Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"[Penelitian ini dilakukan untuk mengetahui pengaruh dari penerapan sistem depositinsurance sebagai salah satu opsi financial safety net yang dilakukan pemerintahterhadap tingkat stabilitas perbankan yang diukur dengan menggunakan pengambilanrisiko bank. Dengan menggunakan 48 sampel bank yang berada di negara ASEAN-5(Indonesia, Malaysia, Thailand, Filipina, dan Singapura), penulis menemukan bahwaadanya sistem deposit insurance menurunkan tingkat pengambilan risiko yangdiambil oleh bank dan meningkatkan tingkat pengambilan risiko bank pada saatterjadi krisis., The purpose of this study is to know the effect on deposit insurance systemimplementation, as one of the financial safety net option by government, to thebanking stability which measured by the level of bank risk taking. Using 48 banksample in ASEAN-5 (Indonesia, Malaysia, Thailand, Philippine, and Singapore),researcher find evidence that the deposit insurance system implementation decreasedthe level of bank risk taking and increased the level of bank risk taking in crisisperiod.]"

"Penelitian ini membahas mengenai pengaruh program penjaminan simpanan (deposit insurance) oleh LPS terhadap disiplin pasar dengan menggunakan data time series dari 120 bank umum selama kurun waktu Januari 2003 sampai dengan Desember 2013. Dengan menggunakan empat variasi yang menjadi variabel terikat berupa tingkat suku bunga deposito 1 bulan/TD, tingkat suku bunga deposito 3 bulan/TD3, tingkat suku bunga deposito rata-rata 1 dan 3 bulan/MRATE, dan Interbank Call Money, serta dengan variabel bebas berupa : (i) variabel risiko bank yang terdiri dari : NPL, LDR, BOPO, ROA, dan CAR; (ii) variabel kontrol yang terdiri dari Growth GDP dan Inflasi; dan (iii) variabel dummy, diperoleh hasil penelitian Kebijakan program penjaminan simpanan LPS yang di-proxy oleh dummy, efektif menekan tingkat bunga pada lag 4 periode. Dengan kata lain, kebijakan LPS pada saat ini membutuhkan masa tenggang waktu yang relatif lama yaitu 4 triwulan untuk dapat berpengaruh pada kedisplinan pasar.

---

This research explain about The Impact Analysis of Deposit Insurance Program by The Indonesia Deposit Insurance Corporation to Market Dicipline using the time series data from 120 banks from January 2003 to December 2013. I use Ordinary Least Squares/OLS method with four variations of dependent variables (time deposit rate 1 month, 3 months, average rate in 1 month and 3 months, and interbank call money), as well as the independent variable such as: (i) the bank's risk variables consisting of: NPL, LDR, ROA, ROA, and the CAR Ratios; (ii) the control variables consisting of GDP Growth and Inflation; and (iii) a dummy variable, the result of this research is deposit insurance program by IDIC with proxy by dummy, effectively reduces the interest rate on the lag 4 period. In other words, the policy of IDIC during the grace period requires a relatively long time, that is 4 quarters, to be able to influence the market discipline."

