Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"An employee stock option issued as a form of compensation. Employee stock option are mostly offered to management as part of their executive compensation package. They are also offered to lower staff. Employee stock options (ESOP) are issued as a private contract between the employer and employee. Depending on the vesting schedule and the maturity of the options, the employee may elect to exercise the options at whatever stock price was used as the strike price. At that point, the employee may sell the stock or hold on to it in the hope of further price appreciation. There are a variety of differences in the tax treatment of ESOP having to do with their use as compensation. The fact that the benefits from employee stock option are tax at different times in different countries is a difficulties. Also, same country may tax different parts of the benefits at different times. Based on this problem, the writer is attracted to make a research on the Income Tax Treatment Analysis on Employee Stock Option.The point of this analysis is to find when the income tax should be taxable on the benefit from the ESOP, clasiffy the benefit derived from the ESOP and analyze the international tax issue arising from ESOP. The research approach used is qualitative and the method used is descriptive. It means that the research purpose is to describe and analyze the Income Tax Treatment on Employee Stock Option. The analysis will focus on the tax treatment from the employee point of view. The data collected through in-depth interview between the researcher and the informant considered related to this research.After the research completed, there is three conclusions of this research. First, it is concluded that the Income Tax will be taxable when the stock acquired by the option is sold. This treatment is used based on the realization of income principle. Second, the classification of benefit from ESOP treated as employment income in total or split into employment income and capital gain. And the third, a variety of differences in the tax treatment of ESOP can caused the conflict in international taxation which make double taxation and double non taxation between countries. The double taxation and double non taxation can be minimized through the credit and exemption method provided by countries."

"Corporate charitable giving is growing up in Indonesia. It can be classified into 3 (three) motives which are first a strategy to raise profits, second as a compliance because they are forced to do so, and third as beyond compliance as the company is part of the community. Those three motives do reflecting the income tax treatment on charitable giving. PT X as one of the company also does charity. The charitable giving done by PT X becomes unique since PT X is a Contract of Work (CoW) holder. But practically, the CoW results in law uncertainty. The tax auditor adjusted the charitable giving by PT X which were fund contribution and donation to Aceh and Sumatera Utara.The researcher focuses on charitable giving by PT X with qualitative approach. The researcher would like to identify how PT X does the charitable giving and the law certainty of income tax treatment on those charitable giving. With regards to that, the researcher uses a study-case. The researcher obtains the data from interview, field research and library research.Based on the field and library research, there are situations of charitable giving generally in Indonesia and specifically in PT X. On those charitable giving, there are income tax treatment in income taxation law and the regulations underneath. Spesifically, the researcher observes the income tax treatment of charitable giving done by PT X, which can be gathered from the tax audit cases of OT X.From the situations above, it can be analyzed that the charitable giving done by PT X is divided into 3 (two) kinds which are philanthropy and charity. Besides that, there are three motives of charitable giving, as previously mentioned, practiced by PT X, which are related to the income tax treatment. And the focus of this research is the law certainty of income tax treatment on charitable giving of PT X."

"Government needed more income to raise the national budget. They issued instruments to collect income from citizen through debt and foreign currency. Government released Governmental Bonds for domestic market, which sold in retail (ORI) and for international market in foreign currency. Government also presented a law execution regulation to give certainty for the consumers or the taxpayers.Governmental Regulation Number 6 which published in 2002 distinguished the tax procedure for the bonds which imposed only on transactions tradable and reportable to the stock exchange. Income derived or taken from obligation transaction should be based on a global taxation. While, for the international bonds were given the facilities by the government. We would assume that there was an inequality between the bonds for domestic market and for international market. In global taxation, we should not differentiate the income by the source.This research used a quantitative descriptive as the research method. The type and data collection techniques used (1) literature research including on various taxation regulations and another related documents and (2) field research using interviews with such related parties as tax academicians, government as issuer and regulator. They gave several opinion which created differences in equity perspective.Government figured the debt as the best instrument to raise government income. They considered that attracting foreign investor by giving them tax facility was necessary to raise the budget. They named their policy as their budgeting and regulating function. But, we should notice that domestic investor might think the inequality of the tax burden.Therefore, it was suggested to make a comprehensive and equal policy. Based on tax principle, that tax should be fair and equal. It became fair that tax imposed on the income earned from the same source (instrument) equally. If one of them was given the facility, so the other should be given the same facility."

