Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"[Skripsi ini membahas kedudukan hukum corporate guarantor dalam proses kepailitan di Indonesia. Dewasa ini belum terdapat pengaturan yang mengatur secara spesifik terhadap kedudukan hukum guarantor dalam kepailitan, terutama guarantor yang telah melepaskan hak-hak istimewanya sebagai Penanggung. Hal ini menimbulkan ketidakpastian hukum, tercermin dalam perbedaan pendapat ahli hukum serta perbedaan penafsiran Hakim terkait kedudukan hukum guarantor.
Pengaturan yang berlaku saat ini juga memungkinkan bagi guarantor untuk dipailitkan tanpa dipailitkannya Terjamin atau Debitur-utama. Sebagai studi kasus, dalam skripsi ini diteliti perkara kepailitan PT. Jaya Lestari yang dinyatakan pailit dalam kedudukan hukumnya sebagai guarantor.;This thesis discusses the legal position of corporate guarantor in the bankruptcy process in Indonesia. Until now, there is no specific regulation governing the legal position of a guarantor in bankruptcy, especially for guarantor who has waived its privileges. This creates a legal uncertainty, portrayed in the differences of Jurist?s opinions and in the interpretation of Law experts in issues relating to it. The current Bankruptcy Law and Civil Law in Indonesia even allows a Guarantor to be declared bankrupt without having to declare bankruptcy on the Main-Debtor. As a case study this thesis highlights the case of PT. Jaya Lestari?s bankruptcy in its legal position as a guarantor.;This thesis discusses the legal position of corporate guarantor in the bankruptcy process in Indonesia. Until now, there is no specific regulation governing the legal position of a guarantor in bankruptcy, especially for guarantor who has waived its privileges. This creates a legal uncertainty, portrayed in the differences of Jurist?s opinions and in the interpretation of Law experts in issues relating to it. The current Bankruptcy Law and Civil Law in Indonesia even allows a Guarantor to be declared bankrupt without having to declare bankruptcy on the Main-Debtor. As a case study this thesis highlights the case of PT. Jaya Lestari?s bankruptcy in its legal position as a guarantor.;This thesis discusses the legal position of corporate guarantor in the bankruptcy process in Indonesia. Until now, there is no specific regulation governing the legal position of a guarantor in bankruptcy, especially for guarantor who has waived its privileges. This creates a legal uncertainty, portrayed in the differences of Jurist?s opinions and in the interpretation of Law experts in issues relating to it. The current Bankruptcy Law and Civil Law in Indonesia even allows a Guarantor to be declared bankrupt without having to declare bankruptcy on the Main-Debtor. As a case study this thesis highlights the case of PT. Jaya Lestari?s bankruptcy in its legal position as a guarantor., This thesis discusses the legal position of corporate guarantor in the bankruptcy process in Indonesia. Until now, there is no specific regulation governing the legal position of a guarantor in bankruptcy, especially for guarantor who has waived its privileges. This creates a legal uncertainty, portrayed in the differences of Jurist’s opinions and in the interpretation of Law experts in issues relating to it. The current Bankruptcy Law and Civil Law in Indonesia even allows a Guarantor to be declared bankrupt without having to declare bankruptcy on the Main-Debtor. As a case study this thesis highlights the case of PT. Jaya Lestari’s bankruptcy in its legal position as a guarantor.]"

"Skripsi ini membahas mengenai kepailitan Sindu Dharmali yang berkedudukan hukum sebagai personal guarantor. Dewasa ini, perjanjian utang-piutang seringkali diikuti oleh perjanjian jaminan, salah satunya adalah personal guarantee. Dengan adanya perjanjian jaminan ini, personal guarantor dibebankan tanggung jawab untuk memenuhi perikatan debitor manakala debitor itu sendiri tidak memenuhinya. Apabila personal guarantor tersebut juga tidak dapat memenuhinya, maka kreditor dapat mengajukan permohonan kepailitan terhadap personal guarantor tersebut. Di Indonesia sendiri belum ada peraturan yang mengatur secara tegas mengenai kepailitan guarantor, sehingga menimbulkan perbedaan pendapat mengenai guarantor yang dapat dipailitkan. Namun apabila mengacu pada ketentuan KUHPerdata dan Undang-Undang No. 37 Tahun 2004 tentang Kepailitan dan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang maka personal guarantor dimungkinkan untuk dipailitkan. Salah satu kasus kepailitan terhadap personal guarantor adalah kasus yang dibahas dalam tulisan ini yaitu kasus kepailitan Sindu Dharmali dalam Putusan No. 04/PAILIT/2012/PN.NIAGA.SMG.

