Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"[ABSTRAKPenelitian ini menghasilkan bukti empiris dampak migrasi terhadap kesejahteraanrumah tangga di Indonesia, menggunakan data panel Indonesia Family LifeSurvey (IFLS) tahun 2000 dan 2007, dan metode difference-in-differences denganpropensity score matching. Penelitian ini mengestimasi dampak migrasi padarumah tangga migran kerja dan rumah tangga migran nonkerja dalam halpendapatan perkapita, beberapa variabel pengeluaran perkapita dan aset perkapitarumah tangga. Hasil penelitian menemukan bahwa migrasi kerja berdampakterhadap total pengeluaran perkapita rumah tangga, pengeluaran murni panganperkapita rumah tangga, dan pengeluaran rutin nonpangan perkapita rumah tangga.Sedangkan migrasi nonkerja berdampak terhadap pendapatan perkapita dan asetperkapita rumah tangga. Penelitian ini juga menganalisis dampak migrasi terhadapremitansi pada rumah tangga dengan menggunakan data transfer sebagai proksi.Migrasi kerja menunjukkan dampak yang signifikan terhadap pengeluaran transferperkapita rumah tangga, namun tidak terbukti memiliki dampak terhadap netttransfer perkapita rumah tangga. Sementara migrasi nonkerja menunjukkandampak yang signifikan terhadap nett transfer perkapita rumah tangga. Penelitianini juga menganalisis dampak migrasi terhadap suplai tenaga kerja rumah tanggadimana ditemukan bahwa migrasi kerja membawa dampak signifikan, namunmigrasi nonkerja tidak menunjukkan dampak yang signifikan terhadap suplaitenaga kerja rumah tangga.Kata Kunci: Evaluasi Dampak.

---

ABSTRACTThis study provides empirical evidence on the impact of migration on migrantsendinghousehold in Indonesia, using data panel from Indonesia Family LifeSurvey (IFLS) 2000 and 2007, and difference-in-differences with propensity scorematching method. This study estimates the impact of work migration and nonworkmigration on percapita income, some of per capita expenditures variables,per capita asset, migrant-sending household. It is found that work migration haveimpact on total per capita expenditure, per capita pure food expenditure, and percapita non food routine expenditure. Non-work migration have impact on percapita income and per capita asset. This study also analyze migration impact onremittance using transfer data as proxi. Work migration showing impactsignificantly on per capita out transfer, but there is no evidence have impact onper capita nett transfer. Non-work migration showing impact significantly on percapita nett transfer. This study also analyze migration impact on household laborsupply. It is found that work migration have impact significantly on householdlabor supply. But non-work migration have no significant impact on householdlabor supply.;This study provides empirical evidence on the impact of migration on migrantsendinghousehold in Indonesia, using data panel from Indonesia Family LifeSurvey (IFLS) 2000 and 2007, and difference-in-differences with propensity scorematching method. This study estimates the impact of work migration and nonworkmigration on percapita income, some of per capita expenditures variables,per capita asset, migrant-sending household. It is found that work migration haveimpact on total per capita expenditure, per capita pure food expenditure, and percapita non food routine expenditure. Non-work migration have impact on percapita income and per capita asset. This study also analyze migration impact onremittance using transfer data as proxi. Work migration showing impactsignificantly on per capita out transfer, but there is no evidence have impact onper capita nett transfer. Non-work migration showing impact significantly on percapita nett transfer. This study also analyze migration impact on household laborsupply. It is found that work migration have impact significantly on householdlabor supply. But non-work migration have no significant impact on householdlabor supply.;This study provides empirical evidence on the impact of migration on migrantsendinghousehold in Indonesia, using data panel from Indonesia Family LifeSurvey (IFLS) 2000 and 2007, and difference-in-differences with propensity scorematching method. This study estimates the impact of work migration and nonworkmigration on percapita income, some of per capita expenditures variables,per capita asset, migrant-sending household. It is found that work migration haveimpact on total per capita expenditure, per capita pure food expenditure, and percapita non food routine expenditure. Non-work migration have impact on percapita income and per capita asset. This study also analyze migration impact onremittance using transfer data as proxi. Work migration showing impactsignificantly on per capita out transfer, but there is no evidence have impact onper capita nett transfer. Non-work migration showing impact significantly on percapita nett transfer. This study also analyze migration impact on household laborsupply. It is found that work migration have impact significantly on householdlabor supply. But non-work migration have no significant impact on householdlabor supply., This study provides empirical evidence on the impact of migration on migrantsendinghousehold in Indonesia, using data panel from Indonesia Family LifeSurvey (IFLS) 2000 and 2007, and difference-in-differences with propensity scorematching method. This study estimates the impact of work migration and nonworkmigration on percapita income, some of per capita expenditures variables,per capita asset, migrant-sending household. It is found that work migration haveimpact on total per capita expenditure, per capita pure food expenditure, and percapita non food routine expenditure. Non-work migration have impact on percapita income and per capita asset. This study also analyze migration impact onremittance using transfer data as proxi. Work migration showing impactsignificantly on per capita out transfer, but there is no evidence have impact onper capita nett transfer. Non-work migration showing impact significantly on percapita nett transfer. This study also analyze migration impact on household laborsupply. It is found that work migration have impact significantly on householdlabor supply. But non-work migration have no significant impact on householdlabor supply.]"

