Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"This paper aims to discuss problematizations of discretion issue in the Administration Law 2014. Discretion is one of some discussed issues in the Administration Law which provides a legal guidance for bureaucrats to conduct their jobs. Drawing on Bacchi's WPR (What is problem represented to be?] approach to policy analysis, this paper interrogates what 'problemfs]' is (are] produced in the policy document, what presuppositions are used as arguments to support the 'problems', what left as unproblematic issue that is absence in the policy problematizations, and what effects are produced by the 'problem' representation. The paper finds out that rules and procedures are the key concepts which assumed as policy 'problems' related to discretion issue. Neglecting the certain rules and procedures will be considered as doing illegal action. Only public managers have the discretionary power or managerial discretion, but in a limited room, because of upper manager's intervention. However, this discretion policy remains an inefficient and rigid process in facing certain situation because, in exercising discretion, they have to obey certain rules and procedures. In addition, staffs do not have discretionary authority within their jobs although they might also face some certain situation which needs to make decisions."

"Penelitian ini bertujuan, pertama untuk mengetahui tingkat keberhasilan implementasi kebijakan penunjukan pihak ketiga dalam melaksanakan sebagian proses peneraan dan peneraan ulang meter kWh hubungannya dengan faktor-faktor kristis yang mempengaruhinya, dan kedua untuk mengetahui kesesuaian kebijakan tersebut dengan peraturan perundang-undangan yang lainnya. Menurut Edwards III, tingkat keberhasilan implementasi suatu kebijakan dipengaruhi oleh empat faktor kritis atau variabel, yaitu komunikasi, sumber daya, sikap, dan struktur birokrasi.Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa secara umum komunikasi yang terjalin, sumber daya yang tersedia, sikap para pelaksana kebijakan, dan struktur birokrasi yang ada pada saat ini tergolong cukup baik dalam mendukung pelaksanaan peneraan meter kWh oleh Perusahaan Pihak Ketiga, hal tersebut ditunjukkan dengan nilai skor relatif rata-rata yang diperoleh untuk keempat variabel tersebut sebesar 59,35%. Dari hasil penelitian juga terungkap bahwa secara umum sikap para pelaksana kebijakan hubungannya dengan sikap atas kesesuaian antara partisipasi Pihak Ketiga dalam proses peneraan meter kWh dengan peraturan perundang-undangan yang ada tergolong cukup baik.

---

This research has two targets, the first to know level of success of policy implementation of third sector designation in executing some of verification and re-verification processes meter kWh relation with critical factors influencing him, and second to know according to the policy with existing law and regulation. According to Edwards III, level of success of implementation a policy influenced by four critical factor or variable, that is communications, resource, attitude, and bureaucracy structure.

Result of research indicate that in general communications which intertwin, available resource, attitude of executors of policy, and bureaucracy structure which there is at the moment pertained good enough in supporting execution of verification of meter kWh by the Third Sector. The mentioned shown with score value relative mean obtained to be fourth of the variable equal to 59,35%. From research result is also expressed that in general attitude of the executors of policy of relation with attitude to the according to among Third Party participation in executing some of verification of meter kWh with good enough pertained existing law and regulation."

"[ABSTRAK Tesis ini merupakan kajian yang hendak melihat konsep lembaga yangberwenang dalam sebuah proses peradilan. Relevansi antar lembaga sebagaimanadimaksud yaitu Komisi Informasi dan Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara adalahberwenang dalam proses penyelesaian sengketa keterbukaan informasi publik.tujuan daripada keterbukaan informasi publik adalah dalam rangka mengawalkebebasan informasi sebagai falsafah Hak Asasi Manusia dalam generasi ketiga.Dalam penelitian ini menggunakan teori Hukum, teori Politik Hukum Nasional,Teori Pembagian Kekuasaan dan Kekuasaan Keempat, kerangka konsep yangdigunakan yaitu peradilan administrasi dalam perspektif politik hukum danKebebasan atas informasi sebagai HAM.Hasil dari penelitian menunjukan bahwa komisi informasi ditempatkanlayaknya peradilan tingkat pertama karena hasil dari putusan dapat dimintakanbanding kepada PTUN, dalam proses di PTUN menggunakan hukum acaratersendiri yang menempatkan PTUN sebagai peradilan Banding. atas hasilpenelitian maka terdapat suatu paradigma baru dalam sistem peradilan diIndonesia. Gagasan yang diambil dari penelitian adalah denganmengkonsolidasikan sistem penyelesaian sengketa informasi publik dalamperadilan khusus dibawah PTUN, Konsep demikian digunakan agar dapatmengawal dan memperkuat sistem hukum dan peradilan di Indonesia.

