Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"Menurut pasal 1868 Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata "Suatu akta otentik ialah suatu akta yang dibuat dalam bentuk yang ditentukan undang-undang oleh atau dihadapan Pejabat Umum yang berwenang untuk itu di tempat akta itu dibuat". Jasa Notaris sebagai Pejabat Umum yang membuat akta-akta otentik sangat dibutuhkan dalam kegiatan usaha perbankan, salah satunya adalah dalam pembuatan akta perjanjian kredit perbankan yang melibatkan Nasabah dan Bank, guna menjamin kebenaran dari isi yang dituangkan dalam perjanjian kredit perbankan tersebut, supaya secara publik kebenarannya tidak diragukan lagi. Berdasarkan latar belakang hal tersebut maka yang menjadi pokok permasalahan dalam tesis ini pertama Bagaimanakah Peran Notaris terhadap permasalahan terbakarnya objek jaminan nasabah terkait dengan akta perjanjian kredit yang dibuat olehnya Yang kedua Bagaimanakah Tanggung Jawab Notaris terhadap Akta Perjanjian Kredit yang dibuatnya untuk melindungi kepentingan para pihak (Kreditur dan Debitur).Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui dan menganalisa peran Notaris dan tanggung jawab Notaris terhadap akta yang dibuatnya dan apakah dapat melindungi kepentingan para pihak. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah melalui metode pendekatan yuridis empiris, dengan menggunakan data primer dan data sekunder. Perjanjian kredit perbankan yang dibuat secara notariil bermanfaat bagi para pihak, dalam hal menjamin kekuatan pembuktiannya, menjamin kebenaran dari aktanya Penyelesaian hukum terhadap akta perjanjian kredit perbankan bila timbul persengketaan, dan Notaris mempunyai peran yang penting terhadap kebenaran akta yang dibuatnya.

---

According to Article 1868 KUHPerdata mentioned: an authentic deed is a made deed in the form of which is determined by code, by or before Public Functionary in charge for that in place that deed is made". Service Notary as Public Functionary which make authentic deed very required in banking business activity, one of them is in making deed agreement of banking credit entangling Client and Bank, utilize to guarantee the truth from content which is poured in agreement of banking credit, so that publicly its truth no doubt again. Based on that the subject matter for this thesis first how is the role of the Notary towards the credit agreement which the objects of the guarantee had burned, and the second subject matter is How Responsibilities of the Notary Towards of Credit Agreement were made to protect the interests of the parties (creditors and debtors).

Intention this research is to know and analyze the role and responsibilities of Notary Public Notary of the deed he made and whether it can protect the interests of the parties. Research method the used is to through method approach empirical juridical, by using primary data and secondary data. Made Credit banking agreement by notarial be of benefit to creditor, in the case of guarantying strength of its verification, guarantying the truth of from its deed and guarantee its investment security. and the Notary has an important role to the truth of the deed made."

"Kebutuhan manusia yang begitu banyak sering kali tidak dapat dipenuhi dengan dana yang ia miliki sehingga manusia memerlukan suatu lembaga yang memberikan fasilitas yang bertujuan untuk memberikan dana penunjang untuk memenuhi kebutuhannya, yakni lembaga jaminan. Dalam pelaksanaannya, setiap lembaga jaminan mengatur tata cara eksekusi nya masing-masing. Hukum Indonesia yang mengenal dua lembaga jaminan yakni lembaga jaminan gadai dan fidusia, mengatur bahwa pelaksanaan eksekusi terhadap benda jaminan khususnya benda bergerak dapat dilakukan melalui lembaga parate executie yang dilakukan tanpa melibatkan proses peradilan dan rieel executie yang dilakukan melalui proses peradilan. Disini diketahui bahwa dalam pelaksanaan eksekusi benda jaminan, negara Indonesia masih melibatkan badan peradilan. Hal tersebut berbeda dengan negara Australia yang pelaksanaan eksekusi benda jaminannya tidak melibatkan badan peradilan. Di negara Australia, hak jaminan benda bergerak yang bernaung dalam satu lembaga yakni lembaga Personal Property Securities, mengatur bahwa terkait pelaksanaan eksekusi nya, para pihak dalam perjanjian penjaminan mengemban hak dan kewajibannya masing-masing berdasarkan Personal Property Securities Act 2009. Sehingga, pelaksanaannya tidak perlu melibatkan badan peradilan. Adanya perbedaan ketentuan tersebut, menjadi dasar penulis untuk melakukan perbandingan terkait pengaturan pelaksanaan eksekusi jaminan benda bergerak antara kedua negara. Dengan itu, dalam skripsi ini akan dibahas mengenai persamaan dan perbedaan pelaksanaan eksekusi lembaga jaminan benda bergerak di Indonesia dan Australia berikut dengan penjelasan umum terkait hukum jaminan yang berlaku di kedua negara. 

