Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"Mining reserve of the earth in a regional government of Indonesia will be decreased by exploitation reasons. There is Necessary a creative solution by the regional government through the alternative solutions to bring the prosperity society of the regional government. Tourism transformation is one of the real acts of a Tengarong Government due to optimallize natural and cultural resources in order to regional tourism. Most of exploitation of a tourism development reasons will accept negative risks which is caused by unbalanced treatment. To be a necessary wise and idea so that tourism exploitation still keeps on going through objectives method and universal result as mentioned in the ethic code of tourism and cultural tourism charter."

"ABSTRAKTesis ini membahas proses kebangkitan Kesultanan Kutai Kartanegara IngMartadipura. Menggunakan pendekatan penelitian etnografi. Secara mendalammelihat bagaimana prosesnya, siapa yang membangkitkan, apa tujuannya dan apaimplikasinya. Proses kebangkitan itu kemudian dilukiskan sebagai Re-InvensiKesultanan yang didalamnya terdapat rekacipta tradisi. Dalam upayamembangkitkan kesultanan, terdapat kepentingan politik dari aktor di luarkesultanan yang bertemu dengan kepentingan kesultanan. Pasca kebangkitankesultanan, lembaga-lembaga adat di tingkat desa, kecamatan, hingga kabupatenikut dibangkitkan. Selain itu juga muncul klaim-klaim tanah adat denganmengatasnamakan tanah hibah sultan baik yang dilakukan secara peroranganmaupun kelompok.

---

ABSTRACTThis thesis describes the revival process of Kutai Kartanegara IngMartadipura Sultanate. Using ethnographic research approach, this thesis providesan in-depth explanation about the rise-up process, who revived the Sultanate, whatis the goal, and what are the implications. The process of revival was laterdescribed as a re-invention of the Sultanate in which there is a rekacipta oftradition. In order to revive the Sultanate, there are political interests from outsideactors that would meet the interests within the Sultanate itself. After the revival,traditional institutions in the village, kecamatan, and kabupaten are alsoresurrected along with the Sultanate. There are also claims over the customarylands on behalf of the Sultan’s grant, coming from either individuals or groups."

"Skripsi ini membahas mengenai pertambangan batubara di Kutai, Kalimantan Timur dan dampak yang ditimbulkan dalam aspek sosial dan ekonomi pada tahun 1860 - 1926. Ketika Pemerintah Hindia Belanda datang ke Kutai dan melakukan perjanjian-perjanjian dan konsesi dengan Kesultanan Kutai, maka pada saat itu Pemerintah Hindia Belanda berhak menguasai sebagian wilayah di Kutai. Dengan begitu, Pemerintah Hindia Belanda langsung menginstrusikan para ahli geologinya untuk melakukan pencarian tanah yang memiliki kandungan lapisan batubara, dan ketemulah lapisan batubara di Bukit Pelarang. Pertambangan batubara di Kutai dimulai ketika tahun 1860, Pemerintah Hindia Belanda langsung memulai melakukan eksploitasi batubara dan menghasilkan jumlah produksi batubara yang cukup memuaskan, namun, pada tahun 1872, Pemerintah Hindia Belanda menutup pertambangan tersebut dikarenakan jumlah hasil produksi yang terus menurun dan tentu merugikan. Pada tahun 1888, masuklah Perusahaan modal asing yang bernama Oost Borneo Maatschappij untuk meneruskan pertambangan batubara di Kutai.Hasil yang didapat pun cukup memuaskan dan puncak jumlah produksi terbanyak diraih pada tahun 1926 hal ini dikarenakan OBM melakukan penambahan pekerja kuli di pertambangan. Dengan adanya pertambangan batubara di Kutai, tentu akan menimbulkan dampak sosial dan ekonomi terhadap sekitar. Seperti peningkatan pertumbuhan penduduk, perubahan mata pencaharian masyarakat sekitar, dan pembuatan sarana prasarana dan fasilitas umum, serta dampak untuk Kesultanan Kutai yang mendapat royalti dari pertambangan batubara di Kutai.

---

This undergraduate thesis discusses about coal mining in Kutai, East Kalimantan and the impact on social and economic aspects in 1860 - 1926. When the Dutch East Indies government came to Kutai, to negotiate agreements and concessions in Kutai, then at that time the Dutch is entitled to retain some regions in Kutai. By doing so, the Dutch immediately instruct geological experts to conduct a search of land to own the content coal seam, and it was found in Bukit Pelarang. Kutai coal mining began in 1860, the Dutch immediately started to exploit coal and produce a number of production was satisfactory. However, in 1872, the Dutch closed the mine because of the amount of production continues to decline and is certainly detrimental. In 1888, the Company entered the foreign capital called Oost Borneo Maatschappij to continue mining coal in Kutai.The result was quite satisfactory and the peak of the highest production amount achieved in 1926, this is due to the addition of OBM doing porters mining. With the mining of coal in Kutai, would have caused social and economic impact on the surrounding, such as increased population growth, changes in the livelihoods of surrounding communities, the manufacture of infrastructure and public facilities, and the impact of Kutai who received royalties from coal mining in Kutai."

