Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

Hasil Pencarian

Ditemukan 100660 dokumen yang sesuai dengan query
cover
Muhammad Fatonie Suryansyah
"[ABSTRAK
Akta jual beli seharusnya merupakan bukti bahwa benar telah dilakukan perbuatan hukum peralihan hak atas tanah untuk selama-lamanya bukan dilakukan dengan pura-pura (schijnhandeling). Pembuktian bahwa hak atas tanah tersebut dialihkan dibuktikan dengan suatu akta yang dibuat oleh dan dihadapan Pejabat Pembuat Akta Tanah. Permasalahan dalam tesis ini adalah bagaimana akibat hukum yang ditimbulkan oleh akta jual beli yang dilakukan dengan pura-pura (schijnhandeling) dalam putusan nomor 51/PDT/2014/PT/PLG. dan bagaimana peran dan tanggung jawab Pejabat Pembuat Akta Tanah dengan adanya akta jual beli yang dilakukan dengan pura-pura (schijnhandeling). Untuk menjawab permasalahan tersebut dilakukan penelitian hukum dengan pendekatan secara yuridis normatif, mempergunakan data sekunder yang diperoleh dari studi kepustakaan, dan hasil penelitian bersifat preskriptif analitis, karena ditujukan untuk memberikan data yang seteliti mungkin tentang sifat-sifat hubungan hukum, keadaan atau gejala-gejala tertentu dalam suatu tindakan hukum. Akta jual beli yang dilakukan dengan pura-pura adalah perbuatan yang bertentangan dengan ketentuan yang berlaku, dikarenakan jual beli atas tanah pada dasarnya adalah suatu perbuatan hukum berupa penyerahan hak atas tanah yang bersangkutan untuk selama-lamanya. Pejabat Pembuat Akta Tanah dalam hal ini hanya menjamin kebenaran materiil dan kebenaran formil dalam setiap akta peralihan hak atas tanah dan tidak dapat dipertanggungjawabkan secara hukum terhadap ketidakjujuran klien dalam memberikan informasi.

ABSTRACT
Deed of Sale and Purchase necessarily be as an evidence that a legal act of land rights transfer has been done for permanently instead of ostensible (schijnhandeling). A verification that land rights has been transfered is evidenced by a deed which is made and before by a Land Deed Officer. Issues in this thesis are how legal consequences that made by an ostensible act (schijnhandeling) in a Deed of Sale and Purchase as in verdict number 51/PDT/2014/PT/PLG and how is the role and responsibility of Land Deed Officer with the presence of ostensible act in a Deed of Sale and Purchase. To answer those issues a normative legal research is conducted. Using secondary data gained from literature studies and a prescriptive analytic research wherefore its intended to provide a comprehensive and accurately data on attributes of legal relation, circumstances or certain symptoms in a legal act. Deed of Sale and Purchase which made with an ostensiblity is contrary to the applicable law and regulation, because a land sale and purchase is a legal act in the form of land rights submission for permanently. The Land Deed Officer regard to this issue is only ensure the material righteousness and formal righteousness in every land rights submission and could not legally accounted for dishonest clients in giving information.
;Deed of Sale and Purchase necessarily be as an evidence that a legal act of land rights transfer has been done for permanently instead of ostensible (schijnhandeling). A verification that land rights has been transfered is evidenced by a deed which is made and before by a Land Deed Officer. Issues in this thesis are how legal consequences that made by an ostensible act (schijnhandeling) in a Deed of Sale and Purchase as in verdict number 51/PDT/2014/PT/PLG and how is the role and responsibility of Land Deed Officer with the presence of ostensible act in a Deed of Sale and Purchase. To answer those issues a normative legal research is conducted. Using secondary data gained from literature studies and a prescriptive analytic research wherefore its intended to provide a comprehensive and accurately data on attributes of legal relation, circumstances or certain symptoms in a legal act. Deed of Sale and Purchase which made with an ostensiblity is contrary to the applicable law and regulation, because a land sale and purchase is a legal act in the form of land rights submission for permanently. The Land Deed Officer regard to this issue is only ensure the material righteousness and formal righteousness in every land rights submission and could not legally accounted for dishonest clients in giving information.