---

ABSTRACTThis thesis is a study that about to the concept of authorized institutionsthe process of judicial. Relevance between institutions referred to the Commissionof Information and Administrative Court is competent in the process of disputepublic resolution disclosure. Objectives rather than public disclosure is in order toguard the freedom of information as the philosophy of human rights in thirdgeneration. in this research, using the theory of Law, Nationalism Legal policy,Separation of Power Theory and Powers Fourth (De Vierde Macht), theconceptual framework used is the administrative court in the political perspectiveand freedom of information as a human rights.Results of the research showed that the commission of information likefirst instance courts as a result of the decision can be appealed to theAdministrative Court. process in the Administrative Court uses its own procedurallaw which puts the Administrative Court of Appeals. on the results of theresearch, there is a new paradigm in the justice system in Indonesia. The ideafrom research by consolidating system public information of dispute resolution ina special court under the Administrative Court. Thus, the concept is used in orderto initiate and strengthen the legal and judicial system in Indonesia.;This thesis is a study that about to the concept of authorized institutionsthe process of judicial. Relevance between institutions referred to the Commissionof Information and Administrative Court is competent in the process of disputepublic resolution disclosure. Objectives rather than public disclosure is in order toguard the freedom of information as the philosophy of human rights in thirdgeneration. in this research, using the theory of Law, Nationalism Legal policy,Separation of Power Theory and Powers Fourth (De Vierde Macht), theconceptual framework used is the administrative court in the political perspectiveand freedom of information as a human rights.Results of the research showed that the commission of information likefirst instance courts as a result of the decision can be appealed to theAdministrative Court. process in the Administrative Court uses its own procedurallaw which puts the Administrative Court of Appeals. on the results of theresearch, there is a new paradigm in the justice system in Indonesia. The ideafrom research by consolidating system public information of dispute resolution ina special court under the Administrative Court. Thus, the concept is used in orderto initiate and strengthen the legal and judicial system in Indonesia.;This thesis is a study that about to the concept of authorized institutionsthe process of judicial. Relevance between institutions referred to the Commissionof Information and Administrative Court is competent in the process of disputepublic resolution disclosure. Objectives rather than public disclosure is in order toguard the freedom of information as the philosophy of human rights in thirdgeneration. in this research, using the theory of Law, Nationalism Legal policy,Separation of Power Theory and Powers Fourth (De Vierde Macht), theconceptual framework used is the administrative court in the political perspectiveand freedom of information as a human rights.Results of the research showed that the commission of information likefirst instance courts as a result of the decision can be appealed to theAdministrative Court. process in the Administrative Court uses its own procedurallaw which puts the Administrative Court of Appeals. on the results of theresearch, there is a new paradigm in the justice system in Indonesia. The ideafrom research by consolidating system public information of dispute resolution ina special court under the Administrative Court. Thus, the concept is used in orderto initiate and strengthen the legal and judicial system in Indonesia., This thesis is a study that about to the concept of authorized institutionsthe process of judicial. Relevance between institutions referred to the Commissionof Information and Administrative Court is competent in the process of disputepublic resolution disclosure. Objectives rather than public disclosure is in order toguard the freedom of information as the philosophy of human rights in thirdgeneration. in this research, using the theory of Law, Nationalism Legal policy,Separation of Power Theory and Powers Fourth (De Vierde Macht), theconceptual framework used is the administrative court in the political perspectiveand freedom of information as a human rights.Results of the research showed that the commission of information likefirst instance courts as a result of the decision can be appealed to theAdministrative Court. process in the Administrative Court uses its own procedurallaw which puts the Administrative Court of Appeals. on the results of theresearch, there is a new paradigm in the justice system in Indonesia. The ideafrom research by consolidating system public information of dispute resolution ina special court under the Administrative Court. Thus, the concept is used in orderto initiate and strengthen the legal and judicial system in Indonesia.]"

"Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengevaluasi dampak intervensi gizi yang dilakukan pemerintah Indonesia dalam menurunkan prevalensi stunting. Intervensi tersebut bertujuan untuk memberikan tambahan anggaran bagi daerah yang diprioritaskan untuk melaksanakan upaya kesehatan masyarakat yang ditargetkan untuk mengurangi stunting. Intervensi dimulai pada tahun 2018 di 100 kabupaten/ kota dan diperluas secara bertahap untuk mencakup 260 kabupaten/ kota pada tahun 2020. Studi ini mengadopsi metode quasi-natural experiment dengan menggunakan staggered difference-in-differences dan propensity score matching pada data panel prevalensi stunting, capaian intervensi kesehatan secara agregat, dan karakteristik lainnya di tingkat kabupaten/ kota tahun 2018- 2020. Prevalensi stunting kabupaten/ kota digunakan sebagai ukuran hasil kebijakan, sedangkan dummy kabupaten/ kota prioritas digunakan untuk mengukur efek treatment dari intervensi. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa baik kabupaten/ kota prioritas maupun nonprioritas mengalami penurunan prevalensi stunting, namun penurunan prevalensi di kabupaten/ kota prioritas lebih tinggi 2,160% dibandingkan penurunan yang terjadi di kabupaten/ kota nonprioritas. Studi ini juga menemukan bahwa dampak intervensi lokasi prioritas signifikan di kabupaten/ kota wilayah Indonesia Barat dibandingkan dengan bagian Tengah dan Timur. Temuan ini menyiratkan bahwa pemilihan kabupaten prioritas mungkin bias terhadap wilayah Barat yang lebih berkembang dibandingkan dengan wilayah lainnya.

---

This study aims to evaluate the impact of Indonesian’s government public health intervention in reducing the stunting prevalence. The strategy aims to provide an additional budget for prioritized regions to implement public health measures that are targeted to reduce stunting. The intervention was started in 2018 in 100 districts and expanded in stages to cover 260 districts by 2020. This study adopts a quasi-natural experiment by employing staggered difference-in-difference and propensity score matching on regional-level 2018-2020 panel data on stunting prevalence, aggregate public health outcomes targeted under the intervention, and other regional characteristics. District’s stunting prevalence is used as a measure of the policy’s outcome while dummy of priority districts is used to measure treatment effect from the interventions. The result indicates that both priority and non-priority districts experienced a declining stunting prevalence, but the reduction of prevalence in priority districts was 2.160% higher than the reduction that occurred in non-priority districts. The study also finds that the impact of priority districts intervention is significant in districts in Western Indonesia compared to the Central and Eastern parts. This finding implies that the selection of priority districts might be biased towards Western regions which have been more developed compared to the other regions."

"Tesis ini membahas pelaksanaan Penyetaraan Jabatan Administrasi ke dalam Jabatan Fungsional di Indonesia. Melalui penyetaraan jabatan, salah satu area perubahan yang hendak diperbaiki dalam Reformasi Birokrasi adalah Bidang Kelembagaan dan Sumber Daya Manusia Aparatur. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis penyetaraan jabatan administrasi ke dalam jabatan fungsional ditinjau dari segi pengaturan dalam peraturan perundang-undangan dan teori birokrasi serta perkembangan pelaksanaan penyetaraan jabatan di Indonesia beserta kendala yang dihadapi, dan hasil yang diharapkan dari penyetaraan jabatan. Bentuk penelitian yang digunakan adalah yuridis normatif. Penelitian yang dilakukan menggunakan data sekunder. Pengumpulan data sekunder dilakukan dengan menggunakan studi dokumen/studi pustaka dari bahan-bahan pustaka. Alat pengumpulan data melalui studi dokumen. Pendekatan yang digunakan adalah pendekatan kualitatif melalui metode analisis preskriptif analitis. Hasil penelitian adalah sebagai bagian dari upaya reformasi birokrasi, penyetaraan jabatan diatur dalam Peraturan Menteri Pendayagunaan Aparatur Negara Nomor 28 Tahun 2019 tentang Penyetaraan Jabatan Administrasi ke Dalam Jabatan Fungsional dan Surat Edaran Menteri PAN RB Nomor 382 s.d. 393 Tahun 2019 tentang Langkah Strategis dan Konkret Penyederhanaan Birokrasi. Penyetaraan jabatan administrasi ke dalam jabatan fungsional pada Instansi Pusat, dilaksanakan di 34 Kementerian, 27 Lembaga Pemerintah Non Kementerian, Sekretariat Lembaga Non Kementerian, Sekretariat Lembaga Negara, dan Lembaga Penyiaran Publik. Sejumlah 23.622 Jabatan Administrasi direkomendasikan untuk penyetaraan ke jabatan fungsional, 21.954 jabatan pengawas yang dialihkan ke jabatan fungsional, namun dalam pelaksanaannya penyetaraab jabatan terkendala dari segi regulasi dan budaya birokrasi

