Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"Advises how to mobilize support in order to make forest policy relevant. This book gives an introduction in the methodology of social sciences. It is a guideline for all those who are interested in the use and protection of the forest. It shows how to identify political options for solving issues of the forest. "

"ABSTRAKHutan rakyat kemitraan telah dianggap sebagai strategi baru dalam menghadapi masalah sosial ekonomi yang dihadapi oleh model pengelolaan konvensional bersamaan dengan masalah keberlanjutan pasokan bahan baku kayu industri. Melalui kebijakan, pemerintah telah berupaya mendukung pembangunannya. Beberapa fakta menunjukan potensi kayu hutan rakyat bernilai di bawah tegakan normal mengindikasikan belum tercapainya keberlanjutan. Penelitian ini bertujuan: 1 menganalisis kebijakan kemitraan hutan rakyat dari aspek kerjasama sarana prasarana produksi, pendampingan, modal usaha, dan pasar kayu beserta implementasinya, 2 menganalisis pengelolaan tegakan hutan rakyat kemitraan berdasarkan kriteria silvikultur, pendapatan petani dan pengendalian tebang butuh, dan 3 merumuskan kebijakan hutan rakyat kemitraan yang berkelanjutan. Content analysis digunakan untuk mengidentifikasi seluruh produk kebijakan terkait, evaluasi implementasi dianalisis menggunakan metode evaluasi formal. Analisis deskriptif digunakan untuk menganalisis pengelolaan tegakan di lokasi penelitian dan Analitical Hierarchy Process AHP sebagai metode dalam merumuskan konsep kebijakan kemitraan hutan rakyat yang berkelanjutan. Hasil penelitian menunjukan bahwa kebijakan saat ini lebih fokus terhadap bantuan sarana dan prasarana produksi sebagai aspek kerjasama. Tingkat implementasi kebijakan tergolong rendah dengan nilai capaian sebesar 16,28 sementara 43,75 hutan rakyat kemitraan di lokasi penelitian tidak berkelanjutan dilihat dari potensi tegakannya. Analisis pengelolaan tegakan menunjukan silvikultur memiliki peran dominan dengan nilai skala kriteria paling tinggi. Penelitian ini juga membuktikan bahwa pendampingan petani menjadi kunci utama dalam mengembangkan kebijakan kemitraan hutan rakyat yang mendukung keberlanjutan.

---

ABSTRACTAs a new strategy to solve socio economic problems faced by conventional private forest management along with sustainability issue of industrial wood supply, government has issued policies to support the development of private forest partnership between forest farmers group and timber based industry. Some facts showed private forest partnership has low standing stock that indicates the private forest sustainability has not been reached yet. This research is aimed to 1 analyze private forest partnership policy and its implementation between forest farmer group and timber based industry in terms of cooperation aspects production facilities and infrastructure, fostering, financial support and timber market 2 analyze wood standing stock management based on criteria of silviculture, cutting needs behavior and farmers income and 3 formulate the sustainable private forest partnership policy. Content analysis was utilized to identify all policies related to private forestry partnerships, while the policy implementation was analyzed by the formal evaluation method. Descriptive method was implemented to analyze the standing stock management and Analytical Hierarchy Process AHP as a method to formulate the concept of sustainable private forest partnership policy. The results showed that private forest partnership policy now is more focused on production facilities and infrastructure aspect. The level of policy implementation in research location is at low grade, it was only reached 16,28 , while 43,75 of private forest partnerships in the research area are not sustainable due to the low of its standing stock. Analysis of wood standing stock management indicated that silviculture play dominant role with its highest value on scale of standing stock management criteria. This research also proved that fostering the farmers is a key factor to develop sustainable private forest partnership policy."

