Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"Di projek ini, kita harus menganalisa tata kelola dari Queensland Nickel, perusahaan Australian yang terletak di Townville, Queensland. Laporan ini akan fokus di kewajiban masing-masing direktur, struktur bisnis, and partanggung jawaban sosial. Kedepannya, kita dapat mengambil pembelajaran cara untuk membangun tata kola perusahaan yang bagus.

---

In this project, we need to analyse the governance of Queensland Nickel, an Australian company which is located in Townville, Queensland. This report will focus on the duties of each director, the business structure, and the social responsibility. Further, we can take a learning from here how to build a good corporate governance."

"Penelitian ini dilakukan untuk mengetahui pola hubungan yang terjadi diantara Pengungkapan Corporate Governance (CG) dengan Pengungkapan Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) pada perusahaan yang termasuk ke dalam kelompok industri high profile yang tercatat di Bursa Efek Indonesia. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode content analysis atas laporan tahunan perusahaan sampel pada tahun 2006. Penelitian ini menguji dua buah model penelitian. Dimana, pada pengujian pertama, Pengungkapan CG berlaku sebagai variabel dependen dan Pengungkapan CSR berlaku sebagai variabel independen, pada pengujian kedua berlaku hal sebaliknya. Selain itu, untuk lebih mengetahui faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi Pengungkapan CG dan Pengungkapan CSR, penelitian ini menggunakan beberapa variabel independen yaitu Status Afiliasi, Komisaris Independen, dan Kepemilikan Manajemen serta Ukuran Perusahaan, Resiko, dan Profitabilitas sebagai variabel pengendali. Untuk menguji masing-masing variabel terhadap Pengungkapan CG maupun Pengungkapan CSR, dilakukan analisis regresi linear berganda. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pada pengujian pertama, Pengungkapan CSR berhubungan positif dan signifikan terhadap Pengungkapan CG. Sedangkan, Resiko, Profitabilitas, Ukuran Perusahaan, serta Komisaris Independen berhubungan positif namun tidak signifikan dengan Pengungkapan CG. Sebaliknya, Kepemilikan Manajemen berhubungan negatif dan signifikan terhadap Pengungkapan CG. Selanjutnya, pada pengujian kedua hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa Pengungkapan CG, Status Afiliasi, dan Kepemilikan Manajemen berhubungan positif dan signifikan terhadap Pengungkapan CSR. Sementara, Ukuran Perusahaan dan Komisaris Independen berhubungan positif namun tidak signifikan dengan Pengungkapan CSR. Sebaliknya, Resiko berhubungan negatif dan signifikan terhadap Pengungkapan CSR.

---

This research is conducted to develop an understanding of the relationship between Corporate Governance (CG) Disclosure and Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Disclosure involving companies that are included within the high profile industry that are listed in the Indonesian Stock Exchange. The method used in developing this research is through content analysis based on companies? annual report samples taken from the year 2006. This study investigates two different model, where in the first model the consequences of CG act as an dependent variable and CSR act as an independent variable. While, in the second model the two variables act vice versa. Beside other than the interaction between those two variables, there are other independent variables that also affect CG Disclosure and CSR Disclosure such as Affiliation Status, Independent Commissioners and Management Ownership in addition to the Size of the company, Risk and Profitability as controlling variables. To test each variable?s effect towards the CG Disclosure and CSR Disclosure, a multiple linear regression analysis was done. The result in the first model shows that CSR Disclosure has a positive and significant effect to CG Disclosure. Meanwhile, Risk, Profitability, Size, and Independent Commissioners have a positive effect but insignificant to CG Disclosure. On the other hand, Management Ownership have a negative effect and significant to CG Disclosure. Then, on the second model show that CG Disclosure, Affiliation Status, and anagement Ownership have a positive and significant effect to CSR Disclosure. Meanwhile, Size and Independent Commissioners have a positive but insignificant effect to CSR Disclosure. On the other hand, Risk has a negative and significant effect to CSR Disclosure."

"Good Corporate Governance (GCG) mendapatkan perhatian luas setetah terjadinya berbagai /crisis seperti Krisis Moneter di Indonesia ataupun skandal Enron di Amerika Serikat. Lima eiemen GCG, yaitu Transparansi, Akuntabilitas, Pertonggungjawafaan, Kemandirian dan Kewajaran baik dalam arti sempit dan tuas. Dalam arti tuas GCG berkaitan dengan para stakeholders perusahaan. Di sisi lain Corporate Social Responsibility merupakan komitmen bisnis untuk memberikan kontribusi kepada masyarakat. Dengan kata lain, GCG dan CSR merupakan wujud nyata hubungan perusahaan dan masyarakat setaku stakeholders"

