Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"[Undang-Undang Nomor 4 Tahun 2009 merupakan undang-undang yang dapat dikatakan cukup kontroversial bagi pertambangan mineral logam, karena merubah alur industri pertambangan logam tanah air menjadi tidak hanya mencakup kegiatan pertambangan semata, akan tetapi juga diwajibkan untuk perusahaan-perusahaan pertambangan melakukan kegiatan pengolahan dan pemurnian di dalam negeri dalam kurun waktu hanya 5 (lima) tahun saja. Keterbatasan infrastruktur di daerah-daerah, ketidaktersediaan listrik, serta kompleksnya birokrasi yang melingkupi perluasan bidang usaha lintas sektor antara pertambangan (hulu) dengan pemurnian (hilir) membuat hal tersebut menjadi terlalu sulit diwujudkan, ditambah lagi dengan inkonsistensi Pemerintah yang menetapkan kewajiban divestasi saham bagi Perusahaan Pertambangan Penanaman Modal Asing, dari 20% (dua puluh persen) di tahun 2010, menjadi 51% (lima puluh satu persen) di tahun 2012. Selain kedua hal tersebut, pada tahun ketiga sejak Undang-Undang Nomor 4 Tahun 2009 diberlakukan, Pemerintah telah melarang kegiatan ekspor mineral mentah, akan tetapi mencabutnya kembali dan menetapkan ketentuan ekspor dengan tambahan birokrasi yang semakin panjang, sehingga menyebabkan investor pertambangan penanaman modal asing kehilangan waktu dan sulit dalam merealisasikan amanah Undang-Undang Nomor 4 Tahun 2009 tersebut. Penulisan ini bertujuan untuk menampilkan fakta kesulitan-kesulitan yang dialami oleh PT. X selaku perusahaan penanaman modal asing dalam bidang pertambangan mineral nikel oleh karena kebijakan pertambangan yang tidak cukup berimbang.

---

Law Number 4 Year 2009 could be considered as a controversy for the metal mineral mining businesses, since it has changed the scheme of domestic metal mineral mining industry to not only contains mining but also obliged the mining companies to conduct mineral smelting and processing domestically within period of only 5 (five) years. The limitation of infrastructure facilities within the counties, unavailability of electrical source, and the complexity of bureaucracies that facilitates such cross borders industrial sectors between the mining (mainstream industries) , and the smelting and processing (downstream industries) has caused such policy too unreasonable to be accomplished, moreover the inconsistency of the Government whom has stipulated the divestment terms for the foreign investing mining company, from 20% (twenty percent) in 2010, and re-stipulated it to became 51% (fifty one) percent within 2012. Apart from those two main issues herein, by the third year since the enactment of Law Number 4 Year 2009, the Government has banned the raw mineral export activities, however revoked such laws and enacted a new regulation of raw mineral export policies with additional/ longer bureaucracy’s mechanism process, therefore it has put the foreign mining investors within difficult circumstances to actualize the mandate of the laws itself. This Thesis intends to display the problematic facts that experienced by PT. X as a foreign investing mining company in nickel mining by the insufficient fairness of mining policies.;Law Number 4 Year 2009 could be considered as a controversy for the metal mineral mining businesses, since it has changed the scheme of domestic metal mineral mining industry to not only contains mining but also obliged the mining companies to conduct mineral smelting and processing domestically within period of only 5 (five) years. The limitation of infrastructure facilities within the counties, unavailability of electrical source, and the complexity of bureaucracies that facilitates such cross borders industrial sectors between the mining (mainstream industries) , and the smelting and processing (downstream industries) has caused such policy too unreasonable to be accomplished, moreover the inconsistency of the Government whom has stipulated the divestment terms for the foreign investing mining company, from 20% (twenty percent) in 2010, and re-stipulated it to became 51% (fifty one) percent within 2012. Apart from those two main issues herein, by the third year since the enactment of Law Number 4 Year 2009, the Government has banned the raw mineral export activities, however revoked such laws and enacted a new regulation of raw mineral export policies with additional/ longer bureaucracy’s mechanism process, therefore it has put the foreign mining investors within difficult circumstances to actualize the mandate of the laws itself. This Thesis intends to display the problematic facts that experienced by PT. X as a foreign investing mining company in nickel mining by the insufficient fairness of mining policies.;Law Number 4 Year 2009 could be considered as a controversy for the metal mineral mining businesses, since it has changed the scheme of domestic metal mineral mining industry to not only contains mining but also obliged the mining companies to conduct mineral smelting and processing domestically within period of only 5 (five) years. The limitation of infrastructure facilities within the counties, unavailability of electrical source, and the complexity of bureaucracies that facilitates such cross borders industrial sectors between the mining (mainstream industries) , and the smelting and processing (downstream industries) has caused such policy too unreasonable to be accomplished, moreover the inconsistency of the Government whom has stipulated the divestment terms for the foreign investing mining company, from 20% (twenty percent) in 2010, and re-stipulated it to became 51% (fifty one) percent within 2012. Apart from those two main issues herein, by the third year since the enactment of Law Number 4 Year 2009, the Government has banned the raw mineral export activities, however revoked such laws and enacted a new regulation of raw mineral export policies with additional/ longer bureaucracy’s mechanism process, therefore it has put the foreign mining investors within difficult circumstances to actualize the mandate of the laws itself. This Thesis intends to display the problematic facts that experienced by PT. X as a foreign investing mining company in nickel mining by the insufficient fairness of mining policies., Law Number 4 Year 2009 could be considered as a controversy for the metal mineral mining businesses, since it has changed the scheme of domestic metal mineral mining industry to not only contains mining but also obliged the mining companies to conduct mineral smelting and processing domestically within period of only 5 (five) years. The limitation of infrastructure facilities within the counties, unavailability of electrical source, and the complexity of bureaucracies that facilitates such cross borders industrial sectors between the mining (mainstream industries) , and the smelting and processing (downstream industries) has caused such policy too unreasonable to be accomplished, moreover the inconsistency of the Government whom has stipulated the divestment terms for the foreign investing mining company, from 20% (twenty percent) in 2010, and re-stipulated it to became 51% (fifty one) percent within 2012. Apart from those two main issues herein, by the third year since the enactment of Law Number 4 Year 2009, the Government has banned the raw mineral export activities, however revoked such laws and enacted a new regulation of raw mineral export policies with additional/ longer bureaucracy’s mechanism process, therefore it has put the foreign mining investors within difficult circumstances to actualize the mandate of the laws itself. This Thesis intends to display the problematic facts that experienced by PT. X as a foreign investing mining company in nickel mining by the insufficient fairness of mining policies.]"