---

Human need often can not be fulfilled because of the limited amount of funds they have, therefore humans need an institution that provides facilities that aim to provide supporting funds to meet their needs, such as security institution.  In practice, every security institution regulates the procedure of its own execution. Indonesia security law, provides two types of security in personal property which is pawn and fiduciary guarantee, both types of security regulate that the execution of collateral can be enforce through parate executie and rieel executie. Enforcing collateral through parate executie does not requaries the court act , while the implementation of rieel executie is involving the court decision. Thus, it is known that the execution of collateral in Indonesian still involves the court act. In the other side, execution of personal property in Australia security law does not involve the court. In Australia, security interest in personal property regulated under one institusion, namely Personal Property Securities. Under the Personal Property Securities, execution of personal property can be enforced by the parties in the security agreement by complying the rights and obligations regulated under Personal Property Securities Act 2009. As a result, the execution of collateral in Australia security law does not requires the court act. The difference in these provisions becomes the basis for the author to make a comparisons related to the execution of personal property between the two countries. Therefore, this thesis will discuss the similarities and differences in the execution of personal property security in Indonesia and Australia along with general explanation related to the security law in both countries. "

"Terjadinya sengketa dalam suatu hubungan kontrak dapat menyebabkan timbulnya pembatalan kontrak. Dalam suatu kontrak dengan pilihan hukum dan pilihan forum asing, khususnya arbitrase yang kini semakin banyak terjadi, pembatalannya tidak sesederhana pembatalan kontrak biasa yang tidak memuat unsur asing. Penelitian ini akan membahas mulai dari forum yang berwenang hingga hukum yang seharusnya diberlakukan untuk pembatalan kontrak internasional. Lebih jauh, dibahas pula mengenai dampak pembatalan kontrak terhadap putusan arbitrase terkait kontrak yang telah memiliki kekuatan eksekutorial. Agar didapatkan pemahaman yang lebih baik, dalam penelitian ini akan dianalisis dua perkara beserta putusan pengadilannya.

---

A dispute in a contractual relationship can lead to a nullification of the contract.  In a contract with a choice of law and a choice of foreign forum, especially arbitration which occurs more often these days, the nullification is not as simple as the nullification of an ordinary contract which does not contain foreign elements.  This research will discuss starting from jurisdiction to governing law for the nullification of international contracts. Furthermore, it will also discuss the impact of the nullification of the contract on the arbitration award related to a contract that has an executorial power.  In order to get a better understanding, this research will analyse two cases related to the topic and its court decisions."