;Deed of Sale and Purchase necessarily be as an evidence that a legal act of land rights transfer has been done for permanently instead of ostensible (schijnhandeling). A verification that land rights has been transfered is evidenced by a deed which is made and before by a Land Deed Officer. Issues in this thesis are how legal consequences that made by an ostensible act (schijnhandeling) in a Deed of Sale and Purchase as in verdict number 51/PDT/2014/PT/PLG and how is the role and responsibility of Land Deed Officer with the presence of ostensible act in a Deed of Sale and Purchase. To answer those issues a normative legal research is conducted. Using secondary data gained from literature studies and a prescriptive analytic research wherefore its intended to provide a comprehensive and accurately data on attributes of legal relation, circumstances or certain symptoms in a legal act. Deed of Sale and Purchase which made with an ostensiblity is contrary to the applicable law and regulation, because a land sale and purchase is a legal act in the form of land rights submission for permanently. The Land Deed Officer regard to this issue is only ensure the material righteousness and formal righteousness in every land rights submission and could not legally accounted for dishonest clients in giving information.
, Deed of Sale and Purchase necessarily be as an evidence that a legal act of land rights transfer has been done for permanently instead of ostensible (schijnhandeling). A verification that land rights has been transfered is evidenced by a deed which is made and before by a Land Deed Officer. Issues in this thesis are how legal consequences that made by an ostensible act (schijnhandeling) in a Deed of Sale and Purchase as in verdict number 51/PDT/2014/PT/PLG and how is the role and responsibility of Land Deed Officer with the presence of ostensible act in a Deed of Sale and Purchase. To answer those issues a normative legal research is conducted. Using secondary data gained from literature studies and a prescriptive analytic research wherefore its intended to provide a comprehensive and accurately data on attributes of legal relation, circumstances or certain symptoms in a legal act. Deed of Sale and Purchase which made with an ostensiblity is contrary to the applicable law and regulation, because a land sale and purchase is a legal act in the form of land rights submission for permanently. The Land Deed Officer regard to this issue is only ensure the material righteousness and formal righteousness in every land rights submission and could not legally accounted for dishonest clients in giving information.
]"
2015
T42651
UI - Tesis Membership  Universitas Indonesia Library
cover
Alvin Kusuma Putra
"Tesis ini membahas mengenai keabsahan Akta Jual Beli yang memiliki nomor akta dengan penambahan huruf dibelakangnya dan tanggung jawab dari PPAT terhadap akta yang dibuatnya apabila mengalami kecacatan. Penilitian ini adalah menggunakan yuridis normatif dengan metode analisis. Hasil penelitian menyatakan bahwa setiap akta yang mempunyai penambahan huruf pada nomornya, untuk menyatakan bahwa akta tersebut sah atau tidak, harus dilihat dari penyebab penambahan tersebut; dan PPAT harus bertanggung jawab sesuai perundang-undangan.

This thesis discusses the validity of the Sale and Purchase Agreements that have numbers behind the deed with the addition of the letter and the responsibility of PPAT deed made when the experience of disability. This research is to use normative juridical analysis method. The study states that every deed that has the addition of the letters on the number, to declare that the deed is legitimate or not, to be seen of the causes of the increase; and shall be responsible in accordance PPAT legislation."
Depok: Fakultas Hukum Universitas Indonesia, 2014
T42451
UI - Tesis Membership  Universitas Indonesia Library
cover
Lyla Mutiara
"ABSTRAK
Tesis ini membahas mengenai bentuk-bentuk dari pembuatan akta jual beli tanah yang tidak sesuai dengan tata cara pembuatan akta PPAT dan akibat hukum dari pebutan akta jual beli tanah yang tidak sesuai dengan tata cara pembuatan akta PPAT.Penelitian ini adalah penelitian yuridis normatif yaitu suatu penelitian yang menganalisis hukum baik yang tertulis oleh hakim melalui proses pengadilan (Law it is devided by the judge through judicial process) Penelitian ini bersifat evaluatif yang bertujuan untuk memberikan penilaian atas kegiatan atau program yang telah dilaksanakan. Berdasarkan suatu penelitian dari analisa hukum ditemukan bahwa akibat hukum dari pembuatan akta jual beli tanah yang tidak sesuai dengan tata cara pembuatan akta PPAT adalah PPAT dapat diberhentikan dengan tidak hormat, Akta PPAT terdegradasi kekuatan pembuktiannya menjadi akta di bawah tangan dan pihak ketiga dapat memanfaatkan hal ini untuk kepentingannya. Sebagai PPAT, hendaknya dalam melakukan pembuatan akta jual beli selalu bersandar kepada ketentuan-ketentuan yang ada oleh karena yang akan dibuat adalah akta akta otentik yang sangat mempengerahui kepastian hukum atas peralihan hak atas tanah .