"Thinking about Play... cleverly brings together research-based chapters from experienced Early Years practitioners and academics who provide knowledge the field desperately needs to ensure young children can engage in play - laying their own meaningful foundations for their later education."

"This book is designed to give you all (or at least most of) the tools that youwill need for statistical data analysis. I attempt to provide the background you needto understand what you are doing. I do not prove any theorems and do not applymathematics unless necessary. For all tests, a working Python program is provided.In principle, you just have to define your problem, select the corresponding program,and adapt it to your needs. This should allow you to get going quickly, even if youhave little Python experience. This is also the reason why I have not provided thesoftware as one single Python package. I expect that you will have to tailor eachprogram to your specific setup (data format, plot labels, return values, etc.)."

"ABSTRAKMenurut model sistem seksual Abramson, faktor yang mempengaruhi struktur kognitif seseorang sehingga iamenampilkan perilaku seksual tertentu adalah faktorkematangan, faktor norma sosial (narma agama, masyarakat,teman sebaya), faktor standar yang ditanamkan orang tua,faktor pengalaman seksual sebelumnya, faktor peristiwaendukrinologis, faktor rangsang yang dikondisikan dan takdikondisikan, faktor fisiologis serta faktor parametersituasi.Dalam penelitian ini akan dilihat faktor-faktortersebut pada subyek, faktur yangdirasakan/muncul/terlintas sesaat sebelum subyek terlibatdalam perilaku hubungan seks pranikah serta bagaimanafaktor yang dirasakan/muncul/terlintas itu mempengaruhi struktur kognitif subyek sehingga subyek akhirnya terlibatdalam perilaku tersebut. Selain itu akan dilakukan jugatinjauan terhadap tiga hal yang dianggap berkaitan denganperilaku hubungan seks pranikah. Ketiga hal tersebutadalah: situasi keluarga, ketaatan beribadah, dan hal-halyang berkaitan dengan pengetahuan dan pendidikan seksual.Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian studi kasus yangdilakukan terhadap 5 orang remaja puteri yang berusiaantara 11 - 24 tahun dan belum menikah. Teknikpengumpulan datanya adalah dengan wawancara mendalam.Analisis dilakukan pada setiap kasus secara individual danrangkuman analisis dalam bentuk tabel.Dari hasil analisis terhadap lima kasus dengan modelsistem seksual Abramson diperoleh hasil bahwafaktor-faktor yang dirasakan/muncul/terlintas sesaatsebelum subyek terlibat dalam hubungan seks pranikahadalah hal-hal yang berkaitan dengan norma sementarahal-hal yang bersifat biologis umumnya tidak disadari.Tidak dipungkiri, faktor emosional dan situasionalberperan dalam keterlibatan subyek dengan hubungan sekspranikah.Dari analisis terhadap situasi keluarga diketahuikurangnya pengawasan orang tua, pola asuh orang tua yangpermisif berpengaruh terhadap keterlibatan subyek dalamperilaku hubungan seks pranikah. Terlihat pula adanyagangguan komunikasi antara orang tua anak yang tampildalam perilaku negatif dari orang tua anak atau sebaliknya. Ketaatan beribadah dan latar belakangkeluarga yang religius tidak menjamin subyek tidakterlibat dalam perilaku tersebut. Semua subyek tidakpernah mendapat pendidikan seks dari orang tuanya. Subyeklebih suka membicarakan masalah seksual bukan dengan orangtua melainkan dengan teman.Berdasarkan hasil tersebut, dirasakan pentingnyapendidikan seks tidak hanya untuk remaja tapi juga untukorang tua.

---

"

"buku teks untuk pelajar kelas 4 di Belanda"

