Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"Skripsi ini menganalisis penyebab dari kegagalan keluarga politik Yasin Limpo untuk mempertahankan kekuasaan di Sulawesi Selatan 2018. Penelitian ini menggunakan kerangka analisis boundary control Edward Gibson, sebagai teori utama, dan dilengkapi dengan analisis otonomi elit dari Eva Etzony Halevy. Menggunakan metode kualitatif, hasil penelitian ini memperlihatkan bahwa ada tiga faktor yang menyebabkan kegagalan keluarga politik Yasin Limpo dalam pemilihan kepala daerah Sulawesi Selatan 2018. Pertama, melemahnya kontrol politik dari keluarga Yasin Limpo yang disebabkan oleh gagalnya strategi boundary strengthening mereka. Kedua, adanya strategi boundary opening yang berhasil melemahkan kekuatan keluarga Yasin Limpo. Ketiga, seiring dengan keberhasilan boundary opening, intensitas kompetisi antar elit di pilkada meningkat karena terjadi distribusi sumber daya antara elit elit.

---

This thesis analyzes the causes of Yasin Limpo's political family failure to maintain power through the South Sulawesi Regional Head Election 2018. This study uses Edward Gibsons Boundary Control analysis framework, as the main theory, and is equipped with elite autonomy analysis from Eva Etzony Halevy. Using qualitative methods, the results of this study show that there are three factors that led to Yasin Limpo's political family failure in the South Sulawesi regional elections in 2018. First, the weakening of political control of Yasin Limpo family caused by the failure of their boundary strengthening strategy. Secondly, there was a boundary opening strategy from challenger elites who managed to weaken Yasin Limpos political family power. Third, along with the success of the boundary opening, the intensity of competition among elites in regional election increased due to resources distribution between elites.

"

"Penelitian ini dimaksudkan untuk mengeksplorasi Pilkada Makassar yang merupakan satu-satunya pilkada calon tunggal yang berakhir dengan kekalahan calon tunggal. Pasangan calon tunggal yang kalah bukan petahana maupun kerabat petahana. Pertanyaan penelitian adalah mengapa terjadi pilkada calon tunggal dan pasangan calon tunggal kalah serta bagaimana dinamika kompetisi yang terjadi? Penelitian dilakukan dengan metode kualitatif, menggunakan teori boundary control Edward Gibson (2012) dan antagonistic cooperation Heinrich Best (2010) serta otonomi elit Etzioni-Halevy (1993). Argumen penelitian adalah terjadi kerja sama antagonistik antar elit serta dinamika boundary control antara petahana walikota dan penantang yang menyebabkan pilkada menjadi kompetisi calon tunggal dan pasangan calon tunggal kalah. Pilkada calon tunggal terjadi karena keberhasilan nasionalisasi oleh penantang melalui pelibatan elit nasional. Terdapat dua mekanisme pelibatan elit nasional yaitu melalui party-led transitions dan center-led transitions. Petahana hanya berhasil merespon party-led transitions dengan mendaftar melalui jalur perseorangan. Petahana tidak dapat bertahan menghadapi center-led transitions sehingga didiskualifikasi. Setelah pilkada calon tunggal terjadi, petahana melakukan penguatan (boundary strengthening) melalui parokialisasi kekuasaan, sebagai respons terhadap gugatan hukum lawan yang menyebabkannya didiskualifikasi. Parokialisasi kekuasaan terjadi berupa penguatan birokrasi dan RT/RW serta mobilisasi isu ke ruang publik secara maksimal. Saat bersamaan pasangan calon tunggal gagal mempertahankan boundary opening dengan lemahnya citra figur. Koalisi pasangan calon tunggal lemah dalam mengantisipasi banyaknya kepentingan strategis pada kolom kosong seperti proyeksi elit untuk pilkada berikutnya, munculnya sentimen negatif terhadap korporasi politik, protes atas party-led transitions dalam penetapan calon serta respon terhadap dinamika politik berdasar nilai budaya lokal. Pilkada Makassar terdiri dari dua fase interaksi elit yang melibatkan elit lokal, elit nasional dan elit partai politik berupa mekanisme penguatan diri dan pelemahan terhadap lawan.

---

Makassar local election was the only one single-candidate election which the candidate failed to win the election. The failed single-candidate were not an incumbent nor had relationship with the incumbent. The research questions are: Why did the single candidate election happen, why did the single-candidate could be failed and how did the dynamic competition among elites The research was conducted by qualitative method using Edward Gibson`s (2012) boundary control theory, antagonistic cooperation theory of Heinrich Best (2010) and elite autonomy theory of Etzioni-Halevy (1993). The research argument is there were elites antagonistic cooperations as well as dynamic of boundary control between incumbent of mayor and his competitors which caused the election turned into single-candidate election then ended up with the failed of single-candidate. The single-candidate election caused by the success of opposition nationalization carried out by national elites. There were two transitions which national elites involved i.e. through party-led transitions and center-led transitions. The incumbent did the boundary strengthening after the party-led transitions by registered as a candidate independently (without political party stripe). The incumbent failed to do boundary strengthening after the center-led transitions which caused him to be disqualified from the election. As the single-candidate election ensued, the incumbent did boundary strengthening by parochialization of power in response to the opposition`s lawsuit that had caused him been disqualified. Parochialization of power consisted of the strengthening of bureaucracy, RT/RW, as well as the mobilization of issues to the public. At the same time the single candidate failed to maintain their boundary opening with the weakness of candidates in political experiences. The coallition could not anticipated many important interests of its opponent (kolom kosong) such as many elites strategies for the next election, negative sentiment of political corporation, protest over party-led transitions and respons to political dynamic based on local culture. Makassar local election consists of two elit interaction phases which involved of local elites, national elites, and political party elites such as self-strengthening and weakening against the opponent."

"This book offers an introduction to piezoelectric shells and distributed sensing, energy harvesting and control applications. It familiarizes readers with a generic approach of piezoelectric shells and fundamental electromechanics of distributed piezoelectric sensors, energy harvesters and actuators applied to shell structures. The book is divided into two major parts, the first of which focuses on piezoelectric shell continua, while the second examines distributing sensing, energy harvesting and control of elastic continua, e.g., shells and plates.The exploitation of new, advanced multifunctional smart structures and structronic systems has been one of the mainstream research and development activities over the years. In the search for innovative structronics technologies, piezoelectric materials have proved to be very versatile in both sensor and actuator applications. Consequently, the piezoelectric technology has been applied to a broad range of practical applications, from small-scale nano- and micro-sensors/actuators to large-scale airplane and space structures and systems."