Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"Skripsi ini membahas tentang mekanisme penghitungan Pajak Penghasilan Pasal 21 atas pegawai tetap. Skripsi ini berfokus pada analisis penggunaan metode Estimasi dan Bayangan dalam menghitung PPh Pasal 21 atas pegawai tetap. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif dengan jenis deskriptif. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa penggunaan metode Estimasi dan Bayangan memiliki hasil penghitungan PPh Pasal 21 yang sama dalam setahun, tetapi dalam hal penghitungan setiap masanya terdapat perbedaan hasil. Metode Bayangan tidak dicontohkan dalam ketentuan perundangan yang berlaku, sehingga apabila terdapat penghitungan ulang oleh petugas pajak dengan metode Estimasi dan terdapat selisih kekurangan bayar, maka atas selisih kekurangan bayar PPh Pasal 21 tersebut dan sanksi administrasi perpajakan atas selisih kekurangan bayar tersebut akan ditanggung oleh pihak pemotong pajak.

---

This thesis discusses about the mechanism of calculation of Income Tax Article 21 on a permanent employee. This thesis focuses on the analysis of the use Forecast and Running method in calculating Tax Article 21 of the permanent employee. This study uses a qualitative approach with descriptive. The results of this study indicate that the use of methods Forecast and Running has the same count results Tax Article 21 in in a tax year, but in terms of counting every month there are differences in the results. Method of Running is not exemplified in in the provisions of legislation, so that if there is a recount by the tax officer with the method Forecast and there is a difference underpayment, then the difference between the underpayment of income tax Article 21 and sanctions the tax administration on the difference underpayment will be borne by the tax withholder."

"Ketidaksesuaian peraturan pelaksana Pajak Penghasilan Pasal 21 atas komisi PDLA yaitu PMK No.206/PMK.011/2012 dan Peraturan DJP No.31/PJ/2012 dalam menerapkan PTKP menimbulkan ketidakpastian hukum. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menjelaskan penerapan Pajak Penghasilan Pasal 21 PDLA yang terdapat dalam peraturan DJP dan PMK ditinjau dari aspek certainty dan pelaksanaan pemotongan PPh Pasal 21 PDLA oleh perusahaan asuransi di Indonesia sebagai withholder. Metode penelitian menggunakan pendekatan kuantitatif dengan teknis pengumpulan data wawancara mendalam. Hasil penelitian adalah peraturan DJP dan PMK menimbulkan ketidakpastian (uncertainty) hukum dalam menetapkan hak PDLA untuk mendapatkan pengurangan PTKP dan perusahan asuransi sebagai pemotong pajak menggunakan PMK sebagai acuan dalam penerapan PTKP serta menggunakan peraturan DJP dalam menerapkan tarifnya.

---

Incompatibility withholding tax regulations implementing income tax article 21 of PDLA commission is PMK No.206/PMK.011/2012 and regulation of DJP No.31/PJ/2012 in applying the taxable income can create legal uncertainty. This study aimed to explain the withholding tax provisions of Tax Income Article 21 to PDLA contained in the regulations DJP and PMK in terms of aspects certainty and explain the implementation of withholding tax of Tax Income Article 21 ​​PDLA by insurance companies in Indonesia as withholder. This study used a quantitative approach with in-depth technical analysis of interviews and literature studies.

The result of the study is that the DJP rules and PMK still pose uncertainty rules, there is uncertainty law to ensure the right PDLA as Non-Official Taxpayers for a reduction of PTKP and the insurance company as a withholder using the PMK as a reference in the application of regulatory and non-taxable income using the DJP rules apply charge."