"Kabupaten Kutai Kartanegara seluas 2326.310 hektar merupakan salah satu kabupaten di Propinsi Kalimantan Timur, memiliki Kawasan Budidaya Kehutanan lKBK seluas 1.619.238 hektar atau sekitar 59,39 % dari luas kabupaten. Sedangkan Kawasan Budidaya Non Kehutanan (KBNK) di kabupaten tersebut seluas 1.107.072 hektar, yang di dalamnya termasuk hutan rakyat dengan luas 16.710,34 hektar atau sekitar 1,51 % dari luas KBNK.Guna mengembangkan hutan rakyat, Pemerintah Daerah dan Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat Daerah (DPRD) Kabupaten Kutai Kartanegara telah menetapkan kebijakan Peraturan Daerah (Perda) Nomor 31 Tahun 2000 tentang Pengelolaan Hutan Rakyat/Hutan Milik. Pasal 4 Ayat (1) Perda tersebut menjelaskan bahwa pengelolaan hutan rakyat mencakup kegiatan penanaman, pemeliharaan, pemanenan, pemanfaatan, pengolahan, pemasaran dan pengembangan dengan tata cara pelaksanaannya diatur melalui Keputusan Bupati.Permasalahan kebijakan pengelolaan hutan rakyat di Kabupaten Kutai Kartanegara hingga saat ini adalah sebagai berikut : (1) Kebijakan pengelolaan hutan rakyat di Kabupaten Kutai Kartanegara barn dijabarkan melalui Tata Cara Pemberian Ijin Pemungutan dan Pemanfaatan Kayu (IPPK) Rakyat yang tertuang dalam Keputusan Bupati Kutai Kartanegara Nomor : 180.188IHK-11012002; (2) Kebijakan pengelolaan hutan rakyat di Kabupaten Kutai Kartanegara pada aspek kegiatan penanaman, pemeliharaan, pemanenan, pengolahan, pemasaran dan pengembangannya dilakukan melalui bimbingan teknis kepada petani hutan rakyat namun implementasinya tidak dilakukan secara keseluruhan clad aspek-aspek kegiatan pengelolaan hutan rakyat tersebut di atas.Hutan rakyat di Kabupaten Kutai Kartanegara hingga kini masih menghadapi beberapa masalah teknis, yaitu : (1) Pengelolaan hutan rakyat belum berkembang secara luas karena pengelolaannya masih bersifat parsial; (2) Pemanfaatan hutan rakyat terutama pengembangan tanaman kayu jenis Akasia dan Sengon, setelah masak tebang menghasilkan pendapatan yang sangat kecil karena harga jual yang diperoleh petani tidak sesuai dengan biaya pemeliharaanya, sehingga hampir tidak ada petani yang tertarik untuk melakukan penanaman kembali; (3) Pengelolaan hutan rakyat belum mewujudkan pengelolaan hutan secara lestari.

---

Kutai Kartanegara Regency with 2,726,310 hectares is one of regencies in East Kalimantan Province, having Kawasan Budidaya Kehutanan KBK (Forest Preservation Area) as large 1,619,238 hectares or around 59.39% of this regency. And the Non-Forestry Conservation Area (KBNK) in this regency is 1,107,072 hectares which include private forest with 16.710,34 hectares or about 1,51 % of non-forestry conservation area.

In order to develop this private forest, The Regional Government and Local House of Representatif (DPRD) of Kutai Kartanegara Regency has stipulated policies on Regional Regulation (Perda) on Number 31 12000 pertaining to Management on Private Forest. Article 4 point (1) of this regulation explains that management of private forest is include planting, maintaining, harvesting, processing, usage, marketing and developing activities with code of conducts that has been regulated by Head of Regency's decree.

Matters pertaining to private forest management policies in the Regency of Kutai Kartanegara are, thus far, as follows: (1) Management policy is just about spelled ant trough the IPPK harvest and utilization license for private timber set out by decision of the regency No. 180.188IHK-11012002; (2) Private forest management policy at Kutai Kertanegara Regency on the aspects of planting, cultivation, harvesting, utilization, management, marketing and development are implemented by technical guidance to private forest fanner, but it didn't implemented as a whole in terms of such management.