"ABSTRAKLatar Belakang: Chairside teaching merupakan salah satu metode pembelajaran di tahap klinik pendidikan dokter gigi yang memberikan perawatan secara langsung pada pasien. Meskipun telah dinyatakan kompeten dalam melakukan tindakan pada phantom gigi, namun mahasiswa tetap membutuhkan pengalaman klinis dengan bimbingan dan umpan balik konstruktif dari staf pengajar. Umpan balik konstruktif merupakan media pembelajaran yang penting dalam membantu mahasiswa menganalisis hal baik dan buruk dalam performanya sehingga dapat mengidentifikasi perbaikan yang diperlukan. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengeksplorasi praktik pemberian umpan balik konstruktif pada chairside teachingMetode: Penelitian ini menggunakan metode kualitatif dengan pendekatan studi kasus di FKG Universitas YARSI. Pengumpulan data dilakukan melalui wawancara mendalam pada pemangku kebijakan, FGD Focus Group Discussion) dengan dosen klinik dan mahasiswa tahap profesi. Triangulasi data dilakukan dengan observasi pelaksanaan pemberian umpan balik konstruktif pada chairside teaching, serta studi dokumen selama bulan Januari sampai dengan April 2019. Hasil wawancara mendalam dan FGD dituliskan dalam bentuk transkrip verbatim lalu dilakukan analisis tematik.Hasil: Pengambilan data melalui FGD staf pengajar terlaksana dalam 2 kelompok (8 dan 6 staf), FGD mahasiswa profesi sebanyak 2 kelompok (masing-masing 8 mahasiswa), dan wawancara mendalam pada 5 staf pemangku kebijakan. Tiga tema utama disepakati oleh seluruh informan pada penelitian ini. Tema pertama yaitu peran staf dalam pendidikan profesi di kedokteran gigi. Staf pengajar klinik merasa memiliki peran sebagai pengelola pendidikan, membimbing dan melakukan supervisi, mendidik profesionalisme, dan mengevaluasi pekerjaan mahasiswa. Kedua, pembelajaran klinik dengan pasien di kedokteran gigi chairside teaching. Pada pembelajaran ini terdapat supervisi, kurikulum tahap klinik dan mahasiswa terlibat aktif dalam pembelajaran. Ketiga, proses pemberian umpan balik dalam pembelajaran klinik dengan pasien. Proses pemberian umpan balik dilakukan dengan berbagai cara serta ditemukan tantangan dalam pemberian dan tindak lanjut terhadap umpan balik.Diskusi: Proses pemberian umpan balik pada chairside teaching merupakan suatu siklus interaksi antara mahasiswa, dosen klinik, dan pasien. Siklus interaksi ini membentuk suatu sistem yang langsung berhubungan dengan mahasiswa (microsystem). Menurut Teori sistem ekologi, beberapa microsystem akan saling berhubungan membentuk mesosystem yang akan memengaruhi penerimaan dan tindak lanjut mahasiswa terhadap umpan balik yang diberikan. Berbagai sistem lain seperti kurikulum pendidikan profesi kedokteran gigi exosystem), budaya institusi macrosystem), serta berbagai pengalaman belajar yang diterima oleh mahasiswa selama pendidikannya (chronosystem) akan turut memengaruhi proses pemberian dan penerimaan umpan balik.Simpulan: Perbedaan persepsi antara pemangku kebijakan, staf pengajar dan mahasiswa terkait proses pemberian umpan balik konstruktif pada chairside teaching diidentifikasi terutama penerimaan mahasiswa dan upaya tindak lanjut terhadap umpan balik yang diberikan. Perbedaan persepsi ini dipengaruhi oleh interaksi mahasiswa dengan berbagai sistem yang ada dalam lingkungan pembelajarannya sehingga dibutuhkan intervensi yang melibatkan dosen, mahasiswa, institusi serta intervensi terhadap interaksi antara ketiganya.

---

ABSTRACTBackground: Chairside teaching is one of the teaching-learning methods used in clinical stage of dentistry that enable students to provide direct care to patients under supervision. Despite being deemed competent after training with phantom head, real clinical experiences are still needed in which one of the roles of teachers is to give constructive feedback. Constructive feedback is an essential and powerful learning tool that gives opportunity for students to analyze what went well and what to improve. This study aimed to explore the practice of giving constructive feedback in the chairside teaching.Methods: This qualitative study, adopting a case study design, obtained participants' perspectives on feedback through in-depth interview with leaders and focus group discussion (FGD) with students and clinical teachers. Data triangulation was carried out by observing the implementation of chairside teaching, as well as document analysis in January to April 2019. A thematic analysis was conducted to identify recurrent themes in relation to experiences of giving or receiving constructive feedback during chairside teaching.Results: A total of 5 in-depth interviews, 2 FGDs with clinical teachers (8 and 6 teachers), and 2 FGDs with clinical students (8 students per group), were completed. Three main themes were identified. The first theme was the role of clinical teacher in dentistry. Clinical teachers realized the role as manager, giving guidance and supervision, teaching professionalism, and evaluating students' performance. Second, clinical learning with patients in dentistry. Supervision, the curriculum of clinical phase, and active involvement of students in the learning process, were discussed. Third theme was on feedback provision in chairside teaching. The feedback was provided in various ways and various challenges were identified in giving and receiving feedback.Discussion: The process of giving feedback on chairside teaching is a cyclical interaction between students, clinical teachers, and patients. This interaction forms a system that is directly related to students (microsystem). According to the ecological system theory, several microsystems will be interconnected to form a mesosystem that will affect the acceptance and students' follow-up to the feedback. The other systems such as the curriculum of dental clinical stage (exosystem), institutional culture (macrosystem), and various learning experiences received by students during their education (chronosystem) might also influence the process of giving and receiving feedback.Conclusion: There were differences in perceptions among respondents regarding the process of providing constructive feedback, especially on students' acceptance and follow-up efforts on the feedback given. It is influenced by student interaction with various systems that exist in the clinical learning environment so that a comprehensive intervention involving lecturers, students, institutions and interventions for interactions between those three aspects, is needed."