"Skripsi ini membahas mengenai ketentuan kewajiban divestasi saham bagi perusahaan asing di bidang pertambangan mineral menurut UU No. 4 Tahun 2009 dan peraturan pelaksananya serta sinkronisasinya dengan hasil renegosiasi kontrak karya PT. Freeport Indonesia. Setelah melewati proses renegosiasi, pada akhirnya tercapai kesepakatan antara Pemerintah Republik Indonesia dan PT. Freeport Indonesia yang menentukan bahwa kewajiban divestasi saham PT. Freeport Indonesia adalah sebesar 30%. Dengan menggunakan jenis penelitian yuridis normatif, hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa hasil renegosiasi kontrak karya PT. Freeport tidak sinkron dengan peraturan yang berlaku pada saat itu yaitu PP No. 24 Tahun 2012, yang mengatur perusahaan asing di bidang pertambangan mineral untuk mendivestasikan sahamnya paling sedikit sebesar 51%. Setelah PP No. 24 Tahun 2012 diubah dengan PP No. 77 Tahun 2014, maka ketentuan kewajiban divestasi saham hasil renegosiasi kontrak karya PT. Freeport Indonesia dengan peraturan perundang-undangan telah sinkron.

---

This thesis examines the provisions regarding share divestment obligation for foreign mineral mining company according to Law No. 4 of 2009 and its implementing regulations, and the synchronisation with the result of contract of work renegotiation of PT. Freeport Indonesia. After going through the process of renegotiation, the Government of Republic of Indonesia and PT. Freeport Indonesia eventually reached an understanding that PT. Freeport Indonesia is obliged to divest 30% of its share.

By using normative juridical research, this study shows that the result of contract of work renegotiation of PT. Freeport Indonesia is not in sync with the applicabe regulation i.e. Government Regulation No. 24 of 2012 which requires foreign mineral mining company to divest at least 51% of its share. After Government Regulation No. 24 of 2012 is amended by Governement Regulation No. 77 of 2014, the provisions regarding share divestment obligation between the result of contract of work renegotiation of PT. Freeport Indonesia and Law No. 4 of 2009 and its implementing regulations has synchronised."