"[ABSTRAKSebagai salah satu unsur penting dalam jaring pengaman sistem keuangan khususnya dibidang perbankan, Lembaga Penjamin Simpanan (LPS) memiliki peranan untuk menjaga stabilitas keuangan Indonesia. Krisis ekonomi global pada tahun 2008 mengharuskan LPS meningkatkan Nilai Penjamin Simpanan. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui alasan LPS meningkatkan Nilai Penjamin Simpanan berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 24 Tahun 2004 Tentang Lembaga Penjamin Simpanan sebagaimana telah diubah dengan Undang-Undang No. 7 Tahun 2009 dan peraturan perundang-undangan yang berlaku, menganalisis kemungkinan penurunan Nilai Penjamin Simpanan LPS serta hubungannya dengan penerapan risk-based premium di Indonesia untuk menjaga stabilitas sistem keuangan Indonesia. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian kepustakaan yang bersifat yuridis-normatif. Data yang dikumpulkan dengan studi kepustakaan. Hasil dari penelitian ini adalah berdasarkan Pasal 11 UU LPS dimungkinkan terjadi penurunan terhadap Nilai Penjamin Simpanan LPS. Berdasarkan alasan peningkatan Nilai Penjamin Simpanan pada tahun 2008, yaitu adanya ancaman krisis ekonomi, UU LPS mengatur apabila alasan tersebut telah teratasi maka besaran Nilai Penjamin Simpanan dapat disesuaikan kembali. Maka berdasarkan hal ini, dimungkinkan untuk menurunkan Nilai Penjamin Simpanan LPS. ABSTRACTAs one of the important elements in the financial safety net, especially in banking system, Indonesia Deposit Insurance Corporation (IDIC) has a big role to keep the stability of Indonesia?s financial system. The global economic crisis in 2008 requires IDIC increase the Deposit Insurance Coverage. This studies aims to determine the reaseon IDIC increase the coverage based on Law No. 24 of 2004 on the Indonesia Deposit Insurance Corporation (IDIC) as amended by Act No. 7 of 2009, to analyze the possibility to decrease the deposit insurance coverage and its relation to the risk-based premium in Indonesia in order to maintan the stability of the financial system. This research is a normative juridical research. The data were collected by literature study. The results for this study are based Article 11 of IDIC Act, there is a posibility to adjust the Deposit Insurance Coverage. IDIC increased the coverage in 2008 because there is a threat of an economic crisis. So based on this Act, if the threat is no longer a problem for Indonesia, IDIC can adjust to decrease the Deposit Insurance Coverage. ;As one of the important elements in the financial safety net, especially in banking system, Indonesia Deposit Insurance Corporation (IDIC) has a big role to keep the stability of Indonesia?s financial system. The global economic crisis in 2008 requires IDIC increase the Deposit Insurance Coverage. This studies aims to determine the reaseon IDIC increase the coverage based on Law No. 24 of 2004 on the Indonesia Deposit Insurance Corporation (IDIC) as amended by Act No. 7 of 2009, to analyze the possibility to decrease the deposit insurance coverage and its relation to the risk-based premium in Indonesia in order to maintan the stability of the financial system. This research is a normative juridical research. The data were collected by literature study. The results for this study are based Article 11 of IDIC Act, there is a posibility to adjust the Deposit Insurance Coverage. IDIC increased the coverage in 2008 because there is a threat of an economic crisis. So based on this Act, if the threat is no longer a problem for Indonesia, IDIC can adjust to decrease the Deposit Insurance Coverage. ;As one of the important elements in the financial safety net, especially in banking system, Indonesia Deposit Insurance Corporation (IDIC) has a big role to keep the stability of Indonesia?s financial system. The global economic crisis in 2008 requires IDIC increase the Deposit Insurance Coverage. This studies aims to determine the reaseon IDIC increase the coverage based on Law No. 24 of 2004 on the Indonesia Deposit Insurance Corporation (IDIC) as amended by Act No. 7 of 2009, to analyze the possibility to decrease the deposit insurance coverage and its relation to the risk-based premium in Indonesia in order to maintan the stability of the financial system. This research is a normative juridical research. The data were collected by literature study. The results for this study are based Article 11 of IDIC Act, there is a posibility to adjust the Deposit Insurance Coverage. IDIC increased the coverage in 2008 because there is a threat of an economic crisis. So based on this Act, if the threat is no longer a problem for Indonesia, IDIC can adjust to decrease the Deposit Insurance Coverage. ;As one of the important elements in the financial safety net, especially in banking system, Indonesia Deposit Insurance Corporation (IDIC) has a big role to keep the stability of Indonesia?s financial system. The global economic crisis in 2008 requires IDIC increase the Deposit Insurance Coverage. This studies aims to determine the reaseon IDIC increase the coverage based on Law No. 24 of 2004 on the Indonesia Deposit Insurance Corporation (IDIC) as amended by Act No. 7 of 2009, to analyze the possibility to decrease the deposit insurance coverage and its relation to the risk-based premium in Indonesia in order to maintan the stability of the financial system. This research is a normative juridical research. The data were collected by literature study. The results for this study are based Article 11 of IDIC Act, there is a posibility to adjust the Deposit Insurance Coverage. IDIC increased the coverage in 2008 because there is a threat of an economic crisis. So based on this Act, if the threat is no longer a problem for Indonesia, IDIC can adjust to decrease the Deposit Insurance Coverage. ;As one of the important elements in the financial safety net, especially in banking system, Indonesia Deposit Insurance Corporation (IDIC) has a big role to keep the stability of Indonesia?s financial system. The global economic crisis in 2008 requires IDIC increase the Deposit Insurance Coverage. This studies aims to determine the reaseon IDIC increase the coverage based on Law No. 24 of 2004 on the Indonesia Deposit Insurance Corporation (IDIC) as amended by Act No. 7 of 2009, to analyze the possibility to decrease the deposit insurance coverage and its relation to the risk-based premium in Indonesia in order to maintan the stability of the financial system. This research is a normative juridical research. The data were collected by literature study. The results for this study are based Article 11 of IDIC Act, there is a posibility to adjust the Deposit Insurance Coverage. IDIC increased the coverage in 2008 because there is a threat of an economic crisis. So based on this Act, if the threat is no longer a problem for Indonesia, IDIC can adjust to decrease the Deposit Insurance Coverage. , As one of the important elements in the financial safety net, especially in banking system, Indonesia Deposit Insurance Corporation (IDIC) has a big role to keep the stability of Indonesia’s financial system. The global economic crisis in 2008 requires IDIC increase the Deposit Insurance Coverage. This studies aims to determine the reaseon IDIC increase the coverage based on Law No. 24 of 2004 on the Indonesia Deposit Insurance Corporation (IDIC) as amended by Act No. 7 of 2009, to analyze the possibility to decrease the deposit insurance coverage and its relation to the risk-based premium in Indonesia in order to maintan the stability of the financial system. This research is a normative juridical research. The data were collected by literature study. The results for this study are based Article 11 of IDIC Act, there is a posibility to adjust the Deposit Insurance Coverage. IDIC increased the coverage in 2008 because there is a threat of an economic crisis. So based on this Act, if the threat is no longer a problem for Indonesia, IDIC can adjust to decrease the Deposit Insurance Coverage. ]"

"ABSTRAKPenelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui pengaruh implementasi penjaminan simpanan, rasio kecukupan modal (CAR) dan non performing loan (NPL) terhadap tingkat deposit, risiko moral hazard dan net interest margin (NIM) bank umum di Indonesia periode 2000-2012. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode regresi data panel.Hasil dari penelitian ini menunjukkan implementasi penjaminan simpanan, CAR dan NPL mempengaruhi tingkat deposit bank umum secara negatif.Implementasi penjaminan simpanan terbukti signifikan meningkatkan risiko moral hazard sementara variabel CAR dan NPL berpengaruh negatif terhadap risiko moral hazard. Temuan lain menunjukkan NIM dipengaruhi positif oleh implementasi penjaminan simpanan dan CAR, tetapi dipengaruhi negatif oleh NPL.

---

ABSTRACTThis study aims to determine the effect of the implementation of deposit insurance, capital adequacy ratio (CAR) and non-performing loan (NPL) towards deposit, moral hazard risk and net interest margin (NIM) of commercial banks in Indonesia from 2000 to 2012. This study uses panel data regression method. The results of this study demonstrate the implementation of deposit insurance, CAR and NPL affects commercial bank deposits negatively. Implementation of deposit insurance were proven significantly increases moral hazard risk while the variable CAR and NPL negatively affect moral hazard risk. Other findings showed NIM is affected positively by the implementation of deposit insurance and the CAR, but negatively affected by the NPL."

"Hadirnya Corona Virus Disease 2019 (COVID-19), yang telah ditetapkan sebagai pandemi oleh World Health Organization, menimbulkan adanya penurunan pertumbuhan ekonomi dianggap perlu untuk dilakukan mitigasi oleh Pemerintah dan Komite Stabilitas Sistem Keuangan (KSSK) dengan tujuan untuk menjaga stabilitas sistem keuangan. Dengan itu, KSSK diberikan penguatan kewenangan yang ditetapkan dalam UU No. 2 Tahun 2020. Dalam rangka untuk mendukung pelaksanaan kewenangan KSSK menangani permasalahan stabilitas sistem keuangan, kewenangan dari anggota KSSK juga diperkuat dalam undang-undang tersebut, salah satunya adalah Lembaga Penjamin Simpanan (LPS). Metode penelitian penulisan skripsi ini adalah yuridis-normatif dan menggunakan data sekunder, yaitu bahan hukum primer dan sekunder, dan yang didukung dengan wawancara. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa kewenangan LPS yang diperkuat adalah LPS dapat meningkatkan intensitas bersama dengan OJK, melakukan beberapa tindakan untuk memenuhi likuiditas dalam penanganan bank, penyelamatan bank selain bank sistemik, dan merumuskan dan melaksanakan kebijakan penjaminan. Namun, dengan adanya penguatan kewenangan LPS tersebut ditemukan adanya beberapa permasalahan hukum, yang salah satunya adalah permasalahan terhadap kewenangan LPS untuk menempatkan dana di bank, perlunya kewenangan LPS untuk dapat mengakses data bank setiap saat, dan potensi moral hazard. Penelitian ini diharapkan dapat memberikan informasi baru serta memberikan masukan untuk menguatkan kewenangan LPS dalam melakukan akses data dan/atau informasi Bank dan menentukan batas waktu yang jelas terhadap keberlakuan kewenangan LPS untuk melakukan penempatan dana.

