Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"Sistem perpajakan Indonesia mengalami perubahan pada tahun 1984 dari sistem Official Assesment menjadi sistem Self Assesment. Dengan sistem Self Assesment pemerintah memberikan kepercayaan penuh kepada wajib pajak untuk menghitung, menyetor, dan melaporkan sendiri kewajiban perpajakannya. Pemerintah dalam hal ini, Direktorat Jenderal Pajak, sesuai dengan fungsinya berkewajiban melaksanakan pembinaa.i, pelayanan, pengawasan, dan penerapan sanksi perpajakan terhadap pelaksanaan kewajiban perpajakan wajib pajak berdasarkan ketentuan yang digariskan dalam peraturan perundang-undangan pajak. Namun dalam perkembangannya dari tahun ke tahun tunggakan pajak yang belum lunas tidak berkurang, tetapi justru bertambah sehingga hal tersebut harus dilakukan tindakan antisipasi agar tunggakan pajak tersebut dapat dikurangi. Penagihan pajak masih belum efektif dilaksanakan tanpa adanya peraturan yang bersifat memaksa. Surat teguran, surat peringatan atau surat lain yang sejenis telah diterbitkan apabila pcnanggung pajak tidak melunasi utang pajaknya sampai dengan tanggal jatuh tempo, tetapi kenyataannya seringkali kurang mendapat perhatian oleh wajib pajak. Segala tindakan penagihan pajak sebagai upaya pelunasan tunggakan pajak baik pajak-pajak pusat maupun pajak-pajak daerah haruslah dilakukan berdasarkan peraturan perundang-undangan yang berlaku. Masalah yang timbul adalah untuk mengetahui surat teguran dan surat paksa yang diterbitkan berpengaruh signifikan terhadap pelaksanaan pembayaran tunggakan pajak oleh wajib pajak dan apakah faktor penerbitan surat paksa berpengaruh dominan terhadap pelaksanaan pembayaran tunggakan pajak oleh wajib pajak. Tujuan penelitian ini untuk menganalisis surat teguran dan surat paksa yang diterbitkan memiliki pengaruh yang signifikan terhadap pelaksanaan pembayaran tunggakan pajak oleh wajib pajak dan apakah faktor penerbitan surat paksa memiliki pengaruh yang dominan terhadap pelaksanaan pembayaran tunggakan pajak oleh wajib pajak. Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah metode penelitian pengujian hipotesis atau penelitian penjelasan (explanatory research). Penelitian ini dimaksudkan untuk mengetahui dan menguji bagaimana hubungan dan sejauhmana pengaruh dari variable-variabel surat teguran dan surat paksa terhadap variabel pelaksanaan pembayaran tunggakan pajak oleh wajib pajak. Teknik pengumpulan data menggunakan penelitian kepustakaan dan penelitian lapangan terhadap data yang meliputi laporan dan proses penagihan pajak yang dilakukan oleh Kantor Pelayanan Pajak Jakarta Setia Budi Satu.Kesimpulan dari penelitian ini antara lain : surat teguran dan surat paksa yang dikirimkan kepada wajib pajak mempunyai pengaruh signifikan terhadap pelunasan tunggakan pajak oleh wajib pajak, secara umum kesadaran wajib pajak di wilayah KPP Setiabudi Satu masih rendah, terbukti setiap tahun wajib pajak menunggak relatif tinggi. Saran yang diberikan adalah selalu melakukan evaluasi terhadap efektifitas poly tagihan yang telah diterapkan, sehingga dapat ditemukan rumusan model penagihan yang strategis dan dapat menekan angka wajib pajak penunggak dari tahun ke tahun; serta untuk mempengaruhi kesadaran pajak para wajib pajak selain pelayanan prima perpajakan juga penyuluhan melalui pendidikan pajak.

---

Indonesia Taxing System has changed in 1984 from Official Assessment System to Self Assessment system. Because of Self Assessment system government give a full of trust to tax obligator , in order to account, to pay and to report herself/himself taxing obligation. In this case, the government, especially Directorate General of Tax, as suitable with its function obligate to execute, to guide, to serve, to monitor and the application of taxing sanction to taxing obligation execution of tax obligator based on decided regulation in tax laws regulation. Unfortunately in its development year to year , delay payment of tax is not decrease yet, but it is increasing so such matter must be done anticipation action in order to decrease of delay payment of tax. The addiction of tax is still not effective yet , because it is done without enforcement regulation. Admission letter, remaining letter or other same kind of letter have been published if tax obligator is not pay of its tax yet to the date line of the payment, but in the fact it is not often have paid attention by the tax obligator. All of action for tax addiction as the effort of the payment of addiction of tax both government taxes and local government taxes must be done based on valid laws regulation