"Penelitian ini menganalisis pengaruh kebijakan pengendalian penggunaan kawasan hutan terhadap luas IPPKH tambang mineral dan batubara di Indonesia pada periode 2008-2017. Kebijakan pengendalian penggunaan kawasan hutan yaitu kebijakan moratorium izin dan kebijakan kenaikan tarif PNBP PKH yang dianalisis melalui pendekatan model ARIMA dengan melakukan proyeksi data sebelum kebijakan yang diidentifikasi sebagai Business As Ussual BAU dari IPPKH tanpa kebijakan dan selanjutnya BAU dibandingkan dengan data aktual setelah kebijakan untuk melihat pengaruh kebijakan tersebut. Kebijakan pengendalian penggunaan kawasan hutan lainnya yaitu kebijakan kuota IPPKH dianalisis dengan pendekatan deskriptif dan analisis spasial terhadap pola sebaran dan model ekspansi IPPKH tambang. Selain itu, dilakukan wawancara mendalam terhadap narasumber yang kompeten untuk memperdalam analisis. Hasil analisis mengindikasikan kebijakan moratorium izin tidak efektif mengurangi luas IPPKH tambang mineral dan batubara sedangkan kebijakan kenaikan tarif dan perubahan skema pungutan PNBP PKH terindikasi mampu mengendalikan luas IPPKH tambang mineral dan batubara. Untuk kebijakan kuota luas IPPKH tambang, kebijakan ini cenderung mendorong terjadinya usaha penguasaan kawasan hutan oleh perusahaan tambang dan persaingan untuk mendapatkan IPPKH tambang khususnya pada wilayah yang kaya sumber daya alam.

---

This research analyzes the influence of policy of controlling the use of forest area against IPPKH area of mineral and coal mine in Indonesia in the period of 2008 2017. The policy of controlling the use of forest areas is the policy of permit moratorium and the policy of tariff increase of PNBP PKH is analyzed through ARIMA model approach by doing data projection before policy identified as Bussines As Ussual BAU of IPPKH without policy and BAU then compared with actual data after policy to see influence of the policy. The other policy of controlling the use of forest areas is the IPPKH quota policy is analyzed by descriptive approach and spatial analysis on the distribution pattern and expansion model of IPPKH mine. In addition, in depth interviews were conducted to competent sources to deepen the analysis.

The results of the analysis indicate that the policy of permits moratorium is ineffective reduces the extent of IPPKH of mineral and coal mines while the policy of tariff increase and the change of PNBP PKH levy scheme is indicated to be able to control the extent of IPPKH of mineral and coal mines. For IPPKH 39 s broad quota policy, this policy tends to encourage forestry companies 39 control of forest areas and competition to obtain IPPKH mines, especially in rich natural resources areas. "

"Penelitian ini menjelaskan dampak proses globalisasi dan otonomi khusus yang terjadi secara bersamaan pada pengelolaan huitan berkelanjutan di Provinsi Aceh. Dengan menggunakan pendekatan kualiitatif, tiga aspek diteliti: respons kebijakan dan institusi oleh pemerintah Aceh dan dampaknya pada keberlanjutan dua ekosistem penting, Leuser dan Ulu Masen. Teori proses kebijakan dan ekologi politik digunakan untuk menjelaskan narasi, aktor dan jaringan, serta kepentingan yang mempengaruhi pembuatan dan hasil kebijakan. Indeks Tata Kelola Hutan yang Baik dengan menggunakan teknik Multi Dimentional Scaling digunakan untuk mengukur kinerja lembaga yang mengurus konservasi yang dibentuk Pascatsunami di Aceh. Teknik yang sama digunakan untuk mengukur keberlanjutan kawasan hutan dengan melibatkan lima dimensi pengelolaan hutan di Aceh. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan terdapat empat narasi dengan berbagai aktor dan kepentingan terlibat dalam proses kebijakan kehutanan/konservasi di Aceh. Kebijakan dan lembaga yang dibentuk pascatsunami memiliki kinerja kurang baik dan status keberlanjutan kawasan hutan juga kurang berkelanjutan. Berdasarkan temuan ini, sebuah model kemitraan pemerintah-swata diusulkan untuk mengelola kawasan hutan Aceh secara berkelanjutan di masa mendatang.

---

This research explains the impact of parallel processes of asymmetric decentralization in the form of special autonomy and globalization through REDD+ on sustainable forest management in Aceh Province, Indonesia. Using qualitative approach, three key aspects are studied: the policy and institutional responses of the government of Aceh and the sustainability of forest management for two important ecosystems: Leuser and Ulu Masen. Political ecology and policy process theories are used to explain the narratives behind a policy, the actors involved, and the political interests influencing the policy making and outputs. Good Forest Governance index by using Multi Dimensional Scaling (MDS) technique is used to measure the performance of conservation institutions formed during the post tsunami Aceh. Similar MDS technique is used to develop sustainability index by looking at five dimensions of sustainable forest management in Aceh.

