Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"Designed to accompany Epistemology: An Anthology or stand alone as a concise primer, this is a straightforward and accessible introduction to contemporary epistemology for those studying the topic for the first time. A step-by-step introduction to contemporary epistemology, with coverage of skepticism, epistemic justification, epistemic closure, virtue epistemology, naturalized epistemology, and more ; Explains the main arguments of the most influential publications from the last 50 years ; Contextualizes key concepts and themes, instead of treating them in isolations ; Straightforward and accessible for those studying the topic for the first time ; Designed to accompany the second edition of Epistemology: An Anthology (Wiley Blackwell, 2008), but stands on its own as a concise introduction to the key ideas and arguments in epistemology"--Provided by publisher."

"Summary:This comprehensive anthology of classic and contemporary readings by leading philosophers complements Robert Audi's Epistemology: A Contemporary Introduction (Routledge, 1997). Each topic is carefully introduced by the editor"

"Tesis ini membahas mengenai perkembangan epistemologi dan peran perempuan dalam pengetahuan melalui pemikiran dan kritik Sandra Harding. Studi mengenai perempuan tidak akan relevan tanpa adanya epistemologi yang berbasis feminisme karena setiap studi mengenai perempuan berdasarkan pada kacamata patriarkal. Oleh karena itu, diperlukan epistemologi baru untuk mencapai pemahaman yang lebih konkrit mengenai perempuan sebagai subjek yang setara dengan laki laki dalam pengetahuan.

---

The focus of this study is to examine epistemology development and women role on knowledge from critics and notion by Sandra Harding. Study about women wont become relevant without feminism based epistemology, because every study about women are based on patriarchy viewpoint. Because of this, we need a new epistemology to reach more concrete understanding about women as equal subject as men on knowledge."

"ABSTRAKSkripsi ini membahas cara menjamin keterandalan sumber pengetahuan testimoni di era teknologi informasi dan komunikasi. Perdebatan mengenai cara menjustifikasi testimoni dilatari oleh tradisi epistemologi modern yang tercermin pada argumentasi reduksionisme dan anti-reduksionisme. Reduksionisme merujuk pada tesis bahwa jaminan keyakinan berbasis testimoni mesti dilandaskan pada sumber non-testimoni seperi persepsi inderawi dan penalaran induktif. Sedangkan, anti-reduksionisme menyatakan bahwa keterandalan pengetahuan testimonial dapat dijamin oleh testimoni itu sendiri. Thesis ini berpijak pada prinsip kebenaran yang akan dibagikan oleh pemberi maupun penerima testimonisecara alami karena niat baikyang melekat padanya. Penelitian ini menolak prinsip justifikasi yang dipakai oleh reduksionisme dan anti-reduksionisme. Sebab, prinsip justifikasi tidak menghitung keterlibatan aktif agen epistemik sebagai pemberi dan penerima testimoni serta mengabaikan risiko gullibility dan intellectual irresponsibility pada proses akuisisi dan transmisi testimoni. Berdasarkan problem tersebut, skripsi ini hendak mendemonstrasikan prinsip kebajikan intelektual sebagai upaya teoretis yang lebih baik daripada prinsip justifikasi dalam menjamin keterandalan sumber pengetahuan testimoni.

---

ABSTRACTThis undergraduate thesis discusses the problem of testimony rsquo s reliability in the age of infosphere. The early argumentation of the justification of testimony typically traced to two views reductionism and anti reductionism. According to reductionists, to justify testimonial knowledge acquired by the hearer from a speaker, we need to possess non testimonial source of knowledge, such as inductive reasoning or perception. In contrast to reductionism, anti reductionists argue that testimony is a basic source of justification. This research refutes the principle of justification in both reductionism and anti reductionism to answer the problem of reliability in testimony because of two reasons first, the principle of justification fails to see the active roles of a speaker and a hearer in knowledge acquisition, second, the principle of justification ignores the risk of gullibility and intellectual irresponsibility in the process of transmission of testimony. Based on the problems of principle of justification, I will demonstrate how intellectual virtues of virtue epistemology have better approach to warrant the reliability of testimony. "

"This is a collection of original contributions from a group of eminent philosophers and philosophers of education, who sketch the implications of advances in contemporary epistemology for education. This book contains new papers on education and social and virtue epistemology contributed by a range of eminent philosophers and philosophers of education. This book reconceives epistemology in the light of notions from social and virtue epistemology. It demonstrates that a reconsideration of epistemology in the light of ideas from social and virtue epistemology will in turn re-invigorate the links between epistemology and education."