---

This thesis discusses the bankruptcy of Sindu Dharmali whose legal position as personal guarantor. Nowadays, debt agreement often followed by guarantee agreement, for example is personal guarantee. With this guarantee agreement, personal guarantor is charged with responsibility to fulfill the debtor rsquo s engagement when he does not fulfill it. If the personal guarantor also can not fulfill it, then the creditor may propose bankruptcy against the personal guarantor. In Indonesia, there has been no firm regulation regarding guarantor bankruptcy, thus causing differences of opinion regarding guarantor who bankrupted. But if it refers to the provisions of Indonesian Civil Code and Indonesian bankruptcy law, then the personal guarantor is possible to bankrupt. One of the personal guarantor bankruptcy cases is the case discussed in this thesis, the bankruptcy case of Sindu Dharmali in the Supreme Court Decision No. 04 PAILIT 2012 PN.NIAGA.SMG."

"Tesis ini membahas kedudukan Personal Guarantor dalam proses kepailitan dimana debitur yang melakukan wanprestasi.Dalam perjanjian penanggungan (borgtoct) dikenal istilah penjamin pribadi atau Personal Guarantor yaitu orang ketiga yang menjamin debitur manakala debitur wanprestasi, dalam hukum kepailitan peran seorang Personal Guarantor dalam sangat penting, walaupun sebagai pihak ketiga Personal Guarantor sebagai penjamin dapat diposisikan sebagai debitur pada saat Personal Guarantor melepas hak istimewanya. Pada Kasus Putusan Mahkamah Agung No.868 K/Pdt.Sus/2010 Standard Chartered Bank menuntut Termohon Pailit I Tundjung Rachmanto dan Termohon Pailit II Rudy Syahputra (selaku pemegang saham dan pemberi jaminan) karena PT. HPS. (Handalan Putra Sejahtera) tidak membayar hutangnya yang telah jatuh tempo kepada Stadard Chartered Bank. Stadard Chartered Bank mengajukan kasasi karena dinilai putusan pengadilan negri tidak tepat dengan alasan, Tundjung Rachmanto dan Rudy Syahputra memiliki memiliki dua atau lebih Kreditor dan tidak membayar lunas sedikitnya satu utang yang telah jatuh waktu dan dapat ditagih. Mahkamah Agung mengabulkan permohon Standard Chartered Bank (pemohon kasasi) sesuai dalil dengan bukti-bukti yang diberikan oleh Standard Chartered Bank (pemohon kasasi).

---

This thesis has contended the role of a Personal Guarantor in bankruptcy process where the Debitur is a party who performs a default. In a encumbrance agreement the term of Personal Guarantor is known, which is a third party (third person) who guarantees the Debtor when the Debtor performs a default. In a law of Bankruptcy, the role of a personal Guarantor is important although as the third party, the standing of such Personal Guarantor as the guarantor may be positioned as a debtor when the Personal Guarantor releases its privilege. In the Case of the Judgment of the Supreme Court No.868 K/Pdt.Sus/2010, Standard Chartered Bank demands the Bankruptcy Respondent I Tundjung Rachmanto and the Bankruptcy Respondent II Rudy Syahputra (as the shareholders and the guarantors) because PT. HPS. (Handalan Putra Sejahtera) did not pay its debt due to Standard Chartered Bank. Standard Chartered Bank filed a petition for cassation as it was considered that the court's judgment was inappropriate on the ground that Tundjung Rachmanto and Rudy Syahputra had two or more creditors and they did not settle at least the debt that was due and payable. The Supreme Court acceded Standard Chartered Bank?s petition (the Requester for cassation) pursuant to an argument by the evidences given by Standard Chartered Bank (the Requester for cassation)."

"Skripsi ini membahas mengenai kedudukan antara kreditor konkuren dan kreditor separatis selama menjalankan proses Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang (PKPU). Dalam lembaga PKPU, kedudukan antara kreditor adalah sama. Undang-undang secara implisit telah memberikan perlindungan kepada kreditor konkuren sebagai pihak yang memiliki kedudukan yang lemah. Namun dalam prakteknya masih sering ditemukan kecondongan atau dominasi dari kreditor lainnya, khususnya kreditor separatis. Ketimpangan antara kedua kreditor tersebut juga terjadi dalam kasus PKPU PT. Benangsari Indahtexindo. Asas Keseimbangan yang terdapat dalam hukum kepailitan menjadi patokan utama dalam menentukan proses PKPU, karena dengan asas tersebut maka dapat dicapai hasil akhir yang adil.

