Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"Latar belakang: Penggunaan media sosial di kalangan pelaku praktik kedokteran gigi marak dilakukan di seluruh dunia, termasuk Indonesia. Fenomena pelanggaran e-profesionalisme telah dilaporkan dalam literatur dan dapat diamati dalam kehidupan sehari-hari. Timbulnya ekspektasi pasien yang terlalu tinggi atau tidak logis terhadap perawatan, termasuk di bidang Prostodonsia, semakin marak terjadi. Terlebih lagi, definisi e-profesionalisme di Indonesia masih merupakan perdebatan. Minimnya aturan tentang penggunaan media sosial untukpelaku praktik kedokteran gigi di Indonesia menyebabkan tidak jelasnya batas tindakan profesional dalam bermedia sosial.Tujuan: Mengetahui preferensi, intensi dan perilaku penggunaan media sosial di kalangan pelaku praktik kedokteran gigi di Indonesia.Metode: Studi dilakukan dengan menggunakan kuesioner kepada tiga kelompok subjek, yaitu dokter gigi spesialis, dokter gigi umum dan mahasiswa koas. Studi kualitatif melalui wawancara singkat dilakukan pada 8 orang perwakilan kelompok subjek tersebut untuk memperkaya item kuesioner dari literatur. Diskusi pakar dilakukan untuk merumuskan item kuesioner yang menyusun domain preferensi, intensi dan perilaku bermedia sosial. Validasi kuesioner dilakukan melalui uji coba kuesioner kepada 30 orang perwakilan kelompok subjek. Kuesioner disebarkan melalui media sosial ke 450 responden dari ketiga kelompok subjek. Hasil penelitian dianalisis secara deskriptif.Hasil: Pelaku praktik kedokteran gigi di Indonesia dari setiap kelompok generasi menggunakan media sosial 1-3jam/ hari. Platform yang paling banyak digunakan adalah Whatsapp, Instagram dan YouTube. Tujuan utama mereka adalah mencari hiburan dan jenis konten yang paling banyak dibagikan adalah update kehidupan pribadi. Mayoritas responden memasang pengaturan privasi untuk mengatasi hambatan berupa ancaman terhadap keamanan data. Mereka percaya bahwa penggunaan media sosial dapat memberikan informasi dan memperluas jaringan sosial, namun menyita waktu. Pelaku praktik kedokteran gigi di Indonesia menganggap konten iklan/promosi berisi kalimat ajakan, diskon, harga, dan dokter gigi sebagai duta merk termasuk sebagai kategori konten yang tidak profesional. Banyaknya konten promosi yang beredar di media sosial memicu pemilihan sikap netral responden dalam menentukan sikap e-profesionalisme terhadap konten promosi. Organisasi profesi dianggap belum memberikan aturan yang memadai, terutama dalam hal pengaturan tata cara beriklan di media sosial. Konten restorasi direk kedokteran gigi merupakan konten utama yang banyak dilihat di media sosial. Bidang Prostodonsia merupakan bidang yang terdampak tertinggi kedua oleh adanya media sosial. Tingkat kekhawatiran terhadap dampak dari media sosial pada citra diri, citra institusi profesi dan karir meningkat seiring meningkatnya pendidikan. Pada kelompok subjek dengan tingkat pendidikan dan usia yang lebih tinggi, cresponden cenderung tidak terpengaruh oleh media sosial dalam mendiagnosis/menentuka rencana perawatanKesimpulan: Preferensi pelaku praktik kedokteran gigi terhadap penggunaan media sosial tergambarkan melalui pemahaman terhadap faktor sosiodemografis, kepercayaan terhadap penggunaan media sosial, pemberlakuan aturan penggunaan media sosial, serta sikap e-profesionalisme dalam bermedia sosial. Preferensi, Intensi dan Perilaku bermedia sosial di setiap kelompok generasi cenderung sama. Setiap kelompok generasi cenderung memilih sikap netral terhadap konten promosi di media sosial. Aturan tentang tata cara beriklan di media sosial merupakan salah satu aturan yang dirasakan perlu untuk diterapkan di Indonesia. Preferensi dan intensi bermedia sosial di kalangan pelaku praktik kedokteran gigi di Indonesia selaras dan dapat menggambarkan perilaku mereka dalam bermedia sosial.

---

Background: The use of social media among dental practitioners is rife worldwide, including in Indonesia. Violation of e-professionalism has been reported in the literature and easily observed. Unrealistic patient expectations for treatment result, especially in Prosthodontics, is increasing across the board. Furthermore, the definition of e-professionalism in Indonesia is still a debate. The lack of regulations regarding the use of social media among Indonesian dental practitioners has led to blurry boundaries between professional and unprofessional actions.