The problem that arise is in order to know of admission letter and enforcement letter that be published have a significant influent payment execution of delay payment of tax by tax obligator or is the publishing of enforcement letter factor have dominant influent payment execution of delay payment of tax by tax obligator The purpose of this research is in order to analyze the admission letter and enforcement letter that be published have significant execution of delay payment of tax by tax obligator. Method that be used in this research hypothesis testing research method and exploration research) , This research meant in order to know and to test how the connection and how far the influence of admission letter and enforcement letter variables to execution of delay payment of tax by tax obligator. Data collection technique uses dictum research and field research to data that consist of report and tax addiction process that be done by Tax Service Office Jakarta Setia Budi Satu

The conclusion of this research namely: admission letter and enforcement letter that be sent to tax obligator have a significant influence to the payment of tax addiction by tax obligator., in general consciousness of tax obligator in KPP Jakarta Setia Budi Satu territory is still low, it is proved every year, tax obligator delay the payment high relatively The advice that given is always evaluate to addiction pattern effectively that have been applied, so it can be found strategic addiction model formula and can push the numeric of addiction of tax obligator year to year and also to influence consciousness of tax for tax obligator beside taxing primary service and also illumination through tax education."

"In order to increased voluntary disclosure from the tax payer, the Indonesian government trough Directorate General of Tax making a tax reforms and the policy that the government choose is by using tax amnesty policy. At the year 1984 the government has been issued a tax amnesty policy, but this policy failed in implementation and the government never evaluated the failure. At 2008 the government issuing the same tax amnesty policy and it called sunset policy.

This research will explain about government comparison when issuing tax amnesty policy at the year 1984 and the year 2008, what exactly becomes the major obstacle on the implementation of the tax amnesty policy at the year 1984, and what are the differences between tax amnesties that were used at 1984 with tax amnesty that used in 2008. The approach used in this research is qualitative approach. The goal is to find an understanding about tax amnesty policy that implemented in Indonesia since 1984 until 2008. The research type is descriptive because the researcher tries to give a detailed description about tax amnesty policy that implemented in Indonesia since 1984 until 2008. Data collected in this research is by trough in depth interview with Directorate General of Tax, academic, tax payer, and tax expert. Beside that the data was also collected trough study literature, books, magazine, journals, and the tax regulation which are related to tax amnesty at the year 1984 and 2008.

The result from this research found that the government rationale issuing tax amnesty policy at the year 1984 because of the change of tax system in Indonesia from official assessment system to self assessment system. The change of tax system needs honesty and voluntary disclosure from every tax payer. Based on that reason, the government issuing tax amnesty policy. At the year 2008 the government tries to collect taxation data from Indonesian citizen who already registered as tax payer and the citizen who are not registered as tax payer. In order to make the tax payer willing to declare the taxation data that they have, government issuing tax amnesty policy. The obstacle on the implementation of tax amnesty at the year 1984 are because the limitation of taxation data, information technology, tax authorities who are not ready with this policy, and public perception of unfairness in tax amnesty. The main differences between tax amnesty at the year 1984 and 2008 is what the government forgiven. At the year 1984 the government forgives all the tax liabilities including interest, penalties, and other prosecution, whereas tax amnesty at the year 2008 only forgive the interest."

"Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui hubungan dan pengaruh sistem informasi perpajakan yang memadai terhadap kepatuhan wajib pajak dan penerimaan pajak.Penelitian ini dilakukan di Lingkungan KPP Badora I, pada bulan Mei 2006 dengan sampel 115 Wajib Pajak Badan yang diambil secara acak dari 910 Wajib Pajak atau +1- 2% dari populasi.Instrumen untuk menjaring data Sistem Informasi Perpajakan (Y1) dan Kepatuhan Wajib Pajak (X1) adalah kuesioner model skala likert sedangkan data penerimaan pajak (Y2) adalah data sekunder yang diperoleh langsung dari KPP Badora 1.Analisis data dilakukan secara kuantitatif dengan dua teknik analisis statistika yang akan digunakan dalam penelitian ini, yaitu Analisis Regresi dan Uji Perbedaan Mann-Whitney. Teknik analisis regresi digunakan untuk mengetahui dan memprediksi pengaruh Sistem Informasi Perpajakan terhadap Kepatuhan Wajib Pajak dan Penerimaan Pajak, sementara Uji Perbedaan Rata-Rata Mann-Whitney digunakan untuk mendeteksi apakah terdapat perbedaan antara tingkat penerimaan Pajak Kantor Pelayanan Pajak Badan dan Orang Asing (KPP Badora 1) antara sebelum digunakannnya sistem komputerisasi dan setelah digunakannya sistem tersebut. Interpretasi hasil analisis data menggunakan signifikansi a 5%.Hasil analisis regresi menunjukkan bahwa terdapat hubungan yang signifikan antara penerapan sistem informasi perpajakan dengan kepatuhan Wajib Pajak yaitu sebesar 0,653. Sedangkan besar pengaruh dari penerapan sistem informasi perpajakan terhadap kepatuhan Wajib Pajak adalah sebesar 42,6%. Persamaan regresi liniernya Y = 25,23 I + 0, 538X.Hasil pengujian Mann-Whitney menunjukkan bahwa tidak terdapat perbedaan yang signifikan antara penerimaan pajak sebelum dan sesudah penerapan sistem informasi perpajakan yang berarti bahwa penerapan sistem informasi perpajakan tidak mempengaruhi secara signifikan terhadap penerimaan pajak.Berdasarkan hasil penelitian ini dapat dinyatakan bahwa pengaruh sistem informasi perpajakan memberikan sumbangan yag berarti terhadap kepatuhan wajib pajak dan penerimaan pajak khususnya di KPP Badora 1Dengan demikian diharapkan bahwa untuk meningkatkan kepatuhan wajib pajak dan penerimaan pajak diperlukan sistem informasi pajak yang baik pula.

