Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"Organisasi yang menghasilkan suatu produk seperti jasa, memerlukan suatu evaluasi berupa penilaian mandiri (self assessment) yang dapat meningkatkan kualitas pelayanan secara terus-menerus (continous improvement) sehingga didapatkan kualitas pelayanan yang tinggi dan sesuai dengan tuntutan zaman. Salah satu penilaian keberhasilan suatu organisasi adalah hasil kinerja yang optimal yang diukur berdasarkan target-target yang ditentukan organisasi itu sendiri. Peneliti menggunakan 7 (tujuh) kriteria yang terdapat dalam Malcolm Baldrige Health Care Criteria for Performance Excelence untuk mengetahui mutu organisasi Direktorat Bina Upaya Kesehatan Rujukan tahun 2014. Metode penelitian adalah mix methode dengan sequential eksplanatory design. Hasil analisis bivariat menunjukkan hubungan yang kuat dan berpola positif antara hasil kinerja organisasi dengan enam kriteria Malcolm Baldrige. Sedangkan hasil analisis multivariat menunjukkan empat kriteria yang positif dan satu kriteria negatif yang dapat menjelaskan hasil kinerja organisasi sebesar 65,7% sementara satu kriteria tidak masuk dalam pemodelan. Hasil kinerja Direktorat Bina Upaya Kesehatan Rujukan termasuk dalam range sangat rendah. 3 permasalahan yang masih yang menonjol antara lain organisasi belum menetapkan sasaran, tujuan dan ukuran kinerja (key perfomance indicator) dalam perencanaan organisasi; belum menetapkan visi, misi dan nilai-nilai organisasi serta perencanaan belum disusun berdasarkan periode jangka panjang dan jangka pendek. Permasalahan tersebut dapat diselesaikan jika direktur dan pimpinan organisasi segera menetapkan visi, misi dan nilai-nilai organisasi, menyusun perencanaan strategis sesuai dengan tugas dan fungsi organisasi serta berdasarkan periode jangka panjang dan jangka pendek.

---

Organizations that produce a product such as services, requires an evaluation of a self-assessment to improve service quality continuously to obtain a high quality of service and in accordance with the demands of the times. One of the assessment of an organization's success is the result of optimal performance as measured by the target-the specified target organization itself. Researchers are using seven (7) criteria contained in the Malcolm Baldrige Health Care Criteria for Performance Excelence to determine the quality of the organization of the Refferal Health Directorate Building Effort, 2014. Research method is the sequential explanatory mixed method design.

The results of the bivariate analysis showed a strong association between positive and patterned organizational performance results with the six criteria of the Malcolm Baldrige. While the results of the multivariate analysis showed four positive criteria and negative criteria that one can explain the results of the organization's performance by 65.7%, while the criteria are not included in the modeling.

The results of the performance of the Refferal Health Directorate Building Effort references included in the very low range. 3 problems that still stand out among other organizations have not set goals, objectives and performance measures (key perfomance indicators) in the planning of the organization; has not set a vision, mission and values of organization and planning has not been prepared based on a period of long-term and short-term. These problems can be solved if the director and the head of the organization immediately set the vision, mission and values of the organization, strategic planning in accordance with the duties and functions of the organization as well as by long-term period and the short-term."

"Suatu organisasi yang menghasilkan suatu produk seperti jasa, memerlukan suatu evaluasi berupa penilaian mandiri (self assessment) yang dapat meningkatkan kualitas pelayanan secara terus-menerus (continous improvement) sehingga didapatkan kualitas pelayanan yang tinggi dan sesuai dengan tuntutan zaman dengan tetap mengikuti peraturan yang berlaku. Gambaran mutu suatu organisasi dapat dilihat dengan pendekatan Malcolm Baldrige yang terdiri dari kepemimpinan (leadership), perencanaan strategis (strategic planning), fokus pada pelanggan/pasar (costumers focus), pengukuran, analisa dan manajemen pengetahuan (measurement, analysis and knowledge management), fokus pada staf/tim (workforce focus), fokus pada proses (operation focus), dan hasil-hasil kinerja organisasi (result). Terkait hal tersebut, tesis ini akan membahas mengenai Analisis Mutu Pelayanan Rumah Sakit Umum Pusat Fatmawati Yang Terakreditasi Versi 2012 Berdasarkan Kriteria Malcolm Baldrige Tahun 2014. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan ada hubungan antara variabel kepemimpinan dengan hasil-hasil kinerja Rumah Sakit Umum Pusat Fatmawati sebesar 19,32%, ada hubungan antara variabel perencanaan strategis dengan hasil-hasil kinerja Rumah Sakit Umum Pusat Fatmawati sebesar 10,35%, ada hubungan variabel fokus pada pelanggan/pasien dengan hasil-hasil kinerja Rumah Sakit Umum Pusat Fatmawati sebesar 18,75%, ada hubungan antara manajemen pengukuran analisis dan pengetahuan dengan hasil-hasil kinerja Rumah Sakit Umum Pusat Fatmawati sebesar 4,75%, ada hubungan antara fokus pada tim/staf dengan hasil-hasil kinerja Rumah Sakit Umum Pusat Fatmawati 36%, ada hubungan antara manajemen proses dengan hasil-hasil kinerja Rumah Sakit Umum Pusat Fatmawati sebesar 13,33%. Manajemen Rumah Sakit Umum Pusat Fatmawati untuk selalu memperhatikan kebutuhan staf/tim terutama dalam peningkatan kompetensi staf/tim, serta kepada pihak Kementerian Kesehatan agar membuat kebijakan berupa penyusunan instrument monitoring dan evaluasi pasca akreditasi sebagai suatu alat untuk menilai rumah sakit yang telah terakreditasi sehingga diharapkan mutu pelayanan Rumah Sakit Umum Pusat Fatmawati yang terakreditasi dapat tetap dipertahankan bahkan semakin meningkat.

