains that moral judgement mediates the relationship between identification and

moral disengagement is not significant."