"Tesis ini membahas mengenai kedudukan Kontrak Karya pasca disahkannya UU Nomor 4 Tahun 2009 tentang Mineral dan Batubara, dimana dengan berlakunya UU Minerba tersebut, sistem Kontrak Karya sudah tidak diberlakukan lagi karena sistem perizinan yang diberlakukan untuk berinvestasi pada bidang pertambangan di Indonesia. Dalam UU tersebut terdapat ketentuan bahwa Kontrak karya yang telah disetujui akan tetap berlaku, tetapi perlu penyesuaian. Ketentuan tersebut dinilai kontradiktif oleh beberapa kalangan. Hasil penelitian menyarankan bahwa sebaiknya dibuat peraturan pelaksana agar ketentuan yang menimbulkan pertanyaan dapat dijawab.

---

This thesis discusses about legal standing of Work of Contract after Law Number 4 Year 2009 concerning Mineral and Coal Mining is being authorized, where Work of Contract is no longer applicable for mining investment in Indonesia according to the new regulation which applies license system. It is mentioned later in the regulation that the Work of Contract that have been approved will remain valid, but with necessary adjustment. Thus, the provision is considered contradictory. This research suggests that it is better to make implementation regulation so that provisions which may raise questions can be answered."

"Era bare pengusahaan dan pengelolaan pertambangan khususnya mineral dan batubara pada masa sekarang dimulai dengan diterbitkannya Undang-Undang Nomor 4 tahun 2009 tentang Pertambangan Mineral dan Batubara atau biasa dikenal dengan nama UU Minerba. UU Minerba memberikan arah baru kebijakan pertambangan mineral dan batubara di Indonesia ke depannya termasuk diantaranya dalam hal pengaturan Domestic Market Obligation (DMO), kebijakan produksi mineral dan batubara, peningkatan nilai tambah pertambangan, ketentuan divestasi saham usaha pertambangan asing Berta praktik pertambangan yang baik dan benar. Tesis ini secara khusus memfokuskan kajiannya pada ketentuan divestasi wham pertambangan penanaman modal asing yang terdapat dalam UU Minerba beserta peraturan pelaksanaannya termasuk juga menganalisis kewajiban divestasi saham yang terdapat dalam Kontrak Karya PT. Freeport Indonesia yang scat ini sedang dalam tahap renegosiasi oleh Pemerintah Indonesia. Metode penelitian yang dipakai dalam penulisan tesis ini adalah penelitian deskriptif analisis karena akan mendeskripsikan dan memberikan gambaran secara sistematis, faktual dan akurat mengenai ketentuan divestasi wham usaha pertambangan asing sebagaimana diamanatkan dalam UU Minerba beserta peraturan pelaksanaannya. Sedangkan dilihat dari bentuknya merupakan penelitian evaluatif karena akan menilai dan menganalisa proses renegosiasi khususnya ketentuan divestasi saham di dalam Kontrak Karya PT. Freeport Indonesia. Dari sudut tujuan penelitian hokum maka penelitian ini merupakan penelitian hokum yuridis normatif karena sasaran penelitian ini adalah hokum atau kaedah (norm). Disamping itu penelitian ini merupakan penelitian kepustakaan, sehingga data yang digunakan adalah data sekunder, dengan penelusuran literatur-literatur Berta berbagai peraturan terkait yang dikeluarkan oleh pemerintah. Dari penelitian ini dapat disimpulkan bahwa divestasi wham pada dasarnya merupakan salah satu bentuk kewajiban yang harus dilakukan oleh penanam modal asing atau investor asing kepada pemerintah Indonesia atau warga negara Indonesia atau badan hokum Indonesia dengan tujuan untuk meningkatkan kesejahteraan masyarakat banyak karena dividen yang diterima oleh pembeli saham akan dapat dipergunakan dalam pembangunan daerah dan pengembangan masyarakat. Terkait dengan renegosiasi ketentuan divestasi wham dalam Kontrak Karya PT. Freeport Indonesia diperlukan kebijakan dan ketegasan untuk menata keistimewaan yang selama ini telah diperoleh PT. Freeport Indonesia melalui Kontrak Karyanya. Penulis menyarankan agar Pemerintah Indonesia dapat menciptakan suatu iklim penanaman modal yang dapat menarik modal asing masuk ke Indonesia dimana diperlukan suatu upaya dan terobosan dalam mengeluarkan peraturan-peraturan tentang penanaman modal asing dan kebijaksanaan pemerintah yang pada dasarnya tidak akan merugikan kepentingan nasional dan kepentingan investor.