---

This paper discusses the standing of the unsecured creditor and secured creditor throughout the process of Suspension of Payment. In Suspension of Payment foundation, the standings between all the creditors are same. The law implicitly has been giving protection for the unsecured creditor, as the party which has a weak position. But in practice there are still tendency or dominance of other creditor, especially the secured creditor. Disparities between the two of the creditor also happened in Suspension of Payment of PT. Benangsari Indahtexindo. The principle of balance that was found in bankruptcy law is the first criterion in determining the process of the Suspension of Payment, because of this principle, it can achieved the fair result."

"Skripsi ini membahas mengenai syarat kepailitan di Indonesia yang terdapat dalam Pasal 2 ayat 1 Undang-Undang Nomor 37 Tahun 2004 dan juga syarat kepailitan di Singapura serta perbedaan diantara keduanya, dan bagaimana penerapan syarat-syarat tersebut pada kasus kepailitan PT Telkomsel. Pada bagian analisis akan dibahas mengenai penerapan syarat kepailitan dalam kasus kepailitan PT Telkomsel dalam Putusan Pengadilan Niaga Nomor 48/Pailit/2012/PN.Niaga.Jkt.Pst dan juga Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 704 K/Pdt.Sus/2012 dimana putusan pailit terhadap PT Telkomsel dibatalkan. Dalam penelitian ini, penulis menggunakan metode penelitian yuridis normatif, dengan studi kepustakaan sebagai cara menganalisis kasus yang sudah dalam bentuk putusan pengadilan. Dari hasil penelitian, penulis mendapat kesimpulan bahwa perbedaan antara syarat kepailitan di Indonesia dan Singapura terkait jumlah minimal kreditor, jumlah minimal utang, dan keadaan tidak mampu membayar utang, serta bahwa penulis setuju dengan putusan Mahkamah Agung yang membatalkan kepailitan PT Telkomsel karena Majelis Hakim di Pengadilan Niaga kurang tepat dalam menerapkan syarat-syarat kepailitan.

---

This thesis discusses the terms of bankruptcy in Indonesia contained in Article 2 paragraph 1 of Law Number 37 Year 2004 and also the condition of bankruptcy in Singapore and the difference between the two, and how the application of those conditions in the bankruptcy case of PT Telkomsel. In the analysis section will be discussed the application of bankruptcy requirements in the bankruptcy case of PT Telkomsel in the Commercial Court Decision Number 48 Bankrupt 2012 PN.Niaga.Jkt.Pst and also the Supreme Court Decision Number 704 K Pdt.Sus 2012 where the decision to put PT Telkomsel in bankruptcy is canceled. In this study, the author uses normative juridical research methods, with literature study as a way of analyzing cases that have been in the form of court decisions. The author concludes that the difference between bankruptcy requirements in Indonesia and Singapore is related to the minimum number of creditors, the minimum amount of debt, and the inability to pay the debt, and that the authors agree with the decision of the Supreme Court to cancel the bankruptcy of PT Telkomsel because the Panel of Judges in the Commercial Court did not apply the terms of bankruptcy appropriately."

"Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1999 tentang Perlindungan Konsumen mengatur beberapa hal mengenai hak konsumen terhadap informasi produk yang dikonsumsinya. Konsumen Indonesia, yang secara khusus adalah konsumen kesehatan, memiliki hak atas informasi terhadap obat-obatan yang akan dikonsumsinya terutama mengenai komposisi dan khasiat obat. Skripsi ini membahas bagaimana analisis peraturan perundang-undangan yang mengatur mengenai hak konsumen atas informasi terhadap fakta yang terjadi terkait dengan pelanggaran-pelanggaran yang dilakukan oleh pelaku usaha dalam pemenuhan hak konsumen atas informasi obat yang berada pada label obat, serta pengaturan mengenai perlindungan hukum terhadap konsumen kesehatan yang mengalami kerugian akibat mengkonsumsi obat yang memiliki kesalahan yaitu ketidaksesuaian antara label informasi obat dengan isi kandungan obat yang terdapat dalam ampul obat tersebut. Hasil penelitian menyarankan bahwa dalam memproduksi obat-obatan harus diterapkan prinsip kehati-hatian; mengadakan kerja sama antara Badan Pengawas Obat dan Makanan dengan Kepolisian dalam pengawasan serta pemberian sanksi pidana terhadap pelaku usaha yang melanggar; mengadakan sosialisasi mengenai hak konsumen terutama penyuluhan tentang Undang-Undang Perlindungan Konsumen.

