Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"Revolutionary Justice narrates the power struggle between the free officers and their adversaries in the aftermath of Egypts July revolution of 1952 by studying trials held at the revolutions court and the peoples court. The establishment of these tribunals coincided with the most serious political crisis between the new regime and the opposition, primarily the muslim brothers and the wafd party, but also senior officials in the previous government. By this point, the initial euphoria and the unbridled adoration for the free officers had worn off, and the focus of the public debate shifted to the legitimacy of the armys continued rule. Revolutionary justice focuses on what happened both within and outside the courtroom. The tribunals transcripts, which constitute the prime source of this study, afford a rare glimpse of the direct dialogue between opposing parties. The books principle argument is that the rhetoric generated by Egypts special courts played a crucial role in the denouement of the countrys political struggles, the creation of new historical narratives, and the shaping of both the regimes and the oppositions public image. The courtroom deliberations perpetuated the prevailing emergency atmosphere, which helped the junta tighten its grip on the helm and advance its plans for a new dispensation. At the same time, the responses of defendants and witnesses during the trials exposed weaknesses in the official hegemonic narrative. Paradoxically, oppositional views that the regime tirelessly endeavored to silence were tolerated and recorded in the courtroom."

"Summary:Written by a Brazilian academic with effective political experience in reforming the state, this is an innovative analysis of the effects of public management reform on the new state of the twenty-first century. The result is essential reading for all those with an interest in globalisation, the politics of the state, and government reform"

"The constitutional referendum has become a vital feature of modern constitution-making and reform. This book provides the first full-length analysis of the theoretical foundations of constitutional referendums, assessing their democratic credentials and the design decisions that affect the value and legitimacy of the referendum process. "

"Pembentukan Mahkamah Pidana Internasional atau lnternationalCriminal Court (ICC) merupakan perwujudan terpendam setelah 50tahun digelarnya Mahkamah Militer Internasional pada 1946.Sungguhpun Mahkamah menghadapi sejumlah rintangan daribeberapa negara besar namun mereka telah menjalankan fungsinyadalam penegakkan keadilan internasional terhadap kejahatanserius hak asasi manusia (IMM) sebagaimana dikenal dalamhukum internasional. Saat ini, Mahkamah mengadili kasus diRepubiik Demokratik Kongo dan beberapa kasus lainnya pada sesiPre-Triai\l Chamber. Secara fakta, banyak peserta Statuta Roma1998 merupakan negara pelanggar HAM Negara-negara sepertiRepublic Demokratic Kongo, Uganda, Republik Afrika Tengah danColombia merupakan Negara pihak dalam Statuta Roma 1998namun memiliki permasalahan terhadap pelanggaran HAM didalam negeri mereka. Dibandingkan dengan indonesia yang bukannegara peserta akan tetapi memiliki permasalahan yang sama.Indonesia sendiri berniat untuk menjadi pihak dalam Statuta Roma1998 pada 2008. Tulisan ini menjelaskan bagaimana reaksi negarakhususnya yang sedang menghadapi konflik bersenjata internalserta dalam masa transisi-baik telah menjadi pihak maupunbelum dengan perkembangan baru dalam hukum internasionalkhususnya HAM. Penulis menggunakan teori dari AndrewMoravcsik dalam artikelnya The Origins of Human Rights Regimes:Democratic Delegations in Postwar Europe, dimana negara-negaratersebar berada dalam fase tradisional menuju demokrasi danmencoba untuk "lock in" dengan hukum internasional. Dengancara inilah menurut Moravesik negara tersebut tidak dapat kembalipada masa otoritarian."