The private forest at the Kutai Kartanegara region up to present day is still facing some technical problems, such as (1) Private forest Management has not yet deve-loped significantly due to to its partial management. (2) Private forest utilization ,especially the development of acacia, and sengon, after ready for logging, does not result in proper revenues to the forester due to its cheap selling price, which does not correspond to its plantation Cost, which almost no foresters interested to replant them. (3) A conserved private forest management is still far from realization.

Such problems indicated that there are gaps between the implementation and management policy, so that it causes private forest in the region is not yet developing as expected. To find ant why it is so happen and how the implantation on the management policy of private forest in Kutai Kertanegara should be made. And then a recommendation to develop the management should be proposed. The Evaluation will be based on Prince analysis approach, taking into account some criterion (Dunn,2000), such as : effectiveness, efficiency, adequacy, participation, responsiveness, appropriateness.

Formulation of research is drawn up as follows: (I) How the management policy is implemented? (2) What is the result of implementation? (3) Are there any gap between the implementation and the management policy of private forest? (4) What any factors that shall afflict such gap?

The purpose of this research are: (1) To find out the policy and its implementation at research location; (2) To evaluate the implementation policy of private forest; (3) To inductivity the gap between implementation and management policy of private forest; (4) To identify any factors that cause gap in the implementation and management policy of private forest.

Research is carried out with qualitative-descriptive method. Selection of respondents is made with purposive sample. This technique applies considering limitations of time, energy and money and that one could not take larger and further sample (Arikunto, 2002).

Respondents for this Research include decision makers and social figures that are concerned with the private forest management such as: Bupati ("municipal ruler or regent"), Forestry Officials, Bappeda, DPRD Kutai Kartanegara Regency (Local House of Representatives), specialists or experts in forestry field, NGO-s, forest industrialists, and press whereas the respondent sampling is drawn from the private forest farmers under two-stage cluster sample technique.

The research conclusions are as follows: (1) Management policy for private forest No. 31/2000, until today is just spelled out by regent's decision No. 180.1881HK-110/2002 on the procedure of licensing in 1PPK. Implementation policy of forest management in Kutai Kertanegara regency give more priority to planting, cultivation and farm operations to develop private forest than other aspects; (2) Implementation result of forest management on the planting aspect in the frame work of preserving and developing private forest have a good assessment, but the processing of get bad rating. Whereas timber marketing and utilization by means IPPK realization, replanting post-felling of timber get bad rating; (3) There are a gap between the implementation and management policy of private forest in Kutai Kertanegara Regency, that is in the management, marketing, utilization by means of IPPK realization and replanting post-felling of the result is deficient; (4) Factors affecting the gap between implementation of management policy give more priority to planting, cultivation and development assistance of private forest; lack of technical guidance relating to management and marketing operations; lack of socialization relating to utilization by means of IPPK realization capital shortage for farm operations; lack regulation in log trade; extreme minimum in the result of log sale; and the orientation still rely on the utilization of natural forest in relation to private forest."

"ABSTRAKPenelitian ini tentang distribusi bahasa di Kabupaten Kutai Kartanegara dengan bidang kajian dialektologi. Penelitian dialektologi di Indonesia sebagaian besar masih terfokus di Pulau Jawa. Berdasarkan data, penelitian dialektologi di Pulau Kalimantan hanya sebesar 3,57 dari keseluruhan penelitian dialektologi yang pernah dilakukan. Sebagai salah satu daerah yang termasuk wilayah Kalimantan, Kabupaten Kutai Kartanegara merupakan daerah yang kaya akan bahasa. Kabupaten Kutai Kartanegara bukan hanya dihuni oleh suku Melayu sebagai suku asli, tetapi juga suku pendatang dari luar daerah, seperti suku Dayak, suku Jawa, suku Banjar, dan suku Bugis. Suku-suku ini hidup menyebar di setiap kecamatan di Kabupaten Kutai Kartanegara. Oleh sebab itu, perlu dilakukan pelacakan bahasa di setiap kecamatan untuk mengetahui distribusi bahasa yang ada di Kabupaten Kutai Kartanegara. Penelitian ini menggunakan dua metode, yaitu metode pupuan lapangan dengan dengan mendatangi informan secara langsung ke titik pengamatan, sedangkan metode gabungan digunakan untuk mengitung persentase dialektometri, berkas isoglos, dan interpretasi data dalam bentuk uraian. Penelitian ini menyimpulkan bahwa di Kabupaten Kutai Kartanegara terdapat empat bahasa, yaitu bahasa Kutai, bahasa Bugis, bahasa Jawa, dan bahasa Dayak Kenyah.