"Peraturan BPJS Ketenagakerjaan mewajibkan pemberi kerja untuk mendaftarkan seluruh pegawainya baik itu pegawai tetap maupun Pegawai Tidak Tetap. Peraturan pelaksana perpajakan tentang PPh Pasal 21 yakin PER -16/PJ/2016 sudah mengatur secara rinci untuk pegawai tetap yang terdaftar di BPJS Ketenagakerjaan, namun belum mengatur secara rinci mengenai mekanisme penghitungan PPh Pasal 21 untuk Pegawai Tidak Tetap yang terdaftar di BPJS Ketenagakerjaan. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis kepastian hukum atas kebijakan penerapan Pajak Penghasilan Pasal 21 bagi Pegawai Tidak Tetap yang terdaftar sebagai peserta BPJS Ketenagakerjaan. Metode penelitian ini adalah postpositivist. Hasil penelitian menunjukan bahwa asas kepastian hukum dalam penerapan PPh Pasal 21 tidak sepenuhnya memenuhi indikator-indikator dari kriteria asas kepastian hukum, khususnya untuk indikator objek pajak tidak memenuhi asas kepastian hukum dalam hal penentuan Dasar Pengenaan Pajak atas iuran BPJS Ketenagakerjaan. Sebaiknya PER - 16/PJ/2016 perlu disempurnakan lagi dengan menambahkan subbab tentang contoh penghitungan PPh Pasal 21 untuk Pegawai Tidak Tetap yang terdaftar sebagai peserta BPJS Ketenagakerjaan.

---

BPJS Ketenagakerjaan regulations require employers to register all of their employees, both permanent and temporary employees. Tax regulation of Income Tax Article 21 that is PER - 16/PJ/2016 has regulated in detail for permanent employees who registered at BPJS Ketenagakerjaan, but it has not arranged in detail for temporary employees registered at BPJS Ketenagakerjaan. This study aims to analyze certainty principle of implementation Income Tax Article 21 for temporary employees registered at BPJS Ketenagakerjaan. This research method is postpositivist.

The results showed that certainty principle has not been accordance with criteria of the certainty principle. For tax object indicator it does not fulfill certainty principle in terms of determining the tax base. PER - 16/PJ/2016 should to be refined by adding a sub-section on the example of calculating Income Tax Article 21 for temporary employees registered at BPJS Ketenagakerjaan."

"ABSTRAKKebijakan Biaya Jabatan ditujukan menjadi pengurang penghasilan dalam perhitungan Pajak Penghasilan PPh Pasal 21. Kebijakan ini sudah berjalan hampir satu dekade sejak terakhir dikeluarkan yakni pada Tahun 2008 melalui PMK 250/PMK.03/2008. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis faktor penentu utama biaya jabatan serta diselaraskan dengan perkembangan ekonomi saat ini. Metode penelitian ini adalah kualitatif dengan teknik pengumpulan data . Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa faktor penentu utama kebijakan biaya jabatan adalah biaya transportasi yang dikeluarkan pegawai tetap dari rumah ke kantor serta sebaliknya dan kebijakan batas maksimal biaya jabatan tersebut perlu dilakukan penyesuaian berupa kenaikan apabila dilihat dari perkembangan ekonomi saat ini.

---

ABSTRACTThe policy of ldquo Biaya Jabatan rdquo individual operational cost is intended to be a deduction of income in the calculation of Withholding Tax Article 21 for employment income tax. This policy has been running almost a decade since the last issued in 2008 through PMK 250 PMK.03 2008. This research has goals to analyze the proxy of this policy and harmonized with the current economic development. The method of this research is qualitative. The results of this study indicate that the proxy of this policy is the cost of transportation issued by permanent employees from home to the office and vice versa and the limitation of this policy needs to be increase with the current economic development as the source."

"Saat ini permasalahan mengenai pandemi COVID-19 telah menyita perhatian dunia. Efek yang ditimbulkan nyaris terjadi di semua bidang di dalam negeri, salah satunya berdampak pada kondisi perekonomian di Indonesia. Terdapat keterkaitan dan ketergantungan antara perpajakan dengan pertumbuhan ekonomi, karena potensi perpajakan teletak pada kegiatan ekonomi. Guna membantu wajib pajak dalam mengatasi pandemi yang berkepanjangan, pemerintah mengeluarkan kebijakan yaitu Pajak Ditanggung Pemerintah (DTP) atas Pajak Penghasilan Pasal 21. Apakah hasil yang diharapkan sehubungan pelaksanaan kebijakan telah memenuhi sasaran dan tujuan dari kebijakan oleh DJP. Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah pendekatan kuantitif dengan paradigma post positivis, dengan melakukan studi lapangan dalam hal ini wawancara mendalam, dan survei dalam hal ini membagikan kuesioner kepada wajib pajak pemberi kerja Hasil dari penelitian ini adalah dalam mengevaluasi kebijakan dapat dilakukan dengan mengaitkan 6 (enam) kriteria, yaitu efektivitas, efisiensi, kesamaan, kecukupan, responsivitas, dan ketepatan.

