Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"Masyarakat hukum adat sebagai suatu masyarakat yang tetap dan teratur telah berkembang secara internasional hal ini di dukung dengan adanya pembentukan United Nations Declaration on the rights of Indigenous People (UNDRIP) yang telah disahkan oleh PBB pada tahun 2007. Di Indonesia ketentuan mengenai masyarakat hukum adat telah tertuang pada Pasal 18 B ayat (2) UUD 1945. Tulisan ini disusun dengan menggunakan metode penelitian doktrinal. Dengan menganalisis bagaiman a pembentukan Rancangan Undang – Undang (RUU) tentang Masyarakat Hukum Adat berpengaruh terhadap upaya pemenuhan dan perlindungan hak asasi manusia bagi masyarakat hukum adat. Rencana pembentukan RUU tentang masyarakat hukum adat tersebut telah ada sejak tahun 2004, dan pada tahun 2016 hingga 2018 RUU tersebut sudah masuk kedalam Program Legislasi Nasional (Prolegnas) di dalam DPR. Namun hingga saat ini RUU tersebut belum juga dilakukan pengesahan oleh pemerintah. Senyatanya pembentukan RUU tersebut sudah ada masuk dalam tahap urgensi seperti banyak kasus perampasan wilayah yang menimpa masyarakat hukum adat, pelanggaran hak atas free, prior, dan informed consent (FPIC) yang dimiliki oleh masyarakat hukum adat terhadap pernyataan persetujuan atas suatu agenda, pelanggaran terhadap hak konstitusional termasuk hak politik, serta perempuan adat yang sering dihadapkan terhadap permasalahan diskriminasi. Dalam RUU tentang Masyarakat Hukum Adat yang saat ini masuk dalam tahap pembahasan DPR juga tak luput dari permasalahan, beberapa pasal menimbulkan kerancuan dalam implementasinya misalkan Pasal 11 hingga Pasal 17 yang memuat mengenai proses identifikasi dan verifikasi, Pasal 6 terhadap ketentuan persyaratan, Pasal 22 terhadap ketentuan perlindungan, dan Pasal 20 terhadap ketentuan evaluasi. Beberapa pasal dan ketentuan tersebut belum mencerminkan tujuan utama pembentukan RUU tentang Masyarakat Hukum Adat, namun secara nyata hal tersebut justru banyak mengurangi hak yang seharusnya diperoleh oleh masyarakat. Hal inilah yang menjadikan pengesahan RUU tentang Masyarakat Hukum Adat menjadi hal yang penting disahkan untuk melakukan pemenuhan dan perlindungan hak asasi manusia bagi masyarakat hukum adat.

---

Indigenous Peoples, as stable and organized societies, have developed internationally, supported by the establishment of the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP), which was ratified by the UN in 2007. In Indonesia, provisions concerning indigenous peoples are outlined in Article 18B, Paragraph (2) of the 1945 Constitution. This paper is composed using doctrinal research methods. It analyses how the drafting of the Draft Law on Indigenous Peoples impacts efforts to fulfill and protect human rights for indigenous legal communities. The plan to establish the Draft Law on Indigenous Peoples has been in place since 2004, and from 2016 to 2018, the draft law was included in the National Legislation Program (Prolegnas) within the House of Representatives (DPR). However, to date, the draft law has not yet been enacted by the government. In fact, the drafting of this draft law has reached an urgent stage due to numerous cases of territorial seizures affecting indigenous legal communities, violations of the right to free, prior, and informed consent (FPIC) regarding their approval of certain agendas, violations of constitutional rights including political rights, and indigenous women often facing issues of discrimination. The Draft Law on Indigenous Peoples currently under discussion in the DPR is not without problems. Several articles cause confusion in their implementation, such as Articles 11 to 17, which cover the processes of identification and verification. Article 6, which pertains to the requirements. Article 22, which concerns protection provisions. And Article 20, which deals with evaluation provisions. These articles and provisions do not yet reflect the main objectives of forming the Draft Law on Indigenous Peoples. In fact, they often diminish the rights that should be granted to the communities. This underscores the importance of enacting the Draft Law on Indigenous Peoples to ensure the fulfillment and protection of human rights for Indigenous Peoples."