---

An organization that produces a product such as services, requires an evaluation of a self-assessment (self-assessment) to improve service quality continuously (continuous improvement) to obtain a high quality of service and in accordance with the demands of the times to keep up with regulations. Picture quality of an organization can be seen with the Malcolm Baldrige approach consisting of leadership (leadership), strategic planning (strategic planning), focus on the customer / market (costumers focus), measurement, analysis and knowledge management (measurement, analysis and knowledge management), focus on staff / team (workforce focus), focus on the process (focus operation), and the results of organizational performance (result). Related to this, this thesis will discuss the analysis of Quality of Service General Hospital Accredited Fatmawati The 2012 Version By 2014 Malcolm Baldrige Criteria.

The results showed no relationship between leadership variables with performance results Fatmawati General Hospital at 19.32%, there is a relationship between the variables of strategic planning with performance results Fatmawati General Hospital at 10.35%, there is a variable relationship focus the customer / patient with the results of the performance General Hospital Fatmawati of 18.75%, there is a relationship between measurement, analysis and knowledge management with performance results Fatmawati General Hospital at 4.75%, there is a focus on the relationship between team / staff with performance results Fatmawati General Hospital 36%, there is a relationship between process management with performance results Fatmawati General Hospital 13.33%.

Management General Hospital Fatmawati to always pay attention to the needs of the staff / team, especially in improving the competence of the staff / team, as well as to the Ministry of Health in order to make the formulation of policy instruments such as post-accreditation monitoring and evaluation as a tool to assess hospital that is accredited so that the expected quality General Hospital services are accredited Fatmawati can be maintained and even increased."

"Tesis ini membahas tentang analisa mutu pelayanan unit hemodialisa ditinjau dari Kriteria Baldrige di Rumah Sakit Anna Medika Bekasi Tahun 2015. Hal ini didasari karena saat ini unit hemodialisa menjadi rumah sakit dengan tindakan hemodialisa terbesar ke dua di Jawa Barat, sehingga perlu diketahui kekuatan dan kelemahan dalam pelayanan unit hemodialisa. Hal lain karena belum dilakukan kajian terhadap mutu pelayanan, maka dilakukan analisa dengan menggunakan kriteria Baldrige. Kriteria Baldrige digunakan karena fleksibel, tidak mengukur satu aspek saja, namun terhadap faktor organisasi, operasional dan hasil pelayanan. Jenis penelitian ini adalah penelitian kualitatif dengan pendekatan deskriptif. Pengumpulan data dengan wawancara mendalam, observasi dan telaah dokumen. Pengolahan dan analisa data menggunakan petunjuk/panduan penilaian kriteria Baldrige. Hasil penelitian menemukan bahwa mutu pelayanan unit hemodialisa telah mencapai poin 527,75 dari total skor dalam kriteria Baldrige yakni 1000 poin. Dalam penilaian ini, unit hemodialisa menuju tahap pengembangan dan perbaikan. Aspek yang terkuat dalam pelayanan unit hemodialisa terletak pada kepuasan pelanggan (pasien), operasional dan berorientasi terhadap pelayanan, namun terdapat aspek yang perlu perbaikan yakni dalam hal strategi, monitoring dan evaluasi serta kepemimpinan. Saran penelitian ini agar unit memperhatikan, membuat program kerja, pedoman pelayanan/standar operasional prosedur, sistem keamanan dan keselamatan pasien dan karyawan guna mencapai pelayanan yang bermutu tinggi.

---

This thesis discusses the analysis of service quality hemodialysis unit in terms of the Baldrige Criteria Anna Medika Hospital in Bekasi year since 2015. This is based on current hemodialysis unit into a hospital with action hemodialysis second largest in West Java, so keep in mind the strengths and weaknesses in service hemodialysis unit. The other thing because it has not done a study of quality of service, then the analysis using the Baldrige criteria. Baldrige criteria is used because it is flexible, does not measure one aspect only, but to factor organizational, operational and service delivery.