---

The Law Number 8 Year 1999 on Consumer Protection rules some consumer rights about product information which is consumed. Indonesian consumers, especially health consumer, have the rights for information about medicines they buy and consume, especially about compositions and properties of the drug.

This thesis discusses how the analysis of legislation regulating for the rights of consumers to information on the facts that occurred in relation to offenses committed by business actors in the fulfillment of the right of consumers to information on the drug?s label, also regulations about protection to health consumers that suffered losses as the result of taking the medicine that has a fault, that is a mismatch between the drug?s information label to the content of the drug contained in the drug ampule.

The results suggested, when producing drugs business actors should apply the principle of prudence; held the cooperation between the National Agency of Drug and Food with the police to supervise and the provision of criminal sanctions to business actors that break the rules; also held socialization and education about consumer rights, especially counseling about the Consumer Protection Act."

"Untuk kepentingan harta pailit, kepada pengadilan niaga dapat dimintakan pembatalan segala perbuatan hukum debitor yang telah dinyatakan pailit yang merugikan kepentingan kreditor, yang dilakukan sebelum putusan pernyataan pailit diucapkan. Gugatan pembatalan ini dikenal dengan nama gugatan actio pauliana. Debitor dan pihak dengan siapa perbuatan hukum itu dilakukan harus terbukti beritikad tidak baik sehingga merugikan kreditor. Tesis ini akan membahas terkait tinjauan umum hukum kepailitan di Indonesia, hukum actio pauliana dalam hukum kepailitan di Indonesia, dan analisis terkait putusan actio pauliana dalam kasus kepailitan PT Metro Batavia (Putusan Nomor 61 PK/Pdt.Sus-Pailit/2015 Jo. Nomor 389 K/Pdt.Sus-Pailit/2014 Jo. Nomor 02/Pdt. Sus. ActioPauliana/2014/PN.Niaga.Jkt.Pst). Tesis ini memakai penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan undang-undang dan pendekatan kasus. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian, hukum kepailitan di Indonesia diatur dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 37 Tahun 2004 Tentang Kepailitan dan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang ('UU Kepailitan'). Ketentuan actio pauliana diatur dalam Pasal 41 sampai Pasal 49 UU Kepailitan. Putusan pengadilan niaga dan kasasi yang menolak gugatan actio pauliana dari tim kurator PT Metro Batavia (dalam pailit) telah tepat karena aset yang menjadi obyek sengketa bukan milik PT Metro Batavia (dalam pailit). Putusan Peninjauan Kembali (PK) yang mengabulkan gugatan actio pauliana tidak tepat karena novum yang menjadi pertimbangan majelis hakim Peninjauan Kembali (PK) tidak membuktikan kepemilikan suatu aset.

---

In the interest of the bankruptcy assets, annulment may be requested to the commercial court for all legal acts of the debtor who has been declared bankrupt which prejudice the interests of the creditors, which were conducted before the declaration of bankruptcy was rendered. The annulment is known as the actio pauliana lawsuit. The debtor and the party with whom the legal acts was carried out must be proven to have a bad faith that prejudice the creditors. This thesis will discuss about general review of bankruptcy law in Indonesia, actio pauliana in Indonesia’s bankruptcy law, and analysis related to actio pauliana decision in Metro Batavia’s company (in bankruptcy). This thesis use normative legal research with statute approach and case approach.

Based on research results, bankruptcy law in Indonesia is regulated in Law Number 37 of 2004 on bankruptcy and suspension of obligation for payment of debts ('Bankruptcy Law'). The actio pauliana is regulated in article 41 to article 49 of Bankruptcy Law. The decision of the commercial court and cassation which rejected the actio pauliana lawsuit from the curator team of Metro Batavia’s company (in bankruptcy) was appropriate because the assets of the dispute did not belong to Metro Batavia’s company (in bankruptcy). The judicial review decision that grants the actio pauliana lawsuit is faulty because the new evidences (novum) that are used for consideration by the panel of judges do not prove the ownership of an asset."