"[Ekspresi Budaya Tradisional (EBT) adalah kekayaan warisan budaya yangmenceminkan nilai-nilai, tradisi, dan kepercayaan suatu bangsa dan masyarakatadat. Setiap bangsa memiliki kekayaan EBT masing-masing, terutama negaranegaraberkembang, dimana Indonesia termasuk ke dalam salah satu negara yangkaya akan keanekaragaman hayati luar biasa (mega biodiversity). EBT rentanterhadap penyalahguaan (misappropriation dan misuse) terutama dari negaranegaramaju karena memiliki potensi ekonomi, sehingga penting agar dapatsegera terbentuk suatu sistem perlindungan EBT di Indonesia. Pendekatan yangumum diaplikasikan untuk perlindugnan EBT adalah melalui rezim hukum HKIkonvensional yang bersifat individualistis sehingga tidak sesuai untukdiaplikasikan pada EBT. Penulisan ini akan mengkaji efektifitas praktikperlindungan EBT di Indonesia;Traditional Cultural Expressions (TCE) is a form of cultural heritage that reflectsupon the values, traditions, and beliefs of a nation and its indigenous peoples.Every nation has its own TCE with its unique characterizations, especiallydeveloping countries, in which Indonesia is included as one of the countries withmega biodiversity. TCE is prone to misuse and misappropriation by developedcountries due to its economical potential. Therefore, it is imperative that Indonesiaadopts a set of rules regulating the protection of TCE. The common practices forTCE protection is through the intellectual property law regime with individualisticcharacteristics that is not suitable for the protection of TCE. This writing willanalyze the affectivity of the protection of TCE in Indonesia;Traditional Cultural Expressions (TCE) is a form of cultural heritage that reflectsupon the values, traditions, and beliefs of a nation and its indigenous peoples.Every nation has its own TCE with its unique characterizations, especiallydeveloping countries, in which Indonesia is included as one of the countries withmega biodiversity. TCE is prone to misuse and misappropriation by developedcountries due to its economical potential. Therefore, it is imperative that Indonesiaadopts a set of rules regulating the protection of TCE. The common practices forTCE protection is through the intellectual property law regime with individualisticcharacteristics that is not suitable for the protection of TCE. This writing willanalyze the affectivity of the protection of TCE in Indonesia, Traditional Cultural Expressions (TCE) is a form of cultural heritage that reflectsupon the values, traditions, and beliefs of a nation and its indigenous peoples.Every nation has its own TCE with its unique characterizations, especiallydeveloping countries, in which Indonesia is included as one of the countries withmega biodiversity. TCE is prone to misuse and misappropriation by developedcountries due to its economical potential. Therefore, it is imperative that Indonesiaadopts a set of rules regulating the protection of TCE. The common practices forTCE protection is through the intellectual property law regime with individualisticcharacteristics that is not suitable for the protection of TCE. This writing willanalyze the affectivity of the protection of TCE in Indonesia]"

"Tesis ini membahas mengenai jual beli hak atas tanah berdasarkan hukum adat yang dijadikan dasar untuk pendaftaran tanah dengan menganalisa suatu putusan pengadilan Negeri Cibinong. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian normatif dengan pendekatan kualitatif, sehingga penelitian ini dapat memberikan gambaran tentang kedudukan jual beli tanah yang dilakukan berdasarkan hukum adat dalam pandangan hukum positif di Indonesia dan bagaimana perlindungan hukum serta penyelesaian hukum terhadap pemegang hak terakhir yang mengalami kesukaran untuk melakukan pendaftaran tanah akibat jual beli berdasarkan pada hukum adat, dari hasil penelitian disarankan bahwa jual beli hak atas tanah hendaknya dilakukan dihadapan PPAT yang berwenang, dan Kantor Pertanahan berikut PPAT sebagai mitra Kantor Pertanahan selalu memberikan informasi serta melakukan penyuluhan tentang Hukum Tanah Nasional kepada masyarakat setempat agar terciptanya kepastian hukum dan adanya perlindungan hukum terhadap hak-hak atas tanah.

---

This thesis discusses the sale and purchase of land rights based on customary law wich is made the basis for land registration by analyzing a decision of the Court Cibinong. Research using this method of research with a qualitative approach normative, so that this research can provide a snapshot of the sale and purchase is based on customary law in the positive law in Indonesia and how the protection and legal settlement of the last holder of the rights that are difficult to perform the registration of land in onder maintenance data. Based on the results of research suggested that the sale and purchase rights to the land should be done before the authorized PPAT and PPAT office land below as a patner of the Land Office land below as a patner of the Land Office should always be to provide information and conduct espionage on national land law to the local community in order to to create legal certainty and the protection of the law rights over land."