"The main idea of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) which has become a hot topic at the present is that companies doing businesses are not only committed to their shareholders but also their stakeholders. This commitment is shown from the contribution to develop a sustainable economy by contributing to the environment and working with employees, their families, the local community and society at large to improve their lives in ways that are good for business and for development. Through CSR, the establishment of good corporate governance will be supported. It is one of the means in realizing the principles of corporate governance established by the Organization for Economic and Co-operation andDevelopment (OECD) in 2004. OECD listed these principles which are:

1. Ensuring the basis for an effective corporate governance framework

2. The rights of shareholders and key ownership functions,

3. The equitable treatment of shareholders,

4. The role of stakeholders in corporate governance,

5. Disclosure and Transparency,

6. Responsibilities of the Board.

The principles were first endorsed back in 1999 by OECD ministers and since then they have become an international benchmark for investors, policy makers, corporations and stakeholders worldwide.

The discussion on the matter of CSR reheated in Indonesia when there were rumors that a new law will be established on the requirement and details in conducting CSR.Eventually it became the main discussion due to the approval of the draft of the much fearful new law ; Company Law article 74 (UU Perseroan Terbatas pasal 74) on July 20th, 2007 one of which paragraph states that every company operating in areas relating to natural resources is obliged to fulfill its social and environment responsibilities. The approval of this new law surely invites pros and contras from many constituents. It seems that many still feel that CSR is not necessary and only should be voluntary. The problem is when CSR was a voluntary activity, only a few are willing to carry it out furthermore to give their best to contribute on the matter. Unilever as one of the companies realizing the importance of CSR has been executing CSR since it was first established. Its reputation in the CSR implementation is recognized nationally and internationally; many have awarded Unilever for its outstanding achievements. Programs are approached using the triple bottom-line approach so that it covers the three perspectives, namely social, economy and environmental. Thus, the company formulates CSR programs mainly in three areas environment, small and medium enterprises and health and hygiene. The programs have been enormously successful and have contributed significantly to the sustainable operations of the company and its position as a market leader and as the brand preferred by the people. This excellent implementation of CSR is a mirror image of the commitment made by the company to its stakeholders; an emphasis on the growing awareness in the industry to alter companies? point of views in their purpose of existence from maximizing shareholders? value to stakeholders? value. It has also helped the implementation of good corporate governance at Unilever as CSR is one of the elements of supporting good corporate governance."

"Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menguji secara empiris pengaruh karakteristik dan tata kelola perusahaan terhadap Corporate Social Responsibility CSR Expenditure pada perusahaan publik di Indonesia. Populasi pada penelitian ini adalah perusahan yang terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia pada tahun 2013 hingga 2015. Kriteria pemilihan sampel adalah perusahaan non-finansial yang menjalankan kegiatan Corporate Social Responsibility CSR , memiliki data terkait ASEAN Corporate Governance Scorecard ACGS serta termasuk sebagai 100 perusahaan dengan nilai kapitalisasi terbesar pada tiap periode. Pengujian hipotesis dilakukan dengan menggunakan Fixed Effect Panel-Corrected Standard Errors Model.Hasil menunjukkan bahwa ukuran perusahaan, penjualan, Cash Flow from Operations CFO dan tata kelola perusahaan berpengaruh positif terhadap CSR Expenditure. Selain itu, tingkat profitabilitas dan leverage berpengaruh negatif terhadap CSR Expenditure, namun Market-To-Book MTB Ratio tidak berpengaruh terhadap CSR Expenditure perusahaan. Implikasi dari penelitian ini adalah untuk mendorong pihak perusahaan dalam meningkatkan kualitas praktik tata kelola perusahaan, dan menghimbau manajemen perusahaan untuk memperhatikan perubahan maupun perkembangan ukuran perusahaan, tingkat penjualan maupun tingkat Cash Flow from Operations CFO perusahaan.

---

This research aims to empirically examine the impact of firm's characteristics and governance towards Corporate Social Responsibility CSR Expenditure on Indonesian public listed companies. This research is based on a sample of non financial companies listed in Indonesian Stock Exchange for the period of 2013 until 2015, which proven to run Corporate Social Responsibility CSR activities, included in the ASEAN Corporate Governance Scorecard ACGS and also included as the 100 largest capitalized companies in each period.

The fixed effect regression and Panel Corrected Standard Errors PCSE approach are used to test the hypothesis of this research, with results indicating that firm's size, sales, Cash Flow from Operations CFO and Corporate Governance CG have a significant and positive impact towards CSR Expenditure. On the other hand, firm's profitability and leverage have a significant but negative impact towards CSR Expenditure. However, firm's MTB Ratio known to have no significant impact towards CSR Expenditure. The implications of this research are to encourage the company to improve the quality of their corporate governance practices, and suggests the company 39 s management to pay attention to the change and development of company's size, sales level and Cash Flow from Operations CFO level."