---

ABSTRACTThis research about distribution of language in Kutai Kartanegara district with Dialectology approach. Most of dialectology research in Indonesia is still focused in Java Island. Based on data, dialectology research in Kalimantan island only about 3,57 of dialectology research that had been done. As one of the region in Kalimantan, Kutai Kartanegara District is a region rich with many language. This district is inhabited by, not only Malay Tribe as the original tribe, but also other tribe such as Dayak, Javanese, Banjar, and Bugis. These tribes live spread out of all sub district in Kutai Kartanegara District. Because of that, to understand the distribution of language in this district, it is required to track the language in every sub district in Kutai Kartanegara District. This research use two methods. The first method is The Pupuan Lapangan Method where we come directly to the interviewees in the observation point. The second method is The Compilation Method, which we use to count the dialectometry percentage, isogloss bundle, and to interpret the data into description. This research conclude that there are four languages in the Kutai Kartanegara District, that is Kutai, Bugis, Javanese, and Dayak Kenyah."

"Sistem Pemerintahan Berbasis Elektronik (SPBE) adalah salah satu bentuk upaya pemerintah dalam melakukan transformasi digital pada pelayanan pemerintahan dan merupakan salah satu rencana kerja pemerintah tahun 2024. Salah satu pemerintah daerah yang konsisten menerapkan dan mengembangan SPBE di wilayah Kalimantan Timur adalah melalui Dinas Komunikasi dan Informatika. Nilai indeks SPBE Pemerintah Kabupaten Kutai Kartanegara (Pemkab Kukar) tahun 2021 berhasil menduduki peringkat pertama di wilayah Kaltim (Nilai Indeks SPBE = 2,48). Peringkat tersebut turun ke posisi 8 di tahun 2022 (Nilai Indeks SPBE = 1,94), khususnya untuk Domain tata kelola SPBE pada Aspek Teknologi Informasi dan Komunikasi (TIK). Penurunan nilai tersebut melatarbelakangi pentingnya penelitian ini dengan tujuan untuk melakukan analisis problem solving. Analisis pertama dilakukan terhadap informasi dan indikator kinerja yang digunakan dalam pengukuran kinerja program dan kegiatan yang berhubungan dengan kinerja tata kelola SPBE pada aspek TIK dengan menggunakan pendekatan logic model.  Analisis kedua dilakukan terhadap 5 area fokus pada IT governance untuk mengukur efektivitas implementasi tata kelola SPBE pada aspek TIK. Hasil analisis pertama menggambarkan bahwa informasi dan indikator kinerja yang digunakan dalam pengukuran kinerja program dan kegiatan masih belum menunjukkan hubungan yang logis.  Sehingga disusunlah rekomendasi berupa outcome sequence chart yang baru agar lebih menggambarkan hubungan yang logis dan lebih terintegrasi dengan seluruh stakeholder. Hasil analisis kedua menggambarkan bahwa dari 5 area fokus, masih terdapat 3 area fokus yang belum menunjukkan efektivitasnya dalam proses implementasi tata kelola SPBE pada aspek TIK, sehingga diberikan rekomendasi perbaikan agar dapat lebih meningkatkan tata kelola SPBE pada objek penelitian.

---

Electronic-Based Government System (SPBE) is one of the government's efforts in carrying out digital transformation in government services and is one of the government's 2024 work plans. One of the local governments that consistently implements and develops SPBE in the East Kalimantan region is the Kutai Kartanegara Regency Government (Kukar Regency Government) through the Communication and Information Technology Office. The SPBE index value of the Kukar Regency Government in 2021 was ranked first in the East Kalimantan region (SPBE Index Value = 2.48). This ranking dropped to 8th place in 2022 (SPBE Index Value = 1.94), especially for the SPBE governance domain in the Information and Communication Technology (ICT) aspect. The decline in value is the background for the importance of this research with the aim of conducting a problem-solving analysis. The first analysis was conducted on information and performance indicators used in measuring the performance of programs and activities related to SPBE governance performance in the ICT aspect using a logic model approach.  The second analysis was conducted on the 5 focus areas in IT governance to measure the effectiveness of SPBE governance implementation in the ICT aspect. The results of the first analysis illustrate that the information and performance indicators used in measuring the performance of programs and activities still do not show a logical relationship.  So a recommendation was made in the form of a new outcome sequence chart to better describe the logical relationship and be more integrated with all stakeholders. The results of the second analysis illustrate that of the 5 focus areas, there are still 3 focus areas that have not shown their effectiveness in the process of implementing SPBE governance in the ICT aspect, so that recommendations for improvement are given in order to further improve SPBE governance in the object of research."