"Tulisan ini menganalisis bagaimana kepastian hukum jual beli atas tanah dengan adanya Putusan Pengadilan (Studi Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Tangerang Nomor 822/Pdt.G/2020/PN.TNG). Tulisan ini menggunakan metode doktrinal, dengan tipologi penelitian preskriptif analisis menggunakan bahan hukum primer berupa peraturan perundang-undangan dan bahan hukum sekunder berupa buku-buku, artikel dan jurnal. Kepastian hukum dalam pembuatan akta jual beli (AJB) atas tanah menjadi landasan utama dalam transaksi properti, dimana terdapat beberapa situasi/kondisi ketika proses transaksi jual beli sudah lunas, pembeli masih belum dibuatkan AJB, sementara pembeli ingin mendaftarkan kepemilikan atas obyek yang dibelinya menggunakan atas nama sendiri, tetapi kesulitan dalam mencari keberadaan pihak penjual, sehingga pembeli menggunakan cara lain untuk memperoleh kepastian hukum melalui gugatan ke pengadilan. Kepastian hukum pembuatan AJB atas tanah yang dibuat karena adanya putusan pengadilan sejatinya tidak memiliki pengaturan hukum baik dalam PP No. 24 Tahun 1997 tentang Pendaftaran Tanah (yang kini telah diperbaharui dengan PP No. 18 Tahun 2021), maupun dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 5 tahun 1960 tentang Pokok-Pokok Agraria. Meski di pasal 37 PP No. 24 tahun 1997 tidak mengakomodasi, Putusan pengadilan dapat dijadikan pondasi dasar dalam melakukan peralihan hak maupun balik nama sertifikat disebabkan putusan memiliki prinsip “Res Judicata Pro Veritate Habetur” yang bermakna bahwa “putusan hakim harus dianggap benar” ketika putusan tersebut ditetapkan, berdasarkan irah “Demi Keadilan Berdasarkan Ketuhanan Yang Maha Esa”. Prinsip tersebut memposisikan hakim sebagai bagian fundamental dalam menegakkan keadilan dalam negeri terkait suatu perkara yang hendak diputuskan. Hal tersebut memberi akibat hukum bagi Pembeli untuk memiliki hak memperoleh sertifikat yang sah yang akan diterbitkan oleh pihak Kantor Pertanahan Kota Tangerang Selatan atas kepemilikan tanah serta mendapat ganti rugi biaya perkara.

---

This article analyzes the legal certainty of buying and selling land with a court decision (Study of Tangerang District Court Decision Number 822/Pdt.G/2020/PN.TNG). This paper uses a doctrinal method, with a prescriptive analysis research typology using primary legal materials in the form of statutory regulations and secondary legal materials in the form of books, articles and journals. Legal certainty in making a sale and purchase deed (AJB) for land is the main basis for property transactions, where there are several situations/conditions when the sale and purchase transaction process has been completed, the buyer has not yet made an AJB. In contrast, the buyer wants to register ownership of the object he purchased using the above name. Still, it is difficult to find the seller's whereabouts, so the buyer uses other methods to obtain legal certainty through a lawsuit in court. The legal certainty of making AJB on land which is made because of a court decision does not have any legal regulation either in PP No. 24 of 1997 concerning Land Registration (which has now been updated with PP No. 18 of 2021), as well as in Law Number 5 of 1960 concerning Agrarian Principles, although in article 37 of PP No. 24 of 1997 does not accommodate, court decisions can be used as the basic foundation for transferring rights or changing the name of certificates because the decision has the principle of "Res Judicata Pro Veritate Habetur" which means that "the judge's decision must be considered correct" when the decision is determined, based on the principle "For the sake of Justice Based on Belief in One Almighty God.” This principle positions judges as a fundamental part of upholding domestic justice regarding a case to be decided. This has legal consequences for the Buyer to have the right to obtain a valid certificate which will be issued by the South Tangerang City Land Office regarding land ownership and to receive compensation for court costs."