---

Nowadays, the issue of the COVID-19 pandemic has seized the world’s attention. The effect that occur in almost all fields in the country, one of which has an impact on economic conditions in Indonesia. There is a relationship and dependence between taxation and economic growth, because the potential for taxation lies in economic activities. In order to assist taxpayers in overcoming a prolonged pandemic, the government issued a policy, namely Government-Borne Tax Incentives on Article 21 Income Tax. Have the expected result regarding the implementation of the policy by DGT. The method used in this study is a quantitative approach with a post-positivist paradigm, by conducting field studies in this case in-depth interviews, and surveys in this case distributing questionnaires to taxpayers. The result of this study is that n evaluating policies, it can be done by linking six criterias namely effectiveness, efficiency, similarity, adequacy, responsiveness, and accuracy."

"Penghasilan yang diterima oleh pengemudi ojek online merupakan potensi bagi sektor perpajakan khususnya pajak penghasilan pasal 21. Penelitian ini menganalisis perlakuan pajak penghasilan atas penghasilan pengemudi ojek online di PT. X. Pendekatan penelitian yang digunakan adalah kualitatif dengan wawancara mendalam sebagai metode pengumpulan data. Penelitian ini menunjukan PT. X memberikan tambahan penghasilan yang disebut sebagai bonus yang merupakan objek pajak penghasilan pasal 21 namun PT. X belum melakukan pemotongan atas penghasilan tersebut karena pengemudi ojek merupakan mitra perusahaan. Berdasarkan penelitian terlihat bahwa pengemudi ojek merupakan pegawai tidak tetap berdasarkan kriteria peraturan yang berlaku, sehingga perlakuan pajak penghasilan yang tepat pada pengemudi ojek online PT. X ialah dengan menggunakan aspek perpajakan pegawai tidak tetap yang diatur dalam Peraturan Direktur Jendral Pajak No. PER - 16/PJ/2016.

---

The earnings generated by ride sourcing ojek drivers presents an opportunity for taxation, especially by referring to the Income Tax Article 21. This study seeks to analyze this potential tax imposition by employing a qualitative approach based on in depth interviews as a method to collect data. This study illustrates that PT X hands out additional incomes to its drivers in the form of bonuses. While these bonuses are subject to the Income Tax Article 21, the company has not withheld any taxes from the drivers as the latter are considered as partners of the company. Using the criteria mentioned in prevailing regulations, this study concludes that ojek drivers can be considered as temporary employees. Therefore, the appropriate tax accounting for the earnings made by these drivers should be based on the tax practice for temporary employees which is formally set out in the Regulation of the Directorate General of Taxes No. PER mdash 16 PJ 2016."

"Tax as one of revenue of the country has a strategic role in funding the government operation: whether routine or development funding. As for regulator it could be used 1w the government as an accelerator of economic development by giving a conclusive stimulus for effort field.

Tax as an obligation of citizen to the state, which could be forced by law generating, contain in the implementation. The contrary generated in the form of the effort that done by the taxpayer to keep minimizes the tax payment. The contrary of the taxpayer on the tax collection is caused by the nature of the tax that does not have direct impact to the party who spend the cost.

The tax planning is an initial stage of tax management that is integrated part of the strategic management of the entire company. Therefore that will be necessary if the tax planning conducted has the contribution to determine the success of strategic management made by the company.

Income tax-article 21 is one of direct taxes that the third party conducts the collection by deducting the obliged or paid amount. The employer shall account, deduct, and report the amount of the deducted tax.

In this thesis, writer discusses the planning of income tax article 21 that conducted by PT. XYZ. The planning of income tax article 21 conducted is to minimize the tax burden especially corporate income tax as minimum as possible.

The main problem of the research could be formulated as: How PT. XYZ conducting the planning of income tax article 21 so that the main objective of the planning which is to minimize tax burden could be obtained and to avoid the wasting of the company's resources optimally caused by administrative sanction in the form of fine, interests, or the tax increase and criminal sanction.

The objective of this thesis writing was to explain the terms of taxation law affected and to find out whether tax planning could minimize the amount of tax burden that should be paid by PT. XYZ.

