Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"Skripsi ini bertujuan menganalisa faktor-faktor yang menyebabkan kemenangan Jabhat Al-Nusra dalam Anfal Campaign di Kassab, Suriah, 21-23 Maret 2014. Pemahaman militer konvensional melihat bahwa aktor dengan power yang lebih unggul akan memenangkan perang. Namun, Jabhat Al-Nusra yang kapabilitas power nya relatif lebih lemah dibandingkan dengan pihak rezim Bashar Al-Assad dapat memenangkan pertempuran di Kassab. Penelitian ini menganalisis menggunakan teori asymmetric warfare oleh Patricia L. Sullivan dan merupakan penelitian kualitatif dengan metode process tracing. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa kemenangan di Kassab diakibatkan oleh besarnya toleransi biaya dari JN karena bantuan dari Tier JN dan Turki.

---

This undergraduate thesis seeks to analyze the cause of Jabhat Al-Nusra`s winning on Anfal Campaign in Kassab, Syria, March 21st-23rd, 2014. According to the conventional military understanding, those who have military superiorities will inevitably win the war. However, Jabhat Al-Nusra as a military oppoisition as a weak actor against Bashar Al-Assad`s regime as a strong actor, could win the battle on Anfal Campaign in Kassab. On making the analysis, this research is using the asymmetric wafare theory by Patricia L. Sullivan and done in a process tracing method. This research shows that JN has a greater cost tolerance because there were several supports from JN`s Tier and Turkey which helped JN in winning the battle against regime."

"This article seeks to examine the shift in Japanese security policy and potential shift inantimilitaristic strategic culture. Based on the rational proposition that despite the continuouschange, Japan has never changed its strategic culture because of continuous debate in domesticpolitics arena which plays vital role in shaping Japans perceptions and security policy. Thechanging security practices are thus seen as a logical response to the current international security dynamics. Therefore, within this period of time remain, it would be unlikely that ShinzoAbes government would achieved its goal of reforming the constitution in terms of security policy."

"The Indonesian Armed Forces used to be at the forefront of the countryʼs counterterrorism efforts. Following the countryʼs democratic transition in 1998, the Indonesian National Police took up the lead role. However, many analysts argue that the military is trying to regain its past dominance in counterterrorism. Regardless of this concern, the military does not have to be at the forefront of the countryʼs counterterrorism efforts to influence the overall policy and practices. The lingering militaryʼs historical legacies remains intact in Indonesiaʼs counterterrorism governance. This research highlights three dynamics: (1) The interagency rivalries; (2) the framing of issues; and, (3) the inherent militaryʼs ideological legacies. Despite various political changes that Indonesia underwent in the past few decades, thesedynamics are still relevant in discussing the contemporary counterterrorism governance and practices in Indonesia. This research will demonstrate the importance of historical understanding to analyse Indonesiaʼs counterterrorism governance."