Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"ABSTRAKDalam penelitian ini dianalisis tanggung jawab rumah sakit terhadap perbuatanmelawan hukum yang dilakukan dokter bukan pegawai rumah sakit, penerapanteori central responsibility dan analisis putusan No. 18/Pdt.G/2006/PN.PLG,62/PDT/2006/PT.PLG, 1752 K/Pdt/2007 dan 352/PK/PDT/2010. Penelitian inimenggunakan metode yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan kualitatif. Rumahsakit bertanggung jawab terhadap perbuatan melawan hukum yang terjadi dirumah sakit. Penerapan teori Central Responsibility memberikan kepastianhukum bagi pasien dan rumah sakit dimana rumah sakit bertanggung jawabsecara terpusat terhadap semua kejadian di rumah sakit. Pada putusan No.18/Pdt.G/2006/PN.PLG, 62/PDT/2006/PT.PLG, 1752 K/Pdt/2007 dan352/PK/PDT/2010 rumah sakit bertanggung jawab secara Central Responsibility

---

ABSTRACTIn this research analyzed the relation between the hospital's responsibility withthe unlawful act that done by the doctors who are not be part of hospital'semployee and the application of the central responsibility theory, and analysis ofthe judicial decision number 18/Pdt.G/2006/PN.PLG, 62/PDT/2006/PT.PLG,1752 K/Pdt/2007 and 352/PK/PDT/2010. This study uses normative juridicalmethod with qualitative approach. The hospital is responsible for the unlawful actthat occurred in the hospital. The application of the central responsibility theorymakes the legal certainty of both patients and the hospital with the hospitalresponsible centrally to all cases that happen in the hospital. In the judicialdecision number 18/Pdt.G/2006/PN.PLG, 62/PDT/2006/PT.PLG, 1752K/Pdt/2007 and 352/PK/PDT/2010 hospital responsible centrally"

"ABSTRAKDalam penelitian ini dianalisis tanggung jawab rumah sakit terhadap perbuatan melawan hukum yang dilakukan dokter bukan pegawai rumah sakit, penerapan teori central responsibility dan analisis putusan No. 18/Pdt.G/2006/PN.PLG, 62/PDT/2006/PT.PLG, 1752 K/Pdt/2007 dan 352/PK/PDT/2010. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan kualitatif. Rumah sakit bertanggung jawab terhadap perbuatan melawan hukum yang terjadi di rumah sakit. Penerapan teori Central Responsibility memberikan kepastian hukum bagi pasien dan rumah sakit dimana rumah sakit bertanggung jawab secara terpusat terhadap semua kejadian di rumah sakit. Pada putusan No. 18/Pdt.G/2006/PN.PLG, 62/PDT/2006/PT.PLG, 1752 K/Pdt/2007 dan 352/PK/PDT/2010 rumah sakit bertanggung jawab secara central responsibility.

---

ABSTRACTIn this research analyzed the relation between the hospital's responsibility with the unlawful act that done by the doctors who are not be part of hospital's employee and the application of the central responsibility theory, and analysis of the judicial decision number 18/Pdt.G/2006/PN.PLG, 62/PDT/2006/PT.PLG, 1752 K/Pdt/2007 and 352/PK/PDT/2010. This study uses normative juridical method with qualitative approach. The hospital is responsible for the unlawful act that occurred in the hospital. The application of the central responsibility theory makes the legal certainty of both patients and the hospital with the hospital responsible centrally to all cases that happen in the hospital. In the judicial decision number 18/Pdt.G/2006/PN.PLG, 62/PDT/2006/PT.PLG, 1752 K/Pdt/2007 and 352/PK/PDT/2010 hospital responsible centrally."

"Tesis ini membahas tentang Penerapan Sertifikasi Halal Berbasis Elektronik (OSS-RBA) Pada Sektor Usaha Mikro dan Kecil (UMK) Setelah Berlakunya Undang-Undang Cipta Kerja (UU No 11 Tahun 2020). Sejak Undang Undang Nomor 33 Tahun 2014 tentang Jaminan Produk Halal telah digalakkan untuk sertifikasi halal di Indonesia. Kemudian terbit Undang Undang Cipta Kerja dan terbit peraturan pelaksananya yaitu Peraturan Pemerintah No 39 Tahun 2021 maka sertifikasi halal ini wajib dilaksanakan oleh UMK, namun kesiapan dari UMK dan Pemerintah dalam ketersediaan penyelia halal serta pengaturan berkaitan dengan penyelia halal pada sektor UMK (Usaha Mikro dan Kecil) setelah berlakunya Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2020 tentang Cipta Kerja serta penerapan sertifikasi halal dikaitkan dengan sistim Online Single Submission Risk Based Approach (OSS-RBA) untuk UMK (Usaha Mikro dan Kecil) setelah berlakunya Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2020 tentang Cipta Kerja perlu diteliti lebih lanjut. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan kualitatif. Usaha Mikro dan Kecil (UMK) wajib untuk melakukan sertifikasi halal terhadap produk yang dihasilkannya tetapi saat ini penyelia halal masih terbatas jumlahnya dan pengetahuan terkait sertifiksi halal pada UMK masih belum terinformasikan dengan baik. Oleh karenanya Peneliti melakukan wawancara langsung kepada 3 UMK di Kebumen, Halal mCenter Universitas Indonesia dan UKM Center Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis Universitas Indonesia. Penerapan teori maqashid asy-Syariah dan Efektifitas Hukum Hans Kelsen untuk menganalisis penerapan sertifikasi halal pada UMK, agar jangan sampai penerapan sertifikasi halal ini wajib tetapi UMK belum siap sehingga dapat merugikan UMK dan masyarakat pada umumnya.

---

This thesis discusses the Application of Electronic-Based Halal Certification (OSS-RBA) in the Micro and Small Business Sector (UMK) after the Enforcement of the Job Creation Law (UU No 11 of 2020). Since Law Number 33 of 2014 concerning Guaranteed Halal Products has been promoted for halal certification in Indonesia. Then the Employment Creation Law was issued and the implementing regulation was issued, namely Government Regulation No. 39 of 2021, this halal certification must be carried out by MSEs, but the readiness of MSEs and the Government in the availability of halal supervisors and regulations relating to halal supervisors in the MSE sector (Micro and Small Enterprises) ) after the enactment of Law Number 11 of 2020 concerning Job Creation and the application of halal certification associated with the Online Single Submission Risk Based Approach (OSS-RBA) system for MSEs (Micro and Small Enterprises) after the enactment of Law Number 11 of 2020 concerning Copyright The work needs to be investigated further. This study uses a normative juridical method with a qualitative approach. Micro and Small Enterprises (UMK) are required to carry out halal certification for their products but currently there are limited number of halal supervisors and knowledge related to halal certification in MSEs is still not well informed. Therefore, the researcher conducted direct interviews with 3 MSEs in Kebumen, the University of Indonesia's Halal Center and the SME Center of the Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Indonesia. The application of maqashid ash-Sharia theory and Hans Kelsen's Legal Effectiveness to analyze the application of halal certification to MSEs, so that the application of halal certification is not mandatory but MSEs are not ready so that it can harm MSEs and society in general."