---

The new era of business and management of mining especially on mineral and coal, currently begins with the issuance of Law No. 4 of 2009 on Mineral and Coal Mining or commonly known as the Mining Law. Mining Law provide the new policy direction of mineral and coal mining in Indonesia in the future including in terms of Domestic Market Obligation (DMO), mineral and coal production policy, the increasing in value-added mining, shares divestment of foreign investment mining company and good mining practices.

This thesis specifically focuses its studies on the provision of mining shares divestment of foreign investment as set forth in the Mining Law and its implementing regulations as well as the analyzing of the divestment obligations as contained in the Contract of Work of PT. Freeport Indonesia which is currently under renegotiation by the Government of Indonesia.

The research method used in this thesis is a descriptive analysis since it will describe and illustrate a systematic, factual and accurate information on the terms of foreign mining divestment as mandated by the Mining Law and its implementing regulations. In the terms of of its forms, this research is an evaluative research as it will assess and analyze the process of renegotiation especially divestment provisions in the Contract of Work of PT. Freeport Indonesia. From the purpose of law research point of view, this research is a normative legal research since the goal of this research is legal or norm. Thus, this research is also a library research, so that the data used are the secondary data, the literature search as well as a variety of related regulations issued by the government.

The conclusion of this research is that the divestment is basically a form of obligation that must be carried out by the foreign investors or foreign investors to the Indonesian government or Indonesian citizens or Indonesian legal entities with the aim to improve the welfare of people due to the dividends that received by stock buyers will be used in local development and community development. Relating to renegotiation in the terms of shares divestment in the Contract of Work of PT. Freeport Indonesia, it needed the policy and firmness for managing the privileges that had been acquired by PT. Freeport Indonesia through its Contract of Work. The author recommends that the Government of Indonesia shall create an investment climate that can attract foreign capital into Indonesia where it will need effort and breakthrough in terms of regulations issuance of foreign investment and also government policies that basically will not prejudice the national and investors' interest."

"Pada bidang energi dan sumberdaya alam terdapat sektor pertambangan Mineral dan Batubara merupakan energi yang tak dapat diperbaharui serta berasal dari bawah tanah, sehingga memerlukan perhatian dalam melakukan pengelelolaan. Dalam hal pengelolaan tersebut pemerintah pusat medistribusikan kewenangannya untuk melakukan pengelolaan pertambangan mineral dan batubara berdasarkan pada asas-asas otonomi daerah. Dengan didasari atas asas-asas otonomi daerah tersebut maka adanya pembagian atas urusan pemerintahan yang menjadi kewenangan antara Pemerintah Pusat, Pemerintah Provinsi dan Pemerintah Kabupaten/Kota. Kewenangan Pemerintah Daerah Kabupaten/Kota dalam pengelolaan sumberdaya alam mineral dan batubara berdasarkan pada UU No. 4 Tahun 2009 Tentang Mineral dan Batubara diberikan secara setelah berlakunya UU No. 23 Tahun 2014 Tentang Pemerintah Daerah.

---

In the field of energy and natural resources containing mineral and coal mining sector are the non-renewable energy and derived from underground, requiring attention in managing. In terms of the management of the central government authority distributed the management of mineral and coal based on the principles of local autonomy. Based on the principles of local autonomy discords by the top division of government affairs under the authority of the central government, provincial government and regency/district governments. The authority of regency/district government in natural resource management of mineral and coal base Law Number 4 Year 2009 in concern Mineral and Coal granted after the enactment of Law Number 23 Year 2014 on Regional Government."