---

Corona Virus Disease 2019 (COVID-19), which has been declared as a pandemic by the World Health Organization, causes the decline in economic growth is considered necessary for mitigation by the Government and the Financial System Stability Committee (FSSF) with the aim of maintaining the stability of the financial system. Therefore, the FSSF was given authorities stipulated in Law No. 2 of 2020. In order to support the implementation of FSSF's authority to handle the stability issues of the financial system, the authority of FSSF members is also strengthened by the law, one of them is the Indonesia Deposit Insurance Corporation (IDIC). The method used in this research is a juridical-normative method with using secondary data that include primary and secondary legal material, also supported with interview. This research finds that the aforementioned IDIC's authorities are IDIC can improve the preparations and intensify the preparations with Financial Services Authority, initiate actions to manage and/or increase IDIC liquidity, make loans for other parties, and apply for a loan to the government. However, with the strengthening of IDIC’s authority, there are several legal problems that arise, such as issues regarding the fund placement, the need for IDIC to be able to access bank’s data at any time, and the possibilities of moral hazard. This thesis is aimed to provide new information and suggestions to strengthen IDIC's authority over accessing data and/or information of banks and determining the clear headline of the IDIC's enforceability of fund placement."

"Great Depression telah menimbulkan banyak dampak bagi dunia, terutama dalam lingkup industri perbankan. Alhasil, untuk mendapatkan kepercayaan nasabah, pemerintah Amerika Serikat mendirikan korporasi untuk menjamin simpanan nasabah dengan metode Insurance Deposit Schemes bernama Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC). Selanjutnya, dengan keberhasilan di Amerika Serikat, banyak negara khususnya Indonesia yang mengikuti jalur tersebut dengan mendirikan perusahaan penjamin simpanan bernama Lembaga Penjamin Simpanan (LPS). Namun dengan membandingkan kedua sistem tersebut terdapat beberapa persamaan dan perbedaan mengenai peran keduanya di kedua negara. Tesis ini dimaksudkan untuk menjawab dua pertanyaan. Pertanyaan pertama bagaimana persyaratan dan ketentuan skema penjaminan simpanan dalam rangka menjaga stabilitas keuangan di Indonesia dan Amerika Serikat dan yang kedua adalah bagaimana persamaan dan perbedaan skema penjaminan simpanan di Indonesia dan Amerika Serikat. Dengan menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif, tesis ini menunjukkan regulasi Lembaga Penjamin Simpanan di Indonesia dan Amerika Serikat serta perbedaan dan persamaan aturan dan ketentuan. Dengan membandingkan kedua sistem tersebut, meskipun kedua korporasi bertujuan untuk menjamin simpanan nasabah dan tujuan utamanya adalah untuk menumbuhkan kepercayaan masyarakat terhadap industri perbankan, tidak semua peran kedua korporasi tersebut sama.

---

The Great Depression has caused many impacts to the world, especially in the scope of banking industry. As a result, in order to gain customers’ trust, the government of the United States of America established a corporation to guarantee customers’ deposits with the method of Insurance Deposit Schemes named Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC). Hereafter, by the success in the United States of America, many countries, especially Indonesia followed the path by establishing a deposit insurance corporation named Indonesia Deposit Insurance Corporation (IDIC). However, by comparing both systems there are several similarities and differences regarding their roles in both countries. This thesis intended to answer two questions. The first question is how are the requirements and provisions of the deposit insurance schemes in order to maintain financial stability in Indonesia and the United States of America and the second one is how are the similarities and differences of deposit insurance schemes in Indonesia and the United States of America. Using normative legal research methods, this thesis shows the regulations of Deposit Insurance Corporation in Indonesia and the United States of America as well as the differences and similarities of the rules and conditions. By comparing both systems, although both corporations aim to guarantee customers’ deposits and the main objective is to foster public trust in the banking industry, not all the roles of both corporations are the same.

