Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui pengaruh kepemimpinan dan iklim organisasi terhadap perilaku knowledge sharing. Berdasarkan hasil uji regresi berganda pada 92 karyawan dengan menggunakan Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire (Form 5x-Short), Organizational Climate Instrument, dan Knowledge Sharing Behavior Questionnaire menunjukkan adanya pengaruh yang signifikan dari kepemimpinan dan iklim organisasi terhadap knowledge sharing, dimana sumbangan paling signifikan berasal dari iklim organisasi (r = 0,511**, p<0,01). Kemudian peneliti merancang intervensi untuk meningkatkan iklim organisasi pada dimensi fairness yang memberikan sumbangan terbesar. Fairness yang dipersepsikan rendah karena penilaian atasan yang dianggap tidak adil. Oleh karena itu, intervensi effective performance feedback workshop diberikan kepada para atasan untuk meningkatkan persepsi fairness bawahannya yang diharapkan akan meningkatkan perilaku knowledge sharing bawahan.Hasil uji signifikansi perbedaan pre-test dan post-test menunjukkan intervensi signifikan meningkatkan dimensi iklim organisasi yaitu persepsi fairness sehingga terdapat peningkatan pula pada knowledge sharing (t = -4,733*, p<0,05). Hasil ini mengimplikasikan bahwa penting untuk memberikan feedback secara berkala agar karyawan menampilkan perilaku knowledge sharing yang diharapkan.

---

This study is aimed to analyze the effect of leadership and organizational climate toward knowledge sharing behaviors. Based on multiple regression test to the 92 employees using Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire (Form 5x-Short), Organizational Climate Instrument, and Knowledge Sharing Behavior Questionnaire showed a significant effect of leadership and organizational climate toward knowledge sharing, in which the most significant contribution came from organizational climate (r = 0.511**, p <0,01). Then the researcher designed intervention to improve organizational climate dimension of fairness as biggest contribution. The low perceived fairness was considered because of unfair superior rating. Hence, the effective performance feedback workshop intervention was given to supervisors to improve the perception of fairness on their subordinates and expected to enhance knowledge sharing behaviors.

The result of the significance test on the difference between pre-test and post-test showed that the given intervention could improve the dimension of organizational climate that was the perception of fairness so that there was improvement knowledge sharing (t = -4.733 *, p <0,05). This result implies that it is important to give the employee feedback on a regular basis in order to show the expected knowledge sharing behaviors."

"Here are the tools to build a genuinely proactive performance management program. Fully updated with all-new case studies from major companies, the second edition will help managers and HR professionals: start a program designed to get maximum results; understand job requirements and set standards; use coaching to maximise performance; conduct more efficient and effective appraisal interviews; and, create performance improvement plans that really work."

"Measuring the impact of learning continues to be one of the most challenging aspects of the learning function. ASTDs Value of Evaluation report explores the complex issue of learning evaluation, the techniques being used, barriers to effective implementation, and strategic use of learning metrics..Companies employ myriad strategies to identify and quantify the results of training, but most are not satisfied with the evaluation efforts. Organizations are not giving up on successful measurement of the learning function, as they continue to explore ways to communicate and document the value of training and development they provide to employees. The data in this report can help many firms become more proficient in these areas."

"Improving the Quality of child custody evaluations raises significant questions of accuracy, reliability, and validity in the way even the best-intentioned evaluations are conducted, and proposes standardized guidelines for correction. Identifying conceptual as well as empirical shortcomings in the evaluation process, the authors analyze the current state of custody evaluation protocols and the welter of laws surrounding the concept of the best interests of the child. An empirically-based framework, the egregious/promotive factors model, is presented as a reliable alternative, supported by rigorous assessment tools and backed by the results of a pilot study of the model among family court judges. Throughout, the book never loses sight of the optimum end result : a reliable foundation for children’s future well-being. "