ABSTRACT
The thesis examines forms of land sale-purchase deed drafting not in accordance with Land Deed Official’s Drafting procedures and legal consequences resulting thereof.This is a juridical normative research analyzing the law decided by the judge through judicial process. The research is an evaluative study aimed at assessing the activities or programs which are already performed. Based on careful examination legal analysis it is found that the legal consequences of land sale-purchase deed drafting not in accordance with Land Deed Official’s Drafting procedures is that the relevant Land Deed Official may have his/her license terminated dishonorably. His/her deed shall be degraded in terms of its evidencing power to become a private deed and any third parties shall be able to benefit this circumstance for their respective interests.It is suggested for a land deed official in drafting a land sale purchase deed to always refer to the present provisions as the document that he/she will make is authentic ones which greatly affect the legal certainty over the transfer of land title."
Universitas Indonesia, 2013
T33159
UI - Tesis Membership  Universitas Indonesia Library
cover
Harum Melati Suci
"ABSTRAK
Jual beli tanah dengan kuasa jual secara umum sering ditemui dalam praktek pertanahan. Terdapat kelemahan-kelemahan dalam pelaksanaannya, salah satunya terkait dengan sebab-sebab berakhirnya kuasa akibat meninggalnya pemberi kuasa sebagaimana diatur dalam pasal 1813 KUHPerdata. Penelitian ini akan membahas mengenai akibat hukumnya bagi pihak ketiga yang beritikad baik dan penerapannya dalam putusan Peninjauan Kembali Nomor 29PK/Pdt/2009. Bentuk penelitian ini adalah Yuridis normatif, dengan Tipologi Penelitian Deskriptif-Preskriptif, menggunakan data sekunder yang diperoleh melalui penelusuran dokumen hukum, kemudian data tersebut dianalisis dengan metode analisis data kualitatif. Pihak ketiga yang beritikad baik memperoleh perlindungan hukum dari ancaman kebatalan surat kuasa akibat meninggalnya pemberi kuasa dan ancaman kebatalan perikatan yang dilakukannya atas dasar kuasa tersebut sebagaimana diatur dalam pasal 1818 ayat (2) KUHPerdata, dan oleh karenanya alasan-alasan hukum yang digunakan dalam putusan Peninjauan Kembali Nomor 29PK/Pdt/2009 dalam pembatalan akta-akta jual beli atas tanah yang menjadi obyek sengketa adalah tidak tepat, karena ketentuan hukum perdata telah memberikan solusi dan perlindungan hukum terhadap kelemahan dari pemberian kuasa, terutama akibat hukumnya bagi pihak ketiga yang beritikad baik. Sebagai saran dari penelitian ini adalah untuk mencegah timbulnya sengketa dikemudian hari, apabila menerima kuasa jual yang pelaksanaannya dalam tenggang waktu yang relatif panjang sejak kuasa tersebut diterbitkan, maka PPAT sebaiknya berupaya untuk meminta klien untuk membuat surat kuasa jual yang baru, dan/atau untuk memastikan bahwa kuasa yang dimiliki oleh si penerima kuasa belum berakhir oleh sebab-sebab berakhirnya kuasa menurut pasal 1813 KUHPerdata, ditambahkan klausul pada akta jual beli yang memuat pernyataan dan jaminan dari si penerima kuasa mengenai keberlakuan dan keabsahan surat kuasa tersebut.

