Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"Latar belakang: Strategi problem based learning pada kurikulum berbasis kompetensi didasari atas adult learning theory, dimana salah satu ciri dari adult learning adalah self directed learning. Kemampuan self directed learning perlu diberikan dan dilatih, agar siswa kelak lulus nanti dapat mengembangkan keilmuannya. Melihat pentingnya self directed learning, maka perlu adanya suatu gambaran bagaimana penerapan self directed learning pada kegiatan mandiri oleh para siswa kita serta faktor yang berhubungan dengannya. Metoda: Penelitian ini menggunakan disain potong lintang. Subyek dari penelitian ini adalah 266 mahasiswa semester 3 FK UKRIDA. Instrument yang dipakai untuk pengumpulan data terdiri dari 3 kuesioner, yaitu: kuesioner penerapan self directed learning, motivasi dan pemanfaatan waktu pada kegiatan mandiri. Hasil data yang diperoleh dianalisis dengan menggunakan chi square lest. Hasil: Penerapan self direcled learning didalam PBL diterapkan oleh 68% mahasiswa, 71,8% mahasiswa mempunyai motivasi baik, tetapi hanya 28,2% yang memanfaatkan waktu pada kegiatan mandiri. Kesimpulan: Adanya hubungan yang bermakna antara mahasiswa yang menerapkan self directed learning dengan motivasi belajar, pemanfaatan waktu pada kegiatan mandiri.

---

Background: Problem based learning strategy in competency based curriculum was based on adult learning theory which is characterized by self directed learning. Student should be trained self directed learning. so after graduation they could develop their knowledge. Due to the importance of self directed learning, it is necessery to know the process of self directed learning and factors related to it.

Method: A cross sectional design has been conducted among 266 third semester medical student at University of Ukrida. Three questionaires were used to collect data related to self directed learning, motivation and time management. Data were analize using chi square test.

Result: Self directed learning in the PBL session was done by 68% of students, 71,8% has a good motivation, however only 28.2% used the time allocated in the PBL.

Conclusion: Motivation, time management were found significantly related to self directed learning."

"Ketika bertransisi dari kuliah ke dunia kerja, Generasi Z ditemukan mengalami kesenjangan soft skills, kurang mengetahui potensi diri dan minat karier, dan khawatir tidak bisa mendapat pekerjaan yang diinginkan. Fenomena tersebut mengindikasikan bahwa mereka belum memiliki adaptabilitas karier yang baik. Adaptabilitas karier adalah sumber daya psikososial yang dapat membantu Generasi Z untuk menghadapi masa transisi dan tantangan dalam berkarier. Kepribadian proaktif adalah faktor yang kritis dalam pembentukkan adaptabilitas karier dan dapat membantu Generasi Z untuk bertahan dalam lingkungan kerja yang tidak terprediksi. Selain itu, agar Generasi Z bisa terus memenuhi tuntutan dunia karier yang kompleks, kemampuan self-directed learning (SDL) menjadi penting untuk dimiliki. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui peran SDL dalam memediasi hubungan antara kepribadian proaktif dan adaptabilitas karier. Partisipan penelitian adalah 131 lulusan baru Generasi Z yang sudah bekerja atau magang selama maksimal 1 tahun. Hasil analisis regresi dengan Hayes Macro PROCESS menunjukkan bahwa SDL memediasi parsial hubungan antara kepribadian proaktif dan adaptabilitas karier. Artinya, SDL tidak sepenuhnya menjelaskan hubungan antara kepribadian proaktif dan adaptabilitas karier. Penelitian ini merekomendasikan Generasi Z agar memanfaatkan kepribadian proaktifnya yang tinggi untuk mengoptimalkan adaptabilitas kariernya. Penyedia kerja dapat menyediakan mentoring karier atau coaching untuk memfasilitasi pengembangan adaptabilitas karier Generasi Z.

