Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

""Self-determination is on the agenda of Indigenous peoples all over the world. This analysis by an Indigenous feminist scholar challenges the United Nations-based human rights agendas and colonial theory that until now have shaped Indigenous models of self-determination. Gender inequality and gender violence, Dian Million argues, are critically important elements in the process of self-determination. Million contends that nation-state relations are influenced by a theory of trauma ascendant with the rise of neoliberalism. Such use of trauma theory regarding human rights corresponds to a therapeutic narrative by Western governments negotiating with Indigenous nations as they seek self-determination. Focusing on Canada and drawing comparisons with the United States and Australia, Million brings a genealogical understanding of trauma against a historical filter. Illustrating how Indigenous people are positioned differently in Canada, Australia, and the United States in their articulation of trauma, the author particularly addresses the violence against women as a language within a greater politic. The book introduces an Indigenous feminist critique of this violence against the medicalized framework of addressing trauma and looks to the larger goals of decolonization. Noting the influence of humanitarian psychiatry, Million goes on to confront the implications of simply dismissing Indigenous healing and storytelling traditions. Therapeutic Nations is the first book to demonstrate affect and trauma's wide-ranging historical origins in an Indigenous setting, offering insights into community healing programs. The author's theoretical sophistication and original research make the book relevant across a range of disciplines as it challenges key concepts of American Indian and Indigenous studies"--"

"This paper aims to provider an understanding linking indigenous women, land rights, indigenous forests and the marginalisation of women in agrarian conflicts in Indonesia. For indigenous people, forests are not only a natural resource but they are a integral part of their culture. Rivers and swamps are a source a food and help indigenous women teach their children how to survive in nature. Forests lose their biodiversity overshadowed by monoculture plantations, mining and other agricultural practice. These practice do not only destroy the beauty of forests, but also cause acute environmental pollution and birth defects."

"Masyarakat hukum adat sebagai suatu masyarakat yang tetap dan teratur telah berkembang secara internasional hal ini di dukung dengan adanya pembentukan United Nations Declaration on the rights of Indigenous People (UNDRIP) yang telah disahkan oleh PBB pada tahun 2007. Di Indonesia ketentuan mengenai masyarakat hukum adat telah tertuang pada Pasal 18 B ayat (2) UUD 1945. Tulisan ini disusun dengan menggunakan metode penelitian doktrinal. Dengan menganalisis bagaiman a pembentukan Rancangan Undang – Undang (RUU) tentang Masyarakat Hukum Adat berpengaruh terhadap upaya pemenuhan dan perlindungan hak asasi manusia bagi masyarakat hukum adat. Rencana pembentukan RUU tentang masyarakat hukum adat tersebut telah ada sejak tahun 2004, dan pada tahun 2016 hingga 2018 RUU tersebut sudah masuk kedalam Program Legislasi Nasional (Prolegnas) di dalam DPR. Namun hingga saat ini RUU tersebut belum juga dilakukan pengesahan oleh pemerintah. Senyatanya pembentukan RUU tersebut sudah ada masuk dalam tahap urgensi seperti banyak kasus perampasan wilayah yang menimpa masyarakat hukum adat, pelanggaran hak atas free, prior, dan informed consent (FPIC) yang dimiliki oleh masyarakat hukum adat terhadap pernyataan persetujuan atas suatu agenda, pelanggaran terhadap hak konstitusional termasuk hak politik, serta perempuan adat yang sering dihadapkan terhadap permasalahan diskriminasi. Dalam RUU tentang Masyarakat Hukum Adat yang saat ini masuk dalam tahap pembahasan DPR juga tak luput dari permasalahan, beberapa pasal menimbulkan kerancuan dalam implementasinya misalkan Pasal 11 hingga Pasal 17 yang memuat mengenai proses identifikasi dan verifikasi, Pasal 6 terhadap ketentuan persyaratan, Pasal 22 terhadap ketentuan perlindungan, dan Pasal 20 terhadap ketentuan evaluasi. Beberapa pasal dan ketentuan tersebut belum mencerminkan tujuan utama pembentukan RUU tentang Masyarakat Hukum Adat, namun secara nyata hal tersebut justru banyak mengurangi hak yang seharusnya diperoleh oleh masyarakat. Hal inilah yang menjadikan pengesahan RUU tentang Masyarakat Hukum Adat menjadi hal yang penting disahkan untuk melakukan pemenuhan dan perlindungan hak asasi manusia bagi masyarakat hukum adat.

---

Indigenous Peoples, as stable and organized societies, have developed internationally, supported by the establishment of the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP), which was ratified by the UN in 2007. In Indonesia, provisions concerning indigenous peoples are outlined in Article 18B, Paragraph (2) of the 1945 Constitution. This paper is composed using doctrinal research methods. It analyses how the drafting of the Draft Law on Indigenous Peoples impacts efforts to fulfill and protect human rights for indigenous legal communities. The plan to establish the Draft Law on Indigenous Peoples has been in place since 2004, and from 2016 to 2018, the draft law was included in the National Legislation Program (Prolegnas) within the House of Representatives (DPR). However, to date, the draft law has not yet been enacted by the government. In fact, the drafting of this draft law has reached an urgent stage due to numerous cases of territorial seizures affecting indigenous legal communities, violations of the right to free, prior, and informed consent (FPIC) regarding their approval of certain agendas, violations of constitutional rights including political rights, and indigenous women often facing issues of discrimination. The Draft Law on Indigenous Peoples currently under discussion in the DPR is not without problems. Several articles cause confusion in their implementation, such as Articles 11 to 17, which cover the processes of identification and verification. Article 6, which pertains to the requirements. Article 22, which concerns protection provisions. And Article 20, which deals with evaluation provisions. These articles and provisions do not yet reflect the main objectives of forming the Draft Law on Indigenous Peoples. In fact, they often diminish the rights that should be granted to the communities. This underscores the importance of enacting the Draft Law on Indigenous Peoples to ensure the fulfillment and protection of human rights for Indigenous Peoples."