ABSTRACT
In the implementation of the land transfering, we commonly found a mandate or an authority which is also known as authority to transfer a land rights and represent the seller/the owner of the land rights. There are some disadvantages about this letter of authority, related to the causes that ended the authority as stipulated in the civil code Article 1813. That the authority is ended by law because of the death of the endorser. This research discussed about the the legal consequences for third parties with good faith and the consequences to the Land deed, by analysing it with the verdict number 29PK/Pdt/2009. This research is a normative juridical research, with the Descriptive-Prescriptive typology, using secondary data which was obtained through searches of legal documents, and analyzed with qualitative method. Third party with good faith obtain legal protection from the causes of the nullification on the letter of authority due to the death of the endorser, and nullification of the legal act which was performed based on the letter of authority, as regulated in the Civil Code, Article 1818 subsection (2). Therefore, the legal reasons which was used in verdict number 29PK/Pdt/2009 about the Land deed annulment is not comply with the rule of law, because the civil law has provided solutions and legal protection against the weakness of granting authority, particularly on legal consequences for third parties with good faith. As the result of this research, there are some recommendation in order to prevent future disputes : if a PPAT received an authorization letter which has relatively long period to executed with the issuing date of the authorization letter, the PPAT should try to ask the client to sign a new authorization letter, and/or to ensure that the authority which is owned by the authority recipient (endorsee) had not ended by the causes that were regulated in the Civil Code Article 1813, PPAT should add an additional clause in the Land deed which is contains statement and assurance from the endorsee about the enforceability and validity of the authorization letter."
2013
T34904
UI - Tesis Membership  Universitas Indonesia Library
cover
Wening Mahardiyani
"Penulisan tesis ini membahas proses jual beli hak tanah antara ayah kandung kepada salah satu anaknya di Klaten, Jawa Tengah dan akibat hukumnya dari jual beli tersebut. Tidak adanya pedoman mengenai jual beli tanah yang dilakukan antara ayah kandung kepada salah satu anaknya, menyebabkan ada Notaris/PPAT merasa jual beli tersebut sudah sesuai aturan, tanpa memikirkan akibat hukumnya. Konflik yang timbul akibat akta jual beli tersebut biasanya baru timbul setelah orang tuanya meninggal. Selain itu dalam penulisan ini akan dibahas mengenai peranan Notaris/PPAT dalam proses jual beli tanah untuk mencegah timbulnya sengketa di kemudian hari melalui kewenangannya melakukan penyuluhan hukum atas akta. Penelitian ini menggunakan yuridis-normatif dengan menggunakan data sekunder, bersifat deskriptif-analitis. Analisis data pada penelitian ini dilakukan secara kualitatif yaitu data yang diperoleh disusun secara sistematis kemudian dianalisis secara kualitatif untuk menjelaskan masalah yang diteliti. Proses jual beli tanah yang dilakukan antara ayah kandung kepada anaknya sebaiknya diberitahukan kepada saudara lainnya dengan Surat Pernyataan Mengetahui. Notaris/PPAT berperan memberikan kepastian hukum dengan akta otentik, sehingga dapat dipergunakan sebagai pembuktian di kemudian hari dan akta tersebut dapat dijadikan pencegahan sengketa antara para pihak dan pihak ketiga di kemudian hari. Berdasarkan uraian tersebut, disarankan proses jual beli tanah yang dilakukan antara orang tua kepada anaknya harus melihat dari syarat sahnya suatu perjanjian yaitu kausa yang halal dalam melakukan jual beli ini dan dilaksanakan dengan sepengetahuan dari saudara lainnya. Selain itu ketelitian dan kehati-hatian dalam menjalankan jabatannya adalah mutlak dilakukan oleh Notaris/PPAT untuk menghindari terjadinya sengketa akibat pembuatan akta jual beli tersebut.

This thesis is to examine the process of selling buying land between father to his daughter in Klaten, Central Java, and the legal consequences of it. The lack of guidance on the sale and purchase of land made ​​between father to his daughter, leading many Notary / PPAT involved that they already follow appropriate trading rules, without understanding the legal consequences of it. Conflicts` arising from the Sales and Purchase deed is usually only arise after her parents died. Also in this thesis will discuss the role of the Notary / PPAT in the process of purchase of land to prevent future disputes through legal education authority. This thesis uses juridical-normative by using secondary data, descriptive-analytical. Analysis of the data in this thesis conducted qualitative data obtained systematically compiled and analyzed qualitatively to explain the problems examined. The process of purchasing land made between fathers to his daughter should be notified to the other children with Statement of Knowing. Notary/PPAT role providing legal certainty by authentic act, so it can be used as evidence at court and the deed can be used as deterrence dispute between the parties and third parties in the future. Based on the description, it is suggested that the process of buying and selling land made between father to his children should see the terms of a agreement that the movement in the buying and selling lawful and carried out with the knowledge of other relatives. Besides accuracy and prudence in carrying out his job is to be conducted by the Notary / PPAT to avoid disputes caused by the sale purchase deed."