---

In transitioning from college to the workforce, Generation Z was found to experience soft skills gaps, lack of self-potential and career interests understanding, and worry about securing their desired job. This phenomenon indicates that they do not have good career adaptability. Career adaptability is a psychosocial resources that can help Generation Z to face transitions and challenges in their careers. Proactive personality is a critical factor affecting the formation of career adaptability and can help Generation Z to survive in an unpredictable work environment. In addition, self-directed learning (SDL) skills are important for Generation Z to meet the demands of a complex career world. This study aims to determine how SDL mediates the relationship between proactive personality and career adaptability. The participants of this study are 131 Generation Z fresh graduates with working or internship experience for a maximum of 1 year. The regression analysis result using Hayes Macro PROCESS shows that SDL partially mediates the relationship between proactive personality and career adaptability. In other words, SDL does not fully explain the relationship between proactive personality and career adaptability. This research recommends Generation Z utilize their proactive personality to continue optimizing their career adaptability. Job providers can facilitate Generation Z with career mentoring or coaching to advance their career adaptability."

"Latar belakang: Self directed learning (SDL) merupakan kemampuan yang harus dimiliki oleh seorang dokter. Kurikulum berbasis kompetensi dengan pendekatan problem based learning (PBL) didukung dengan motivasi diri mahasiswa yang tinggi akan meningkatkan kesiapan penerapan SDL mereka. Penelitian dilakukan untuk mengetahui tingkat motivasi diri, kesiapan penerapan SDL pada mahasiswa kedokteran dan mengidentifikasi faktor-faktor yang memengaruhinya. Metode: Penelitian dilakukan dengan mixed method pada kelompok mahasiswa tahun pertama dan kelompok mahasiswa kepaniteraan. Penelitian kuantitatif menggunakan kuesioner motivasi diri (MSLQ) dan kuesioner penerapan SDL (SDLRS). Responden dipilih dengan total sampling. Penelitian kualitatif dilakukan menggunakan Focus Group Discussion (FGD) pada mahasiswa dan tutor/preseptor. Informan dipilih secara purposive sampling. Hasil: Hasil penelitian kuantitatif mengungkapkan bahwa sebagian besar mahasiswa kedokteran memiliki motivasi diri yang cukup baik tetapi dengan kesiapan penerapan SDL yang rendah. Nilai rerata kesiapan penerapan SDL pada kedua kelompok penelitian tidak berbeda bermakna. Penelitian kualitatif mengidentifikasi empat faktor yang berperan besar dalam kesiapan penerapan SDL mahasiswa yaitu karakteristik mahasiswa, proses pembelajaran, peran tutor/preseptor dan sarana penunjang pembelajaran. Kesimpulan: Kesiapan penerapan SDL pada kelompok mahasiswa tahun pertama dan mahasiswa kepaniteraan tidak berbeda. Faktor yang berperan dalam kesiapan penerapan SDL pada mahasiswa yaitu karakteristik mahasiswa, proses pembelajaran, peran tutor/preseptor dan sarana penunjang pembelajaran.

---

Background: Self-Directed Learning (SDL) is an important skill that should be achieved by medical students. Competence-based curriculum with problem-based learning (PBL) as one of its learning approach, supported by high self-motivation of the students will enhance their readiness for SDL. The research is carried out to identify the level of self-motivation and SDL readiness in medical students as well as identify factors affecting SDL.

Methods: This research? design is a mixed method study. Samples were first-year and clinical year medical students. A quantitative research was conducted by distributing self-motivation (MSLQ) and SDL questionnaire (SDLRS). A total sampling was applied to select the respondents. Furthermore, focus group discussion (FGD) on students and tutors/preceptors was carried out. Informants were chosen by purposive sampling method.

Results: The quantitative research revealed that most of medical students had a good level of self-motivation but a low level of SDL readiness. Nevertheless, the mean scores of SDL readiness in both groups showed no significant differences. In addition, the qualitative research identified four major factors affecting the SDL readiness, which were the students? characteristics, learning process, the role of tutors/preceptors and supporting facilities for learning.

