Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"Proses transisi perekonomian negara berkembang menuju tingkat pendapatan negara maju tidak lepas dari transformasi struktural. Perpindahan tenaga kerja dari sektor pertanian menuju sektor industri dan kemudian beralih ke sektor jasa dianggap menjadi pola umum yang telah dialami negara-negara maju Chenery 1960 . Meski demikian, beragam penelitian terkini telah menunjukkan bahwa banyak negara-negara berkembang tidak mengikuti pola yang sama. Negara-negara tersebut mulai beralih dari sektor industri ke sektor jasa sebelum sektor industrinya matang. Penelitian ini mencoba melihat apakah proses transformasi struktural di indonesia telah berdampak baik pada produktivitas dan pertumbuhan.Menggunakan metode productivity decomposition pada tahun 1998 hingga 2014, penelitian ini menemukan bahwa transformasi struktural di Indonesia belum mampu memberikan dampak yang positif perekonomian secara menyeluruh. Setelah Krisis Keuangan Global, sektor-sektor produktif di indonesia mengalami penurunan produktifitas. Tak hanya itu, banyak di antara sektor-sektor tersebut juga mengalami kontraksi dilihat dari pertumbuhan jumlah pekerjanya. Di sisi lain, mayoritas sektor dengan produktivitas rendah yang menyerap banyak lapangan kerja juga merupakan sektor-sektor yang mengalami ekspansi yang relatif lebih tinggi dibandingkan dengan sektor lain jika dilihat dari jumlah lapangan kerja yang terbuat.Penelitian ini juga mencoba melihat faktor-faktor yang mampu menjelaskan fenomena tersebut. Dengan menggunakan data provinsi-provinsi di indonesia dari tahun 2000 hingga 2014, penelitian ini mencoba mencari variable-variabel yang mungkin mempengaruhi arah transformasi struktural. Penelitian ini menemukan bahwa ketergantungan akan sumber daya mineral dan human capital ndash; dua variable yang sering dianggap berpengaruh pada arah transformasi struktural ndash; tidak memiliki pengaruh terhadap rendahnya komponen produktivitas yang disebabkan oleh transformasi struktural di Indonesia.

---

Structural change ndash the process of reallocation of labor to more productive sectors ndash has been one of the key roles in the process of economic development. The pattern of transition from agriculture heavy economies to industry and services has been analyzed in many growth literatures as early as Chenery 1960. But recent empirical works have casted doubts on whether developing countries have been able to continue the same pattern, as many of them have started to reallocate labor away from industry to services before their industry matures. This paper analyzes whether the sectoral structural change in Indonesia has been productivity enhancing.

Using productivity decomposition method from 1998 to 2014, this paper finds that structural change has not been able to generate impact on economy wide productivity. After the global financial crisis, the productivity in high productive sectors declines and many of these productive sectors shrink in terms of employment. At the same time, most of the unproductive sectors that generate large shares of employment are also the ones to expand in terms of employment after the crisis.

This paper also explores possible determinants of the direction of structural change. Using Indonesian provincial data from 2000 to 2014, this paper does not find commodity dependence and human capital ndash two commonly used variables to explain structural change ndash to have significant association with the low structural productivity that is observed in the paper."

"ABSTRAK Structural change in the volatility of five Asian and U.S. stock markets is examined during the post-liberalization period (1990-2005) of Asian financial markets using the Sup-LM test. Four Asian financial markets (Korea, Japan, Hong Kong, and Singapore) experienced structural changes. However, test results do not support the structural changes in volatility for Thailand and the U.S. Also, the empirical results show that the GARCH persistent coefficients tend to increase while the ARCH impact coefficients decrease in Asian markets, which implies that the volatility process has become more persistent"

"The pattern of economic growth in Indonesia between 1995 and 2005 was analyzed to determine structural changes that occurred in Indonesia. A hypothetical analysis of Deviation from Proportional Growth was used in this study to better understand the structural change of a country by assuming a virtual economic structure. The author analyzed the Indonesian National Input-Output Table of 1995, 2000, and 2005 extracted from the Asian International Input-Output Table. A comparative study was also conducted for Malaysia and Thailand during the same period. The results revealed a shift away from the agricultural sector towards non-agricultural sectors in Indonesia, Malaysia, and Thailand between 1995 and 2005, confirming the existence of industrialization in these countries. Although the countries had a similar pattern of growth which is contributed mainly by the expansion of export from 1995–2000, the pattern of growth among the three countries was divergent from 2000–2005."

"This textbook covers the fundamentals of organizational development and change (ODC) theory while offering a comprehensive, structured, and systematic approach to guide change management strategies at the organization level. It provides an in-depth understanding of and the tools necessary for designing, diagnosing, implementing and evaluating organizational change interventions. Students will be exposed to case studies in ODC from selected international and Caribbean/Latin American organizations, demonstrating ODC in practice across a broad geographical context. This textbook, the first to offer a macro-level perspective of ODC, provides students with the tools needed to be successful in implementing change into today's organizations."