Depok: Universitas Indonesia, 2013
T32687
UI - Tesis Membership  Universitas Indonesia Library
cover
Wardah Latifah Widianti
"Jual beli merupakan salah satu dari beberapa peralihan hak atas tanah yang sering dilakukan oleh masyarakat. Pengaturan mengenai jual beli tanah di Indonesia pada awalnya diatur berdasarkan hukum adat. Pengaturan tanah tersebut tetap dipegang teguh sampai dengan terciptanya undang-undang khusus mengenai tanah yaitu Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1960 tentang Peraturan Dasar Pokok-Pokok Agraria (selanjutnya disebut dengan “UUPA”). Untuk memberikan suatu kepastian hukum kepada pemiliki tanah, kemudian
Pemerintah membuat suatu peraturan mengenai Pendaftaran Tanah dimana setiap dilakukannya peralihan hak atas tanah diwajibkan untuk dilakukan pendaftaran atas tanah. Peralihan hak atas tanah yang dapat dilakukan pendaftaran tanah adalah peralihan yang
memiliki bukti telah dilakukannya peralihan, yang dibuat oleh Pejabat Pembuat Akta Tanah (selanjutnya disebut “PPAT”), yang dalam menjalankan kekuasaan jabatannya dituntut untuk
mematuhi ketentuan-ketentuan yang berlaku. Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah secara deskriptif analisis dimana metode ini berfungsi untuk mendeskripsikan suatu objek yang diteliti melalui data atau sampel yang telah dikumpulkan dan hasil penelitian tersebut kemudian dilakukan analisis untuk diambil kesimpulannya. Dari penelitian ini diketahui bahwa jual beli pada umumnya cukup dilakukan secara terang dan tunai saja,
namun untuk mendapatkan suatu kepastian hukum terkait kepemilikan tanah harus dilakukan suatu pendaftaran tanah kepada Kantor Pertanahan dengan menggunakan akta otentik yang dibuat oleh PPAT sebagai dasar dilakukannya pendaftaran tanah tersebut. Dilakukannya pendaftaran tanah ini membuat pemilik tanah memiliki kepastian hukum dan kepemilikannya tersebut tercatat di Kantor Pertanahan.

Buying and selling is one of several transfers of land rights that are often carried out by the community. Arrangements regarding the sale and purchase of land in Indonesia were originally regulated based on customary law. The regulation of land is still firmly adhered to until the creation of a special law on land, namely Law Number 5 of 1960 concerning Basic Agrarian Regulations (hereinafter referred to as "UUPA"). In order to provide legal certainty to landowners, the Government then made a regulation regarding Land Registration where every transfer of land rights is required to carry out land registration. Transfer of land rights that can be registered for land is a transfer that has evidence of the transfer, which is made by the Land Deed Official (hereinafter referred to as “PPAT”), who in exercising their power of office is required to comply with the applicable provisions. The method used in this research is descriptive analysis where this method serves to describe an object under study through the data or samples that have been collected and the results of the research are then analyzed to draw conclusions. From this research, it is known that buying and selling is generally done in a clear and cash only manner, however, to obtain legal certainty regarding land ownership, a land registration must be carried out at the Land
Office using an authentic deed made by the PPAT as the basis for the land registration. The registration of this land provides the land owner with legal certainty and his ownership is
recorded at the Land Office.
"
Depok: Fakultas Hukum Universitas Indonesia, 2021
T-pdf
UI - Tesis Membership  Universitas Indonesia Library
cover
Ricky Samuel S.