"Setiap pihak yang berinvestasi dalam saham mengharapkan dividen dan atau capital gains. Perseroan dalam membagi dividen kepada pemegang sahamnya mempunyai dua cara yaitu secara tunai dan non tunai. Metode non tunai yang terkenal adalah share buy back. Perlakuan pajak atas penghasilan dari transaksi share buy back dapat dikenakan sebagai dividen atau capital gains. Perlakuan sebagai dividen atau capital gains menjadi rumit di lapangan karena adanya beberapa bentuk dan kondisi share buy back yang berbeda. Adanya beberapa bentuk dan kondisi share buy back yang berbeda perlu dipelajari dan dicermati secara baik oleh pembuat kebijakan perpajakan untuk merumuskan bagaimana seharusnya perlakuan perpajakan terhadap penghasilan dari transaksi share buy back yang diterima atau diperoleh pemegang saham. Kebijakan perpajakan diharapkan mengacu kepada hakekat ekonomi yang terjadi dalam setiap Janis transaksi share buy back Dengan demikian asas keadilan, netralitas dan kepastian hukum bagi Wajib Pajak dapat diterapkan dengan baik.Pokok permasalahan tesis ini adalah bagaimana penentuan obyek pajak atau penentuan dasar pengenaan pajak atas penghasilan dari transaksi share buy back yang diterima atau diperoleh pemegang saham. Penghasilan tersebut diperlakukan sebagai dividen ataukah sebagai capital gains.Setiap pembagian laba ditahan kepada pemegang saham arahnya menuju ke bentuk-bentuk distribusi dividen termasuk dengan cara share buy back. Untuk itu setiap pengenaan pajak harus didasarkan pada hakekat ekonomi atas transaksi yang sebenarnya. Sehingga tambahan kemampuan ekonomi yang dinikmati wajib pajak yang terlibat dalam transaksi dapat terukur dengan baik. Di dalam Undang-undang PPh disebutkan: setiap tambahan kemampuan ekonomis yang diterima atau diperoleh wajib pajak (realized income), baik yang berasal dari Indonesia maupun dari luar Indonesia (world wide income), yang dapat dipakai untuk konsumsi atau untuk menambah kekayaan wajib pajak yang bersangkutan dengan nama dan dalam bentuk apapun (substance over form principle). Konsep tersebut akan dapat terwujud apabila asas keadilan horisontal dan keadilan vertikal diterapkan dalam tahap pembuatan peraturan sampai tahap implementasinya.Metode penelitian yang dipakai adalah metode penelitian dokumen dan lapangan. Penelitian dokumen dilakukan dengan meneliti hasil karya ilmiah dan ketentuan perudang-undangan di bidang perpajakan, perseroan terbatas, pasar modal, termasuk peraturan pelaksanaannya serta prospektus Wajib Pajak terkait. Metode penelitian lapangan dilakukan melalui wawancara kepada analis sekuritas, konsultan pajak, pejabat Bapepam dan pejabat Ditjen Pajak. Sedangkan teknik penelitian yang digunakan dalam penulisan tesis ini adalah deskriptif analitis.Berdasarkan analisis yang dilakukan, dapat disimpulkan bahwa belum ada ketentuan Pajak Penghasilan yang mengatur secara lengkap, jelas dan menyeluruh tentang perlakuan perpajakan atas penghasilan dari transaksi share buy back. Oleh karena itu disarankan agar segera dikaji secara seksama semua bentuk transaksi share buy back dengan mempertimbangkan ketentuan-ketentuan Undang-undang Perseroan Terbatas, Undang-undang Pasar Modal dan Tax Treaties sehingga dapat dikeluarkan peraturan Pajak Penghasilan yang mengatur secara lengkap, jelas dan menyeluruh tentang perlakuan perpajakan atas penghasilan dari transaksi share buy back.Pokok-pokok yang perlu diatur antara lain: menegaskan bahwa sumber dana share buy back dari laba ditahan merupakan pembagian dividen; dasar pengenaan dividen dari share buy back proporsional adalah atas seluruh pembayaran tetapi jika non proporsional atas selisih harga jual dan beli saja; pada saat menerima/memperoleh penghasilan share buy back tetap sebagai pemegang saham diperlakukan sebagai dividen tetapi jika bukan pemegang saham lagi penghasilan tersebut diperlakukan sebagai capital gains; kepemilikan saham secara efektif tidak berubah setelah share buy back merupakan dividen atas seluruh pembayaran tetapi jika berubah pengenaan dividen hanya atas selisih harga jual dan beli.Untuk mempertahankan prinsip keadilan dan netralitas sebaiknya tarif pajak atas dividen dari berbagai bentuk transaksi share buy back mengacu pada Pasal 23 UU PPh yaitu 15% dan memperhatikan realisasi penghasilan yang sesungguhnya. Atas penghasilan tersebut digabungkan dengan penghasilan lain (global income/global taxation) dan dikenakan satu macam tarif progressif yaitu tarif Pasal 17 UU PPh dengan memperhitungkan pajak yang telah dipotong sesuai definisi penghasilan yang diamanatkan dalam Pasal 4 ayat (1) UU PPh."

