Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"Organizational Citizenship Behaviour (OCB) adalah perilaku di luar peran kerja, yang merupakan kontribusi individu yang mendalam yang melebihi tuntutan peran di tempat kerja dan di-reward oleh perolehan kinerja tugas. OCB dalam 30 pertanyaan diukur berdasarkan pada 5 (lima) dimensi OCB yaitu altruism, conscientiousnes, courtesy, civic virtue and sportmanship. Sikap adalah reaksi evaluasi yang mendukung atau tidak mendukung terhadap seseorang atau sesuatu, yang menunjukkan tingkah laku, perasaan atau kepercayaan seseorang. Sikap dalam 30 pertanyaan diukur berdasarkan pada taraf afeksi terhadap nilai organisasi, aturan organisasi, iklim organisasi dan perilaku orang-orang dalam interaksi sosial. Kecerdasan Emosi didefinisikan sebagai kemampuan yang tidak hanya mengontrol emosi tapi juga merasakannya. Kecerdasan Emosi dalam 42 pertanyaan diukur berdasarkan pada Kompetensi Pribadi dan Kompetensi Sosial.Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah menganalisis 1) pengaruh dari Sikap terhadap Organizational Citizenship Behaviour (OCB) Karyawan 2) pengaruh dari Kecerdasan Emosi terhadap Organizational Citizenship Behaviour (OCB) Karyawan dan 3) pengaruh dari Sikap dan Kecerdasan Emosi terhadap Organizational Citizenship Behaviour (OCB) Karyawan di Badan Pengkajian dan Penerapan Teknologi untuk periode penelitian mulai Mei sampai dengan Juni 2008.Structural Equation Modeling digunakan untuk menguji hipotesis yang menunjukkan bahwa Sikap dan Kecerdasan Emosi mempunyai pengaruh yang positif signifikan terhadap OCB. Populasi dari penelitian ini adalah 2641 karyawan yang aktif bekerja di BPPT. Sebanyak 10 persen dari populasi sebagai target sampel, 226 kuesioner kembali dan hanya 223 responden dapat diolah datanya karena lengkap menjawab pertanyaan dalam kuesioner.Hasil dari penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa (1) Ada pengaruh yang positif signifikan antara Sikap terhadap OCB (2) Ada pengaruh yang positif signifikan antara Kecerdasan Emosi terhadap OCB (3) Ada pengaruh yang positif signifikan antara Kecerdasan Emosi terhadap OCB.

---

Organizational Citizenship Behaviour (OCB) is extra role behaviour, which is individual contributions in the workplace that go beyond role requirement an contractually rewarded a job achievement. OCB, which is represented in 30 questions, is measured based on 5 dimensions : altruism, conscientiousness, courtesy, civic virtue and sportmanship. Attitude is a favorable or unfavorable evaluative reaction to war something or someone, exhibited in one?s belief, feelings or intended behavior. Attitude, which is represented in 30 questions, is measured based on affective indicator to organization?s values, rules, climate and behaviour of people in social interaction. EQ is defined as the power not only to control emotions but to perceive them. EQ, which is represented in 42 questions, is measured based on Personal Competence and Social Competence.The objective of this research is to analyze 1) the effect between Attitude on Organizational Citizenship Behaviour of Employee, 2) the effect between Emotional Quotient on Organizational Citizenship Behaviour of Employee, and 3) the effect between Attitude and Emotional Quotient on Organizational Citizenship Behaviour of Employee at Agency of Assessing and Application of Technology (BPPT).Structural Equation Modeling Analysis is used to test hypotheses that Attitude and EQ are positively significant on OCB. Population of this research consists of 2641 employees who work at 45 units at BPPT. Ten percents of the population is target sample, 226 questionaires are respons and only 223 respondents can be analyzed because they answer the questionaires completely.The result shows that 1) Attitude has an positive effect to OCB 2) Emotional Quotient has an positive effect to OCB 3) Attitude and Emotional Quotient have an positive effect to OCB."

"[ABSTRAK Penelitian ini dilakukan untuk mengetahui perbedaan dalam perilaku social loafing antara mahasiswa dari berbagai negara di Asia dengan mahasiswa dari Australia. Partisipan dalam penelitian ini adalah mahasiswa University of Queensland, yang dibagi menjadi dua kelompok kondisi yaitu kondisi kerja kelompok koaktif atau kerja kelompok kolektif. Masing-masing kondisi terdiri dari antara mahasiswa Asia atau mahasiswa Australia. Partisipan diberikan mental task dan kemudian performanya diukur untuk menunjukkan tendensi perilaku social loafing. Hasil dari penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa meskipun tidak ada perbedaan signifikan antara kelompok koaktif dan kolektif, mahasiwa Australia pada kelompok koaktif bekerja lebih baik dibanding mahasiswa Asia pada kelompok koaktif. Hasil dari penelitian ini mengindikasi bahwa budaya individualistik barat menunjukkan performa kerja lebih baik dibanding budaya kolektivis timur ketika ditempatkan pada kondisi kelompok kerja koaktifABSTRACTThis research is done to investigate the differences in social loafing between Asians students from various Asian countries and Australian students. Participants were university students who were divided into either a coactive or collective work condition. Each work condition consisted of either Asians or Australians. Participants were given a mental task and the performance on this task was measured to represent social loafing. The results revealed that although there was no significant difference between coactive and collective groups, Australians in a coactive setting performed better than Asians in a coactive setting. The results of this study indicate that western individualistic cultures perform better than eastern collectivistic cultures on a task if they are put in a coactive work setting;This research is done to investigate the differences in social loafing between Asians students from various Asian countries and Australian students. Participants were university students who were divided into either a coactive or collective work condition. Each work condition consisted of either Asians or Australians. Participants were given a mental task and the performance on this task was measured to represent social loafing. The results revealed that although there was no significant difference between coactive and collective groups, Australians in a coactive setting performed better than Asians in a coactive setting. The results of this study indicate that western individualistic cultures perform better than eastern collectivistic cultures on a task if they are put in a coactive work setting, This research is done to investigate the differences in social loafing between Asians students from various Asian countries and Australian students. Participants were university students who were divided into either a coactive or collective work condition. Each work condition consisted of either Asians or Australians. Participants were given a mental task and the performance on this task was measured to represent social loafing. The results revealed that although there was no significant difference between coactive and collective groups, Australians in a coactive setting performed better than Asians in a coactive setting. The results of this study indicate that western individualistic cultures perform better than eastern collectivistic cultures on a task if they are put in a coactive work setting]"