Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

Hasil Pencarian

Ditemukan 2 dokumen yang sesuai dengan query
cover
Lenggo Septiady P
"[Pendahuluan: Luka penetrasi akibat kekerasan tajam merupakan temuan yang umum dalam pemeriksaan luar tindakan autopsi. Namun, sebagian besar mayat korban kekerasan tidak menjalani pemeriksaan dalam karena beragam alasan. Dengan demikian, temuan luka luar dapat berperan sebagai salah satu pertimbangan ahli forensik dalam memperkirakan kerusakan organ dalam walau tidak memiliki kekuatan secara hukum. Penelitian ini dilakukan untuk menghasilkan bukti empiris terkait kerusakan organ dalam yang ditimbulkan kekerasan tajam. Metode: Peneliti mengambil sampel 5 luka penetrasi ke rongga peritoneal pada masing-masing area abdomen dari 36 subjek penelitian yang diotopsi di Departemen Forensik dan Medikolegal FKUI-RSCM, kemudian mencari tahu organ yang terlibat melalui data pemeriksaan baku emas. Hasil: Melalui uji hipotesis menggunakan uji Fisher, didapatkan nilai yang bermakna (p< 0,05) pada beberapa korelasi terkait temuan luka dan kerusakan organ dalam, yakni pada luka penetrasi di epigastrik dengan kerusakan hati (p= 0,01), luka penetrasi di hipokondriak kanan dengan kerusakan hati (p= 0,01), luka penetrasi di hipokondriak kiri dengan kerusakan lambung (p= 0,002), luka penetrasi di umbilikal dengan kerusakan pembuluh darah abdomen mayor (p= 0,004), serta luka penetrasi di iliaka kiri dan kerusakan pankreas (p= 0,01). Pembahasan: Korelasi yang bermakna pada temuan luka luar dan kerusakan organ dalam terkait regio anatomi dan arah luka. Besaran gaya yang diberikan turut mempengaruhi organ-organ yang terlibat;Introduction: Penetrating wounds from sharp force injuries are common findings in external examination of autopsy. Unfortunately, the majority of the victims do not undergo the internal examination part due to various reasons. Even though the forensic doctors do not perform the autopsy completely, the external findings can prove to be useful to predict the resulted organ damages. Therefore, they would still be able to release their expertise opinions based on evidence based medicine. The aim of this study is to produce the empirical evidence related to penetrating wound and organ damage. Method: Five penetrating wounds into peritoneal cavity for each abdominal region from 36 corpses, that had already been autopsied in Forensic and Medicolegal Department FKUI-RSCM, was analyzed to identify organ damage by using gold standard examination (e.g. internal examination in forensic practice), and then to find the correlation between them. Result: The results from hypothesis testing Fisher shows that the p< 0,05 appeared in some correlation findings between variables (penetration wound in epigastric and right hypochondriac and liver damage (p= 0,01), penetration wound in left hypochondriac and stomach damage (p= 0,002), penetration wound in umbilical and major abdomen blood vessel (p= 0,004), and penetration wound in left iliaca and pancreas damage (p= 0,01), thus made them statistically significant. Discussion: The significant results strongly associated with anatomical region and the direction of the wound. The amount of force applied to each wound affected the outcome of the damaged organs, Introduction: Penetrating wounds from sharp force injuries are common findings in external examination of autopsy. Unfortunately, the majority of the victims do not undergo the internal examination part due to various reasons. Even though the forensic doctors do not perform the autopsy completely, the external findings can prove to be useful to predict the resulted organ damages. Therefore, they would still be able to release their expertise opinions based on evidence based medicine. The aim of this study is to produce the empirical evidence related to penetrating wound and organ damage. Method: Five penetrating wounds into peritoneal cavity for each abdominal region from 36 corpses, that had already been autopsied in Forensic and Medicolegal Department FKUI-RSCM, was analyzed to identify organ damage by using gold standard examination (e.g. internal examination in forensic practice), and then to find the correlation between them. Result: The results from hypothesis testing Fisher shows that the p< 0,05 appeared in some correlation findings between variables (penetration wound in epigastric and right hypochondriac and liver damage (p= 0,01), penetration wound in left hypochondriac and stomach damage (p= 0,002), penetration wound in umbilical and major abdomen blood vessel (p= 0,004), and penetration wound in left iliaca and pancreas damage (p= 0,01), thus made them statistically significant. Discussion: The significant results strongly associated with anatomical region and the direction of the wound. The amount of force applied to each wound affected the outcome of the damaged organs]"
[, Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Indonesia], 2015
S-Pdf
UI - Skripsi Membership  Universitas Indonesia Library
cover
Shafira Ninditya
"[Latar Belakang: Di Amerika Serikat, terdapat 16.000 kematian setiap tahunnya
karena trauma pada dada, berkontribusi pada 75% kematian akibat trauma. Di
RSCM Jakarta, tercatat setidaknya ada 1200 mayat yang masuk dengan hanya
33,3% mayat diautopsi sehingga dapat diketahui kerusakan organ dalamnya.