Conclusions: There was no significant difference between SDL readiness of the first-year and clinical year medical students. Students? characteristics, learning process, the role of tutors/preceptors and learning resources were found to be the mayor factors influencing SDL readiness."

"Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menjelaskan pengaruh learning organization dan organizational commitment terhadap turnover intention. Penelitian ini dilakukan di kantor pusat PT Telkomsel Jakarta. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan kuantitatif dengan pengumpulan data menggunakan metode survei dengan cara memakai accidental sampling. Jumlah responden yang ada di dalam penelitian ini berjumlah 100 orang. Penelitian ini mengaplikasikan tiga teori utama, yaitu teori learning organization dari Watkins & Marsick, organizational commitment dari Steers, serta turnover intention dari Ableson. Hasil dari penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa learning organization dan organizational commitment mempengaruhi turnover intention. Apabila dilihat pada masing-masing variabel, maka hasil yang diperoleh adalah learning organization memiliki pengaruh terhadap turnover intention sedangkan organizational commitment juga memiliki pengaruh terhadap turnover intention.

---

This study aims to explain the effect of learning organization and organizational commitment on turnover intention. This research conducted in head office of PT Telkomsel Jakarta. This research uses a quantitative approach to gather the data using a survey method that implement accidental sampling. Total respondents in this research are 100 employees. This research employs three main theories, which are the theory of learning organization by Watkins & Marsick, organizational commitment by Steers and turnover intention by Ableson. When viewed on each variable, the results obtained are that learning organization has influence on turnover intention and organizational commitment has also an influence on turnover intention.

"

"Latar belakang: Pembelajaran Berdasarkan Masalah atau Problem-based Learning (PBL) merupakan suatu pendekatan yang efektif dalam student-centered learning. Melalui metode PBL, mahasiswa diharapkan lebih Siap untuk belajar mandiri. Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Riau (FK Unri) Pekanbaru telah melaksanakan metode PBL sejak tahun 2004. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui pengaruh metode PBL terhadap kesiapan belajar mandiri pada rnahasiswa FK Unri. Mctode: Penelitian dilakukan secara cross sectional dengan menggunakan kuesioner terhadap mahasiswa FK Unri yang belum maupun yang sudah mengikuti metode PBL. dan dilaksanakan pada bulan Juli 2007. Subjek penelitian diambil Secara acak dari kedua jenis populasi yang terdiri dari 40 orang mahasiswa yang belum mengikuti metode PBL. dan 40 orang mahasiswa yang sudah mengikuti metode PBL. Kesiapan belajar mandiri mahasiswa dinilai dengan menggunakan skala Fisher. Data yang diperoleh dianalisis dengan menggunakan regresi Cox. Hasil: Dari 80 kuesioner yang dianalisis. sebagian besar subjek adalah perempuan (62,5%), berasal dari SMA dalam kota (80,0%), mempunyai waktu belajar yang cukup (58,8%), mempunyai sumber belajar yang mcmadai (86.3%) dan linggal di tcmpat kos (60,0%). Subjek yang mempunyai kesiapan belajar mandiri sebanyak 6l,3%. Subjek yang sudah mengikuti metode PBL mempunyai kesiapan belajar mandiri 1.96 kali Iebih siap jika dibandingkan dengan subjek yang belum mengikuti metode PBL (risiko relatif suaian 1,96; 95% interval kepercayaan = L30 ~ 2,94; P = 0.00l). Kesimpulan: Kesiapan belajar mandiri pada mahasiswa Fl( Unri dapat ditingkatkan dengan menggunakan metode PBL.

