Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"Perkembangan perdagangan internasional sejak adanya kemajuan teknologi seakan tidak mengenal batas-batas negara sehingga perdagangan barang antar negara semakin bebas dan membentuk pasar persaingan sempurna. Adanya praktek dumping yaitu persaingan dalam bentuk harga berupa diskriminasi harga atau menjual di bawah harga pasaran adalah imbas dari adanya pasar bebas yang bersaing untuk memperoleh keuntungan. Pengaturan untuk menanggulangi dampak negatif dari praktik dumping ditetapkan dalam Agreement on Implementation of Article VI of GATT 1994 dan merupakan salah satu Multilateral Trade Agreements yang ditandatangani bersamaan dengan Agreement Establishing The World Trade Organization WTO. Praktik dumping yang dilarang menurut WTO adalah penjualan barang sejenis yang dibawah harga normal yang menyebabkan kerugian material di Industri dalam negeri. Sebagai anggota WTO, Indonesia wajib melindungi industri dalam negeri dari akibat negatif dumping dengan cara memberikan bea masuk antidumping kepada barang impor dan melindungi industri dalam negeri dari tuduhan dumping negara lain. Dengan adanya Komite Anti Dumping Indonesia KADI Indonesia mempunyai suatu lembaga yang bertugas untuk melindungi industri dalam negeri dari persaingan barang impor yang tidak adil dan memberikan perlindungan atau pembelaan terhadap produk-produk ekspor Indonesia yang dituduh dumping di Negara tujuan.

---

The development of international trade since the advent of technology as if not know the boundaries of the country so that trade goods between countries more free and form a perfect competition market. The existence of the practice of dumping the competition in the form of price in the form of price discrimination or selling below the market price is the impact of a free market competing for profit.The arrangement to address the negative impact of dumping practices is set out in the Agreement on Implementation of Article VI of GATT 1994 and is one of the Multilateral Trade Agreements signed in conjunction with the World Trade Organization WTO Agreement Establishing. Dumping practices prohibited under the WTO are the sale of similar goods below the normal price causing material losses in the domestic Industry. As a member of the WTO, Indonesia is obliged to protect the domestic industry from the negative effects of dumping by providing import duties on anti dumping and protecting domestic industries from accusations of dumping of other countries. The existence of anti dumping BMAD action against Indonesia biodiesel export must be adjusted with Anti dumping Agreement so that justice in international trade can be achieved."

"[ABSTRAKPenelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisa ketentuan WTO dan hukumnasional Indonesia berkaitan dengan pengaturan dumping dan antidumping diKawasan Bebas dan upaya yang dapat dilakukan untuk mengenakan atau tidakmengenakan Bea Masuk Antidumping pada barang dumping yang akan masuk keKawasan Bebas di Indonesia. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian hukum yangbersifat yuridis normatif dengan menggunakan data sekunder, diantaranyaperaturan perundang-undangan dan buku. Tindakan Antidumping menurutketentuan WTO pelaksanaannya wajib dilakukan apabila telah dipenuhi syaratsyarattindakan dumping dan berdasarkan hasil investigasi Komite Antidumping.Perbandingan antara nilai normal dengan nilai ekspor hasil investigasi tersebutakan mendapatkan suatu marjin dumping yang dinilai sangat penting dalammenentukan besaran pengenaan Bea Masuk Antidumping. Pada praktiknya, beamasuk antidumping justru dibebaskan dalam Kawasan Perdagangan Bebas danPelabuhan Bebas (Kawasan Bebas) sebagaimana Pasal 14 Peraturan PemerintahNomor 10 Tahun 2012 tentang Perlakuan Kepabeanan, Perpajakan, dan CukaiSerta Tata Laksana Pemasukan dan Pengeluaran Barang ke dan dari Serta Beradadi Kawasan yang Telah Ditetapkan sebagai Kawasan Perdagangan Bebas danPelabuhan Bebas. Dengan dibukanya lalu lintas barang yang masuk ke dalamKawasan Bebas tanpa terkena bea masuk, apalagi bea masuk antidumping,ternyata dapat mengakibatkan terjadinya disorientasi pelindungan danpengamanan perdagangan yaitu menimbulkan kerugian produsen ataupun industridalam negeri dan mengakibatkan terhambatnya industri dalam negeri karena kalahbersaing dari produsen luar negeri yang berhasil memasukkan barangnya keKawasan Bebas. Ketentuan WTO mengenai Territorial Application-FrontierTraffic-Customs Unions and Free-trade Areas, memungkinkan masuknya barangke dalam suatu Kawasan Bebas untuk dikenakan Tindakan PemulihanPerdagangan, salah satunya Tindakan Antidumping, sehingga dapat menjadi dasarbagi Pemerintah Indonesia untuk dapat melakukan perubahan pengaturanmengenai bea masuk pada Kawasan Bebas.