"Under Law of the Republic of Indonesia No 22 of 2001 on Oil & Gas, upstream producers had a domestic market obligation (DMO), which required them to sell a specified portion of their product into the Indonesian domestic market, which is 25% of all oil and gas production. Contractors are obligated to fulfill domestic requirement from the date of commercial operation, at the first contractors are entitled to a 60-month holiday from the date of commercial operation before the DMO must be fulfilled and the prices are same to market price (ICP). The problem is, after 60-month DMO the cost for domestic oil reduce from 10% to 25% market price (ICP) depends on contract. Because the fee below the market price. For that, need to clear how the income tax treatment on the fee from DMO received by the contractors. Is the assignment considered as transaction and how to determine the price for DMO oil as the tax base.The research method that used by researcher is descriptive. It means that the research is described accurately using facts, spoken or written words, actions, and visual images. The approach used in this research is qualitative approach. The main issue in this research is to find out that fee from domestic market requirement which is paid below the Market price are match with accretion concept and the definition of income in income tax law, so DMO fee can describe as taxable income. The data collection technique used in this research is by reading the literature which focuses on the research, and interview. The interview was done with oil and gas expert, cooperation contractor, government institution, and tax expert.The result of this research are the tax on DMO fee which received by joint cooperation contractor has been right, because the taxation of DMO fee had been meet all general act definition of income refer to article 4 (2) Income Tax Law and accretion concept which adopted by income tax system to describe ability-to-pay. DMO fee cannot be considered as a loss, but its difference price can be reduced contractor's taxable income. DMO fee as the income tax object cannot be taxed separately from the contractor's income but it must counted as the whole accretion on contractor income and taxable at specified tariff based on contract rate."

"Skripsi ini membahas tentang pemenuhan kriteria asas-asas perpajakan dalam Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 51 Tahun 2008. Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui asas-asas perpajakan apa saja yang terpenuhi dalam Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 51 Tahun 2008. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah penelitian kualitatif dengan design deskriptif. Pemberlakuan surut Peraturan Pemerintah Nomo 51 Tahun 2008 menimbulkan banyak kerugian bagi Wajib Pajak. Mereka diwajibkan untuk membayar pajak yang terutang bukan pada waktu memperoleh penghasilan (prinsip ability to pay tidak terpenuhi). Perubahan-perubahan peraturan perpajakan atas penghasilan dari usaha jasa konstruksi merepotkan Wajib Pajak karena membuat mereka harus berulang kali mengajukan permohonan pemindahbukuan pajak yang telah dibayar. Pengenaan PPh final bagi seluruh Wajib Pajak usaha konstruksi juga sangat tidak adil karena pengenaan pajak tidak lagi memperhatikan keadaan Wajib Pajak sedang untung atau rugi. Revenue adequacy principle terpenuhi dalam peraturan ini. Equity principle tidak terpenuhi. Certainty principle terpenuhi karena dengan Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 51 Tahun 2008 pengenaan PPh final atas usaha jasa konstruksi menjadi pasti, tapi convinience sebagai salah satu unsur dari certainty tidak terpenuhi.