"Skripsi ini membahas kewenangan Pemerintah dalam mengelola pertambangan mineral dan batubara setelah ditetapkannya UU No. 3 Tahun 2020 beserta peraturan pelaksananya. Penelitian ini dilakukan secara yuridis-normatif dengan mengkaji dan membandingkan perkembangan peraturan perundang-undangan terkhususnya pada sektor pertambangan mineral dan batubara. Pengelolaan pertambangan mineral dan batubara berdasarkan pada “Hak Menguasai Negara” dan bertujuan untuk mewujudkan manfaat “sebesar-besarnya kemakmuran rakyat” sebagai amanat Pasal 33 ayat (3) UUD 1945. Melalui hasil penelitian ini dapat disimpulkan bahwa disharmonisasi antara UU No. 4 Tahun 2009 dengan UU No. 23 Tahun 2014 telah diselaraskan oleh UU No. 3 Tahun 2020 melalui perubahan konsep kewenangan pengelolaan pertambangan mineral dan batubara menjadi Sentralisasi dengan mengakomodir Dekonsentrasi berdasarkan diskresi Pemerintah Pusat. Meskipun demikian Pemerintah tetap disarankan untuk mempercepat tindak lanjut pembentukan Perangkat Daerah yang mengurus pertambangan mineral dan batubara serta mengawal secara penuh proses pengalihan Izin Usaha Pertambangan.

---

The following thesis discusses the Government's authority in managing the mining of mineral and coal after the enactment of Law No. 3 of 2020 and its implementing regulations. The research was conducted in a juridical-normative manner by reviewing and comparing the development of laws and regulations, especially in the mineral and coal mining sector. The management of mineral and coal mining is based on the "State Controlling Right" and aims to realize the benefits of "the greatest prosperity of the people" as mandated by Article 33 paragraph (3) of the 1945 Constitution. Through this research, the disharmonization issue between Law No. 4 of 2009 with Law No. 23 of 2014 has been resolved by Law No. 3 of 2020 by implementing changes in the concept of authority for managing mineral and coal mining to become Centralized by accommodating Deconcentration based on the discretion of the Central Government. However, it is strongly advised that the Government needs to accelerate the formation of Regional Apparatus that manages mineral and coal mining and fully oversees the process of transferring Mining Business Permits."

"Tesis ini membahas mengenai perlindungan hukum PT MMP atas Izin Usaha Pertambangan Operasi Produksi yang sudah didapatkan melalui SK Menteri ESDM No. 3109 Tahun 2014 yang kemudian dibatalkan oleh Putusan Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara Jakarta No. 211/G/2014/P.TUN.JKT tanggal 14 Juli 2014, jo. Pengadilan Tinggi Tata Usaha Negara Jakarta No. 271/B/2015/PT.TUN.JKT tanggal 14 Desember 2015, Jo. Putusan Kasasi Mahkamah Agung No. 255 K/TUN/2016 tanggal 11 Agustus 2016. Pembatalan tersebut disebabkan oleh tidak dipenuhi-nya Izin Pemanfaatan Pulau Kecil dari Kementerian Kelautan dan Perikanan oleh PT MMP dan juga terdapat kesalahan dari instansi yang berwenang yakni Kementerian ESDM dan Kementerian kelautan dan Perikanan yang tidak dapat memberikan Izin Pemanfaatan Pulau Kecil kepada PT MMP. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian hukum yang menggunakan pendekatan yuridis normatif. Hasil penelitian ini adalah sebagai berikut: Pertama, pemberian Izin Usaha Pertambangan PT MMP sejati-nya telah sesuai dengan Pasal 65 UU No. 4 Tahun 2009. Kedua, Putusan Pengadilan sebagaimana tertuang dalam Putusan Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara Jakarta No. 211/G/2014/P.TUN.JKT tanggal 14 Juli 2014, jo. Pengadilan Tinggi Tata Usaha Negara Jakarta No. 271/B/2015/PT.TUN.JKT tanggal 14 Desember 2015, Jo. Putusan Kasasi Mahkamah Agung No. 255 K/TUN/2016 tanggal 11 Agustus 2016 yang mencabut Izin Usaha Pertambangan PT MMP telah sesuai dalam menerapkan hukum, akan tetapi Kementerian ESDM dan Kementerian Kelautan dan Perikanan seharusnya bertanggung jawab atas pembatalan tersebut. Ketiga, Perlindungan terhadap PT MMP selaku pelaku usaha yang Izin Usaha Pertambangan-nya dicabut adalah perlindungan secara hukum pidana sebagaimana diatur dalam Pasal 165 UU No. 4 Tahun 2009.