Objective: To find out about preferences, intentions, and behavior of social media usage among dental practitioners in Indonesia.

Methods: The study was conducted using a questionnaire among three groups, including specialist dentists, general dentists and dental students. A qualitative study was conducted through interviews with eight representatives to enrich the questionnaire items found in a literature search. Expert panel discussions were held to determine questionnaire items that build the preferences, intentions, and behavior domains on social media usage. Questionnaire validation was performed by testing the questionnaire on 30 representatives of the subject group. The questionnaire was spread-out through social media with a target of 450 respondents. The research results were analyzed descriptively using statistic software.

Results: Dental practitioners in Indonesia from each generation group use social media for 1-3 hours/day regardless of the various sociodemographic factors behind it. The most used platforms are Whatsapp, Instagram, and YouTube. Their main goal and most shared digital content are to seek entertainment and personal life updates. Most respondents install privacy settings to overcome obstacles in the form of threats to data security. They believe that social media can provide information and broaden social networks, yet it is time-consuming. Dental practitioners in Indonesia consider advertising/promotional content that incorporates solicitations, discounts, prices, and dentists as brand ambassadors included as unprofessional content. The widely shared promotional content on social media triggers respondents' neutral attitude in determining e-professionalism towards promotional content. Indonesian Dental Association is considered not to provide adequate rules, especially in regulating advertising procedures on social media. The prosthodontics sector is the second highest affected dental field by social media. Higher levels of education shows increase of concern over social media's effects on career, professional institutions, and self-image. With increasing age and educational level, there was a decline in the proportion of respondents who acknowledged that social media had influenced their diagnosis or development of treatment plans.

Conclusion: Dental practitioners' preference for using social media is illustrated by understanding their sociodemographic factors, belief in the use of social media, regulations, and attitudes towards e-professionalism. Social media preferences, intentions, and behavior in each generation group tend to show the same result. Each generation group tends to choose a neutral attitude towards promotional content on social media. Indonesian Dental practitioners demand regulation on how to advertise on social media. Social media preferences and intentions among dental practitioners in Indonesia are in conjunction and explaining their behavior in social media."

"Penelitian ini membahas mengenai dinamika dramaturgi dalam penggunaan media sosial Path pada mahasiswa Universitas Indonesia. Media sosial merupakan bagian dari perkembangan teknologi yang tidak dapat dipisahkan dari kehidupan sehari-sehari pada masa ini. Salah satu perkembangan media sosial adalah munculnya media sosial Path. Saat ini, Path merupakan media sosial yang populer dan digunakan oleh berbagai kalangan, terutama kaum muda atau mahasiswa. Telah terjadi perubahan interaksi pada masyarakat di era media sosial. Perubahan interaksi langsung menjadi interaksi virtual yang dilakukan melalui media sosial turut menjadikan perubahan proses dramaturgi di era media sosial. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode kualitatif melalui wawancara mendalam informan, observasi di dunia nyata, observasi di media sosial Path, dan survei ringkas. Berdasarkan hasil survei, mahasiswa Universitas Indonesia secara umum merupakan tipe pengguna media sosial Path ?Socializers?. Penelitian ini juga menemukan bahwa terjadi proses dramatugi yaitu berubahnya batasan antara front stage dan backstage, yang secara spesifik disebut sebagai the forefront of the backstage, melalui interaksi virtual di media sosial Path.

---

This research discusses the dynamics of dramaturgy in the usage of Path, a platform of social media, among students of Universitas Indonesia. Social media is a product of the technological advancement that nowadays cannot be separated from everyday life. The emergence of Path marks a phase of evolution of social media. Now, Path is one of the more popular social media, and it reaches all kinds of social groups, especially to those who are in young age or are in college. There has been a change in interaction among people in this era of social medias. The change from direct interactions through social media has also brought a change in the process of dramaturgy. This research used qualitative methods with in-depth interviews; observations on real world and virtual world of social media Path; and quick survey. According to the survey, the students of Universitas Indonesia in general are ?Socializers? type of Path user. This research also found that there is a process of dramaturgy, that is a shift of borders between the front stage and the backstage, specifically called as the forefront of the backstage, following the virtual interaction on Path."

