Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"The second edition of Detection of Malingering during Head Injury Litigation offers the latest detection tools and techniques for veteran and novice alike. As in its initial incarnation, this practical revision demonstrates how to combine clinical expertise, carefully-gathered data, and the use of actuarial models as well as common sense in making sound evaluations and reducing ambiguous results. And, the book navigates the reader through the many caveats that come with the job, beginning with the scenario that an individual may be malingering despite having an actual brain injury."

"ABSTRAKPenelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui pengaruh dari coaching terhadap malingering. Penelitian ini didasari oleh penemuan sebelumnya bahwa coaching diketahui mampu menurunkan keakuratan diagnosa tes deteksi malingering. Penelitian ini berupa eksperimen dimana partisipan diberikan vignette, kemudian partisipan diminta mengisi Structured Inventory of Malingered Symptomatology (SIMS) milik Smith dan Burger (1997) yang digunakan untuk mengukur malingering. Tujuh puluh mahasiswa psikologi diminta mengisi SIMS dengan instruksi untuk meyakinkan penguji bahwa mereka memiliki gangguan mental agar mereka dapat lolos dari tes deteksi malingering. Sebelum mengisi SIMS, kelompok eksperimen (n = 38) diberikan coaching berupa pemberian informasi mengenai simtom gangguan psikosis dan cara menghindari deteksi malingering, sedangkan kelompok kontrol (n = 32) tidak diberikan coaching dan langsung diminta mengerjakan SIMS. Hasil penelitian menunjukan bahwa terdapat pengaruh dari coaching terhadap malingering, t(40.087) = 2.212, p = .033.

---

ABSTRACTThe objective of this study was to examine the effect of coaching on malingering. This study was based on findings that coaching can reduce the accuracy of a malingering detection assessment. This study was an experimental research that use vignette to the subjects, then the subjects were administered Smith and Burger?s (1997) the Structured Inventory of Malingered Symptomatology (SIMS) that used to detect malingering. Seventy pschology students were asked to fill out the questionnaire to assure the tester that they suffered mental disorder in order to pass the test. Before they completed the SIMS, the experiment group (n = 38) received coaching which gave them some information about psychosis? symptoms and strategies to avoid the detection of malingering, meanwhile the control group (n = 32) didn?t receive any coaching and directly instructed to complete the SIMS. The results in this study showed that the coaching affected malingering, t(40.087) = 2.212, p = .033."

"[Pendahuluan: Trauma akibat benda tumpul pada kepala adalah salah satu traumayang dapat bersifat fatal, berkaitan dengan organ intrakranial yang bersifat vitalbagi kehidupan. Namun, luka kekerasan tumpul pada kepala tidak seluruhnya dapatmenyebabkan kerusakan organ intrakranial, berkaitan dengan berbagai faktor yangmenyebabkan luka, antara lain lokasi, besar gaya, arah gaya. Pada penelitian iniakan dilihat hubungan antara luka kekerasan tumpul dengan adanya kerusakan otak.Penelitian epidemiologi forensik ini digunakan untuk menunjang opini ahli dokterforensik pada temuan luka akibat kekerasan tumpul di kepala dengan kerusakanorgan intrakranial. Metode: Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian cross-sectionaldengan data sekunder yang berasal dari visum et repertum pasien di DepartemenForensik dan Medikolegal FKUI-RSCM. Hasil: Sebanyak 1% hubungan antaramemar pada kepala memiliki hubungan yang bermakna dengan kerusakan otak, 1%hubungan antara ekskoriasi pada kepala memiliki hubungan yang bermakna dengankerusakan otak, sebanyak 82% hubungan antara laserasi pada kepala memilikihubungan yang bermakna dengan kerusakan otak, dan sebanyak 95,3% hubunganantara fraktur pada kepala memiliki hubungan yang bermakna dengan kerusakanotak. Diskusi: Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa terdapat variasi hubunganantara luka kekerasan tumpul dengan adanya kerusakan otak berdasarkan jenis sertalokasi luka luar dan lokasi kerusakan intrakranialnya. Variasi hasil ini terjadi karenaluka kekerasan tumpul, yaitu memar, ekskoriasi, laserasi, dan fraktur, masingmasingmemiliki mekanisme yang berbeda, dan timbul akibat besar gaya yangberbeda. Memar dan ekskoriasi, luka kekerasan tumpul yang disebabkan oleh gayayang kecil dan menyebabkan diskontinuitas jaringan luar hanya sedikit hanyamemiliki sedikit hubungan dengan kerusakan otak. Laserasi dan fraktur memilikibanyak hubungan dengan kerusakan otak oleh karena gaya penyebab lukakekerasan tumpul tersebut bersifat lebih besar, Introduction: Blunt head trauma had a high fatality rate, as the head protectsintracranial organs that are vital to the continuity of life. However, not all blunthead trauma cause the same damage to intracranial organs, due to the variousfactors such as location, the strength of the force, and the direction from which thestriking force came. This forensic epidemiological study is designed to supportexpert opinions in forensic practice regarding the findings of blunt head trauma andintracranial organ damage. In this study, the correlation between blunt head traumaand traumatic brain injury were analyzed. Methods: This study is a cross-sectionalstudy with secondary data from patients’ visum et repertum in the Forensic andMedicolegal Department of Cipto Mangunkusumo General Hospital. Results:Results show that 1% of the correlations between bruise findings on the head hadsignificant association with traumatic brain injury, 1% of the correlations betweenexcoriation findings on the head had significant association with traumatic braininjury, 82% of the correlations between laceration findings on the head hadsignificant association with traumatic brain injury, and 95,3% of the correlationsbetween fracture findings on the skull had significant association with traumaticbrain injury. Discussion: This study showed that the relationship between blunthead injury with traumatic brain injury varied based on the location and type of theexternal injury and the location of the intracranial organ. This variation in resultshappened as external blunt head trauma such as bruise, excoriation, laceration, andfracture each had different mechanisms, and were caused by various force intensity.Bruising and excoriation, which were usually caused by smaller force and onlycaused little damage externally, were found to have little correlation with traumaticbrain injury findings. On the other hand, laceration and fracture were found to havemore correlation with traumatic brain injury findings, since both traumas wereusually caused by a greater force.]"

"This book offers the ideal way for a foreign lawyer to get in touch with litigation practice and procedure in the Netherlands. Whether a lawyer comes to Dutch litigation in the normal course of business, or whether the brief and inexpensive kort geding (preliminary relief proceedings) is the main attraction, this concise guide provides a solid understanding of the practical implications of Dutch litigation. This is the indispensable tool for meaningful exchanges with your Dutch litigation counsel, prior or during any lawsuit." "Litigation in the Netherlands will prove a practical and comprehensive guide for all foreign lawyers, businesses and individuals involved in commercial litigation in the Netherlands, as well as a handy reference for Dutch lawyers who wish to advise their English-speaking clients on Dutch litigation." --Book Jacket. "