---

The focus of this thesis regarding the protection of PT MMP over its Mining Business Licenses which get through from Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources Decree No. 3109 of 2014 but then got annulled by the Administrative Court Jakarta Verdict No. 211/G/2014/P.TUN.JKT dated July 14, 2014, jo. High Administrative Court Jakarta Verdict No. 271/B/2015/PT.TUN.JKT dated December 14, 2015, Jo. Cassation Verdict by the Supreme Court No. 255 K/TUN/2016 dated August 11, 2016. The annulment is caused by the Permission of Isle Utilization from Ministry of Marine Affairs and Fisheries is not fulfilled by PT MMP and also there is a mistake from the authorized institution such as Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources and Ministry of Marine Affairs and Fisheries which cannot provide the Permission of Isle Utilization to PT MMP. This research is a legal research adopting normative juridical approach. The result of the research showed that: First, Mining Business Licenses of PT MMP is in accordance with the Article 65 to Law No. 4 of 2009. Second, the Verdict of The Court that has annulled the Mining Business Licenses of PT MMP is appropriate regarding to its implementation of law, but Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources and Ministry of Marine Affairs and Fisheries should be responsible for the annulment. Third, the legal protection of PT MMP regarding to the revocation of its Mining Business Licenses is only criminal protection which has been regulated in Article 165 to Law No. 4 of 2009."

"Tujuan Negara yaitu untuk memajukan kesejahteraan umum dan memajukan kesejahteraan sosial bagi seluruh rakyat Indonesia. Saat ini mengenai pertambangan mineral dan batubara diatur dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 4 Tahun 2009 tentang Pertambangan Mineral dan Batubara. Dewasa ini hampir di semua negara khususnya negara berkembang membutuhkan modal asing. Modal asing itu merupakan suatu hal yang semakin penting bagi pembangunan suatu negara. Sehingga kehadiran investor asing nampaknya tidak mungkin dihindari. Yang menjadi permasalahan bahwa kehadiran investor asing sangat dipengaruhi oleh kondisi internal suatu negara, seperti stabilitas ekonomi, politik negara, penegakkan hukum. Penanaman modal asing memberikan keuntungan kepada semua pihak, tidak hanya bagi investor saja, tetapi juga bagi perekonomian negara tempat modal itu ditanamkan serta bagi negara asal para investor. Dalam UU Minerba salah satu ketentuan yang dianggap cukup penting adalah mengenai kewajiban divestasi, yang diatur dalam Pasal 112. Divestasi adalah jumlah saham asing yang harus ditawarkan untuk di jual kepada peserta Indonesia.

---

The Purpose of Indonesia as a state is to promote the general welfare and promote social welfare for all the people of Indonesia. Currently the mineral and coal mining regulated by Law Number 4 Year 2009 Concerning Mineral and Coal Mining. Lately in all countries, especially developing countries need foreign capital.

Foreign capital is something that is increasingly important for the development of a country. So the presence of foreign investors is can’t be avoided. The presence of foreign investors is strongly influenced by the internal conditions of a country, such as economic stability, political state, the rule of law.

Foreign investment to the benefit of all parties, not only for investors but also for the economy of the country where the capital invested as well as for the country of origin of the investor. In the Mining Law one of the important regulation is about divestment, which is provided in Article 112. Divestment is the number of foreign shares should be offered to be sold to Indonesian participants."