The results show that four main narratives with different actors and political interests involved in influencing forest conservation arena in Aceh. The conservation policy and institutions formed in post-tsunami Aceh have not performed well and the sustainability status for the two ecosystems studied are less sustainable. Based on these results, a model of public-private partnership is developed to manage future forest conservation in Aceh."

"This paper investigates how the potential of the newly enacted village forest policy to improve the welfare of local people and examines how different actors at local level perceive a legal framework suitable for improving the welfare of local people and enhancing local development. We conducted research through in-dept interviews involiving 75 respondents from different actors, such as policy makers, politician, village chief, customary chief and villagers. The research establish that forest policy on village forestry was a good option for local people to improve their welfare; however, litle understanding of the substance of the newly village forest policy of local development actors due to limited public consultation undertaken at district and village level would become a real challenges for executing the policy. The work of the policy is also depend on the extent to which the central goverment is capable of undertanding local context where multiple legal system operates."

"Kebijakan Kawasan Hutan dengan Pengelolaan Khusus telah mengubah tata kelola kawasan hutan di Pulau Jawa. Pemerintah mengambil alih pengelolaan kawasan hutan seluas ± 1,1 juta hektare yang sebelumnya diamanatkan pengelolaan kepada Perum Perhutani. Perubahan leading sector ini berdampak kepada perubahan aliran distribusi manfaat pengelolaan kawasan hutan di Pulau Jawa. Tesis ini mengargumentasikan bahwa kebijakan KHDPK, yang menempatkan masyarakat sekitar hutan sebagai pelaku utama dalam pengelolaan hutan, ternyata juga berpotensi mengeksklusi masyarakat sekitar hutan. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode patchwork etnografi, serta pengumpulan data melalui observasi berpartisipasi, wawancara mendalam, dan analisa data sekunder. Fakta lapangan menunjukkan bahwa respon Perhutani terhadap kebijakan ini beragam. Di tingkat tapak, Perhutani melakukan berbagai cara untuk mempertahankan akses terhadap sumberdaya hutan meskipun secara regulasi tereksklusi. Hambatan dialami oleh masyarakat sekitar hutan pada masa transisi karena ketidakjelasan pendampingan. Cabang Dinas Kehutanan sebagai aktor baru dalam pengelolaan hutan Jawa tidak mampu berbuat banyak pada masa transisi karena masyarakat belum mendapatkan legalitas sesuai kebijakan terbaru. Meskipun tereksklusi, Perhutani tetap mendapatkan distribusi manfaat secara personal karena hubungan sosial yang masih terjalin meskipun secara regulasi sudah tidak ada kepentingan dalam kegiatan pengelolaan hutan. Perhutani sebagai pihak yang tereksklusi bahkan masih mampu mengesklusi masyarakat sekitar hutan dengan kuasa pasar. Hal ini menunjukkan bahwa keberpihakan terhadap masyarakat yang terpinggirkan di dalam regulasi, perlu dipastikan implementasinya di tingkat tapak melalui pendampingan yang intensif sehingga kebijakan tidak hanya sekedar retorika.

---

The Special Management Forest Area Policy has changed Java's forest management. The government took over the forest area management of ± 1.1 million hectares which was previously mandated to be managed by Perum Perhutani. The change of leading sector has an impact on changes in the flow of distribution benefits from forest area management in the Java Island. This thesis argues that this policy, which places communities around forests as the main actors in forest management, has the potential to exclude forest people. This research uses an patchwork ethnographic method, as well as data collection through participant observation, in-depth interviews, and secondary data analysis. Field facts show that Perhutani's response to this policy has varied. At the site level, Perhutani takes various measures to maintain access of forest resources even though they are excluded by regulation. Obstacles experienced by communities around the forest during the transition period were due to unclear assistance. The Forestry Service branch as a new actor in Javanese forest management was unable to do much during the transition period because the community had not received legality according to the latest policy. Even though it is excluded, Perhutani still receives personal distribution of benefits because of the social relationships that still exist even though according to regulations there is no longer any interest in forest management activities. Perhutani as an excluded party is still able to exclude communities around the forest with market power. This shows that it is necessary to ensure that regulations take sides towards marginalized communities in regulations at the site level through intensive assistance so that policies are not just rhetoric."