"Tesis ini membahas tentang bagaimana peran pemerintah dalam usaha memajukan dunia pendidikan di Indonesia sesuai dengan amanat konstitusi Pasal 31 UUD Tahun 1945 serta Undang-Undang tentang Sistem Pendidikan Nasional dan juga menganalisis bagaimana penafsiran Mahkamah Konstitusi dalam Uji Materil Pasal 50 Ayat (3) Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2003 tentang Sistem Pendidikan Nasional, serta pengaruh yang timbul akibat adanya putusan tersebut. Dengan adanya putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 5/PUU-X/2012 mengenai Sistem Pendidikan Nasional, yang berkaitan dengan pembentukan Rintisan Sekolah Bertaraf Internasional atau Sekolah Bertaraf Internasional secara langsung dan tidak langsung mempengaruhi peran pemerintah terhadap kebijakan rencana dan strategi pendidikan nasional, hal ini tak lepas dari fungsinya dalam memberikan jaminan perlindungan pendidikan yang layak untuk warga negara, adanya putusan tersebut bukan berarti penyelenggara negara dalam hal ini pemerintah dan/atau pemerintah daerah lepas tangan begitu saja untuk mengembangkan RSBI/SBI tetapi justru harus lebih berperan lagi, sepanjang dalam prakteknya tetap memperhatikan pertimbangan hukum Mahkamah Konstitusi karena sejatinya tujuan awal dikembangkannya RSBI/SBI adalah untuk menghasilkan lulusan yang memiliki kompetensi sesuai standar internasional/dunia tetapi tetap menjaga nilai-nilai luhur bangsa dan negara serta budaya lokal. Penulisan tesis menggunakan metode penelitian yuridis normatif yaitu penelitian yang dilakukan dengan cara meneliti data sekunder atau bahan pustaka dan pendekatan yang digunakan adalah pendekatan perundang-undangan (statue approach).

---

This thesis discusses how the role of government in an effort to advance education in Indonesia in accordance with the constitutional mandate of Article 31 of the 1945 Constitution and the Law on National Education System and also analyze how the interpretation of the Constitutional Court in the Judicial Article 50 Paragraph (3) of the Law Number 20 Year 2003 on National Education System, As well as the effects that arise as a result of the decision. With the decision of the Constitutional Court No. 5/PUU-X/2012 on National Education System, relating to the establishment of international school or international school directly and indirectly affect the role of government to plan policies and national education strategy. it is not separated from its function in providing protection guarantee a decent education for citizens, the ruling does not mean the state officials in this case the government and/or local governments just hand off to develop RSBI/SBI but it should be more involved again, all in practice taking into account the legal reasoning of the Constitutional Court because his initial goals developed RSBI/SBI is to produce graduates who have the competence to international standards/ world but still maintain high values ​​of the nation and the state as well as local culture.

The thesis using research methods of juridical normative research. The research is done by examining secondary data or library materials and analyzing in term of the legislative approach (statue approach)."

""This book is a valuable study of how two jurisdictions approach the task of statutory interpretation in a complex and multivalent constitutional environment. It is the product of considerable scholarship across the two jurisdictions and a fine sensitivity to the various factors and different theoretical dimensions which inform the interpretative exercise. The exposition is clear. The argument is forceful. As with all the best works of comparative law, one reads this book and learns as much about one’s own legal system as about the system with which it is compared." – from the Foreword by Philip Sales (Lord Justice of Appeal, England & Wales)How far do contemporary English and German judges go when they interpret national legislation? Where are the limits of statutory interpretation when they venture outside the constraints of the text?Judicial Law-making in English and German Courts is concerned with the limits of judicial power in a legal system. It addresses the often neglected relationship between statutory interpretation and constitutional law. It traces the practical implications of constitutional principles by exploring the outer limits of what courts regard themselves as authorised to do in the area of statutory interpretation. The book critically analyses, reconstructs and compares judicial law-making in English and German courts from comparative, methodological and constitutional perspectives. It maps the differences and commonalities in both jurisdictions and then offers explanatory accounts for these differences and similarities based on constitutional, institutional, political, historical, cultural and international factors.It will be shown that a fundamental unity of statutory interpretation exists in English and German judicial practice in the sphere of rights-consistent and EU-conforming judicial law-making. The constitutional settings and legal cultures in Germany and the UK have converged in both areas of judicial law-making. However, that is not the case for judicial law-making under conventional canons of statutory interpretation, where significant differences in judicial approach to statutory interpretation remain.Judicial Law-making in English and German Courts is the first monograph in English that compares English and German legal methodology as applied in judicial practice, appealing to those interested in statutory interpretation, comparative law or legal methodology."