"Good Corporate Governance (GCG) merupakan prinsip yang mengendalikan perusahaan agar mencapai keseimbangan antara kekuatan serta kewenangan perusahaan dalam memberikan pertanggungjawabannya kepada para shareholders dan stakeholders. Empat prinsip GCG yang dijadikan pedoman, yaitu Responsibility (Pertanggungjawaban), Accountability (Akuntabilitas), Fairness (Keadilan), dan Transparancy (Transparansi). Dalam upaya pelaksanaan prinsip responsibility dari GCG tersebut, PT. KAI melaksanakan program Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR). Prinsip responsibility mempunyai hubungan yang dekat dengan CSR sebagai sarana pencapaian daya saing berkelanjutan sesuai ekspektasi stakeholders. Berdasarkan analisis studi literatur pada Annual Report PT. KAI, tertulis bahwa program CSR PT. KAI bertajuk Program Kemitraan dan Bina Lingkungan (PKBL) yang mencakup pengembangan hubungan internal dan eksternal perusahaan. Pelaksanaan PKBL PT. KAI memiliki keterkaitan dengan konsep-konsep Triple Bottom Lines CSR, yaitu profit, people, dan planet. Penerapan GCG pada program CSR PKBL juga sudah memenuhi kriteria sebagai perusahaan pelaksana GCG terbukti dari kebijakan-kebijakan yang diterapkan oleh PT. KAI. Tata kelola perusahaan dan kebijakan lain yang menyangkut CSR sebagai pedoman pelaksanaan PKBL. Artinya, prinsip GCG merupakan salah satu pilar utama dalam implementasi CSR pada PKBL PT. KAI. CSR PKBL PT. KAI secara keseluruhan dinilai sudah baik aktivitasnya sesuai dengan tahapan-tahapan implementasi CSR dan juga prinsip GCG.

---

Good Corporate Governance (GCG) is a concept that controls the company in order to achieve a balance between the strength and authority of the company in providing accountability to its shareholders and stakeholders. Four GCG guiding concept, namely Responsibility (Responsibility), Accountability (Accountability), Fairness (Justice), and Transparency (Transparency). In efforts to implement the concept of responsibility of GCG, PT. KAI implement Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR). The concept of responsibility has a close relationship with CSR as a means of achieving sustainable competitiveness in line with expectations of stakeholders. Based on the analysis of literature on the Annual Report PT. KAI, that the CSR program PT. KAI entitled “Program Kemitraan dan Bina Lingkungan (PKBL),” which includes the development of internal and external relations. Implementation of CSR PT. KAI has associated with the concepts of Triple Bottom Lines CSR, namely profit, people, and planet. Implementation of GCG on PKBL CSR program also match the criteria as a GCG company which is proved by the executor of the policies applied by PT. KAI. Corporate governance and other policies concerning CSR as CSR implementation guidelines. That is, the concept of corporate governance is one of the main pillars in the implementation of CSR in the PKBL PT. KAI. PKBL CSR on PT. KAI overall has been good activities according to the stages of implementation of the concept of CSR and GCG."

"ABSTRAKPenelitian tesis ini merupakan hasil analisis hukum tentang kebijakan efisiensi furlough yang dilakukan oleh PT. Freeport Indonesia pada tahun 2017 yang dikaitkan dengan kewajiban perusahaan dalam melaksanakan tata kelola perusahaan yang baik dan tanggung jawab sosial dan lingkungan terhadap setiap keputusan perusahaan dan kegiataan operasional perusahaan berdasarkan Peraturan Perundang-undangan di Indonesia.

---

ABSTRACTThis thesis is the results of a legal analysis about PT. Freeport furlough efficiency policy in 2017 which is associated with company's obligation to implement good corporate governance and corporote social responsibility in company's decision and company's operational activities based on Indonesia's law regulation."