"Masyarakat hukum adat memiliki hubungan keterikatan yang kuat dengan wilayah tempat mereka tinggal. Banyak dari masyarakat hukum adat ini telah mendiami suatu wilayah secara turun-temurun sejak zaman pra-kolonisasi yang pada akhirnya wilayah yang mereka diami tersebut tidak jatuh ke dalam wilayah satu kedaulatan negara saja. Perbatasan negara, tidak hanya menjadi pembatas kedaulatan antar negara saja, tapi juga membelah masyarakat hukum adat yang wilayah tradisionalnya dilalui garis batas negara tersebut. Dalam upaya untuk memenuhi kebutuhan ekonomi, sosial, budaya dan spiritual dan juga melanjutkan serta menjaga tradisi dan kebudayaan yang telah dijalankan secara turun temurun, masyarakat hukum adat yang dipisahkan oleh batas negara tidak dapat lepas dari kegiatan lintas batas tradisional. Untuk melihat perlindungan terhadap masyarakat hukum adat yang dipisahkan oleh batas negara, penelitian ini meninjau praktik dari Amerika Serikat, Norwegia dan Indonesia yang menunjukkan variasi perlindungan terhadap masyarakat hukum adat yang dipisahkan oleh batas negara berdasarkan posisi serta sikap masing-masing negara menanggapi permasalahan masyarakat hukum adat secara umum.

---

Indigenous peoples maintain a strong relationship with their homelands, not just based on social-economy needs, but more to cultural and spiritual connection. Long before colonialism came to the new world and divide the world into sovereign-state territory, indigenous peoples call it home, and some of their traditional homelands did not fall within one sovereign-state territory. International border, not only become the boundaries between state soverignty, but also split indigenous peoples whose traditional homelands crossed by those borders. In the effort to fulfill their social, economy, cultural and spiritual needs, those indigenous peoples can not be separated from the traditional cross-border activities. To help us understand about the protection of indigenous peoples whose homelands are separated by international border, this research describe and analyse the practices in the United States, Norway and Indonesia, which potrays the variety based on the country?s position and response to the problems of indigenous peoples in general."

"ABSTRAKPembentukan UUPA dimaksudkan dengan tujuan untuk menjamin hak-hak masyarakat yang ketika zaman kolonial Belanda selalu dikesampingkan. Ketika UUPA diundangkan, hukum adat dinyatakan sebagai dasar penyusunannya tetapi pengaturan tentang hukum adat sendiri tidak diatur secara tegas didalam UUPA tetapi hanya disinggung mengenai pengakuan hakulayat yang bersyarat. Hal ini mengakibatkan banyak terdapat konflik pertanahan salah satunya dalam program Perkebunan Inti Rakyat (PIR) yang terjadi antara masyarakat hukum adat dan perusahaan pelaksana yang di fasilitasi oleh negara

---

ABSTRACTUUPA formation intended for the purpose of guaranteeing the rights of society when the Dutch colonial era has always ruled out. When UUPA legislation, customary law is expressed as the basic formulation but the setting of customary law itself is not set explicitly in the UUPA but only mentioned about the unconditional recognition of customary rights. This resulted in many there is a conflict over land one of them in the program Perkebunan IntiRakyat (PIR) which occurs between the indigenous people and their implementing enterprise which was facilitated by the state"

"ABSTRAKSkripsi ini membahas mengenai peran dari masyarakat hukum adat dalammengelola hutan di Indonesia dan penyelenggaraan pemenuhan hak masyarakathukum adat untuk dapat mengelola hutan oleh negara. Selain itu, dibahas jugaterkait dengan sejarah hukum pengelolaan hutan dan paradigma pengelolaan hutandi Indonesia sebagai analisis atas kebijakan kehutanan yang diterbitkan olehPemerintah. Tujuan utama dari penelitian ini adalah untuk memberikan deskripsiatas kondisi pengelolaan hutan oleh masyarakat hukum adat di Indonesia.

---

ABSTRACTThis thesis discusses the role of customary law communities in forestmanagement in Indonesia and organizing the fulfillment of rights of indigenouspeople to manage forests by the state. In addition, also discussed related to thelegal history of forest management and forest management paradigm in Indonesiaas an analysis of forest policy issued by the Government. The main objective ofthis study is to provide a description of the condition of forest management byindigenous people in Indonesia."

"the code of law of criminal procedure instead of HIR the product of colonial government of nederlands indie contains the participle of fair legal process giving guarantee and protection of human rights, applying the principle in all stages of criminal justice process : preadjudication , adjudication, and postadjudication. In order to apply the fair legal process, it is therefore needed to provide a model of legal enforcer. Without goodwill of legal enforcer to implement the fair legal process, only the arbitrary malpractices of criminal justice and the power of legal enforcer will be in force."