Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"ABSTRAKPenelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis kualitas internal audit Bank Xberdasarkan International Standards for the Professional Practice of InternalAuditing (SPPIA) dan Quality Assurance. Penelitian ini diharapkan dapatmemberikan kontribusi dalam perkembangan peran internal audit sehingga dapatmeningkatkan kualitasnya serta memberikan value added, khususnya bagi internalaudit di suatu perbankan. Penelitian ini dilakukan berdasarkan studi kasus padaBank X. Metode penelitian yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah metodeanalisis deskriptif dengan pendekatan kualitatif, yaitu dengan melakukanpenelitian kepustakaan serta penelitian lapangan. Hasil penelitian inimenunjukkan bahwa kualitas internal audit pada Bank X dapat diukur berdasarkanInternational Standards for the Professional Practice of Internal Auditing(SPPIA) dan review oleh tim Quality Assurance melalui pendekatan Risk BasedInternal Audit, Key Performance Indicators (KPI) dan lima dimensi SPPIA.Penilaian kualitas internal audit Bank X pada pokoknya telah memenuhi standarIIA (substantially complies). Pada divisi internal audit Bank X, perlu dilakukanreview lebih detail secara periodik dalam mengevaluasi kualitas internal audit.Profesionalitas internal audit dapat dipertahankan dan ditingkatkan melaluitraining dan pelatihan khusus bagi internal audit, seperti pada lembaga sertifikasibagi internal audit yang berkualitas

---

ABSTRACTThe purpose of this study was to analyse the quality of internal auditors in Bank Xbased on International Standards for the Professional Practice of Internal Auditing(SPPIA) and Quality Assurance. This study want to give a contribution for thedevelopment of internal audit?s role to increase their quality and provide somevalue added in bank. This study was a kind of case study in Bank X. This studyused the descriptive analysis methodology and qualitative method by literaturestudy and research in Bank X. This study shows that internal audit?s quality inBank X can be measured based on International Standards for the ProfessionalPractice of Internal Auditing (SPPIA) and reviewed by Quality Assurance throughRisk Based Internal Audit Approach, Key Performance Indicators (KPI) and fivedimensions of SPPIA. Internal audit?s quality in Bank X was substantiallycomplies based on SPPIA. It is important for internal audit division in Bank X toincrease their review and evaluation about quality of internal audit periodically.Their professionalism can be develop by any special trainings as sertificationinstitute for qualified internal audit."

"Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui kesesuaian implementasi Standar IPPF 2400 Komunikasi Hasil Penugasan di Bank X dengan praktik profesional dalam standar internasional audit internal. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode kualitatif dengan desain deskriptif. Hasil penelitian ini menyimpulkan bahwa penerapan IPPF 2400 masih belum secara penuh dan kualitas penugasan audit internal terkait LHA belum optimal sesuai standar audit IIA. Penerapan IPPF 2400 tersebut masih memiliki kekurangan terutama dalam pedoman yang diterapkan, proses review QA, dan pemahaman terhadap pedoman yang berlaku bagi tim audit. Kondisi tersebut menyebabkan kualitas penugasan tim audit internal Bank X masih belum optimal dan tidak memenuhi keseluruhan standar audit.

---

This research aims to determine the suitability implementation of IPPF Standard 2400 about Communicating Results in Bank X with professional practices in international standards of internal audit. This research used a qualitative method with descriptive design. The results of this research concluded that the implementation of IPPF 2400 is still partially conform and the quality of internal audit assignment related to internal audit report is not working optimally according to IIA standard. The implementation of the IPPF 2400 still has lacks, especially in the guidelines implemented, QA review process, and an understanding of the guidelines applicable to the audit team. This condition causes the quality of internal audit in Bank X is not working optimally and does not meet the overall audit standard."

"[Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk melakukan assessment atas tingkat maturity staffing quality assurance sesuai dengan standar IIA 1300 dan kemudian memberikan rekomendasi untuk meningkatkan maturity level staffing qualityassurance menjadi tingkat yang dapat diterima (acceptable). Penelitian ini adalah penelitian yang bersifat exploratory kualitatif dengan menggunakan perangkat kuesioner dan dokumen-dokumen pendukung sebagai alat bantu penelitian. Tingkat maturity PT X (Persero), Tbk berada pada tingkat 2 dan 3 people management, IA-CM Model untuk sektor publik dan juga dengan mempertimbangkan penilaian dari pihak internal lainya yaitu komite audit dan manajemen, namun perlu ada perbaikan untuk menyempurnakan tingkat tersebut minimal memenuhi batas minimum penilaian yang ditetapkan.