"Tesis ini membahas tentang kekuatan pembuktian akta jual beli PPAT, terhadap kepemilikan hak atas tanah. Jual beli tanah merupakan perbuatan hukum untuk mengalihkan hak atas tanah dari penjual kepada pembeli. Akta jual beli PPAT mempunyai fungsi sebagai alat pembuktian mengenai benar telah dilakukannya perbuatan hukum jual beli tanah. Setelah Akta Jual Beli PPAT dibuat, kemudian Pembeli mendaftarkan peralihan hak atas tanah tersebut ke Kantor Pertanahan setempat. Namun dalam prakteknya masih terdapat hambatan-hambatan untuk melaksanakan pendaftaran tanah tersebut. Pada tahun 1988, Tuan Wagianto membeli sebidang tanah Sertipikat Hak Milik, dari Tuan Anwar Manaf dan Nyonya Moechisina berdasarkan Akta Jual Beli PPAT. Tuan Wagianto tidak dapat mendaftarkan peralihan hak atas tanah tersebut di BPN, karena Yayasan UMS menguasai fisik dari tanah tersebut dan mengklaim tanah tersebut adalah miliknya. Tahun 1998 Tuan Wagianto meninggal dunia, dan Akta Jual Beli tersebut masih belum didaftarkan ke BPN. Dengan meninggalnya Tuan Wagianto, demi hukum hak atas tanah tersebut jatuh kepada ahli waris. Kemudian pada tahun 2002, para ahli waris menggugat yayasan UMS melalui Pengadilan Negeri Jakarta Barat. Tujuan penulisan tesis ini adalah untuk mengetahui bagaimana suatu akta jual beli PPAT mempunyai kekuatan pembuktian terhadap kepemilikan hak atas tanah. Penulisan tesis ini menggunakan metode penelitian kepustakaan, dengan data sekunder sebagai datanya. Berdasarkan data yang diperoleh dari hasil penelitian ini, maka penulis mendapati bahwa akta jual beli PPAT tersebut telah memenuhi syarat formil dan syarat materiil dari jual beli tanah. Dengan demikian penulis dapat menyimpulkan bahwa Akta Jual Beli PPAT tersebut memiliki kekuatan pembuktian yang sempurna.

This thesis focuses on the probative force of the deed of sale and purchase by PPAT towards the ownership of land right. Sale and Purchase of land is a legal act to transfer land rights from the seller to the buyer. The Deed of Sale and Purchase by PPAT has a function as a tool to prove the truth of the legal act of sale and purchase of land. After making Deed of Sale and Purchase by PPAT, then registered to the local Land Office. However, in practice there are still obstacles to implementing land registration. In 1988, Mr. Wagianto buy a plot of land with Freehold Title, from Mr. Anwar Manaf and Mrs. Moechisina by Deed Of Sale And Purchase by PPAT. But Mr. Wagianto can’t register his rights at BPN, because UMS Foundation physical controls of the land and claimed the land was his. In 1998 Mr Wagianto died, and The Deed of Sale and Purchase are still not registered to BPN. With the death of Mr. Wagianto, by law the land rights fall to the heirs. Then in 2002, the heirs sued UMS Foundation through the West Jakarta District Court. The purpose of this Thesis is to find out how The Deed of Sale and Purchase by PPAT has probative force toward the ownership of land rights. Writing of this thesis uses library research methods, the data required is secondary data. Based on data obtained from this research, the Authors found that The Deed of Sale and Purchase by PPAT has met the terms of the formal and material of sale and purchase land. The Authors conclude that Deed of Sale and Purchase by PPAT has perfect probative force.
"
Depok: Fakultas Hukum Universitas Indonesia, 2014
T42072
UI - Tesis Membership  Universitas Indonesia Library
cover
Anindhita Prameswari
"PPAT adalah pejabat umum yang berwenang untuk membuat akta otentik mengenai perbuatan hukum tertentu mengenai hak atas tanah atau Hak Milik Atas Satuan Rumah Susun. Sebagai akta otentik, akta PPAT haruslah memenuhi tata cara pembuatan akta PPAT sebagaimana yang ditentukan oleh undangundang dan peraturan-peraturan lainnya. Pembuatan akta yang tidak sesuai dengan tata cara pembuatan akta PPAT dapat menimbulkan risiko bagi kepastian hak atas tanah yang timbul atau tercatat atas dasar akta tersebut. Berdasarkan hal ini, penulis tertarik dan bermaksud untuk mengkaji dan memahami lebih dalam mengenai tata cara dan prosedur pembuatan akta yand dibuat oleh PPAT dalam pembuatan Akta Jual Beli Tanah dan penulis untuk menyusun tesis ini akan melakukan analisa mengenai tata cara dan prosedur pembuatan Akta Jual Beli Tanah yang dilakukan oleh PPAT TH. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan yuridis normatif, yaitu penelitian yang menitikberatkan pada penelitian data-data sekunder atas data hukum yaitu norma hukum tertulis. Berdasarkan data hasil penelitian yang diperoleh, didapati akibat hukum dari pembuatan akta jual beli tanah yang tidak sesuai dengan tata cara pembuatan akta dapat mengakibatkan akta tersebut tergredasikan menjadi akta di bawah tangan, batal demi hukum atau dapat dibatalkan.