---

This thesis discusses the Transition process of Administrative Positions to Functional Positions in Indonesia. One of the areas to be improved in Bureaucratic Reforms through this process is the Institutional and Apparatus Human Resources. This research aims to analyze the transition from administrative to functional positions based on the regulating aspect in the legislation and bureaucracy theory along with the development of the transition process in Indonesia and its obstacles, and also the expected results of the process. The method used in this research is juridical normative. This research uses secondary data that are collected by documents/literature review of the materials. Documents review is chosen to be the data collection tool for this research while the approach used is qualitative approach through prescriptive analytics method. The results of this research are a part of bureaucratic reform. The positions transition is regulated under Regulation of the Minister of State Apparatus Empowerment and Bureaucratic Reforms Number 28 of 2019 on Transition from Administrative Positions to Functional Positions and Circular of the Minister of State Apparatus Empowerment and Bureaucratic Reforms Number 382 to 393 of 2019 on Strategic and Concrete Steps for Bureaucracy Simplification. The transition from administrative positions to functional functions in Central Institutions is held in thirty-four Ministries, twenty-seven Non-Ministerial State Institutions, Secretariat of Non-Ministerial Institutions, Secretariat of State Institutions, and Public Broadcasting Institutions. There are 23.622 Administrative Positions recommended to be transitioned to functional positions. However, in the practices, the transition process is hampered by the regulatory and bureaucracy culture aspects"

"

Pasca diterapkannya LAPOR sebagai aplikasi umum dalam Sistem Pengaduan Pelayanan Publik Nasional (SP4N), setiap institusi pemerintah pusat maupun daerah harus mengintegrasikan sistem pengaduannya dengan LAPOR. KLHK RI sebagai salah satu institusi yang ternyata mengalami hambatan dalam proses integrasi tersebut karena memiliki banyak sistem pengaduan internal. Proses integrasi telah dilakukan sejak tahun 2016. Namun, proses integrasi belum berhasil mencapai tujuannya hingga saat ini. Salah satu penyebab yang ditemui adalah adanya gejala mentalitas silo dalam proses integrasi tersebut. Oleh karena itu penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui karakteristik dan faktor penyebab mentalitas silo dalam integrasi sistem pengaduan pelayanan publik di KLHK. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan post-positivist. Data yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini bersumber dari wawancara mendalam, observasi, dan studi kepustakaan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa terdapat dua faktor utama yang menjadi penyebab mentalitas silo dalam integrasi sistem pengaduan di KLHK. Dua faktor tersebut adalah minimnya pendistribusian visi dan misi dan tidak adanya kejelasan peran dan tanggung jawab aktor terkait integrasi sistem pengaduan pelayanan publik di KLHK. Sedangkan karakteristik yang dominan adalah perilaku mengutamakan keamanan dan kenyamanan unitnya sendiri dan menganggap unit lain memberikan beban tambahan. Analisis faktor dan karakteristik tersebut menggunakan teori Elemen Budaya Schein (2010) yang dikombinasikan dengan teori Faktor Penyebab Silo Schutz dan Bloch (2006).

---

LAPOR as a general application of National Public Service Complaint Management System (SP4N), makes every central and regional government institution must integrate its complaints management system with LAPOR. But apparently, one of the institutions that experienced obstacles in its integration process was the Ministry of Environment and Forestry, which has many complaints systems. The integration process has been tried since 2016. However, the integration process has not been fully successful yet in achieving its objectives. One of the causes encountered was symptoms of the silo mentality in the integration process. Therefore, this study aims to determine the characteristics and causative factors of silo mentality in the integration of the complaints management system in the Ministry of Environment and Forestry. This research is conducted using a post-positivist approach. The data are collected from in-depth interviews, observations, and literature studies. The results of the research showed that there were two main factors that led to the silo mentality in the integration of the complaints system in the Ministry of Environment and Forestry. These two factors are a lack of distribution of vision and mission and a lack of clarity on the roles and responsibilities of actors related to the integration of public service complaints systems in the Ministry of Environment and Forestry. While the dominant characteristic that shows the silo mentality is that each unit still prioritizes the safety and comfort of its unit and considers other units to provide additional burdens. Analysis of these factors and characteristics uses the theory of Schein's Cultural Elements (2010) which is combined with the theory of the Causes of Silo Schutz and Bloch (2006).

 

"

"Attempting political democratization, strengthening macroeconomic condition, and developing independent judiciary have been three sector paid more concerns in Indonesia. Beside, administrative reform in Indonesia is considered another sector that is so worth to perform since it plays significant role as prerequisite infrastructure in which other reform efforts are preceded as well as dealing with daily life public services. In doing so, taking administrative procedure law in other well-developed countries, such as the U.S, Germany, and the Netherland, Indonesia government are about to make draft of Government Administration Law. By using point of view as a practicioner of German public servant, this article emphasizes fundamental aspect of this effort in comparison to what has been preceded in Germany as well. That is distinguishing as well as separating administration from branch of political power, especially the executive, in order to maintain its independence and neutrality. It is what the respective legal draft is supposed to afford."

