Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"Penelitian ini membahas tentang pembiaran medik dan keselamatan pasien dalam Putusan No. 381/Pid.B/2014/PN.Tk. Putusan tersebut dikategorikan sebagai pembiaran medik yaitu apabila pimpinan fasilitas pelayanan kesehatan dan/atau tenaga kesehatan tidak memberikan pertolongan pertama dalam keadaan gawat darurat. Dalam kasus tersebut pihak rumah sakit tidak termasuk pembiaran medik dalam hukum kesehatan. Pihak RSUD. Dr. A. Dadi Tjokro Dipo Bandar Lampung tidak memenuhi tujuh standar keselamatan pasien yang terdapat dalam Permenkes No.1691.Menkes/Per/VIII/2011 tentang Keselamatan Pasien Rumah Sakit sehingga pihak rumah sakit dapat dikenakan sanksi berupa teguran tertulis, terguran lisan, penundaan atau penanggahan perpanjangan izin operasional. Metode penelitian yang digunakan pada skripsi saya adalah yuridis normatif. Saran dari penelitian : 1 . Untuk pemerintah agar dapat mengawasi dengan ketat prosedur pelayanan rumah sakit seperti halnya adanya Badan Pengawas Rumah Sakit Indonesia yang salah tugasnya adalah mengawasi hak dan kewajiban pasien sehingga kasus yang menimpa pasien Suparman tidak terulang kembali. 2 . Untuk pemerintah juga agar dapat membuat peraturan mengenai pembiaran medik yang lebih luas di dalam luang lingkup hukum kesehatan sehingga pengaturan mengenai pembiaran medik di dalam hukum kesehatan tidak hanya mengenai pertolongan pertama pada keadaan gawat darurat saja. 3 .Terhadap pihak rumah sakit agar memberikan sosialisasi mengenai Keselamatan Pasien Rumah Sakit terutama Tujuh Standar Keselamatan Pasien Rumah Sakit yang terdapat dalam Permenkes No.1691.Menkes/Per/VIII/2011 tentang Keselamatan Pasien Rumah Sakit.

---

This research examines medical negligence and patient rsquo s safety in Verdict No. 381 Pid.B 2014 PN.Tk. The mentioned verdict is categorized as medical negligence, which means the head of healthcare facility and or medical workers do not give a first aid treatment in an emergency situation. In the case, the hospital did not do any medical negligence according to medical law. Public hospital RSUD. Dr. A. Dadi Tjokro Dipo Bandar Lampung did not fulfill the seven standard of patient rsquo s safety as stipulated in the Ordinance of the Health Minister No.1691.Menkes Per VIII 2011 about Safety of Hospital rsquo s Patient, hence the hospital could be penalized by giving them oral warning, delay or suspension of operational permission extension. Research method that is used in this thesis is normative juridical method. This thesis suggest 1 . The government should keep an eye close to hospital rsquo s service procedure through Indonesian Hospital Supervising Body, which have the authority to supervise the rights and obligations of patients so that the Suparman case will not happen again 2 . For the government also to make regulations on broader medical broadcasting within the scope of health law so that the regulation of medical neglect in health law is not only about first aid in emergencies 3 . Hospital have to give socialization about the Safety of Hospital rsquo s Patient. Particularly, the Seven Standards of the Safety of Hospital rsquo s Patient, which are stipulated in the Ordinance of the Health Minister No.1691.Menkes Per VIII 2011 about Safety of Hospital rsquo s Patient. hence the hospital could be penalized by giving them oral warning, delay or suspension of operational permission extension. Research method that is used in this thesis is normative juridical method. This thesis suggest 1 . The government should keep an eye close to hospital rsquo s service procedure through Indonesian Hospital Supervising Body, which have the authority to supervise the rights and obligations of patients so that the Suparman case will not happen again 2 . For the government also to make regulations on broader medical broadcasting within the scope of health law so that the regulation of medical neglect in health law is not only about first aid in emergencies 3 . Hospital have to give socialization about the Safety of Hospital rsquo s Patient. Particularly, the Seven Standards of the Safety of Hospital rsquo s Patient, which are stipulated in the Ordinance of the Health Minister No.1691.Menkes Per VIII 2011 about Safety of Hospital rsquo s Patient. "

