Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"Krisis Suriah tidak hanya melahirkan perpecahan secara domestik, tapi juga di tataran komunitas internasional. Ketika Amerika Serikat bersama dengan aliansinya menjadi pendukung utama pergerakan oposisi dalam menurunkan rezim Bashar al-Assad, Rusia justru berada di posisi yang berlawanan dengan mayoritas negara-negara di dunia. Tujuan utama dari skripsi ini adalah memaparkan proses konstruksi dalam pembentukan kebijakan luar negeri Rusia di Suriah. Dengan meneliti proses konstruksi tersebut, skripsi ini mencoba untuk menemukan hubungan yang sebelumnya tidak terlihat antara norma dan identitas yang dipegang Rusia dengan kebijakan di dalam kasus Suriah. Hasil dari penelitian menunjukkan bahwa keputusan Rusia untuk melindungi rezim al-Assad dikonstruksi oleh (1) struktur lingkungan dan aktor yang berada disekitar; (2) persepsi diri sebagai global power dan adanya keinginan untuk mendapat pengakuan dari pihak lain; dan (3) adanya kepentingan untuk melindungi negara eks-Soviet dengan mayoritas Muslim dari risiko kemunculan Islamic renaissance.

---

The Syrian crisis has not only torn the domestic society into pieces, but also the international community. United States and its allies are the main supporters of opposition movement in toppling Bashar al-Assad regime, while Russia stands on the opposite of the majority.

The primary aim of the thesis is to provide the constructive process within the formation of Russian foreign policy in Syria. By exploring the constructive process, the thesis seeks to uncover the unseen relations between Russia‟s norms and identity with its policy in Syria.

The results show that Russia's decision to defend al-Assad regime is constructed by (1) the structure of environment and actors surround the conflict; (2) self-perception as global power and how to get the recognition from others; and (3) an interest to protect the Muslim-majority ex-Soviet countries from the risk of Islamic renaissance."

"In this article, the author empirically uncovered hidden strategic significance behind the slogan 'TNI as the foremost vanguard and the last fort'. This effort was done by means of tracking historical flashbacks while comparing them with the doctrine of modern warfare as well as TNI's posture in the present. From the analysis it was then understood that the slogan is a unique concept that is surprisingly a genius combination of conventional and unconventional warfare strategies which are applicable in any given space time. "

"Military capability is essential to enable State to exercise its right of self-defense. Such military capability is referred to as military defense capability. Although its purpose is for defense, it still presents a problem. The military defense capability of one State can be perceived by another State as a threat. For military defense capability not to be regarded as a threat, as argued in this study, the State has to observe certain parameters. One of those parameters is international law. International law as a restricting norm has proscribed limitations that a State has to observe when it exercises its right to establish and build up its military defense capability. The main purpose of this study is to examine how international law can assume its role to restrict the right of a State and to see how effectively international law has played its role. To this effect, the study is divided into two parts. The first part discusses some basic comprehension of military defense capability, how international law in general assumes its role of restricting certain activities of States and the limitations found under international law that enforce these restrictions. The second part is devoted to examining Japan as a case study. This part of the discussion centers on Japan's military defense capability and analyses whether Japan has observed the limitations. The study gives an overall conclusion, including an evaluation of the effectiveness of international law and Japan's degree of adherence to the limitations."