"

"LPS adalah Lembaga Penjamin Simpanan di Indonesia yang menjamin Simpanan nasabah. LPS rate merupakan bagian dari skema penjaminan yang digunakan LPS untuk menentukan jumlah simpanan yang layak bayar. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengkaji pengaruh suku bunga penjaminan simpanan yang dikombinasikan dengan nominal maksimum simpanan yang dijamin terhadap stabilitas perbankan dan seberapa berpotensi mengurangi moral hazard baik pada periode normal maupun krisis. Menggunakan data panel dari 94 bank umum di Indonesia dari tahun 2017 hingga 2022 serta tahun 2020 hingga 2021 dianggap sebagai periode krisis. Hasil kami menunjukkan hubungan negatif yang signifikan antara peningkatan persentase simpanan yang dijamin dan stabilitas bank dalam periode normal atau krisis. Sementara untuk moral hazard pada kondisi normal terdapat hubungan positif yang signifikan, namun pada saat krisis tidak menjadi variabel yang secara signifikan mempengaruhi bank untuk menaikkan suku bunga.

---

LPS is a deposit insurance Corporation in Indonesia that guarantees bank depositors. The LPS rate is part of the guarantee scheme used by the LPS to determine the number of guaranteed deposits that are eligible to be paid. This research aims to assess the influence of deposit insurance rates combined with the maximum nominal deposit guaranteed on banking stability and how potentially reduces moral hazard both in normal periods and crises. Using data panel of 94 commercial banks in Indonesia from 2017 to 2022. where 2020 to 2021 is considered a crisis period. Our results suggest a significant negative relationship between the increase in the percentage of guaranteed deposits and bank stability in normal periods or crises. Related to moral hazard where under normal conditions there is a significant positive relationship, but during a crisis, it does not become a variable that significantly influences banks to raise interest rates."

"Tesis ini membahas mengenai perlindungan hak pemegang saham publik dalam pengambilalihan Bank Gagal yang berstatus terbuka oleh Lembaga Penjamin Simpanan. Permasalahan yang diangkat dalam penulisan ini ketika Lembaga Penjamin Simpanan memiliki hak untuk mengambil alih segala hak, wewenang, kepemilikan, kepengurusan dari Bank Gagal bermaksud untuk menjual saham pemegang saham publik. Penulisan tesis ini menggunakan metode kepustakaan dengan data sekunder sebagai sumber datanya. Pengambilalihan Bank Gagal oleh Lembaga Penjamin Simpanan berdasarkan penyerahan hak kepemilikan melalui RUPS oleh para pemegang saham yang menyerahkan, serta Penyertaan Modal Sementara yang kemudian dikonversi menjadi saham. Kedua mekanisme tersebut menjadikan Lembaga Penjamin Simpanan sebagai pemegang saham mayoritas, namun tidak dapat menghilangkan pengakuan terhadap kepemilikan pemegang saham publik. Lembaga Penjamin Simpanan tidak memiliki hak untuk menjual saham pemegang saham publik yang tidak dikuasai oleh Lembaga Penjamin Simpanan apabila tidak diserahkan oleh pemilik hak sebagaimana dimaksud dalam teori property rule. Pengambilalihan yang dilakukan oleh Lembaga Penjamin Simpanan bukan bertujuan untuk menguasai Bank, namun untuk melaksanakan perintah Undang-Undang. Ketentuan take over, mewajibkan untuk dilakukan tender offer terhadap sisa saham. Peraturan No. IX.H.1. mengenai ketentuan tender sukarela mengecualikan tender offer terhadap pengambilalihan yang dilakukan berdasarkan perintah Undang-Undang. Ketentuan ini membuktikan pemegang saham publik tetap memiliki hak terhadap saham yang dimilikinya. Mengingat lamanya waktu untuk melakukan revisi terhadap Undang-Undang, maka Lembaga Penjamin Simpanan dapat meminta dilakukan uji materiil ke Mahkamah Konstitusi untuk meminta penjelasan terhadap siapa yang dimaksud dengan pemegang saham dan apa yang dimaksud dengan seluruh saham.