The research is a qualitative study with a descriptive approach. Collecting data with in-depth interviews, observation and document analysis. Data processing and analysis using manual / guide assessment Baldrige criteria.

The study found that service quality hemodialysis unit has reached a total score of 527.75 points in the Baldrige criteria for 1000 points. In this assessment, hemodialysis unit towards the stages of development and improvement. Aspects of the strongest in the service of hemodialysis unit located on customer satisfaction (patient), operational and oriented towards services, but there are aspects that need improvement in terms of strategy, monitoring and evaluation, and leadership.

This research suggestion that the unit pay attention, make the program work, ministry guidelines / standard operating procedures, systems security and safety of patients and employees in order to achieve high quality services."

"ABSTRAKPengukuran kinerja penting bagi organisasi karena dapat diketahui keselarasan antara pencapaian organisasi dengan strategi bisnis yang telah ditetapkan. Pengukuran kinerja yang berkala akan memastikan bahwa TI dapat berjalan sesuai dengan ekspektasi top management dan membantu organisasi bertahan serta sukses dalam persaingan bisnis di masa kini dan yang akan datang. pengukuran kinerja antara lain harus verifiable yaitu menyediakan informasi yang menjadi patokan pencapaian, kemudian sebisa mungkin pengukuran kinerja ini mendekati tujuan dari maksud pengukuran serta harus komprehensif yaitu memenuhi semua aspek penting dalam pengukuran kinerja.PT PGN yang diwakili SBU I merasa pencapaian Divisi TI belum sesuai dengan ekspektasi stakeholder yang mungkin disebabkan Indikator Kinerja Utama (IKU) yang digunakan belum efektif untuk mengukur kinerja Divisi TI secara komprehensif. IKU saat ini menggunakan pendekatan Kriteria Penilaian Kinerja Unggul yang diadopsi dari Malcolm Baldrige Criteria for Performance Excellence dan penggunaannya disyaratkan oleh Kementerian BUMN. Terdapat pendekatan lain untuk menyusun IKU yaitu berdasarkan kerangka Balanced Scorecard yang memiliki keunggulan pengukuran yang seimbang antara aspek finansial dan operasional.Penelitian ini termasuk ke dalam penelitian kualitatif, peneliti melakukan in-depth interview terhadap pihak terkait untuk mempelajari lebih dalam tentang IKU saat ini dan mengetahui ekspektasi dari pihak-pihak tersebut dalam proses penyusunan IKU berdasarkan kerangka IT BSC dan COBIT 5 yang digunakan sebagai panduan untuk menyusun sasaran strategis berdasarkan visi Divisi TI. Penelitian ini diakhiri dengan analisis perbandingan IKU berdasarkan ketujuh kriteria KPKU dan IKU berdasarkan keempat perspektif IT BSC. Penelitian ini menghasilkan kesimpulan bahwa IKU saat ini belum mampu mengukur kinerja TI secara komprehensif karena belum mengikutsertakan aspek pengukuran kontribusi perusahaan dan orientasi pengguna. Sebagai solusi dalam hal ini, pengukuran kedua aspek tersebut tercakup dalam IKU berdasarkan IT BSC. Kedua perspektif tersebut menjadi IKU saat ini yang menjadi perrmasalahan terkait domain pengukuran kinerja dalam tata kelola TI.

---

ABSTRACT

Performance measurement is important for organizations because it can be seen between the achievement of organizational alignment with the business strategy that has been set. Periodic performance measurement will ensure that IT can be run in accordance with the expectations of the top management and to help organizations survive and succeed in a competitive business in the present and future. performance measurement, among others, must be verifiable that provide information that is to be the benchmark of achievement, then as much as possible the performance measurement approach and objectives of intent must be comprehensive measurement that meets all the important aspects of performance measurement.

PT PGN which represented by SBU I felt the achievement of IT Division has not been in accordance with the expectations of stakeholders that may be due to the Key Performance Indicators (KPI) that have not been effectively used to measure the performance of IT department in a comprehensive manner. KPI is currently using the Assessment Criteria for Performance Excellence approach adopted from the Malcolm Baldrige Criteria for Performance Excellence and its use is required by the Ministry of SOEs. There is another approach to prepare KPI is based on the Balanced Scorecard framework which has the advantage of measuring the balance between the financial and operational aspects.

This study was included in the qualitative research, researchers conducted in-depth interviews with relevant parties to learn more about the current KPI and knowing the expectations of the parties are in the process of preparation of KPI based IT BSC framework and COBIT 5 is used as a guide for preparing strategic goals based on the vision of the IT Division. This study concludes with a comparative analysis based on the seven criteria KPKU KPI and KPI based on the four perspectives of BSC IT. This study resulted in the conclusion that the KPI has not been able to comprehensively measure the performance of IT because it has not included the measurement aspects of corporate contributions and user orientation. As a solution in this case, the measurement of these two aspects are included in the KPI based IT BSC. With the addition of this KPI is a solution for problems related to IT governance domains."