"Latar Belakang : Praktik kedokteran gigi ternyata memberikan dampak buruk bagi lingkungan sekitar. Saat ini sudah ada konsep praktik kedokteran gigi yang lebih ramah lingkungan yaitu green dentistry. Belum terdapat studi yang memberikan gambaran faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi kesediaan dokter gigi di Jakarta untuk mengadopsi konsep green dentistry. Tujuan : Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui gambaran faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi kesediaan dokter gigi di Jakarta dalam mengadopsi konsep green dentistry dalam praktik sehari-hari. Metode : Penelitian ini merupakan studi cross sectional menggunakan teknik proportional quota sampling. Dokter gigi dari 5 wilayah di DKI Jakarta berpartisipasi dalam penelitian ini. Peneliti menggunakan kuesioner penelitian yang terbagi menjadi beberapa domain yaitu kesediaan, kategori pengadopsi, pengetahuan, sikap, praktik, serta faktor adopsi inovasi. Hubungan antarvariabel dianalisis menggunakan uji beda proporsi chi square, continuity correction test, fisher’s exact test serta uji korelasi spearman’s rho dan kendall’s tau b pada perangkat lunak IBM SPSS Statistik. Hasil Penelitian : Jumlah responden penelitian ini mencapai 210 dokter gigi di Jakarta. Terdapat 54,3% responden yang belum pernah mendengar istilah green dentistry dan hanya 2,9% yang sudah mengikuti pelatihan. Berdasarkan kategorisasi dokter gigi di Jakarta menurut teori difusi inovasi, terdapat 1% kelompok inovator, 28% pengadopsi awal, 44,3% mayoritas awal, 20,5% mayoritas akhir, dan 6.2% laggards. 75.2% dokter gigi telah memiliki pengetahuan yang tinggi, 54,3% sikap positif, dan 35,7% responden cukup mempraktikkan konsep green dentistry. Kesimpulan : Tidak ada hubungan karakteristik responden dengan kesediaan kecuali persepsi (mendengar istilah). Tidak ada hubungan antara tingkat pengetahuan, praktik, dan faktor adopsi inovasi dengan kesediaan. Terdapat hubungan antara kategori pengadopsi dan sikap dengan kesediaan. Terdapat hubungan antara faktor pengaruh adopsi inovasi dengan praktik serta hubungan antara pengetahuan, sikap, dan praktik dokter gigi di Jakarta tentang konsep green dentistry.

---

Backgrounds: Dental practice has a negative impact on the surrounding environment. Currently, there is a concept of dental practice that is more environmentally friendly, namely green dentistry. There are no studies that provide an overview of the factors affecting willingness of dentists in Jakarta to adopt the concept of green dentistry. Objective: This study aims to describe the factors affecting willingness of dentists in Jakarta to adopt the concept of green dentistry in daily practice. Methods: This research is a cross sectional study using proportional quota sampling technique. Dentists from 5 regions in DKI Jakarta participated in this study. Researcher used a research questionnaire which was divided into several domains, namely willingness, adopter categories, knowledge, attitudes, practices, and innovation adoption factors. The relationship between variables was analyzed using the chi square difference test, continuity correction test, fisher's exact test and spearman's rho and kendall's tau b correlation tests on IBM SPSS Statistics software. Results: The number of respondents in this study reached 210 dentists in Jakarta. There were 54.3% of respondents who had never heard the term green dentistry and only 2.9% who had attended training. Based on the categorization of dentists in Jakarta according to the theory of diffusion of innovation, there are 1% innovator group, 28% early adopters, 44.3% early majority, 20.5% late majority, and 6.2% laggards. 75.2% of dentists already have high knowledge of dentistry, 54.3% had a positive attitude, and 35.7% of respondents moderately practiced the concept of green dentistry. Conclusion: There is no relationship between respondent characteristics and willingness except perception (hearing the term). There is no relationship between the level of knowledge, practice, and innovation adoption factors with willingness. There is a relationship between adopter category and attitude with willingness. There is a relationship between the innovation adoption factors and practice and there is relationship between knowledge, attitude, and practice of dentists in Jakarta about the concept of green dentistry."

"ABSTRAK Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian yang bertujuan untuk mengetahui pengaruh yang dimiliki oleh tingkat penggunaan media sosial terhadap tingkat resiko viktimisasi online harassment pada mahasiswa angkatan 2013 Universitas X. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian kuantitatif yang didasari oleh Teori Aktivitas Rutin dari Cohen dan Felson dalam melihat resiko viktimisasi online harassment. Dengan menggunakan instrumen penelitian berupa kuesioner, indikator-indikatornya telah ditentukan oleh penulis. Data yang diperoleh kemudian dianalisa dengan menggunakan SPSS dan kajian teori serta jurnal peneltian yang digunakan. Dari 383 responden, hasil penelitian menyatakan bahwa terdapat hubungan serta pengaruh antara pengguna tingkat penggunaan media sosial terhadap viktimisasi online harassment yang dialami oleh mahasiswa angkatan 2013 Universitas X.