---

The purpose of this research is to assess the level of maturty staffing quality assurance in accordance with standard IIA 1300 and then provide recommendations to improve the maturity level of staffing quality assurance to becomes an acceptable level. This research is a qualitative exploratory research that is using the questionnaire and supporting documents as a tools for research. Level of maturity PT X (Persero), Tbk is at level 2 and 3, people management, IA-CM Model for the public sector and by considering the assessment of other parties that is audit committee and management, but there should be an improvements to refine this level at least meet the minimum set of assessment.;The purpose of this research is to assess the level of maturty staffing quality

assurance in accordance with standard IIA 1300 and then provide

recommendations to improve the maturity level of staffing quality assurance to

becomes an acceptable level. This research is a qualitative exploratory research

that is using the questionnaire and supporting documents as a tools for research.

Level of maturity PT X (Persero), Tbk is at level 2 and 3, people management,

IA-CM Model for the public sector and by considering the assessment of other

parties that is audit committee and management, but there should be an

improvements to refine this level at least meet the minimum set of assessment, The purpose of this research is to assess the level of maturty staffing quality

assurance in accordance with standard IIA 1300 and then provide

recommendations to improve the maturity level of staffing quality assurance to

becomes an acceptable level. This research is a qualitative exploratory research

that is using the questionnaire and supporting documents as a tools for research.

Level of maturity PT X (Persero), Tbk is at level 2 and 3, people management,

IA-CM Model for the public sector and by considering the assessment of other

parties that is audit committee and management, but there should be an

improvements to refine this level at least meet the minimum set of assessment]"

"Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis peran Inspektorat Utama KPU dalam proses penjaminan kualitas atas maturitas penyelenggaraan Sistem Pengendalian Intern Pemerintah (SPIP) di KPU berdasarkan Peraturan Kepala BPKP Nomor 5 Tahun 2021. Analisis dilakukan pada Inspektorat Utama KPU yang merupakan satuan pengendali intern di KPU yang memiliki wewenang untuk melakukan penjaminan kualitas dari tahap persiapan, pelaksanaan, hingga pelaporan. Metode dalam penelitian ini yakni analisis deskriptif berupa studi kasus dengan data diperoleh melalui analisis dokumen, observasi, serta wawancara. Wawancara dilakukan terhadap narasumber dari Inspektorat Utama KPU, KPU Provinsi, dan KPU Kabupaten/Kota. Hasil analisis menunjukkan bahwa pada tahap persiapan terdapat lima parameter yang sesuai dan dengan peraturan, dan satu parameter yang tidak sesuai dengan ketentuan. Pada tahap pelaksanaan, tiga parameter analisis menunjukan kesesuaian dengan ketentuan. Pada tahap pelaporan terdapat tiga parameter yang sesuai dengan ketentuan dan dua parameter yang tidak sepenuhnya sesuai dengan ketentuan.

---

This research aims to analyze the role of the KPU Primary Inspectorate in the process quality assurance on the maturity of the Government Internal Control System (SPIP)’s implementation at the KPU based on BPKP Head Regulation Number 5 of 2021. The analysis carried out at the KPU Primary Inspectorate as an internal control unit at the KPU which has the authority to take quality assurance from the preparation, implementation, and reporting stages that represent all KPU offices. The research method used is descriptive analysis with case studies through data collection through documents analysis, field observations, and interviews. Interviews were conducted that obtained from KPU RI and KPU at provincial/city/district levels. The results of the analysis show that at the preparation stage there are five parameters in accordance with the regulation and there is one paramater that is not accordance with regulation. At the implementation stage, three parameters indicate the accordance with the regulation. At the reporting stage there are three parameters that accordance with the regulation and two parameters that is not fully accordance with the regulation."

"Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis implementasi Quality Assurance yang dilakukan oleh Aparat Pengendali Internal Pemerintah BPK-RI pada audit atas laporan keuangan pemerintah. Analisis implementasi diperlukan untuk mengetahui sejauh mana penerapan Quality Assurance yang berguna untuk meyakinkan bahwa mutu pemeriksaan telah dilaksanakan sesuai dengan standar dan ketentuannya. Penelitian menggunakan data primer berupa wawancara dan menggunakan data sekunder berupa Laporan Hasil Quality Assurance Aparat Pengendali Internal Pemerintah yang dalam hal ini Inspektorat Utama BPK-RI. Metode analisis menggunakan metode kualitatif deskriptif. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa pelaksanaan Quality Assurance telah dilaksanakan dengan cukup baik. Namun peneliti menyarankan kepada BPK agar lebih memberikan rekomendasi yang sifatnya lebih universal, sehingga rekomendasi berulang dapat dieliminasi.