Officials land Deed Maker (PPAT) is as a general officer who is authorized to make an authentic deed of land in accordance with the applicable regulation. As an authentic deed, PPAT's deeds should cater to all terms and conditions of PPAT certificate as prescribed by laws and other regulations. The PPAT's deeds that does not comply with the terms and conditions can pose a risk to the uncertainty of land rights that are recorded on the basis of the certificate. Based on this, the author is interested and intends to examine and understand more about the standard procedures of making deeds made by PPAT in the manufacture of the deed of sale and purchase of land and in order to compose this thesis, the author will do an analysis regarding the Ordinance and procedures of making the deed of sale and purchase of Land by PPAT TH. This research uses the normative juridical approach, which focuses on the research of secondary data for data law that focuses on i.e. written legal norms. Based on the data obtained, the research results found that as a result of the law of creation of the deed of sale and purchase of land that is not in accordance with an applicable regulations, the deed will be degraded a certificate under the hand, annulled by law or may be cancelled."
Depok: Universitas Indonesia, 2013
T32552
UI - Tesis Membership  Universitas Indonesia Library
cover
Aurora Aldwita Mariel
"[Penulisan skripsi ini menggunakan metode penelitian kepustakaan dengan data sekunder sebagai sumber datanya. Skripsi ini bertujuan untuk meneliti mengenai jual beli tanah dan bangunan yang diatur dalam peraturan perundang-undangan serta kedudukan dan kekuatan mengikat Perjanjian Pengikatan Jual Beli Lunas (PPJB Lunas) dan Kuasa Jual dalam hal pengalihan hak milik atas tanah (beserta bangunan apabila diperjanjikan). Dalam skripsi ini, dianalisis satu kasus dengan empat putusan dari Pengadilan Tingkat Pertama sampai dengan Tingkat Peninjauan Kembali. Dari analisis tersebut, dapat diketahui bahwa ada dua pendapat hakim yang saling bertentangan. Pendapat pertama adalah dengan PPJB Lunas dan Kuasa Jual maka telah terjadinya peralihan hak milik atas tanah dan bangunan sedangkan pendapat kedua adalah dengan PPJB Lunas dan Kuasa Jual belum terjadi peralihan hak milik atas tanah dan bangunan. Sebagai hasil penelitian dapat disimpulkan bahwa kedudukan dan kekuatan mengikat PPPJB Lunas dan Kuasa Jual telah mengalihkan hak milik atas tanah dan bangunan apabila dalam kenyataannya sudah terjadi perbuatan hukum dimana pembeli telah melakukan pembayaran dan telah menerima penyerahan serta menguasai tanah dan bangunan tersebut, sedangkan penjual telah menyerahkan Kuasa Jual dan tanah serta bangunan itu sendiri kepada pembeli dan penjual telah menerima pembayaran sehingga perbuatan tersebut memenuhi unsur terang, tunai dan riil sebagaimana dasar hukum jual beli tanah yang berlaku pada saat ini, serta memenuhi syarat materiil jual beli.

This thesis was written using literary research method with secondary data as its source of data. This thesis aims to examine the mechanisms sale and purchase of land and building which is regulated in accordance with the laws and regulations and the legal standing and binding of Land and Building Conditional Sale Purchase Agreement in Full Settlement (CSPA in Full Settlement) and Power of Attorney to Sell, in connection with the transfer of right of ownership over the land (and building if agreed). This thesis will primarily analyze one legal case which went to produce four court decisions, leveling from the Court of First Instance until the Supreme Court. From this analysis, it is discovered that there are two judge’s opinion, which contradicts one to another. The first opinion is that, the CSPA in Full Settlement and Power of Attorney to Sell have transferred the right of ownership over land and building, while the second opinion is that the CSPA in Full Settlement and Power of Attorney to Sell have not transferred the right of ownership over land and building yet. As a result of this study, it can be concluded that the legal standing and binding of CSPA in Full Settlement and Power of Attorney to Sell have transferred the right of ownership over land and building when the facts of the case show that it had happened a juridical action in which the buyer has made payment and has conducted the acceptance, and possessed the land and buildings, while the seller has granted the Power of Attorney to Sell and delivered the land and building to the buyer and received the payment for it. Such action would therefore qualified for a sale and purchase that is “terang”, “tunai” and “riil”, which is the basic of legality of the sale and purchase of the land under the prevailing laws, as well as the fulfilling the material requirement of sales and purchase.
