Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"This is the first book to explore the full range and import of Lacan's theory of poetry and its relationship to his understandingof the subject and historicity. Gilbert Chaitin provides a lucid and accessible study of this famously complex thinker. He shows howLacan moves beyond the traditionally hostile polarities of mythos and logos, poetics and philosophy, to conceive of the subject as acomplex interplay between symbolic systems, desire and history.Lacan incorporates the function of historical contingency into theformation of subjectivity, a combination which in turn illuminatesthe role literature plays in the creation of selfhood. Lacan'smetaphor of the subject, Chaitin argues, drew not only on Saussure, Jakobson, Freud, Heidegger and Hegel, but on hitherto unacknowledged influences such as Bertrand Russell and I. A. Richards. Chaitin explores the ambiguities, contradictions and singularities of Lacan's immensely influential work to provide a definitive account of Lacan's theoretical development across theentire career."

"Christine van Boheemen examines the relationship between Joyce's postmodern textuality and the traumatic history of colonialism in Ireland. Joyce's influence on Lacanian psychoanalysis and Derrida's philosophy, Van Boheemen suggests, ought to be viewed from a postcolonial perspective. Joyce's writing bears witness to a history that remains unspeakable, functioning as a material location for the inner voice of Irish cultural memory. This book engages with a wide range of contemporary critical theory and brings Joyce's work into dialogue with thinkers such as Zizek, Adorno, Lyotard, as well as feminism and postcolonial theory."

"Schopenhauer mengemukakan kesadaran hanya kulit permukaan dari sesuatu yang lebih dalam dan luas yakni dari kehendak yang buta, irasional, dan tidak sadar. Jacques Lacan, sang psikoanalis juga kurang lebih mendukung pernyataan tersebut. Adapun terbersit dalam pikiran penulis, hal ini identik dengan ajaran Buddha, maka penulis mencoba menganalisis film yang sarat Buddhisme, yaitu Shaolin (2011). Yang menjadi fokus perhatian penulis bukanlah simbol-simbol agama melainkan kaitan makna nasib para tokohnya, terutama tokoh antagonis yang kemudian menjadi protagonis—Hou Jie yang diperankan Andy Lau—serta tokoh yang menjadi antagonis sepanjang cerita—Cao Man, diperankan Nicholas Tse. Apa yang memungkinkan jalan kehidupan mereka berubah (ubah) adalah tepat kiranya ditelaah dengan konsep Lacan mengenai tiga fase perkembangan manusia.

---

Schopenhauer argued consciousness only skin surface of something deeper and broader than the will of a blind, irrational, and unconscious. Jacques Lacan, the psychoanalyst is also about supporting the statement. As occurred in the mind of the writer, it is quite synonymous with Buddhism, so the author tries to analyze the film that loaded Buddhism, Shaolin (2011). Which became the focus of attention of the author are not religious symbols but the fate of the characters meaning of terms, especially the antagonist who later became the protagonist--Hou Jie, played by Andy Lau--as well as the antagonist character throughout the story--Cao Man, starring Nicholas Tse. What allows them to change their way of life is precisely would be reviewed with Lacan's concept of the three phases of human development."

"What do we know about Hegel? What do we know about Marx? What do we know about democracy and totalitarianism? Communism and psychoanalysis? What do we know that isn't a platitude that we've heard a thousand times or a self-satisfied certainty? Through his brilliant reading of Hegel, Slavoj Zizek,one of the most provocative and widely-read thinkers of our time, upends our traditional understanding, dynamites every cliché and undermines every conviction in order to clear the ground for new ways of answering these questions. When Lacan described Hegel as the most sublime hysteric, he was referring to the way that the hysteric asks questions because he experiences his own desire as if it were the Other's desire. In the dialectical process, the question asked of the Other is resolved through a reflexive turn in which the question begins to function as its own answer. We had made Hegel into the theorist of abstraction and reaction, but by reading Hegel with Lacan, Zizek unveils a Hegel of the concrete and of revolution, his own, and the one to come."