---

Background: Problem-based Learning (PBL) is an effective approach to promote student-centered learning. Students were thought to be more prepared in conducting self-directed learning by implementation of PBL Faculty of Medicine University of Riau has implemented PBL since 2004. The aim of this study is to identify the influence of PBL on self-directed learning readiness (SDLR) among students in Faculty of' Medicine University of Riau.

Methods: The research was a cross sectional study using self report questionnaires obtained from both PBL students and non-PBL students. conducted in July 2007. Fourty students from each group were randomly selected. The SDLR was assessed using Fisher scale. Data analysis was carried out using Cox regression.

Result: The response rate of the questionnaire was l00%. The result revealed the characteristics of participants which are female (62.5%), originated from city high school (80.0%), had adequate study time (S8.8%), had adequate learning resources (86.3%) and stayed in student dormitory (60.0%). Among 61 3% of' the participants showed readiness in conducting se|t`-directed learning. The PBL students had the readiness more likely two times higher than the non-PBL students (adjusted relative risk 1.96: 95% confidence interval = 1.30 - 194; P = 0.00l).

Conclusion: Self-directed learning readiness among students in Faculty of Medicine University of Riau can be increased by PBL."

"Latar Belakang: Problem-based learning dalam pendidikan kedokteran di Indonesia menuntut lulusannya untuk memiliki mutu yang baik. Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Lampung (UNILA) telah mulai menerapkan strategi pembelajaran PBL pada tahun ajaran 2008. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mencari hubungan kinerja tutor dan kinerja belajar mandiri dan pelaporan hasil belajar mandiri dalam diskusi problem-based learning pada mahasiswa FK UNILA Provinsi Lampung.Metode: Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian kuantitatif cross sectional. Pengambilan data pada penelitian ini menggunakan alat bantu kuesioner yang telah diuji validitas dan reliabilitasnya. Sampel merupakan total sampling dari mahasiswa kedokteran FK Unila semester 3 dan 7 sebanyak 375 sampel.Hasil: Terdapat hubungan bermakna antara kinerja tutor dengan kegiatan belajar mandiri dan pelaporan hasil belajar mandiri oleh mahasiswa FK Unila. Analisis chi square nilai p < 0,001. Pada uji statistik didapati nilai OR =4,88 yang berarti bahwa responden yang menyatakan kinerja tutor baik berpeluang sebesar 4,88 kali untuk memiliki kinerja belajar mandiri dan pelaporan hasil belajar mandiri yang baik dibandingkan dengan responden yang menyatakan kinerja tutor kurang.Kesimpulan: Terdapat hubungan antara kinerja tutor dengan kinerja belajar mandiri dan pelaporan hasil belajar mandiri.

---

Background: Problem-based learning of medical education in Indonesia requires graduates to have a good quality. Faculty of Medicine, University of Lampung (UNILA) have started implementing PBL learning strategies in the academic year 2008. The aim of this study is to find the relationship tutor's performance and the performance of self-directed learning activity and reporting process of medical students Unila Lampung Province.

Methods: This study is a quantitative cross sectional. Data was collected using a questionnaire that has been tested for validity and reliability. The sample is a 3rd and 7th semester medical student of FK UNILA (375 samples).

Results: There was a significant relationship between the performance of tutors with self-directed learning activities and the self study report of 3rd and 7th UNILA medical school (p value <0.001). From statistical analysis, we found OR = 4.88, which means that the respondents who perceived to have a good tutor performance were 4.88 times to have a good self-directed learning performance and their sel-study reporting results that compared the performance of tutors respondents who expressed less.

Conclusion: There is a relationship between the tutor's performance with student self-directed learning performance and self-study reporting results."