---

This thesis describes the protection of public shareholder rights in the takeover process of open-status Failing Bank performed by the Deposit Insurance Corporation. The main focus of this discussion is on the event the Deposit Insurance Corporation posits that it reserves the right to take over all rights, authority, title of ownership and management of the Failing Bank, and generalizes that the liquidation of the stocks includes those belonging to public shareholders. This thesis applies library research method using secondary data as data sources. The handling process of Failing Bank by Deposit Insurance Corporation is performed by surrendering of rights and powers of General Shareholders Meeting in part of the Failing Bank, and provision of temporary capital placement in part of the Deposit Insurance Corporation which is further conversed into shares. The dual mechanisms deems Deposit Insurance Corporation as the major shareholder, however still withstand recognition to the title of ownership of public shareholders. Deposit Insurance Corporation does not reserve the right to sell shares belonging to public shareholders that are not surrendered to the Deposit Insurance Corporation, as described in the theory of Property Rule. The takeover is performed by Deposit Insurance Corporation not for the purpose of acquiring the Bank, but as execution of the Law. The laws governing performance of takeover stipulates that the remaining shares must be disclosed in form of bidding offer or tender offer. Law number IX.H.1. governing voluntary tender excludes tender offer in the event of takeover prescribed by Law. This regulation substantiates that public shareholders reserves rights over their shares. Considering the time taken to conduct revision on the said law, Deposit Insurance Corporation may appeal for judicial review in the Constitutional Court to gain verification as to the reference for shareholder and as to the reference of shares as cited in the law."

"Skripsi ini membahas mengenai lembaga penjamin pemegang polis asuransi sebagai perlindungan bagi nasabah perusahaan asuransi. dalam rangka perlindungan terhadap pemegang polis, lembaga penjamin pemegang polis berfungsi melindungi kepentingan pemegang polis apabila perusahaan asuransi mengalami kegagalan bayar, meskipun demikian, di Indonesia sampai sekarang belum dibentuk lembaga yang dimaksud meski sudah diamanatkan Undang-Undang Perasuransian. Berdasarkan hal tersebut, pertama-tama penulis akan meneliti bagaimanakah perbandingan ketentuan perlindungan terhadap tertanggung dan pemegang polis yang diatur dalam Undang-Undang No.2 Tahun 1992 tentang Usaha Perasuransian dengan Undang-Undang No 40 Tahun 2014 tentang perasuransian. kemudian juga bagaimanakah lembaga penjamin pemegang polis di Singapura yang telah menjalankan program penjaminan polis seperti yang diamanatkan oleh Pasal 53 UU No. 40 Tahun 2014 tentang Perasuransian. Penelitian skripsi ini menggunakan metode penelitian yuridis-nomatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan, konsep, dan analisis. Hasil penelitian yang didapatkan adalah mekanisme perlindungan pemegang polis antara UU No. 2 Tahun 1992 dengan UU No.40 Tahun 2014 tidak memiliki perbedaan jauh. Hanya terdapat perbedaan dalam hal nomenklatur dan persyaratan formil saja. Kemudian di Singapura lembaga penjamin pemegang polis terlembaga menyatu dengan lembaga penjamin simpanan dengan nama Singapore Deposit Insurance Corporation dengan membentuk PPF Life Fund dan PPF General Fund untuk melindungi pemegang polis.

---

This thesis discusses policyholder deposit insurance corporation for protection of insurance company customers. in regards to protect the policyholder, policyholder deposit insurance corporation serves to protect the interests of the policyholder if the insurance company fails to pay. however, Indonesia has not been establish institution that previously mentioned despite Insurance Law have already mandated. Based on this, first the author will examine how the comparison of provisions of protection against the insured and policyholders between which set in Law No.2 of 1992 with Law No. 40 of 2014. Second, how institution of policyholder protection in Singapore who has run the policy guarantee program just as mandated by Article 53 of Law no. 40 Year 2014.

This thesis research using juridical normative research method with approach of legislation, concept, and analysis. The result of this research is protection mechanism of policy holder between Law no. 2 of 1992 with Law No.40 of 2014 does not have much difference. The differences only in nomenclature and formal requirements. Then in Singapore the institutional policy guarantor institution integrates with the deposit insurance agency under the name Singapore Deposit Insurance Corporation by establishing PPF Life Fund and PPF General Fund to protect policyholders."