---

ABSTRACTThis research aims to analyze the provisions of the WTO and theIndonesian national law relating to dumping and anti-dumping regulation in FreeZone and efforts should be made to wear or not to wear Antidumping Duties ondumping of goods that will go to the Free Zone in Indonesia. This research is anormative juridical law using secondary data, such as legislation and books.Antidumping action under the terms of WTO implementation must be done if theconditions have been fulfilled dumping measures and is based on the results of theinvestigation Antidumping Committee. The comparison between the normal valuewith an export value of the results of the investigation will get a dumping marginwhich was considered very important in determining the amount of the impositionof Antidumping Duty. In practice, anti-dumping duties actually released withinthe Free Trade Zone and Free Port (Free Zone) as well as Article 14 ofGovernment Regulation No. 10 of 2012 on the Treatment of Customs, Taxationand Excise And Procedure Entry and goods to and from And Being in the RegionDefined as Free Trade Zone and Free Port. With the opening of freight trafficcoming into the free zone without incurring customs duties, let alone antidumpingduties, it can result in disorientation protection and trade security that iscausing losses of industrial or domestic producers and resulted in inhibition ofdomestic industry because of competition from producers outside who managed toenter the country the goods to the free zone. WTO provisions concerningTerritorial Application-Frontier Traffic-Customs Unions and Free-trade Areas,allowing the entry of goods into a free zone for the Restoration of Commerceimposed measures, one of which Antidumping Measures, which can be the basisfor the Indonesian government to be able to make changes to the settings on dutyentered the free zone.;This research aims to analyze the provisions of the WTO and theIndonesian national law relating to dumping and anti-dumping regulation in FreeZone and efforts should be made to wear or not to wear Antidumping Duties ondumping of goods that will go to the Free Zone in Indonesia. This research is anormative juridical law using secondary data, such as legislation and books.Antidumping action under the terms of WTO implementation must be done if theconditions have been fulfilled dumping measures and is based on the results of theinvestigation Antidumping Committee. The comparison between the normal valuewith an export value of the results of the investigation will get a dumping marginwhich was considered very important in determining the amount of the impositionof Antidumping Duty. In practice, anti-dumping duties actually released withinthe Free Trade Zone and Free Port (Free Zone) as well as Article 14 ofGovernment Regulation No. 10 of 2012 on the Treatment of Customs, Taxationand Excise And Procedure Entry and goods to and from And Being in the RegionDefined as Free Trade Zone and Free Port. With the opening of freight trafficcoming into the free zone without incurring customs duties, let alone antidumpingduties, it can result in disorientation protection and trade security that iscausing losses of industrial or domestic producers and resulted in inhibition ofdomestic industry because of competition from producers outside who managed toenter the country the goods to the free zone. WTO provisions concerningTerritorial Application-Frontier Traffic-Customs Unions and Free-trade Areas,allowing the entry of goods into a free zone for the Restoration of Commerceimposed measures, one of which Antidumping Measures, which can be the basisfor the Indonesian government to be able to make changes to the settings on dutyentered the free zone., This research aims to analyze the provisions of the WTO and theIndonesian national law relating to dumping and anti-dumping regulation in FreeZone and efforts should be made to wear or not to wear Antidumping Duties ondumping of goods that will go to the Free Zone in Indonesia. This research is anormative juridical law using secondary data, such as legislation and books.Antidumping action under the terms of WTO implementation must be done if theconditions have been fulfilled dumping measures and is based on the results of theinvestigation Antidumping Committee. The comparison between the normal valuewith an export value of the results of the investigation will get a dumping marginwhich was considered very important in determining the amount of the impositionof Antidumping Duty. In practice, anti-dumping duties actually released withinthe Free Trade Zone and Free Port (Free Zone) as well as Article 14 ofGovernment Regulation No. 10 of 2012 on the Treatment of Customs, Taxationand Excise And Procedure Entry and goods to and from And Being in the RegionDefined as Free Trade Zone and Free Port. With the opening of freight trafficcoming into the free zone without incurring customs duties, let alone antidumpingduties, it can result in disorientation protection and trade security that iscausing losses of industrial or domestic producers and resulted in inhibition ofdomestic industry because of competition from producers outside who managed toenter the country the goods to the free zone. WTO provisions concerningTerritorial Application-Frontier Traffic-Customs Unions and Free-trade Areas,allowing the entry of goods into a free zone for the Restoration of Commerceimposed measures, one of which Antidumping Measures, which can be the basisfor the Indonesian government to be able to make changes to the settings on dutyentered the free zone.]"