"ABSTRAKPerjanjian Karya Pengusahaan Pertambangan Batubara (PKP2B) generasi ketiga merupakan bentuk peg'anjian yang memberikan kewenangan kepada pengusaha atau kontraktor untuk melakukan usaha pertambangan dengan mengacu kepada Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 1967 tentang Ketentuan Pokok Pertambangan. Dalam perkembangan lebih lanjut, Undang-Undang Nomor I I Tahun 1967 diganti dengan Undang-Undang Nomor 4 Tahun 2009 tentang Pertambangan Mineral dan Batubara. Dalam ketentuan peralihannya, pemegang PKP2B harus menyesuaikan Pe{anjian dalam waktu 1 (satu) tahun. Salah satu penyesuaian yang dilakukan adalah penambahan klausula bea keluar dalam amandemen.Permasahan yang timbul dalam penulisan ini adalah posisi PT XXX dengan Pemerintah dalam renegosiasi terkait penambahan klausula bea keluar dan bagaimana agar renegosiasi dapat dicapai dengan musyawarah mufakat.Metode dalam penulisan ini adalah metode kepustakaan yang bersifat yuridis normatif. Tipe penelitian dalam penelitian ini bersifat preskriptif dan alat pengumpulan data yang dipakai dalam penelitian ini adalah dengan studi dokumen atau studi kepustakaan. Pendekatan yang ditempuh dalam penulisan ini adalah pendekatan kualitatif.Dalam kajian ini, Penulis mengambil kesimpulan bahwa bea keluar dapat dimasukkan dalam amandemen apabila ada kesepakatan dan para pihak menghargai dan menghormati isi PKP2B yang telah ditandatangani. Kajian ini diharapkan dapat memberikan masukan bagi pemerintah dan pemegang PKP2B generasi ketiga untuk menemukan solusi sehingga amandemen yang telah tertunda enam (tahun) dapat segera ditandatansani.

---

ABSTRACT

The 3rd generation of Work Agreement on Coal Mining Exploitation (PIG2B) is a form of agreement which granting authorization to the employer or contractor to engage in mining exploitation work in accordance with Law Number 11 of 1967 on Basic Mining Regulation. Law Number I I of 1967 was later amended by Law Number 4 of 2009 on Mineral and Coal Mining. Under the transitory provisions, the holder of PKP2B is required to amend the Agreement within a period of I (one) year. One of such amendments is to supplement the clause of export duty set forth in an amendment.

The subject matter which arises in this paper is the position of PT XXX with the Government in the renegotiation on the addition of clause of export duty and how such renegotiation can be concluded deliberately.

The method applied in the process of completing this paper is juridical normative literature study. The type of research is prescriptive and data collection instrument used in this research is documentary study or literary study. The approach taken in this paper is qualitative approach.

In this study, the writer has drawn conclusion that the clause of export duty can be incorporated into the amendment upon mutual agreement and honor of the parties of the substance of upon which PKP2B is signed. This study is expected to provide input for the govemment and holders PKP2B third generation to find a solution so that the amendments that had been delayed six (years) could be signed soon."

"Penelitian ini membahas mengenai beberapa permasalahan, seperti pembahasan tentang implikasi dari konsistensi pelaksanaan peraturan serta ketentuan yang berlaku disktor pertambangan terhadap perlindungan investor dalam hal pemberian izin. Kemudian persoalan tentang efisiensi dalam proses penyelesaian sengketa izin usaha wilayah pertambangan. Serta pihak yang berhak atas kuasa pertambangan di konawe Utara berdasarkan fakta hukum dan rasionlitas para majelis Hakim. Penelitian ini adalah penelitian yuridis normatif. Hasil penelitian ini adalah bahwa masalah konsistensi peraturan terhadap pemberian izin pertambangan belum tercapai, sehingga harus ada sosialisasi peraturan di tingkat pemerintah daerah dan koordinasi yang kuat antara pihak yang terkait, baik pada tingkat pusat maupun daerah. Kemudian, proses penyelesaian sengketa yang ditempuh tidak efisien bagi investor, sehingga dianjurkan adanya lembaga khusus untuk menyelesaikan permasalahan pertambangan agar lebih efektif dari segi waktu dan biayas. Berdasarkan fakta hukum dan rasionalitas para hakim, maka jelas pihak yang berhak atas kuasa pertambangan tersebut adalah PT. DIPM karena telah sesuai dengan prosedur yang ada.

---

This research discusses about several issues, such as a discussion of the implications of the consistent implementation of the rules and regulations of the mining sector in terms of investor protection licensing. Then the question of the efficiency of the dispute resolution process mining license area. As well as the party entitled to Mining in Northern Konawe based on legal facts and rationality of the Panel of Judges. This research is normative.

The results of this study is that the problem of consistency rules for granting mining licenses have not been achieved, so there should be laws and regulations at the local level and strong coordination between the parties involved, both at central and regional levels. Then, the dispute resolution process adopted inefficient for investors, so it is recommended a special agency to resolve the problem of mining to be more effective in terms of time and cost. Based on the legal facts and rationality of the judges, it is clear that the parties are entitled to power mining is PT.DIPM due in accordance with established procedures."