"Skripsi ini membahas mengenai inspanningverbineinis dan contributory negligence dalam tindakan medik. Penelitian ini adalah penelitian yuridis-normatif dengan menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif. Pembahasan dalam skripsi ini mencakup penerapan inspanningverbintenis dalam tindakan medik ditinjau berdasarkan hukum kesehatan, penerapan contributory negligence di dalam tindakan medik, dan penerapan mengenai inspanningverbintenis dan contributory negligence dalam Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Bandung No.514/PDT.G/2013/PN.Bdg. Hasil penelitian ini menyatakan bahwa salah satu hal yang diatur di dalam hukum kesehatan ialah hubungan antara dokter dan pasien. Hubungan yang didasarkan atas perjanjian berbentuk inspanningverbintenis, membuat dokter di dalam memberikan suatu tindakan medik harus didasarkan pada suatu upaya maksimal dan sesuai dengan standar profesi. Saat terjadi contributory negligence di dalam perjanjian tersebut, pengaruh yang ditimbulkan yaitu dokter hanya bertanggungjawab sesuai dengan proporsi kelalaiannya. Dalam kasus ini, tindakan para dokter yang digugat telah sesuai dengan standar profesi medik dan dengan suatu upaya maksimal. Tindakan pasien yang memenuhi unsur-unsur contributory negligence, membuatnya tidak menerima ganti rugi sama sekali. Hasil penelitian ini menyarankan agar dokter di dalam menjalankan profesinya, dapat menekankan bahwa hubungannya merupakan suatu upaya maksimal dan pasien juga diharuskan untuk menaati saran dari dokter.

---

This thesis discusses about inspanningverbintenis and contributory negligence in medical action. This research is a juridical normative research using qualitative approach. Discussion in this thesis involves the application of inspanningverbintenis in medical action under health law, the application of contributory negligence in medical action, and the application of inspanningverbintenis and contributory negligence in Bandung District Court Ruling No. 514 PDT.G 2013 PN.Bdg. The results of this study suggest that one of the things regulated in health law is the relationship between doctors and patients. Relationships based on agreements in the form of inspanningverbintenis, resulted in the obligations of doctors to provide medical action that is based on maximal effort and in accordance with professional standards. In the event of a contributory negligence in the agreement, the doctors might only be held liable in accordance with the proportion of his her negligence. In this case, the doctors who are sued have acted in accordance with the standards of the medical profession and with a maximum effort. Moreover the patient's actions that has fulfilled the elements of contributory negligence. Therefore, the patients do not have the right to receive any compensation. This research result recommend doctor in carrying out his profession, can emphasize that the relationship between doctor and patients is a maximum effort and patients are also required to obey the advice of the doctor."

"Penelitian ini mengangkat permasalahan yang sering terjadi berupa kelalaian dalam pelayanan kesehatan dan mengenai kepemilikan rekam medis. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian yuridis normatif dengan metode pengumpulan data kepustakaan dan wawancara profesi yang berkaitan dengan penelitian ini, yakni dokter spesialis obstetri dan ginekologi serta praktisi hukum. Kesimpulan dari penelitian ini menunjukan bahwa terdapat unsur-unsur yang harus terpenuhi untuk dapat menggolongkan apakah tindakan seseorang merupakan kelalaian atau tidak, selain itu pasien berhak untuk mengakses isi atau ringkasan atau copy dari isi atau ringkasan rekam medis berdasarkan Pasal 12 Peraturan Menteri Kesehatan No. 269 Tahun 2008.

---

This study examined the problems that often occur in health service, these are negligence in health services and the ownership of medical records. This study uses normative juridical research method with library data collection method and professional interview related to this research, that are obstetric and gynecology specialist and a law practitioner. The conclusions of this study indicate that there are elements that must be met to be able to classify whether a person 39 s actions are negligent or not, other than that the patient is entitled to access the contents or summary or copy of the contents or summary of the medical record under Article 12 of the Minister of Health Regulation no. 269 Year 2008. "