Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"This study primarily sought to compare levels of child behaviour and parental anxiety during tooth extraction under inhalation sedation (IS) or general anaesthesia (GA). A prospective study was carried out within the Charles Clifford Dental Hospital, Sheffield, UK. The sample comprised 46 IS patients (mean age 11.5 years) and 48 GA patients (mean age 9.4 years) who attended the hospital for dental extractions. Child behaviour was assessed before, during and after treatment using a Frankl Scale. After treatment, parents completed a questionnaire, which sought a measure of parental anxiety before and during treatment, and parental satisfaction with the treatment outcome. Visual Analogues Scales (VAS) were employed to grade the responses. The majority of children complied well throughout their treatment, with no significant differences in parental assessment of child anxiety levels between IS and GA patients. However, GA parents were significantly more anxious than IS parents before and during treatment. About a third of GA parents reported they were worried about the risks of GA. Conclusion; It would appear that parents of children undergoing a GA are significantly more anxious about the treatment than IS parents. Furthermore, IS has been shown to be a viable alternative to GA in alleviating anxiety in children and their parents during tooth extractions."

"Latar Belakang: Tindakan pembedahan dengan invasi minimal seperti laparoskopi abdomen seringkali menjadi modalitas terpilih dengan perkembangan teknologi. Selama pembedahan, digunakan teknik anestesi umum pada pasien. Teknik anestesi yang ideal adalah teknik yang dapat menjaga kestabilan kardiovaskular dan respirasi, mengurangi kejadial mual muntah pascabedah, serta dapat mengurangi derajat nyeri pascabedah. Namun, prosedur laparoskopi menyebabkan perubahan fisiologis akibat kondisi pneumoperitoneum yang disebabkan oleh insuflasi gas karbon dioksida selama pembedahan, yang merupakan sebuah tantangan tambahan dalam pemberian anestesi yang ideal. Maka, penelitian ini bertujuan untuk membandingkan efektivitas penggunaan kombinasi anestesi umum dan spinal dengan anestesi umum saja dalam pembedahan laparoskopi abdomen.Metode: Penelitian ini merupakan uji klinik acak terkendali tanpa penyamaran pada pasien laparoskopi abdomen di Rumah Sakit Cipto Mangunkusumo. Pemberian anestesi umum menggunakan lidokain, fentanyl, propofol, dan rocuronium. Pemberian anestesi spinal menggunakan bupivakain 10 mg. Luaran yang dinilai berupa kebutuhan opioid intraoperatif, kestabilan MAP, nyeri pascabedah, dan kejadian post-operative nausea and vomiting (PONV).Hasil: Kombinasi anestesi umum dan spinal menyebabkan penurunan kebutuhan opioid fentanyl intraoperatif (p<0.001), kestabilan MAP yang lebih baik (p<0.009), dan penurunan nyeri pascabedah secara signifikan dibandingkan kelompok anestesi umum. Tidak terdapat perbedaan signifikan dari tingkat kejadian PONV. Simpulan: Kelompok anestesi umum dan spinal menunjukan penurunan kebutuhan opioid intraoperatif dan MAP yang lebih stabil pada tindakan laparaskopi dibandingkan dengan kelompok anestesi umum.

---

Background: Minimally invasive surgical procedures such as laparoscopic abdominal surgery have often become the preferred modality with technological advancements. During surgery, general anesthesia techniques are employed in patients. The ideal anesthesia technique is one that can maintain cardiovascular and respiratory stability, reduce postoperative nausea and vomiting, and alleviate postoperative pain. However, laparoscopic procedures induce physiological changes due to pneumoperitoneum conditions caused by the insufflation of carbon dioxide gas during surgery, posing an additional challenge in achieving ideal anesthesia. Therefore, this study aims to compare the effectiveness of using a combination of general and spinal anesthesia with general anesthesia alone in laparoscopic abdominal surgery.

Methods: This research is a controlled randomized clinical trial without masking on patients undergoing laparoscopic abdominal surgery at Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital. General anesthesia is administered using lidocaine, fentanyl, propofol, and rocuronium, while spinal anesthesia is administered using bupivacaine. The assessed outcomes include intraoperative opioid requirements, MAP stability, postoperative pain, and the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV).

Results: The combination of general and spinal anesthesia resulted in a significant reduction in intraoperative fentanyl opioid requirements (p<0.001), better MAP stability (p<0.009), and a significant decrease in postoperative pain compared to the general anesthesia group. There was no significant difference in the incidence of PONV .

Conclusion: The combination of general and spinal anesthesia group showed decreased intraoperative opioid requirements and more stable in mean arterial pressure (MAP) during laparoscopic procedures compared to general anesthesia group."