"Dumping merupakan praktik perdagangan tidak sehat yang dilakukan dalam konteksperdagangan lintas batas Negara atau perdagangan internasional yang melibatkanpara pelaku usaha antar Negara. Praktik dumping biasanya dilakukan dalam rangkamenguasai pasar suatu Negara dengan cara menjual produk dengan nilai dibawahkewajaran sehingga merugikan industry dalam negeri suatu Negara hingga akhirnyatidak dapat berkembang. Antidumping merupakan suatu hukum yang bertujuanmencegah terjadinya praktik dumping dengan memberlakukan berbagai cara yangbiasanya dikenal sebagai hambatan guna menciptakan persaingan harga yangseimbang. Penyelesaian sengketa dumping merupakan instrumen antidumpingnasional dan internasional yang diajukan oleh pelaku usaha maupun oleh pemerintahsuatu Negara kepada Organisasi Perdagangan Internasional (WTO) denganmembawa kepentingan industry nasionalnya.Penelitian tesis penulis merupakan penelitian normative yang bersifat kualitatifdengan menggunakan teori Critical Legal Studies penulis melakukan pembahasanterhadap pokok-pokok permasalahan guna menghasilkan suatu kesimpulan dansaran-saran atas hasil penelitian

---

ABSTRACTDumping is an unfair trade practice which is done in the context of cross-bordertrade or international trade involving inter-State businesses. Dumping practices areusually done in order to dominate the market of a State by selling products with anundervalue prices beyond the fairness to the detriment of the domestic industry of acountry until it cannot evolve. Anti-dumping is a law that aims to prevent thepractice of dumping by imposing a variety of ways which is usually known as thebarriers to entry to create a fair price competition. Dumping dispute resolution is anational and international anti-dumping instrument filed by businesses and by thegovernment of a State to an International Trade Organization (WTO) to bring theinterests of national industry.This thesis is normative qualitative research using the theory of Critical LegalStudies the writers study the thesis problems in order to produce a conclusion andsuggestions on the research results."

"On relations between anti-dumping policy of European Union to biodiesel imports in Argentina and Indonesia."

"Skripsi ini membahas tentang bagaimana suatu negara anggota World Trade Organization WTO dapat melakukan tindakan anti dumping. selain itu, akan dibahas pula bagaimana Dispute Settlement Body DSB WTO menentukan apakah tindakan anti dumping yang dilakukan Uni Eropa telah sesuai dengan ketentuan yang berlaku. Hasil penelitian dengan metode yuridis normative menunjukkan bahwa negara anggota dapat melakukan tindakan anti dumping apabila dapat membuktikan aspek-aspek substansial, bahwa: dumping telah terjadi timbul kerugian yang dialami industri dalam negeri yang memproduksi barang yang sejenis dengan barang dumping dan adanya hubungan sebab akibat antara dumping dan kerugian tersebut. Dalam hal tuduhan Uni Eropa terhadap Indonesia, DSB memutuskan bahwa tindakan anti dumping tersebut tidak sesuai dengan Anti Dumping Agreement karena Uni Eropa tidak memenuhi kewajiban untuk membuka hasil investigasi kepada perusahaan-perusahaan Indonesia dimana kewajiban tersebut merupakan aspek prosedural.

---

This thesis discusses how a member country of World Trade Organization WTO can perform anti dumping action. In addition, it will also discuss how the Dispute Settlement Body DSB of the WTO determines whether the anti dumping measures undertaken by the European Union are in compliance with applicable regulations. The result of the research by normative juridical method indicates that member countries can take anti dumping action if it can prove substantial aspects, that dumping has occurred incur losses experienced by domestic industries that produce similar goods with dumping goods and a causal relationship between the dumping and the loss. In the case of EU allegations against Indonesia, the DSB decides that the anti dumping measures are incompatible with the Anti Dumping Agreement because the EU does not fulfill its obligation to disclose the results of the investigation to the Indonesian company where the liability is a procedural aspect."