"[Dalam perjalanan di perkuliahan, mahasiswa akan menemukan masalah salah satunya masalah karir, yaitu merasa salah pada jurusan yang telah dipilihnya dan menyebabkan ketidakyakinan pada jurusan yang telah dipilihnya. Keyakinan mahasiswa untuk tetap persisten pada jurusan yang telah dipilih erat kaitannya dengan career decision self-efficacy. Salah satu faktor yang dapat membantu mahasiswa untuk dapat mencapai career decision self-efficacy adalah self-directed learning pada individu. Tujuan dari penelitian ini untuk melihat hubungan self-directed learning terhadap career decision self-efficacy pada mahasiswa S1 Universitas Indonesia (UI). Responden penelitian ini terdiri dari 516 orang mahasiswa S1 UI tahun kedua atau semester 4. Self-directed learning diukur menggunakan Student Self-Directed Learning Questionnaire dari De Bruin (2008, dalam De Bruin dan Cornelius, 2011) dan career decision self-efficacy diukur dengan Career Decision Self-Efficacy Short-Form dari Betz dan Taylor (1983, dalam Betz & Taylor, 2006) yang telah diadaptasi dan dimodifikasi oleh peneliti. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan terdapat hubungan yang signifikan antara self-directed learning dan career decision self-efficacy (r = 0.576; p < 0.05). Selain itu, hasil juga menunjukkan ada hubungan antara dimensi self-directed learning (perencanaan, pelaksanaan, dan evaluasi) dan career decision self-efficacy. Implikasi dari penelitian ini untuk perguruan tinggi diharapkan agar diadakan pelatihan terkait self-directed learning bagi mahasiswa agar memiliki pengarahan diri dalam pembelajarannya, agar mahasiswa lebih mandiri dalam belajar, menekuni dan mendalami pengetahuan dari jurusan yang dipilihnya sehingga dapat lebih yakin dengan keputusan karirnya.;During their University years, students may encounter problems such as career problem, defined as feeling of mistakenly being in their own chosen study program which then causing hesitation for being in the program. Students? assuredness to be persistent in doing the chosen program is highly related with career decision self-efficacy. One factor that can help students to achieve career decision self-efficacy is by applying self-directed learning for each student. The main purpose of this research is to see the relationship between self-directed learning and career decision self-efficacy among undergraduates students in Universitas Indonesia (UI). A total of 516 students who are currently enrolled in the second or fourth semester participated in the research. Self-directed learning was measured using Student Self-Directed Learning Questionnaire proposed by De Bruin (2008; in De Bruin & Cornelius, 2011) and career decision self-efficacy was measured using Career Decision Self-Efficacy Short-Form designed by Betz and Taylor (1983; in Betz & Taylor, 2006). The two measures were adapted and modified by the researcher. The results indicate that there is a significant relationship between self-directed learning and career decision self-efficacy (r = 0.576; p < 0.05). Furthermore, the results also show that there is a relationship between the dimensions of self-directed learning (planning, implementing, and evaluating) and career decision self-efficacy. The implication of this research is that University is expected to organize training about self-directed learning for the students to have better direction in their studies, so that students more independent in learning, occupy, and steep the knowledge of the major that has been chosen as well as inducing their career decision self-efficacy., During their University years, students may encounter problems such as career problem, defined as feeling of mistakenly being in their own chosen study program which then causing hesitation for being in the program. Students’ assuredness to be persistent in doing the chosen program is highly related with career decision self-efficacy. One factor that can help students to achieve career decision self-efficacy is by applying self-directed learning for each student. The main purpose of this research is to see the relationship between self-directed learning and career decision self-efficacy among undergraduates students in Universitas Indonesia (UI). A total of 516 students who are currently enrolled in the second or fourth semester participated in the research. Self-directed learning was measured using Student Self-Directed Learning Questionnaire proposed by De Bruin (2008; in De Bruin & Cornelius, 2011) and career decision self-efficacy was measured using Career Decision Self-Efficacy Short-Form designed by Betz and Taylor (1983; in Betz & Taylor, 2006). The two measures were adapted and modified by the researcher. The results indicate that there is a significant relationship between self-directed learning and career decision self-efficacy (r = 0.576; p < 0.05). Furthermore, the results also show that there is a relationship between the dimensions of self-directed learning (planning, implementing, and evaluating) and career decision self-efficacy. The implication of this research is that University is expected to organize training about self-directed learning for the students to have better direction in their studies, so that students more independent in learning, occupy, and steep the knowledge of the major that has been chosen as well as inducing their career decision self-efficacy.]"