Writing method of the thesis is descriptive analyze, which is, by description the existing data then analyzing them to resolve the main problem of the research.

At the end, conclusion and suggestion will be given. Conclusion contains whether the tax planning that conducted by PT. XYZ has already accord to the terms of affecting tax and reach the objective of the planning itself and the suggestions contains a thought contribution from writer for the implementation of tax planning in PT. XYZ to be better and more effective."

"Pandemi COVID-19 berdampak signifikan terhadap sektor kehidupan manusia, seperti konstruksi, sehingga Pemerintah Indonesia memberikan insentif perpajakan di mana salah satunya adalah insentif Pajak Penghasilan Pasal 21 Ditanggung Pemerintah. Namun, realisasi insentif tersebut cukup rendah pada tahun 2020 dan mengalami peningkatan signifikan pada tahun 2021. Penelitian ini ditujukan untuk menganalisis faktor-faktor deteminan dalam implementasi kebijakan insentif PPh Pasal 21 DTP untuk pekerja pada sektor konstruksi menggunakan teori implementasi dari Grindle dengan menggunakan dimensi content of policy dan context of implementation. Pendekatan penelitian ini adalah post positivistdengan teknik analisa data secara kualitatif. Jenis data yang digunakan adalah data primer dan sekunder yang didapatkan dengan mengaplikasikan teknik pengumpulan data melalui field research melalui wawancara mendalam dan studi kepustakaan. Penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa implementasi kebijakan insentif PPh Pasal 21 DTP telah memberikan kebermanfaatan bagi pegawai pada sektor konstruksi. Implementasi tersebut pun dipengaruhi oleh sembilan determinan berdasarkan teori implementasi dari Grindle Indikator di mana interests affected menunjukkan keputusan perusahaan konstruksi memanfaatkan insentif adalah untuk membantu para pegawainya, type of benefits menunjukkan adanya kebermanfaatan bagi pegawai perusahaan konstruksi dengan bertambahnya penghasilan yang diterima, extent of change envisioned menunjukkan keikutsertaan perusahaan konstruksi didasarkan pada tujuan yang jelas untuk membantu pegawai, site of decision making meunjukkan bahwa keputusan perusahaan konstruksi telah melalui proses pengambilan keputusan pada jajaran direksi, program implementors menunjukkan adanya keterlibatan banyak pihak dalam implementasi kebijakan insentif PPh Pasal 21 DTP, resources committed menunjukkan adanya sumber daya yang digunakan perusahaan konstruksi dan juga Kementerian Keuangan dalam implementasi kebijakan insentif PPh Pasal 21 DTP, power, interest, and strategies of actor involved menunjukkan adanya kekuatan, keinginan, dan strategi perusahaan konstruksi untuk memanfaatkan insentif PPh Pasal 21 DTP, institution and regime characteristics menunjukkan adanya alasan perusahaan konstruksi untuk memanfaatkan insentif PPh Pasal 21 DTP, compliance and responsiveness menunjukkan adanya kepatuhan perusahaan konstruksi untuk menjalankan kewajiban pelaksanaan pemotongan, penyetoran, dan pelaporan PPh Pasal 21 DTP. Selain itu, ditemukan dua faktor pendukung, yaitu kondisi finansial wajib pajak dan kepatuhan wajib pajak. Namun, terdapat empat faktor penghambat, antara lain keterlambatan petunjuk teknis, kurangnya sosialisasi dari pemerintah, terbatasnya wajib pajak yang berhak memanfaatkan insentif, dan kendala administratif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa perlu apresiasi kepada pemerintah dengan keseriusannya untuk membantu pegawai terdampak pandemi COVID-19 dan juga mendorong wajib pajak agar lebih aktif dalam menjalankan kewajiban perpajakan. Namun, terdapat beberapa hal yang perlu ditingkatkan oleh pemerintah, seperti sosialisasi, kesiapan sistem perpajakan, dan dampak yang ditimbulkan suatu kebijakan kepada masyarakat.