---

ABSTRACT This research aims to understand the extent of influence of the use of social media towards the risks of online harassment victimization on batch 2013 students of University X. this research ia a quantitative reseach that is based on Routine Activity Theory by Cohen and Felson in order to see the risks of online harassment victimization. Questionnare, which indicators have been determined by the writer, is used as an instrument in conducting this research. The received data is then analyzed by using SPSS, theoretica studies, and research journals. The result revealed by 383 respondents that there is a correlation and impacts between the social media usage level and the level of online harassment victimization that is experienced by batch 2013 students of University X."

"[ ABSTRAKTulisan ini membahas ruang publik sebagai tempat untuk arena berdebat dan menyampaikan gagasan bagi setiap orang. Namun, dalam konteks hari ini, ruang publik tidak lagi semata ruang dalam artian fisik, tetapi juga ruang di ranah virtual. Di ruang publik di media sosial, komunikasi face-to-face tidak lagi berlaku, termasuk jarak komunikasi seperti ruang publik dalam artian fisik. Sebagai ruang publik, media sosial seperti Facebook, Twitter, Path, dan Kompasiana bersifat bebas akses dan menjadi tempat bertemunya berbagai ekspresi, gagasan dan pendapat. Dalam tulisan ini dibahas lima kasus penggunaan ranah publik di media sosial, meliputi kasus Florence di Path, kasus penghinaan Jokowi di Facebook, kasus penghinaan Ahok di Twitter, kasus Prita dan RS Omi dan kasus Jilbab Hitam. Kasus tersebut menggambarkan bahwa meskipun prinsip kebebasan menyampaikan pendapat di ruang publik berlaku, pengguna bukan berarti dapat menyampaikan opini yang merugikan individu, kelompok atau institusi lain. Opini yang disampaikan tidak mengandung provokasi, baik berbentuk trolling ataupun flaming, sehingga pengguna tidak terjerat kasus hukum. Kasus penggunaan ruang publik dapat menciptakan sebuah gerakan sosial yang dijalankan para pengguna ruang publik. Sifat gerakan sosial tersebut bisa mendukung ataupun menjatuhkan subjek.

---

ABSTRACT

This paper explains about public sphere as the place for debatting and giving the idea for everyone. But, in today’s context, public sphere is not only a sphere in physical way, but also virtual way. In social media, it is no longer effective for face to face communication, including distance as is found in public sphere. As public sphere media, social media like Facebook, Twitter, Path and Kompasiana have free access and become a place where any expressions, ideas and opinions meet. In this paper, discussion is made regarding five cases related to the use of public sphere in social media including Florence case in Path, Jokowi humiliation on Facebook, Ahok humilation on Twitter, Prita and Omni Hospital case and also Jilbab Hitam case. The cases reveal that inspite of the principle of freedom of expression in public sphere, social media users are not meant to convey any opinion that may harm an individual, group or institution. Opinion delivered does not contain any provocations, either “trolling” or “flaming” so that the user will not be legally or lawfully caught. Cases of the use of public sphere may bring about a social movoment by public sphere users. The nature of this social movement may either support or bring down the subject., This paper explains about public sphere as the place for debatting and giving the idea for everyone. But, in today’s context, public sphere is not only a sphere in physical way, but also virtual way. In social media, it is no longer effective for face to face communication, including distance as is found in public sphere. As public sphere media, social media like Facebook, Twitter, Path and Kompasiana have free access and become a place where any expressions, ideas and opinions meet. In this paper, discussion is made regarding five cases related to the use of public sphere in social media including Florence case in Path, Jokowi humiliation on Facebook, Ahok humilation on Twitter, Prita and Omni Hospital case and also Jilbab Hitam case. The cases reveal that inspite of the principle of freedom of expression in public sphere, social media users are not meant to convey any opinion that may harm an individual, group or institution. Opinion delivered does not contain any provocations, either “trolling” or “flaming” so that the user will not be legally or lawfully caught. Cases of the use of public sphere may bring about a social movoment by public sphere users. The nature of this social movement may either support or bring down the subject.]"