Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"Summary: The contributors investigate policy paradigms and their capacity to explain the policy process - actors, ideas, discourses and strategies employed - to provide readers with a better understanding of public policy and its dynamics. Drawing together leading researchers in the field, this edited collection offers a unique insight into a selection of policy paradigms, investigating their significance for public policy, policy making and policy change, in both theory and practice. The contributions open up new avenues of research on policy dynamics while re-evaluating the accuracy and effectiveness of existing policy orthodoxy."

"Teori kekuasaan modern adalah turunan dari filsafat modern. Teori ini melihat kekuasaan terbentuk lewat asumsi-asumsi khas dari liberalisme dan dependensia. Pendekatan seperti ini gagal melihat aspek teknik kekuasaan, relasi, diskursus, ketidaksadaran, dan praktek-praktek lain yang kerap disingkirkan dalam sejarah. Kekuasaan justru terbangun dari sana. Alih-alih melihat kekuasaan yang terbentuk secara prosedural maupun lewat cengkraman hegemoni, skripsi ini berargumen bahwa kekuasaan adalah proses rumit yang terjalin berkelit, memiliki jejaring, saling tumpang-tindih, tetapi terorganisir sedemikian rupa sehingga tidak menganggap penting peran agensi dalam perubahan sosial. Dengan mencermati sejumlah pengalaman kekuasaan Indonesia abad ke-20, skripsi ini berfokus pada kondisi-kondisi apa, kapan, dan bagaimana sebuah kekuasaan beroleh artikulasi, mengapa suatu bentuk kekuasaan terjadi pada waktu tertentu dan tidak di waktu lain, dan faktor-faktor apa saja yang mengundang perlawanan sekaligus menguatkan rezim kekuasaan.

---

AbstractModern Theory of power is derived from modern philosophy. The theory emphasizes power that is formed through both the typical assumptions of liberalism and dependency theory. Such an approach fails to see the importance of technique of power, relation, discourse, unconsciousness, and other practices that are often excluded in history. Power precisely formed from there. Instead of seeing power formed both procedurally and through hegemony, the thesis argued that power is a complicated process tied continuously, by overlapping network, moreover, organized in such a way that does not assume the importance of agency in social change. By examining a number of Indonesian experience in the 20th century, the thesis focuses on the question of when, how, and what kind of conditions if power articulates, why some kind of power occurs at a certain time and not at other, and what are the factors that invite resistance as well as strengthen the regime of power. "