"Latar Belakang: Insidens postdural puncture headache menggunakan jarum spinal ukuran kecil belum pernah diteliti di RSUPNCM. Saat ini di tempat kami jarum spinal yang tersedia yaitu jarum spinal Quincke ukuran 25G, 26G, dan 27G. Metode: Penelitian observasional ini dilakukan secara prospektif untuk mencari insidens postdural puncture headache sampai 72 jam pasca-anestesia spinal. Faktor-faktor risiko yang berhubungan dengan pasien dan prosedur dihubungkan dengan PDPH dan dilakukan analisis regresi linear terhadap faktor-faktor tersebut. Hasil: Insidens postdural puncture headache pasca-anestesia spinal sebesar 6,6%. Kelompok usia <50 tahun memiliki kemungkinan 3 kali PDPH dibanding kelompok umur lebih tua. Jarum spinal 25G/26G Quincke memiliki kemungkinan 2 kali risiko MPDPH dibandingkan jarum 27G. Kesimpulan: Insidens postdural puncture headache setelah anesthesia spinal di RSUPNCM tidak berbeda dengan hasil laporan di tempat lain.

---

Background : Incidence of postdural puncture headache using small spinal needles was not yet investigated in RSUPNCM. In our centre we use Quincke spinal needle sizes 25G, 26G, and 27G.

Methods : The incidence of postdural puncture headache was prospectively investigated until 72 hours after spinal anesthesia in 440 patients at RSUPNCM. Patient and procedure related factors were recorded and submitted to multiple logistic regression analysis to determine the relationship of these factors to postdural puncture headcahe.

Results: The incidence of postdural puncture headache after spinal anesthesia were 6,6%. The age <50 years old is identified increase three times for PDPH compare to older. Larger needles Quincke (25G/26G) is identified increase twice for PDPH compare to 27G.

Conclusion : The incidence of postdural puncture headache after spinal anesthesia at RSUPNCM is comparable to those reported elsewhere."

"ABSTRAKLatar Belakang: Quality of Recovery-40 (QoR-40) adalah salah satu instrumen yang telah digunakan luas di dunia untuk menilai kualitas pemulihan pascaanestesia umum. Saat ini belum ada instrumen spesifik yang menilai kualitas pemulihan pascaanestesia di Indonesia.Metode: Hasil terjemahan akan diujikan pada minimal 102 pasien yang menjalani anestesia umum satu hari praoperasi dan satu hari pascaoperasi. Uji kesahihan isi menggunakan koefisien Aiken v, uji kesahihan konstruksi (analisis faktor dan uji korelasi pearson), Konsitensi Internal ( Chronbach α), ketanggapan (responsiveness) dengan Standart respon mean (SRM) .Hasil: Uji kesahihan isi formula Aiken V didapatkan bahwa QoR-40 versi Indonesia sahih dengan nilai ≥ 0,5. Uji kesahihan konstruksi dengan analisis faktor menunjukan semua faktor memiliki korelasi yang tinggi (korelasi ≥ 0,5). Uji korelasi Pearson didapatkan 3 item pertanyaan dari dimensi dukungan tehadap pasien yang tidak sahih, (Mendapat dukungan dari dokter Rumah Sakit, ρ= 0,252), (Mampu memahami arahan dan nasehat ρ= 1,98), (Merasa bingung ρ= 0,202). Standart Respon Mean (SRM) pada Uji ketanggapan adalah 1,06. Terdapat hubungan negatif antara skor QoR-40 versi Indonesia dengan lama masa rawatanSimpulan: QoR - 40 versi Indonesia menunjukkan kesahihan dan keandalan yang memuaskan. Dimensi dukungan terhadap pasien dengan koefisien kesahihan terendah dan tiga pertanyaan yang tidak memiliki kesahihan konstruksi. Ada hubungan negatif antara skor QoR - 40 versi Indonesia dengan panjang pengobatan . Penelitian ini menghasilkan instrumen QoR - 40 versi Indonesia yang memiliki ketanggapan atau sensitif untuk menilai perubahan klinis pascanestesia umum.

---

ABSTRACTBackground: Quality of Recovery-40 (Qor-40) is one of the instruments that have been used widely in the world to assess the quality of recovery after general anesthesia. Currently there is no specific instrument that assesses the quality of recovery after general anesthesia in Indonesia.Methods: The translation will be tested on at least 102 patients undergoing general anesthesia preoperative one day and one day postoperative. Test the validity of the content using the coefficient Aiken V, Construction validity (factor analysis and Pearson correlation), Internal consistency (Chronbach α), responsiveness with Standard response mean (SRM).Results: Test the content validity of Aiken V formula found that Qor-40 Indonesian version valid with a value of ≥ 0.5. Test construction validity by factor analysis showed all the factors have a high correlation (correlation ≥ 0.5). Pearson correlation test item obtained 3 question in patient support dimension not valid, ( Getting support from Hospital doctors, ρ = 0.252), (Able to understand the direction and advice of ρ = 1.98), (Feeling confused ρ = 0.202). SRM on test responsiveness 1,06. There is a negative correlation between the scores Qor-40 version Indonesia with long term careConclusion: QoR-40 Indonesian version showed satisfactory validity and reliability. Dimensions support to patients with the lowest validity coefficient and three questions that do not have construction validity. There is a negative relationship between the score Qor-40 version of Indonesia with the length of treatment. This research resulted in the instrument Qor-40 Indonesia version (responsivness) or sensitive to assess clinical changes after general anesthesia."