Tinjauan yuridis mengenai kewenangan kurator dalam mengambilalih harta pihak ketiga berdasarkan pengakhiran sepihak perjanjian sewa-menyewa dan hak pengelolaan tanah atas harta pailit : studi kasus PT. Takara Golf Resort v Kurator PT. Panca Wiratama Sakti = Judicial review on curator's authority in taking over third party property based on unilateral termination of rent agreement and land management rights agreement on bankruptcy land : study case PT. Takara Golf Resort v Curator of PT. Panca Wiratama Sakti

Kedudukan Sita Umum Pailit Terhadap Sita Pidana Dalam Proses Pemberesan Harta Pailit (Studi Kasus Putusan Nomor 11/Pdt.Sus-Gugatan Lain-lain/2018/PN.Jkt.Ps dan Putusan Nomor 3 K/Pdt.Sus-Pailit/2019) = The Position of General Bankruptcy Confiscation Against Criminal Confiscation In The Process of Bankruptcy Assets Settlement (Case Study of Court Decision Number 11/Pdt.Sus-Gugatan Lain- lain/2018/PN.Jkt.Pst and Court Decision Number 3 K/Pdt.Sus-Pailit/2019)

Upaya Hukum Actio Pauliana dalam Melindungi Boedel Pailit yang Diajukan oleh Kurator Tanpa Persetujuan Hakim Pengawas (Studi Kasus: Putusan Mahkamah Agung No. 74 PK/Pdt.Sus-Pailit/2016) = Actio Pauliana Legal Efforts to Protect Boedel Pailit Submitted by the Bankrupty Receiver without the Approval of the Supervisory Judge (Case Study: Supreme Court Decision No. 74 PK/Pdt.Sus-Pailit/2016)

Upaya Hukum Actio Pauliana dalam Melindungi Boedel Pailit yang Diajukan oleh Kurator Tanpa Persetujuan Hakim Pengawas (Studi Kasus: Putusan Mahkamah Agung No. 74 PK/Pdt.Sus-Pailit/2016) = Actio Pauliana Legal Efforts to Protect Boedel Pailit Submitted by the Bankrupty Receiver without the Approval of the Supervisory Judge (Case Study: Supreme Court Decision No. 74 PK/Pdt.Sus-Pailit/2016)

Kewenangan dan keabsahan tindakan kurator atas harta pailit yang diduga atau terbukti dari hasil tindak pidana studi kasus putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 202 PK/PDT.SUS/2012 putusan nomor 156 K/PDT.SUS/2015 = Authority and validity of curator actions to bankruptcy property that allegedly or provided from criminal offense case study from decision of supreme courts number 202 PK/PDT.SUS/ 2012 decision number 156 K/PDT.SUS/2015