Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"Just how does one make sense of the genocide perpetrated by the Khmer Rouge during its rule in the 70’s and the numerous human rights violations in the Philippines during the Marcos period? Like the conflicts that have marked human history at the close of the 20th century, Southeast Asia is no exception, similar to the many attempts to come to terms with the past and put to account wrongdoers worldwide. The paper is an attempt to historicize these two seemingly unrelated events and analyze them from the synoptic frameworks of transitional justice and reparations. Similar to the experiences faced by many societies transitioning towards democratic rule, notably in Latin America, the dilemma of whether to pursue justice or preserve the peace and the newfound status quo has characterized the length at which justice had eluded the victims in Cambodia and the Philippines. Yet, no matter what the limits are in pursuing accountability, or these so called historical injustices, closure is still achievable. The paper would like to argue that closure"

"Hak untuk dilupakan (RTBF) sebagai salah satu perkembangan hukum baru-baru ini yang dibangun sebagai pengembangan hak privasi dan perlindungan data penting bagi masyarakat informasi zaman sekarang dan perkembangan teknologi informasi. Berbagai sistem hukum di dunia termasuk Indonesia telah memasukkan RTBF dalam kerangka hukum mereka yang dilengkapi dengan sejumlah masalah. Oleh karena itu, Penulis mencoba untuk menganalisis peraturan hak tersebut dalam sistem hukum Indonesia yang terkandung dalam undang-undang dan menganalisis posisinya dalam undang-undang dengan membandingkannya dengan peraturan RTBF dari sistem hukum lain. Penelitian ini adalah penelitian hukum normatif yang menggunakan metode penelitian deskriptif analitik. Studi ini menemukan bahwa peraturan perlindungan data yang mendasari pembentukan RTBF di Indonesia bersifat sporadis dan belum ada peraturan yang terharmonisasi tentang perlindungan data. Perumusan RTBF dalam Pasal 26 ayat (3) Undang-Undang Nomor 19 Tahun 2016 tentang Revisi Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2008 tentang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik (UU ITE) bermasalah. Meski begitu, di berbagai negara, RTBF telah diimplementasikan sebagai alat penyeimbang melalui pendekatan kontekstual dalam menangani kasus. Untuk alasan ini, maka perlu untuk melakukan analisis hukum perumusan RTBF di Indonesia dengan mengacu pada perumusan hak yang sama yang diterapkan di sistem hukum lain.

---

The right to be forgotten (RTBF) as one of the recent legal developments that is constructed as a development of the right to privacy and data protection is crucial in this day and age information society and development of information technology. Various jurisdictions in the world including Indonesia’s have incorporated the RTBF in their legal frameworks which comes with a number of problems. For that reason, the Author tries to analyze the Indonesian regulatory framework on the RTBF contained in the legislation and analyze its position in the law by comparing and contrasting other jurisdictions’ regulatory frameworks against it. This research is a normative legal research that uses descriptive analytical research method. This study found that the data protection regulation which underlies the establishment of the RTBF in Indonesia is sporadic and that no harmonized regulation on data protection has not yet been established. The formulation of the RTBF in Article 26 paragraph (3) of Law Number 19 Year 2016 on The Revision to Law Number 11 Year 2008 on Information and Electronic Transactions (ITE Law) is problematic. Even so, in various jurisdictions, a balancing tool has been made out of the RTBF through contextual approach on dealing with cases. For this reason, it is necessary to conduct a legal analysis of the formulation of the RTBF in Indonesia with the reference to the formulation of the same right that is applied in other jurisdictions."