Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengevaluasi implementasi Whistleblowing System (WBS) pada PT XYZ dengan membandingkan antara kebijakan Whistleblowing System yang diungkapkan perusahaan dengan Pedoman Whistleblowing System yang dibuat oleh Komite Nasional Kebijakan Governance (KNKG) serta kesesuaian antara implementasinya di dalam lingkungan dan aktivitas perusahaan dengan apa yang telah diungkapkan perusahaan. Penelitian ini dilakukan dengan pendekatan deskriptif kualitatif dengan pengumpulan data berdasarkan studi literatur, wawancara, observasi, dan dokumentasi. Hasil penelitian menunjukan bahwa secara umum kebijakan WBS yang diungkapkan oleh perusahaan telah sesuai dengan panduan KNKG, akan tetapi Pelatihan Pendidikan Berkelanjutan dan Insentif Bagi Pelapor belum diterapkan oleh perusahaan. Departemen Human Capital dan Internal Audit menjelaskan bahwa pelatihan dan sosialisasi berkelanjutan telah dilakukan dalam bentuk pelatihan budaya dan value perusahaan serta beranggapan bahwa secara tidak langsung, WBS sudah termasuk di dalamnya. Sedangkan menurut karyawan diluar departemen penggerak utama WBS (Internal Audit dan Human Capital), pelatihan berkelanjutan yang khusus mengenai WBS harus tetap dilakukan, diluar pelatihan budaya perusahaan. Selain itu para karyawan juga merasa perlu adanya penambahan saluran pelaporan berupa aplikasi khusus yang mudah dipahami dan digunakan.

---

The objective of this study is to evaluate the implementation of the Whistleblowing System (WBS) at PT XYZ by comparing the Whistleblowing System policy disclosed by the company with the Whistleblowing System Guidelines provided by the National Committee on Governance Policy (KNKG) and the appropriateness of its implementation in the company's business activities with what has been disclosed. This research was conducted using a qualitative descriptive approach with data collection based on literature studies, interviews, observations, and documentation. The results of the study show that in general the WBS policies disclosed by the company are in compliance with the KNKG guidelines, but the Continuing Education Training and Incentives for Whistleblowers have not been implemented by the company. The Human Capital and Internal Audit Departments explained that ongoing training and sosialization had been carried out in the form of corporate culture and values training and assumed that WBS was included indirectly. Meanwhile, according to employees outside the WBS prime mover departments (Internal Audit and Human Capital), continuous training specific to WBS must still be carried out, apart from corporate culture training. In addition, employees also consider the need for additional channels for reporting in the form of special application that are easy to understand and use."

"ABSTRAKPenelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis determinan dalam menentukan tingkat pengungkapan whistleblowing system dengan menggunakan indikator penelitian yaitu besarnya ukuran perusahaan, komposisi komisaris independen, kepemilikan saham publik, independensi auditor, tingkat rasio utang serta tingkat pertumbuhan perusahaan. Sampel penelitian yaitu sebanyak 474 emiten yang tercatat di Bursa Efek Indonesia selama periode tahun 2013. Jenis penelitian ini merupakan studi empiris dengan menggunakan data cross section. Pengolahan data dianalisis menggunakan model regresi berganda. Pengujian signifikansi hipotesis dilakukan dengan melakukan uji-F dan uji-t. Hasil pengujian menunjukkan bahwa besarnya ukuran perusahaan, independensi auditor dan tingkat rasio utang perusahaan berpengaruh positif terhadap tingkat pengungkapan whistleblowing system. Variabel kepemilikan saham publik berpengaruh negatif terhadap tingkat pengungkapan whistleblowing system. Variabel komposisi komisaris independen tidak berpengaruh secara signifikan terhadap pengungkapan whistleblowing system. Variabel tingkat pertumbuhan perusahaan yang diproksikan dengan present book value menunjukkan pengaruh negatif terhadap tingkat pengungkapan whistleblowing system.

---

ABSTRACTThe objective of this research is to analyze the determinant that decides the disclosure rate of the whistleblowing system, with the research indicators such as the size of the companies, composition of independent commissioner, public ownerships, auditor rsquo s independency, rate of debt ratio, and company rsquo s growth rate. Research samples are 474 emitents which are listed at the Indonesian Stock Exchange in 2013. This research is an empirical study with a cross section data. The data process is analyzed using the double regression model. Hypothesis significance testing is done with F test and t test. The result of the test shows that the size of the company, auditor rsquo s independence, and rate of debt ratio gives a positive affects to the rate of whistleblowing system disclosure. The public ownerships variable gives negative effect to the rate of whistleblowing system disclosure. The independent commissioner rsquo s composition doesn rsquo t give significant effect to the whistleblowing system disclosure. As for the company rsquo s growth rate variable, which is proxied with present book value, shows a negative effect to the whistleblowing system disclosure."