Pemanfaatan epidemiologi forensik untuk menentukan hubungan kemaknaan
antara temuan luka luar dengan kerusakan organ dalamnya dapat menunjang opini
ahli dokter forensik pada kasus yang tidak diautopsi.
Metode: Subjek penelitian ini adalah 128 mayat yang diautopsi di Departemen
Ilmu Kedokteran Forensik dan Medikolegal FKUI/RSCM Jakarta Tahun 2010-
2013, dengan temuan luka luar akibat kekerasan tajam pada dada dan punggung.
Dari rekam medis korban yang sesuai dengan kriteria inklusi kriteria dan eksklusi
diinput ke dalam program SPSS, dan selanjutnya dianalisis hubungan antara
kedua variabel.
Hasil: Berdasarkan Uji Chi Square ataupun Uji Fischer, ditemukan hubungan
bermakna (p<0,05) antara (i) luka tusuk dada kanan dengan iga kanan, paru
kanan, dan hati; (ii) luka tusuk dada kiri dengan iga kanan, iga kiri, jantung, paru
kanan, dan paru kiri; (iii) luka tusuk dada tengah dengan sternum; (iv) luka tusuk
punggung kanan dengan iga kanan, jantung, dan paru kanan; (v) luka tusuk
punggung kiri dengan kerusakan iga kanan, jantung, paru kanan, paru kiri, hati,
dan ginjal kiri; serta (vi) luka bacok dada kiri dengan paru kiri.
Pembahasan: Terdapat variasi kemaknaan pada setiap hubungan antara kedua
variabel. Hal ini terutama dipengaruhi oleh hubungan secara letak anatomi, yang
selanjutnya dipengaruhi oleh jenis luka, alat tajam yang digunakan dalam
kekerasan tersebut beserta arah penetrasinya, besar gaya untuk menentukan
sedalam apa luka yang dihasilkan, dan densitas jaringan organ dalam.;Introduction: In the United States, there are 16,000 deaths each year from chest
injury, giving 75% death caused by trauma. At Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital
Jakarta, there are at least 1,200 corpses registered with only 33.3% of the corpse?s
visceral organ injury could be discovered. Utilization of forensic epidemiology to
determine the relation between findings of external injuries and damages to
visceral organ could support the opinion of the expert forensic doctor in a case of
non-autopsy.
Method: The subjects of this research are 128 corpses, which were autopsied
from 2010 until 2013 in the Forensic Medicine and Medicolegal Department of
FKUI/RSCM Jakarta, exclusively corpses with sharp force trauma in the chest
and the back area. The medical records of these corpses, which met the inclusion
and exclusion criteria were inputted to SPSS program and analyzed the
relationship between them.
Result: Based on both Chi Square Test and Fischer Test, significant results
(p<0,05) were found between (i) sharp force injury on the right chest area with
damages in the right rib, right lung, and liver; (ii) sharp force injury of the left
chest area with damages in the right rib, left rib, heart, right lung, and left lung;
(iii) sharp force injury of the middle chest area with damages in the sternum; (iv)
sharp force injury of the right chest area with damages in the right rib, heart and
right lung; (v) sharp force injury of left chest area with damages in the right rib,
heart, right lung, left lung, liver, and left kidney; and (vi) gash wound on the left
chest area with damages in the left lung.
Discussion: There is variation of significance on every relationship between those
two variables. It is mainly caused by the anatomical reason, then followed by the
type of injury, weapon used with its penetrating direction, amount of force to
determine how deep the injury is, and tissue density of the visceral organs, Introduction: In the United States, there are 16,000 deaths each year from chest
injury, giving 75% death caused by trauma. At Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital
Jakarta, there are at least 1,200 corpses registered with only 33.3% of the corpse’s
visceral organ injury could be discovered. Utilization of forensic epidemiology to
determine the relation between findings of external injuries and damages to
visceral organ could support the opinion of the expert forensic doctor in a case of
non-autopsy.
Method: The subjects of this research are 128 corpses, which were autopsied
from 2010 until 2013 in the Forensic Medicine and Medicolegal Department of
FKUI/RSCM Jakarta, exclusively corpses with sharp force trauma in the chest
and the back area. The medical records of these corpses, which met the inclusion
and exclusion criteria were inputted to SPSS program and analyzed the
relationship between them.
Result: Based on both Chi Square Test and Fischer Test, significant results
(p<0,05) were found between (i) sharp force injury on the right chest area with
damages in the right rib, right lung, and liver; (ii) sharp force injury of the left
chest area with damages in the right rib, left rib, heart, right lung, and left lung;
(iii) sharp force injury of the middle chest area with damages in the sternum; (iv)
sharp force injury of the right chest area with damages in the right rib, heart and
right lung; (v) sharp force injury of left chest area with damages in the right rib,
heart, right lung, left lung, liver, and left kidney; and (vi) gash wound on the left
chest area with damages in the left lung.
Discussion: There is variation of significance on every relationship between those
two variables. It is mainly caused by the anatomical reason, then followed by the
type of injury, weapon used with its penetrating direction, amount of force to
determine how deep the injury is, and tissue density of the visceral organs]"
[, Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Indonesia], 2015
S-Pdf
UI - Skripsi Membership  Universitas Indonesia Library