---

This research aim to know about relation and influence of adequate taxation information system to compliance of taxpayer and tax income.

This research is conducted by in Environment of KPP Badora I, in May 2006 with sampel 115 (one hundred and fifteen) Corporate Taxpayer at random from 910 (nine hundred and ten) Corporate Taxpayer or (+I-) 12% from research population.

Instrument to get Information System Taxation data ( Y1) and Compliance of Taxpayer (X1) [is] questioner model scale of likert and Income Tax data ( Y2) is second data that obtained from KPP Badora I. Data analysis is done quantitatively with two technique of statistic analysis to be used in this research, that is Analysis of Regression and Test Difference of Mann-Whitney. Regression analysis technique is used to know and prediction of influence of Taxation Information System to Compliance of Taxpayer and Income Tax, whereas Test Difference of Mean of Mann-Whitney used to detect what is there are difference of KPP Badora 1 tax income between before and after using computerize system. Interpretation result of data analysis use significant amount 5%.

Result of Regression analysis indicate that there are significant relation between applying of taxation information system and compliance of Taxpayer that is equal to 0,653. Influence of applying of taxation information system to compliance of Taxpayer [is] equal to 42,6%. Formula of linear regression Y = 25, 231 + 0, 538X.

Examination Result of Mann-Whitney indicate that there are not the significant difference between before and after using taxation information system is meaning that applying of taxation information system do not influence by significant to tax income.

Based on result of this research can be expressed that influence of taxation information system give contribution to compliance of taxpayer and KPP Badora I Tax Income.

Thereby we expected that to increase compliance of taxpayer and tax income needed [by] good tax information system also."

"Zakat has an important position In Islam. It becomes religion obligation as well as a function for increasing the prosperity of social life. Through zakat, income of people which has more economic's ability is distributed to the people who have a right to earn. As a result, it creates the equal condition of income, wealth, and social justice in society.For Moslem paying zakat is a must. But in Islam, besides zakat, there are another duties in the wealth which have to pay for. One of them is the obligation for paying income tax as a proof of people's obedience to the leaders and the participation in the development. This condition makes the moslem have to suffer double obligation. In order to minimize an obligation Indonesian government carried out the policy which counted zakat as the nett income deduction regarding the income tax. Different with Indonesia, in Malaysia zakat that had been paid by Moslem can deduct tax obligation as a tax credit of individual income tax. One interesting thing from it's difference is, implementation of this policy does not cause decreasing of tax revenue but increase the revenue both zakat and tax instead.This research studied the possibility of zakat policy implementation as a tax credit of individual income tax in Indonesia based on Malaysia's implementation. It tried to describe the comparation between tax and zakat management in Malaysia and Indonesia, some justification of policy implementation in Indonesia, and the obstacle of policy. This research used qualitative approach with descriptive analysis. Besides, this research can be classified into pure and cross sectional research. The data is collected by field research through depth interview with informans and literatures from articles, books, rules, and other sources.The result of this research shows the possibility of implementation this policy in Indonesia with some justifications. First, this policy can support the government's duty to increase citizen prosperity. Second, it can increase zakat and tax revenue. Third, it can dissappear double obligation burden. Although, there are some obstacles that must be faced to implemente this policy, such as structure of zakat collecting organization, the absence of penalty in zakat law, political will of government, self-internal factor, interreligious problem, and other administration problems."