Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"Paloutzian (experimental and social psychology, Westmont College) and Park (psychology, U. of Connecticut) provide a 33-chapter handbook on the psychology of religion and spirituality, for social and clinical psychologists, pastoral counselors, and students and researchers in psychology and religious studies. Psychologists and a few religious studies specialists from the US and some countries in Europe address the foundations, including definitions, core issues, measurement assessment, research methods, psychodynamic psychology and religion, and evolutionary psychology as a foundation for the psychology of religion; religious and spiritual development across the lifespan; and the neural and cognitive bases of religion and connections to emotion, personality, culture, and social behavior. They discuss religious practices and rituals, conversion experiences, prayer, spiritual struggles, fundamentalism, forgiveness, values, and morality, and implications for individual and collective well-being in terms of health, mental health, coping, psychotherapy, workplace spirituality research, terrorism, and other areas. New topics in this edition include cross-cultural issues, spiritual goals, emotional values, and mindfulness. Most chapters have been redesigned or rewritten, with 25 new and eight revised chapters. The main themes of the book are more integrated, and the introductory and concluding chapters argue that the application of religious meaning systems and the multilevel interdisciplinary paradigm can allow reconceptualization of the field and expand research. Annotation ©2013 Book News, Inc., Portland, OR (booknews.com"

"ABSTRAKPenelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui perbandingan religiusitas dan spiritualitas antara emerging adults yang berasal dari keluarga utuh dan emerging adults yang berasal dari keluarga tidak utuh. Variabel religiusitas diukur menggunakan Religious Commitment Inventory-10 RCI-10 yang dikembangkan oleh Worthington dkk 2003 . Variabel spiritualitas diukur menggunakan Spiritual Attitude and Involvement List SAIL yang dikembangkan oleh Meezenbroek dkk 2012 . Penelitian ini melibatkan mahasiswa berusia 18-25 tahun yang berjumlah sebanyak 505 orang. Data yang diperoleh kemudian dianalisis menggunakan teknik perbandingan independent sample t-test. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa tidak terdapat perbedaan religiusitas dan spiritualitas yang signifikan antara kelompok emerging adults yang berasal dari keluarga utuh dan tidak utuh.

---

ABSTRACTThe objective of this study is to know the difference of religiosity and spirituality among emerging adults from single parent and two parent families. Religiosity was measured using Religious Commitment Scale 10 RCI 10 developed by Worthington et al 2003 . Spirituality was measured using Spiritual Attitude and Involvement List SAIL developed by Meezenbroek et al 2012 . Participants of this study are 505 college students aged 18 to 25 years old. The data was analyzed using independent sample t test. The results showed that there is no significant difference in religiosity and spirituality among emerging adults from single and two parent families. "

"Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk melakukan penelitian korelasional dan intervensi. Dua studi, studi korelasi dan studi intervensi, dilakukan untuk meneliti interaksi spiritualitas di tempat kerja dan spiritualitas individual dalam memprediksi kepuasan kerja, dan mengetahui efektivitas pelatihan “BeYOUnd”. Karyawan operasional PT XYZ sejumlah 154 orang berpartisipasi pada studi pertama; dan hasil menunjukkan bahwa terdapat korelasi positif dan signifikan antar variabel p< .01). Hasil analisis PROCESS Hayes menunjukkan bahwa spiritualitas individual berperan sebagai moderator pada hubungan antara spiritualitas di tempat kerja dan kepuasan kerja F p <0,05, R 2=7%. Pelatihan “BeYOUnd”, sebagai studi intervensi, dilakukan pada 14 karyawan yang mendapatkan skor spiritualitas di tempat kerja rendah pada studi pertama. Hasil evaluasi tingkat 1 menunjukkan reaksi positif peserta terlihat dari tidak ada penilaian di bawah rata- rata pengukuran (M = 4,98 – 5,64). Evaluasi tingkat 2 menunjukkan perbedaan signifikan antara skor pengetahuan partisipan sebelum dan sesudah pelatihan “BeYOUnd” (Z = -2.22, p. Hasil evaluasi tingkat 3 menunjukkan bahwa partisipan mendapatkan nilai baik (3) dan sangat baik (4) pada indikator perilaku yang menunjukkan spiritualitas di tempat kerja. Berdasarkan tiga tingkat evaluasi menunjukkan bahwa pelatihan “BeYOUnd” secara umum memiliki hasil yang baik berdasarkan evaluasi reaksi, pengetahuan, dan tingkah laku. Kedua studi yang dilakukan berhasil menjawab seluruh pertanyaan penelitian yang diajukan oleh peneliti.

---

There were two studies in this research, correlation study and intervention study. The purpose of the correlation study was to examine the relationship of individual spirituality as moderator on the relationship between workplace spirituality and job satisfaction. Intervention study aimed to examine the effectiveness of the 'BeYOUnd' training to improve workplace spirituality. One hundred and fifty four employees participated in the first study and showed the result that there was a significant positive correlation between variables (p <.01). The results of Hayes' PROCESS analysis showed that individual spirituality moderated the relationship between workplace spirituality and job satisfaction F (3, 150) = 3.75, p <0.05, R 2 = 7%. Then, 14 employees who had low workplace spirituality scores in the first study participated in 'BeYOUnd' Training. The results of the level 1 evaluation indicated the positive reaction of participants as seen that no response below the average measurement (M = 4.98 - 5.64). Level 2 evaluation showed significant differences between participants' knowledge scores before and after the 'BeYOUnd' training (Z = -2.22, p = 0.029). The results of level 3 evaluation indicated that participants received good (3) and very good (4) scores on behavioral indicators of workplace spirituality. The results of the three evaluation levels showed that the 'BeYOUND' training, in general, had good results based on evaluating partcipants’ reactions, knowledge, and behavior. Both studies were able to answer research questions proposed by researcher."

"Spirituality is, too often, subsumed under the heading of religion and treated as much the same kind of thing. Yet spirituality extends far beyond the spaces of religion. The spiritual makes geography strange, challenging the relationship between the known and the unknown, between the real and the ideal, and prompting exciting possibilities for charting the ineffable spaces of the divine which lie somehow beyond geography. In setting itself that task, this book pushes the boundaries of geographies of religion to bring into direct focus questions of spirituality. By seeing religion through the lens of practice rather than as a set of beliefs, geographies of religion can be interpreted much more widely, bringing a whole range of other spiritual practices and spaces to light. The book is split into three sections, each contextualised with an editors introduction, to explore the spaces of spiritual practice, the spiritual production of space, and spiritual transformations.This book intends to open to up new questions and approaches through the theme of spirituality, pushing the boundaries on current topics and introducing innovative new ideas, including esoteric or radical spiritual practices. This landmark book not only captures a significant moment in geographies of spirituality, but acts as a catalyst for future work."

"In recent years, psychology of religion has experienced a remarkable comeback, research is expanding rapidly, benefiting from a genial scientific infrastructure. An important issue in psychology over a century ago, only a few decades later it vanished almost completely. Its unexpected international reemergence since the seventies has been facilitated by the work of visionaries with the energy and stamina to revive an entire branch of psychology.In Psychology of religion : autobiographical accounts, a number of these pioneers account for their development in this area, depicting the diverse contexts of their work, the difficulties they had to deal with, and the increasing contemporary possibilities for their field. Critical about their discipline and sometimes about themselves, they offer a unique assessment of the subject and show the way to further research and development. "