, This thesis was written using literary research method with secondary data as its source of data. This thesis aims to examine the mechanisms sale and purchase of land and building which is regulated in accordance with the laws and regulations and the legal standing and binding of Land and Building Conditional Sale Purchase Agreement in Full Settlement (CSPA in Full Settlement) and Power of Attorney to Sell, in connection with the transfer of right of ownership over the land (and building if agreed). This thesis will primarily analyze one legal case which went to produce four court decisions, leveling from the Court of First Instance until the Supreme Court. From this analysis, it is discovered that there are two judge’s opinion, which contradicts one to another. The first opinion is that, the CSPA in Full Settlement and Power of Attorney to Sell have transferred the right of ownership over land and building, while the second opinion is that the CSPA in Full Settlement and Power of Attorney to Sell have not transferred the right of ownership over land and building yet. As a result of this study, it can be concluded that the legal standing and binding of CSPA in Full Settlement and Power of Attorney to Sell have transferred the right of ownership over land and building when the facts of the case show that it had happened a juridical action in which the buyer has made payment and has conducted the acceptance, and possessed the land and buildings, while the seller has granted the Power of Attorney to Sell and delivered the land and building to the buyer and received the payment for it. Such action would therefore qualified for a sale and purchase that is “terang”, “tunai” and “riil”, which is the basic of legality of the sale and purchase of the land under the prevailing laws, as well as the fulfilling the material requirement of sales and purchase.
]
"
Depok: Fakultas Hukum Universitas Indonesia, 2016
S62233
UI - Skripsi Membership  Universitas Indonesia Library
cover
Seselia
"ABSTRAK
Dalam melakukan transaksi jual beli tanah, adakalanya para pihak yang berkepentingan berhalangan hadir, oleh karena itu dibuatlah suatu surat kuasa. Dalam kenyataannya pembuatan surat kuasa walaupun sudah mendapat persetujuan antara kedua belah pihak tetapi terkadang masih menimbulkan permasalahan hukum dimana salah satu pihak menyangkal akan keabsahan surat kuasa tersebut. Upaya hukum yang dilakukan para pihak yaitu dengan cara menggugat. Dalam tesis ini dianalisa Putusan Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia nomor 261/Pdt.G/2011/PN.KSP Tanggal 19 Agustus 2011. Pokok permasalahan yang dibahas dalam tesis ini adalah bagaimana keabsahan dari surat kuasa jual beli tanah dan apakah gugatan yang diajukan suami kepada istri sah terkait surat kuasa jual mengenai jual beli tanah yang dibuat olehnya untuk istrinya. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah deskriptif analitis dengan pendekatan secara yuridis empiris Data yang digunakan adalah data primer dan data sekunder. Alat pengumpulan data melalui studi kepustakaan. Metode analisis data yang digunakan adalah metode analisis kualitatif induktif. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian tentang keabsahan surat kuasa jual mengenai jual beli tanah, maka Surat kuasa jual adalah sah.Gugatan yang diajukan oleh suami terhadap isteri terkait dengan surat kuasa jual mengenai menjual tanah, dihubungkan dengan Kasus adalah tidak sah.

ABSTRACT
In conducting land transactions, sometimes the parties unable to attend, so they invented a power of attorney letter. In fact, making a power of attorney letter, although it is approved by both parties but sometimes still raises legal issues which one party will deny the validity of a power of attorney. Legal efforts undertaken by the parties that sue. In this thesis analyzed Verdict of Indonesia Supreme Court number 261/Pdt.G/2011/PN.KSP Date August 19, 2011. The main problems discussed in this thesis is how the validity of a power of attorney if the sale and purchase of land and the husband filed a lawsuit related to the legal wife power of attorney regarding the sale and purchase of land sales made by him to his wife. The method used is descriptive analysis juridical approach empirical data used are primary data and secondary data. Data collection tools through library research. Data analysis method used is inductive method of qualitative analysis. Based on the results of research on the validity of a power of attorney regarding the sale and purchase of the land sale, the selling power of attorney is sah.Gugatan filed by the husband against the wife associated with the sale of the power of attorney to sell the land, be linked to the case is illegal."
2013
T35313
UI - Tesis Membership  Universitas Indonesia Library
<<   1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10   >>