Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"Sixty-five of the world's leading writers open up about the books and authors that have meant the most to them. These wide-ranging interviews are conducted by Pamela Paul, the editor of the The New York Times Book Review, featuring personalities as varied as David Sedaris, Hilary Mantel, Michael Chabon, Khaled Hosseini, Anne Lamott, and James Patterson. These questions and answers admit us into the private worlds of these authors, as they reflect on their work habits, reading preferences, inspirations, pet peeves, and recommendations.By the Book contains the full uncut interviews, reflecting a range of experiences and observations that deepens readers' understanding of the literary sensibility and the writing process"

"Artikel ini membahas bagaimana bantuan keamanan militer CSTO dalam kerusuhan di Kazakhstan tahun 2022 dibingkai sebagai upaya penegasan pengaruh Rusia oleh media The New York Times. Menggunakan model analisis pembingkaian Pan & Kosicki, analisis ini bertujuan untuk membuktikan bahwa The New York Times sebagai media Barat tidak memberitakan keterlibatan militer CSTO sebagai bantuan, melainkan sebagai upaya Rusia untuk menegaskan pengaruhnya. Hasilnya The New York Times terbukti membingkai bantuan keamanan militer CSTO sebagai upaya penegasan pengaruh Rusia atas republik-republik bekas Soviet, yakni dengan menonjolkan Rusia atau Putin sebagai yang paling berperan, dan kemudian menggambarkan keterlibatan itu sebagai intervensi, keuntungan bagi Rusia sendiri, kedok untuk menetap tanpa batas waktu, bantuan yang tidak dibutuhkan dan tidak diinginkan, bantuan yang mengkhawatirkan masyarakat Kazakhstan, bantuan yang tidak tulus, menghambat proses demokrasi, serta merugikan masyarakat dan pemimpin Kazakhstan sendiri.

---

This article discusses how CSTO's military security assistance in the Kazakhstan unrest in 2022 is framed as a Russia’s effort to assert its influence by The New York Times. Using the Pan & Kosicki framing analysis model, this analysis aims to prove that The New York Times as a western media does not report on CSTO's military involvement as aid, but as an attempt by Russia to assert its influence. As the result, The New York Times proved to frame the CSTO military security assistance as an effort by Russia to assert its influence over the former Soviet republics, by highlighting Russia or Putin as the most important, and then describing the involvement as intervention, a benefit for Russia itself, a guise for staying indefinitely, unneeded and unwanted assistance, assistance that worries the people of Kazakhstan, insincere assistance, hinders the democratic process, and is detrimental to the people and leaders of Kazakhstan itself."