"ABSTRAKKontrak konstruksi merupakan jenis kontrak yang dinamis. Kompleksitaspekerjaan dan keterlibatan berbagai kepentingan menjadikan kontrak konstruksimemiliki potensi sengketa di setiap tahapan konstruksi. Oleh karena itu, para pihakdalam kontrak konstruksi harus mencari metode penyelesaian sengketa memastikantidak terhambatnya kegiatan konstruksi. Dalam FIDIC General Conditions ofContract For Construction (1st Edition, 1999) dikenal mekanisme penyelesaiansengketa dalam bentuk Dispute Adjudication Board yang putusannya bersifatmengikat dan harus dijalankan terlebih dahulu oleh para pihak meskipun adakeberatan dari salah satu pihak. Dari sini terdapat dua permasalahan yang dijadikanobjek penelitian, Pertama, kedudukan Dispute Adjudication Board dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 1999 tentang Arbitrase dan Alternatif PenyelesaianSengketa; Kedua, sifat putusan Dispute Adjudication Board yang harus dijalankanterlebih dahulu dibandingkan dengan putusan pengadilan yang bersifat serta mertaberdasarkan Hukum Acara Perdata Indonesia dan pelaksanaannya berdasarkan sifatputusan yang diterapkan oleh beberapa lembaga adjudikasi di Indonesia. Penelitianini merupakan penelitian yuridis normatif yang ditopang oleh analisa terhadapperaturan perundang-undangan dan doktrin hukum. Berdasarkan penelitian,ditemukan bahwa mekanisme Adjudikasi yang melandasi Dispute AdjudicationBoard belum diatur oleh UU Arbitrase. Meskipun demikian, terdapat beberapaperaturan sektoral yang mengatur serta beberapa institusi alternatif penyelesaiansengketa menjalankan adjudikasi. Terkait dengan putusan serta merta DisputeAdjudication Board dalam FIDIC General Conditions of Contract ForConstruction (1st Edition, 1999) dapat disimpulkan hal tersebut merupakankewajiban kontraktual yang ditetapkan para pihak diawal kontrak. Hal ini yangmembedakannya dengan putusan serta merta yang dianut dalam Hukum AcaraPerdata Indonesia di mana putusan serta merta tersebut merupakan kewenanganhakim untuk menilai dapat atau tidaknya suatu putusan dijalankan terlebih dahulu.Disamping itu, baik dalam peraturan sektoral yang telah mengatur adjudikasimaupun peraturan institusi alternatif penyelesaian sengketa dan arbitrase yangmemberikan layanan adjudikasi pada umumnya menentukan putusan adjudikasibersifat mengikat namun tidak selalu bersifat serta merta.

---

ABSTRACTConstruction contract is a dynamic contract. The complexity of the work and theinvolvement of many interests make a construction contract has potential disputesat every stages. Therefore, the parties to the construction contract should seek themethod of dispute resolution which can ensure that the dispute does not hamper theongoing work. The FIDIC General Conditions of Contract for Construction (1stEdition, 1999), recognized a mechanism of alternative dispute resolution by theform of Dispute Adjudication Board whose decision is binding and the parties shallgive promptly effect to it regardless any objections raised by one of the parties.From that point, there are two identified issues, as the object of this research, First,the position of Dispute Adjudication Board under The Law Number 30 of 1999Regarding Arbitration And Alternative Dispute Settlement; Second, comparison thenature of immediate binding effect decision between the the Dispute AdjudicationBoard's decision under The FIDIC General Conditions of Contract forConstruction (1st Edition, 1999) and court?s decision under the Civil ProcedureCode Indonesia. The comparison also considering the implementation ofadjudication?s decision by several adjudication institutions in Indonesia. The typeof research is legal reseach by analyzing the regulations and law doctrine relatedto the issues. The result of this research are, First, the underlying mechanism ofDispute Adjudication Board, has not been regulated and governed under theArbitration Act. Nonetheless, there are some sectoral rules which has govern theadjudication procedures and has also been conducted by several institutions ofalternative dispute resolution and arbitration in Indonesia as part of their services.Second, the immediate binding effect of Dispute Adjudication Board's decision canbe concluded as contractual obligations for the parties as set forth at the beginningof the contract. This is what distinguishes it from the immediate binding effect ofcourt?s decision as in the Civil Procedure Code Indonesia where the decision isunder the judges authority. Besides that, both in the sectoral regulations that havebeen set and/or institutional adjudication of alternative dispute resolution andarbitration rules, in general, determine that the adjudication decision is bindingbut does not necessarily have immediate binding effect"