"Latar Belakang: Umpan balik membantu mahasiswa mencapai tujuan pembelajaran dan membantu staf pengajar menjamin pencapaian sasaran pembelajaran oleh mahasiswa. Berdasarkan penelitian, perbedaan persepsi mengenai umpan balik antara staf pengajar dan mahasiswa dapat menghambat proses pemberian dan penerimaan umpan balik. Sampai saat ini belum diketahui proses pemberian dan penerimaan umpan balik dalam diskusi Problem Based Learning (PBL) di Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Abulyatama, sehingga perlu dilakukan eksplorasi mengenai gambaran keseluruhan pemberian dan penerimaan umpan balik pada tutor dan mahasiswa tahap pre-klinik. Pemberian umpan balik konstruktif dapat memotivasi mahasiswa, memperbaiki kinerja dan mempersiapkan diri untuk masuk ke tahap klinik. Metode : Penelitian ini menggunakan metode kualitatif dengan rancangan fenomenologi. Pengambilan data menggunakan focus group discussion (FGD) pada tutor dan mahasiswa pra klinik serta observasi kegiatan diskusi PBL dengan menggunakan daftar tilik. Hasil: Berdasarkan analisis data kualitatif ditemukan tiga faktor yang mempengaruhi pemberian umpan balik oleh tutor, yaitu; 1) Tutor kurang memahami materi pembelajaran, 2) Sikap tutor yang tidak peduli terhadap diskusi, 3) Tidak memiliki waktu untuk memberikan umpan balik. Sedangkan faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi diterima atau tidaknya umpan balik oleh mahasiswa yaitu; 1) Sikap tutor (ramah, arogan dan tidak peduli) selama diskusi PBL, 2) Karakter mahasiswa (dapat menerima dan tidak dapat menerima umpan balik negatif) , 3) Reaksi afektif, 4) Self assessment, 5) Kepercayaan mahasiswa terhadap staf pengajar kurang dan 6) Umpan balik tidak spesifik. Kesimpulan : Faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi proses pemberian umpan balik harus mendapat perhatian khusus dari tutor agar umpan balik yang diberikan dapat ditanggapi oleh mahasiswa. Tutor dan mahasiswa sepakat bahwa umpan balik konstruktif dapat meningkatkan motivasi belajar mahasiswa

---

Background: Feedback should help student to achieve learning objectives and teacher to ensure achievement of learning objectives by student. Based on the research, the different perceptions about feedback between teachers and students can obstruct the process of delivering and receiving the feedback process. Hitherto, the process of delivering and receiving feedback in Problem Based Learning discussion at the Medical School of University of Abulyatama is not known yet. Thus, an exploration of the overall picture of delivering and receiving feedback to the tutors and the students of preclinical stage is necessary. The delivery of constructive feedback should be able to motivate students in improving their performance and prepare them to enter the Clinical Stage.

Method : This study used qualitative research methods with phenomenology study. Data was retrieved trough focus group discussion (FGD) on tutors and students and observation of PBL discussions using a checklist.

Result: Based on the qualitative data analysis it is found that three influential factors for the delivery of feedback are 1) Incomprehension of tutors upon the learning material, 2) Lack of attention on discussion, 3) Lack of time to deliver the feedback. Whereas, factors that influenced whether or not feedback was received by the students are 1) Attitude of tutors (friendly, arrogant and careless) during discussion, 2) Students’ characteristic (can or cannot receive negative feedback), 3) Affective reaction, 4) Self-assessment, 5) Lack of trust on the tutors, and 6) General feedback.