---

This study aimed to analyze the implementation of the Quality Assurance conducted by Apparatus of Government Internal Controller at BPK-RI on the audit of government financial statements. Analysis of implementation is required to determine the extent of the application of Quality Assurance which is useful for assuring that quality checks have been carried out in accordance with the standards and provisions. The study used primary data in the form of interviews and the use of secondary data from the Quality Assurance Report of Apparatus of Government Internal Controller in this case Inspektorat Utama BPK-RI. The method of analysis using descriptive qualitative method. The results of this study indicate that the implementation of Quality Assurance has performed quite well. But the researchers suggest the BPK-RI to better provide recommendations that are more universal, so that repetitive recommendations can be eliminated."

"Mutu setiap program studi harus terus ditingkatkan. Oleh karena itu, tiap program studi harus mengupayakan pengembangan program studi secara komprehensif dan terstruktur. Kementerian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi (Kemendikbudristek) telah membuat Sistem Penjaminan Mutu Internal (SPMI) yang merupakan kegiatan sistemik penjaminan mutu pendidikan tinggi oleh setiap perguruan tinggi secara otonom. Mekanisme SPMI dijalankan mengikuti siklus Penetapan, Pelaksanaan, Evaluasi, Pengendalian, dan Peningkatan atau disingkat menjadi PPEPP. Meskipun begitu, pelaksanaan SPMI di Universitas Indonesia (UI) masih mengalami banyak hambatan. Salah satunya adalah tidak adanya integrasi data untuk kebutuhan SPMI dari tiap fakultas. Karenanya, Badan Penjaminan Mutu Akademik (BPMA) UI ingin memiliki suatu sistem terpusat yang dapat dimanfaatkan oleh tiap fakultas termasuk BPMA UI itu sendiri. Untuk mencapai tujuan tersebut, dilakukan penelitian dan pengembangan dengan alur yang dimulai dari requirements gathering dengan wawancara pengguna, requirements analysis dengan pembuatan persona, user journey, use case diagram (UCD), dan arsitektur informasi. Kemudian dari hasil analisis, dirancang desain low-fidelity prototype berupa wireframe dan desain high-fidelity prototype. Setelah itu, aplikasi dikembangkan dengan teknologi Python, Django, dan Django REST Framework untuk aplikasi back-end dan TypeScript, React, dan Next.js untuk aplikasi front-end. Aplikasi SPMI UI yang sudah selesai dikembangkan kemudian diuji dengan tiga metode evaluasi, yaitu User Acceptance Test (UAT), Usability Testing (UT), dan System Usability Scale (SUS). Hasil evaluasi yang didapat dari ketiga metode evaluasi menyatakan bahwa sistem telah layak untuk digunakan meski masih terdapat beberapa bagian yang perlu diperbaiki.

---

The quality of each study program must be continuously improved. Therefore, each study program must make an effort for the development of a comprehensive and structured study program. The Ministry of Education, Culture, Research and Technology has created an Internal Quality Assurance System (SPMI), which is a systemic activity of quality assurance in higher education by each university autonomously. The SPMI mechanism is carried out by following the cycle of Establishment (Penetapan), Implementation (Pelaksanaan), Evaluation (Evaluasi), Control (Pengendalian), and Improvement (Peningkatan), abbreviated as PPEPP. Even so, the implementation of SPMI at the University of Indonesia (UI) is still experiencing many obstacles. One of them is the absence of data integration for SPMI needs from each faculty. Therefore, UI’s Academic Quality Assurance Agency (BPMA) wants a centralized system that each faculty can utilize, including BPMA UI itself. In order to achieve that, research and development are done by adhering to the flow that started from requirements gathering through user interview, requirements analysis by creating personas, user journey, use case diagram, and information architecture. Based on the outcome of the analysis, low-fidelity prototype (wireframe) and high-fidelity prototype are made. From then on, the application was developed using Python, Django, and Django REST Framework for the back-end, and TypeScript, React, and Next.js for the front-end. The finished SPMI UI app was then tested and evaluated using three different methods: User Acceptance Test (UAT), Usability Testing (UT), and System Usability Scale (SUS). Based on all the tests conducted, it can be concluded that SPMI UI is production-ready, although it still has some parts that could be improved."