"Pada skripsi ini dibahas mengenai konsep perlindungan investor di dalam Perjanjian Bilateral Investasi (Bilateral Investment Treaty/BIT) dan definisi seputar investasi dan penanaman modal asing merujuk kepada pengertian secara global dan definisinya sesuai dengan perundang-undangan Indonesia. Selain itu, di dalam skripsi ini akan diberikan pula definisi seputar BIT dengan menyertakan contoh BIT Inggris-Indonesia sebagai kajian utama dan dua buah kasus arbitrase internasional terkait penanaman modal asal Inggris di Indonesia, yaitu kasus Churchill Mining Plc melawan Pemerintah Indonesia dan kasus Rafat Ali Rizvi melawan Pemerintah Indonesia. Dua buah kasus ini kemudian dibandingkan dan dijadikan patokan bagi Penulis untuk menentukan sejauh mana BIT Inggris- Indonesia dalam melindungi penanaman modal yang dilakukan oleh penanam modal asal Inggris.

---

The main discussion of this thesis is the concept of investor protection in the Bilateral Investment Treaty (BIT) and the global definition of foreign investment and its definition referring to Indonesian Law. This definition of BIT will be provided in this thesis with also a study of BIT between UK and Indonesia, and two cases related to British investment in Indonesia as examples. These cases are the dispute between Churchill Mining Plc and The Government of Indonesia and Rafat Ali Rizvi and The Government of Indonesia. These two cases will be compared and used as a benchmark for the Author to determine the extent to which the UK-Indonesia BIT protection protects the investment made by UK investors."

"Skripsi ini membahas mengenai tinjauan ganti rugi yang dapat diperoleh agen penjualan tiket maskapai penerbangan, pada saat putusan kepailitan dijatuhkan pada PT. Metro Batavia berdasarkan Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata dan Undang-Undang Nomor 37 Tahun 2004 tentang Kepailitan dan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian yuridis-normatif dengan studi kepustakaan. Metode penelitian tersebut dipakai untuk permasalahan; pertama teori tentang kedudukan hukum agen penjual tiket penerbangan terhadap PT. Metro Batavia yang diatur dalam UU No. 37 Tahun 2004 dan KUHPerdata dan kedua pengembalian uang deposit yang dapat diperoleh oleh agen dari PT. Metro Batavia yang pailit sesuai dengan ketentuan KUHPerdata dan UU No.37 Tahun 2004. Hasil penelitian ini menyarankan bahwa: 1) pemerintah sebaiknya membuat regulasi khusus yang mengatur mengai hukum keagenan; 2) Uang deposit yang diwajibkan dalam perjanjian kerja sama keagenan tidak ditempatkan pada rekening atas nama salah satu pihak.

---

This Thesis discusses about compensation from an airline agent from PT. Metro Batavia based on the Book of the Law and the Civil Law Act Number 37 of 2004 on Bankruptcy and Debt Payment Obligations Towing. This research is juridical-normative research to study literature. The research methods applied to the problem, the first theory of the state law realtors tickets to PT. Metro Batavia arranged in Law. 37 of 2004 and the Civil Code and the second deposit refunds can be obtained by agents from PT. Metro Batavia bankruptcy Civil Code and in accordance with the provisions of Law No.37 of 2004. Results of this study suggest that: 1) government should make a regulation about agency law, 2) Deposit money shall not be placed in an account in the name of one of the parties."

"Industri fashion Indonesia merupakan industri yang sedang berkembang pesat saat ini. Hasil rancangan perancang mode Indonesia merupakan salah satu obyek yang dilindungi oleh Undang-undang Nomor 31 Tahun 2000 tentang Desain Industri. Penelitian ini adalah penelitian non-doktrinal di bidang hukum yang mencari tahu bagaimana fakta-fakta seputar penerapan Undang-undang Desain Industri dalam industri fashion Indonesia, khusunya jika dikaitkan dengan perlindungan terhadap hasil rancangan para perancang mode dan bagaimana perspektif perancang mode Indonesia mengenai undang-undang tersebut. Hasil penelitian menyarankan bahwa perlu adanya sosialisai yang lebih terstruktur guna dapat menjangkau lebih banyak kalangan, salah satunya adalah desainer Indonesia.

---

Indonesia's fashion industry is growing rapidly at this time. Fashion items created by Indonesian fashion designer is one of the objects that are being protected by Law No. 31, 2000 regarding Industrial Design. This research is a non-doctrinal study in the field of law to find out the facts about the implementation of Law No. 31, 2000 regarding Industrial Design in Indonesia's fashion industry, especially if associated with the fashion items created by Indonesian fashion designers and their perspective about the law. Result of the study suggest that Law No. 31, 2000 regarding Industrial Design still needs more structured socialization or promotion to reach more circles, such as Indonesian fashion designer. "