Conclusion : Factors that influence the delivery of feedback should gain special attention from the tutors, so that students can receive the feedback given. Tutors and students agree that constructive feedback can improve students’ learning motivation."

"Latar belakang: Pergeseran teori motivasi kuantitas menjadi kualitas, yaitu self-determination theory (SDT) telah merubah paradigma staf pengajar pendidikan kedokteran tentang motivasi. Menurut SDT, motivasi otonomi (MO) merupakan variabel penting dalam meningkatkan prestasi akademik mahasiswa kedokteran dan MO sangat berpotensi untuk ditingkatkan atau dilemahkan oleh hubungan interpersonal antara tutor dengan mahasiswa selama proses pembelajaran. Tujuan penelitian untuk merumuskan hubungan motivasi otonomi dan dukungan otonomi tutor dengan prestasi akademik mahasiswa kedokteran. Metode: Penelitian cross-sectional dilaksanakan di FK-UPH pada bulan Januari-Maret 2016 dan melibatkan seluruh angkatan 2015 (total sampling) yang mengikuti diskusi tutorial problem-based learning Blok Fundamental Medical Science (FMS). Data motivasi otonomi dan dukungan otonomi tutor diperoleh dari Learning Self-Regulation Questionnaire dan Learning Climate Questionnaire. Data prestasi akademik mahasiswa didapat dari nilai ujian FMS (multiple choice questions). Hasil: Data yang diperoleh secara lengkap sejumlah 199 orang. Penelitian menunjukkan 79,4% mahasiswa memiliki MO dan mendapat dukungan otonomi tutor yang tinggi, yaitu sebesar 5,22 dari total skor 7. Hasil analisis regresi linier multipel menunjukkan peningkatan MO mahasiswa sejalan dengan peningkatan prestasi akademik mahasiswa. Kedua, prestasi akademik mahasiswa akan menurun jika mendapat peningkatan dukungan otonomi tutor. Ketiga, terdapat hubungan MO dan dukungan otonomi tutor secara bersamaan terhadap prestasi akademik. Kesimpulan: Motivasi otonomi dan dukungan otonomi tutor berperan menentukan prestasi akademik mahasiswa. Namun, dukungan otonomi tutor tanpa disertai structure kepada mahasiswa dengan latar belakang pendidikan teacher-centered dan keterampilan belajar mandiri yang rendah dapat menurunkan prestasi akademik mahasiswa.

---

Background: A transformation in motivation theory from quantity to quality, such as self-determination theory (SDT) has changed the paradigm of medical educators. In accordance with SDT, autonomous motivation (AM) is an important variable in improving medical students? academic achievement and AM has a possibility to be augmented or diminished by interpersonal relationships between tutors and students during learning activities. This study is aimed to assess the relationship between AM and tutors? autonomy support with students? academic achievement.

Methods: This study was conducted between January 2016 and March 2016 at the UPH medical school; and all medical students from 2015 class (total sampling) participated in problem-based learning tutorial discussion for Fundamental Medical Science (FMS) Block. Learning Self-Regulation Questionnaire and Learning Climate Questionnaire were distributed to assess students? AM and tutors? autonomy support. Students? academic achievement data was obtained from the score of FMS assessment (multiple choice questions).

Results: The final data was completed by 199 students. About 79,4% of the students were autonomously motivated and the score of perceived tutors? autonomy support was high (5.22 out of 7). The results of multiple regression analysis indicated that first, AM was consistent with students? academic achievement. Second, the augmentation of tutors? autonomy support resulted in the diminished students? academic achievement. Third, there was a concurrent association between AM and tutors? autonomy support with academic achievement.

Conclusion: Students? autonomous motivation and tutors? autonomy support are necessary for academic achievement. However, tutors? autonomy support itself without structure will diminish students? academic achievement especially in students with teacher-centered educational background and poor self-regulated learning skills."