---

COVID-19 has impacted human activities, significantly construction, and the government of Indonesia has stipulated several tax incentives that include tax incentives on employment income tax borne by the government. The realization of the tax incentive was low in 2020 and significantly increased in 2021. This research is purposed to analyze the determinant factor of implementation of a tax incentive on employment income tax borne by the government in the construction sector with the theory of implementation by Grindle. The approach of this research is post-positivist with a qualitative analysis method. The types of data are primary and secondary through interviews and literary studies. The research has shown that the implementation of a tax incentive on employment income tax borne by the government has given a positive impact on the employee in the construction sector. The implementation is affected by the determinant factor of the theory of implementation by Grindle that interests affected shows that the construction company have applied for the incentive with a purpose to help its employee; type of benefits shows that the benefit of the incentive is the increment of income of the construction employee; extent of change envisioned shows that the construction company has a good reason to apply for the incentive which is to help its employee; site of decision making shows that the construction company has had decision making process in the management; program implementors shows that there were a lot of people who have involved in the implementation process; resources committed; power, interest, and strategies of the actor involved shows that the construction company has shown the power, interest, and strategies to involved in the incentive; institution and regime characteristics shows that each stakeholder has its own reason to involved in the incentive; and compliance and responsiveness shows the obedient and responsibility of the stakeholders. Moreover, this research finds out that financial condition and compliance are the supporting factors. On the other hand, delay of the guidance, lack of information, limited recipient, and administrative problems are the obstacles that have affected the implementation. This research has also shown that the government should be appreciated for the effort and encourage the taxpayers to be more active. However, the government needs to improve the accessibility of information, the tax system, and the policy’s effect on the taxpayers."

"Peraturan PER-31/PJ/2012 tidak mencantumkan kata ?magang? seperti yang ditetapkan pada PER-31/PJ/2009. Oleh sebab itu, penerima penghasilan magang dapat diklasifikasikan menjadi 3 (tiga) golongan, hal ini berarti bertentangan dengan asas kepastian hukum karena memiliki penafsiran yang berbeda (Nurmantu, 1994:110). Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk menganalisis pengenaan Pajak Penghasilan (PPh) Pasal 21 atas penghasilan magang ditinjau dari asas kepastian hukum dan untuk menganalisis pengenaan PPh Pasal 21 yang benar atas penghasilan magang. Demi menjawab pokok permasalahan, penelitian menggunakan teori asas kepastian hukum yang dicetuskan oleh Mansury (1996:5) sebagai tolak ukur pengujian. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan kuantitatif, dengan jenis penelitian deskriptif dan teknik pengumpulan data wawancara mendalam. Hasil penelitian ini membuktikan bahwa pengenaan PPh Pasal 21 atas penghasilan peserta magang belum memenuhi asas kepastian hukum. Pengenaan PPh Pasal 21 yang benar atas penghasilan magang yaitu mengklasifikasikan penerima penghasilan magang sebagai Pegawai Tidak Tetap.

---

PER-31/PJ/2012 regulation doesn?t mention ?internship? word as mentioned in PER-31/PJ/2009. Therefore, internship employee could be classified into 3 (three) categories, this means a contradiction to certainty principle (Nurmantu, 1994:110). This research aims to analyze the mechanism of withholding income tax Article 21 on the internship income based on certainty principle and to analyze the correct withholding tax of internship income. This research used certainty principle (Mansury, 1996:5) to answer the main issues. This descriptive research used quantitative approach with in depth interview as data collection technique. Result of this research is withholding tax Article 21 of internship income still has a contradiction to legal certainty principle. The correct income tax Article 21 imposition on internship income is classified internship employee as Temporary Employee."

"Laporan ini bertujuan untuk mengevaluasi proses rekapitulasi PPh (Pajak Penghasilan) Pasal 23 yang harus disetorkan oleh PT J selaku pemotong. Hasil rekapitulasi PPh 23 memudahkan PT J dalam melakukan perhitungan dan penyetoran PPh 23 dan pelaporan SPT Masa PPh 23. Berdasarkan hasil evaluasi, proses rekapitulasi PPh 23 yang dilakukan oleh PT J telah sesuai dengan ketentuan peraturan perpajakan yang berlaku.

---

This report evaluates the recapitulation process of Article 23 Income Tax Payable, which should be settled by PT J as a collector. The result of recapitulation of Article 23 Income Tax Payable assist PT J in calculation and settle Article 23 Income Tax Payable and periodic tax return submission. Based on the result of evaluation, the recapitulation process performed by PT J has complied with the tax regulation."