"Dalam pengelolaan risiko, di Indonesia memiliki pedoman SNI ISO 31000:2018 tentang manajemen risiko. Manajemen risiko adalah suatu pendekatan proaktif untuk mengidentifkasi, menilai, dan menyusun prioritas risiko dengan tujuan untuk menghilangkan atau meminimalkan dampaknya. Berdasarkan hasil analisis risiko, didapatkan sebanyak 56 potensi risiko selama kegiatan laboratorium berlangsung dengan 5 potensi risiko berlevel moderate, 50 potensi risiko berlevel high, dan 1 potensi risiko berlevel extreme dengan adanya respon dari masing – masing risiko. Risiko merupakan dampak dari ketidakpastian, yang mana dampak tersebut berupa penyimpangan negatif maupun positif. Adapun pendekatan dalam menganalisis risiko dengan mempertimbangkan frekuensi terjadinya suatu risiko, dampak risiko, dan kategori risiko, serta respon dari risiko tersebut. Berdasarkan hasil analisis risiko, didapatkan sebanyak 56 potensi risiko selama kegiatan laboratorium berlangsung dengan 5 potensi risiko berlevel moderate, 50 potensi risiko berlevel high, dan 1 potensi risiko berlevel extreme dengan adanya respon dari masing-masing risiko. Dalam penjaminan mutu khususnya di laboratorium, terdapat pedoman SNI ISO/IEC 17025:2017. Penjaminan mutu adalah kegiatan untuk memberikan kepastian bahwa mutu atau layanan yang dihasilkan selalu konsisten dalam memenuhi permintaan mutu yang telah disepakati. Adapun pendekatan penjaminan mutu dengan menganalisis keabsahan hasil uji banding eksternal dengan ruang lingkup kuat tekan beton silinder. Berdasarkan analisis menggunakan referensi ISO 13528:2015, menunjukkan bahwa nilai nilai Z score dari masing – masing laboratorium ≤ 2, maka kinerja dari kelima laboratorium dalam kategori memuaskan. Dari analisis itu pula, didapatkan metode alternatif berupa box plot sebagai metode uji banding dengan parameter uji kuat tekan dan uji UPV beton. Keunggulan dari metode box plot seperti persebaran data lebih akurat dan presisi walaupun data yang didapatkan sedikit dengan minimal lima sampel data. Peraturan baik SNI ISO 31000:2018 dan SNI ISO/IEC 17025:2017 menjadi standar baku di Indonesia, hal itu didasari dari UU No. 20 tahun 2014 serta didukung dengan PP. No. 34 tahun 2018, yang mana dalam perumusan SNI harus selaras dengan standar internasional yang berlaku. Manajemen risiko di Laboratorium Uji DTSL FTUI serta penjaminan keabsahan hasil uji banding eksternal dilakukan sebagai pemenuhan syarat sistem manajemen mutu dalam peningkatan kinerja laboratorium.

---

In risk management, Indonesia has SNI ISO 31000:2018 guidelines on risk management. Risk management is a proactive approach to identify, assess, and prioritize risks with the aim of eliminating or minimizing their impact. Risk is the impact of uncertainty, where the impact is in the form of negative or positive deviations. The approach in analyzing risk takes into account the frequency of occurrence of a risk, the impact of the risk, and the risk category, as well as the response to the risk.

Based on the results of the risk analysis, there were 56 potential risks during laboratory activities with 5 potential risks at moderate level, 50 potential risks at high level, and 1 potential risk at extreme level with a response from each risk. In quality assurance, especially in laboratories, there are guidelines for SNI ISO/IEC 17025:2017. Quality assurance is an activity to provide assurance that the quality or service produced is always consistent in meeting the agreed quality demands. The quality assurance approach is to analyze the validity of the external comparative test results with the scope of the cylinder concrete compressive strength. Based on the analysis using the ISO 13528:2015 reference, it shows that the Z score value of each laboratory is 2, then the performance of the five laboratories is in the satisfactory category.

From that analysis, an alternative method was obtained in the form of a box plot as a comparative test method with the parameters of the compressive strength test and the UPV test of concrete. The advantages of the box plot method are that the distribution of data is more accurate and precise even though the data obtained is small with a minimum of five data samples. Regulations, both SNI ISO 31000:2018 and SNI ISO 17025:2017 become the standard in Indonesia, it is based on Law no. 20 of 2014 and supported by PP. No. 34 of 2018, which in the formulation of SNI must be in line with applicable international standards. Risk management in the FTUI DTSL Test Laboratory as well as guaranteeing the validity of the external comparative test results are carried out as a fulfillment of the requirements of the quality management system in improving laboratory performance."