"Penelitian ini menganalisis metode pengukuran ESG rating yang dikeluarkan oleh 4 lembaga pemeringkat ESG yaitu S&P , MSCI, Sustainalytics, dan Refinitiv dengan metode AHP dan Delphi dimana hasilnya akan menentukan metode mana yang paling cocok digunakan untuk menganalisa risiko ESG di  PT. PLN (PERSERO). Dari hasil pengolahan data ditemukan bahwa metode pengukuran ESG rating dari Sustainalytic memiliki nilai prioritas yang paling tinggi yaitu 43,3% hal itu tidak berbeda jauh dengan metode dari S&P dengan nilai 34,1%. Sementara itu metode dari 2 lembaga pemeringkat ESG lainnya memiliki bobot yang lebih rendah yaitu MSCI dengan 12,1% dan Refinitiv dengan 10,5%. Untuk pengelolaan risiko ESG yang efektif, PLN disarankan untuk membentuk sub-divisi risiko ESG di bawah divisi risiko strategis yang bertanggung jawab penuh terhadap risiko ESG. Dimana mitigasi untuk Risiko lingkungan adalah membuat laporan risiko iklim fisik dan kekurangan air, menetapkan tanggung jawab manajerial untuk mengurangi intensitas karbon energi, melindungi keanekaragaman hayati, rehabilitasi lingkungan. Dari risiko sosial mitigasinya adalah berkomitmen pada program tanggap darurat yang efektif dengan penetapan tanggung jawab manajerial yang jelas, komunikasi yang efektif, dan penyediaan akses layanan bagi kelompok kurang mampu, serta menciptakan lingkungan kerja yang inklusif. Dari risiko tata kelola mitigasinya adalah memperkuat program whistleblower dan menetapkan tanggung jawab manajerial terhadap penilaian risiko etis.

---

This study examines the ESG rating measurement methods issued by four ESG rating agencies: S&P, MSCI, Sustainalytics, and Refinitiv, using the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and delphi. The results determine which method is most appropriate for analyzing ESG risks at PT. PLN (Persero). Data analysis reveals that the ESG rating measurement method from Sustainalytics has the highest priority value at 43.3%, which is closely followed by the S&P method at 34.1%. The methods from the other two ESG rating agencies have lower weights, with MSCI at 12.1% and Refinitiv at 10.5%. For effective ESG risk management, PLN is advised to establish an ESG risk sub-division under the strategic risk division, which will be fully responsible for ESG risks. Environmental risk mitigation includes preparing reports on physical climate risks and water shortages, assigning managerial responsibilities to reduce energy carbon intensity, protecting biodiversity, and environmental rehabilitation. Social risk mitigation involves committing to effective emergency response programs with clear managerial responsibilities, effective communication, and providing access to services for underprivileged groups, as well as creating an inclusive work environment. Governance risk mitigation includes strengthening the whistleblower program and assigning managerial responsibilities for ethical risk assessments."

"ABSTRACTPerusahaan Multinasional (Multinaltional Enterprises MNE) memegang peranan penting dalam Tanggung Jawab Sosial Korporasi (Corporate Social Responsibility CSR) dan mempunyai kemampuan untuk mengarahkan perubahan sosial, lingkungan dan ekonomi karena mereka memiliki operasi pada lebih dari satu pasar di berbagai negara yang memungkinkan mereka untuk mempengaruhi masayarakat dimana mereka berada. Lebih dari itu tantangannya menjadi lebih besar terutama bagi perusahaan multinasional (MNE) yang memiliki operasi di negara negara berkembang (developing countries). Perusahaan multinasional akan menghadapi dilema antara globalisasi atau lokalisasi dalam menerapkan strategi tanggungjawab Sosial (CSR). Berdasarkan pertimbangan masih sangat sedikit pembahasan teoritis berkaitan dengan strategi tanggungjawab sosial (CSR) yang harus dilakukan oleh perusahaan multinasional (MNE) yang memiliki anak perusahaan di negara negera berkembang (developing countries) maka dalam tesis ini membahas lebih dalam masalah ini dengan menggunakan pendekatan yang sebelumnya dikembangkan oleh Mitchell, etal. (1997) terkait peran utama (salience) pemangku kepentingan (stakeholders) dengan mengusulkan perubahan konfigurasi pada atribut pemangku kepentingan yang sebelumnya dikemukakan oleh Mitchel (dalam hal ini : Kekuasaan / Power Legitimasi / Legitimacy dan Urgensi / Urgency) dan bagaimana masing masing atribut yang diusulkan tersebut mempengaruhi keputusan globalisasi atau lokalisasi dalam strategi tanggungjawab sosial (CSR)

---

ABSTRACTMultinational Companies (Multinaltional Companies, MNE) play an important role in Corporate Social Responsibility CSR) and have the ability to direct social, environmental and economic change because they have operations in more than one market in a varietycountry that allows them to optimize the community where they are. More than that the challenge becomes bigger for the peoplemultinational companies (MNE) that have operations in developing countries (developing countries). Multinational companies will face a dilemma between globalization or localization in implementing CSR strategies. Based on consideration there is still very littlethe social responsibility (CSR) strategy that must be carried out by multinational companies (MNE) that have subsidiaries in developing countries (developing countries), in this thesis, we discuss more about this problem by using a discussion previously developed by Mitchell, etal. (1997) related to the main (meaningful) role of stakeholders with Related to changes in stakeholder attributes previously stated by Mitchel (in this case: Power / Legitimacy / Legitimacy and Urgency / Urgency) and how each the suggested attributes are more important decisions on globalization or localization in social responsibility (CSR) strategies"