---

This thesis discusses about the fulfillment of the criteria of the principles of taxation in Government Regulation No. 51 of 2008. The purpose of this study is to determine the principles of taxation what is fulfilled in Government Regulation No. 51 of 2008. The method used is descriptive qualitative research design. Enabling ebb Government Regulation No. 51 Year 2008 caused much loss to taxpayers. They are required to pay the tax due is not earning at the time (the principle of ability to pay is not met). Changes in tax regulations on business income taxpayers inconvenient construction because they must repeatedly make the transfer request is filed taxes already paid. Imposition of the final income tax for the entire construction business taxpayers also very unfair because the taxation is no longer concern the taxpayer is lucky or loss. Revenue-adequacy principle is fulfilled in this rule. Equity principle is not fulfilled. Certainty principle is fulfilled because the Government Regulation Number 51 Year 2008 final imposition of income tax on construction services business to be sure, but convenience as one element of certainty is not met."

"Skripsi ini membahas mengenai pencabutan fasilitas pajak penghasilan atas industri reksa dana yang kemudian melihat pengalaman dengan kebijakan perpajakan mengenai hal yang sama di negara Malaysia. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif dengan jenis penelitian deskriptif. Hasil penelitian menyimpulkan bahwa reksa dana saat ini telah berkembang dan sudah memenuhi tujuan pemberian fasilitas pajak sehingga tidak perlu lagi diberikan fasilitas tersebut. Selain itu pencabutan fasilitas pajak penghasilan bertujuan untuk menciptakan equal treatment serta mengeliminasi terjadinya tax avoidance. Meskipun di Malaysia reksa dana dibebaskan dari pengenaan pajak, Indonesia tidak serta merta dapat mengikuti hal tersebut karena setiap negara mempunyai kebutuhan yang berbeda.

---

This study describes the revocation of income tax facility that previously enjoyed by the investment fund industry in Indonesia up to 2008 and conducts a comparative analysis with those happen in Malaysia. The research is using qualitative approach with a description typed of methodology. This concludes that investment fund has tremendously growing and the government is of the view that it is time to revoke the tax incentive so that it can contribute tax collection equally and eliminate tax avoidance. Even though Malaysia exempt investment fund from income tax it does not means that Indonesia should follow because every country had different purposes. This research recommended investment manager to adjust the product of investment fund."

"Tesis ini bertujuan menguji hipotesis hubungan antara pajak yang dibayar oleh perusahaan dengan size-nya, yaitu apakah perusahaan besar membayar pajak yang lebih besar dibandingkan perusahaan kecil. Ukuran besar perusahaan diukur dari sales yang dihitung setiap tahun. Selain itu penelitian ini bertujuan mengetahui sektor industri apa yang paling besar memberikan kontribusi dalam pembayaran pajak penghasilan pada negara.Perhitungan dan pengujian cross - sectional membuktikan bahwa selama periode pengamatan 2000 - 2002, perusahaan besar terbukti membayar pajak yang lebih tinggi dibandingkan perusahaan lainnya. Namun, besarnya pajak yang dibayarkan tidak berlaku proporsional dengan besarnya perusahaan pada level di bawahnya. Perusahaan yang membayar pajak terbesar kedua setelah perusahaan terbesar, justru adalah perusahaan - perusahaan terkecil dari sampel yang diambil. Sementara pembayar pajak dengan urutan setelahnya tidak secara otomatis proporsional dengan besarnya perusahaan.Dari perhitungan tarif efektif pajak per industri, diperoleh hasil bahwa pembayar pajak terbesar adalah perusahaan - perusahaan dari consumer goods industry, sementara pembayar pajak terkecil adalah perusahaan - perusahaan dari industri property, real estate & building construction. Perbedaan ini terkait dengan perbedaan struktur biaya antar industri.Dengan hasil penelitian ini, diharapkan Direktorat Jenderal Pajak dapat memberikan prioritas perhatian pada pembayar pajak dari kategori perusahaan - perusahaan besar dan industri tertentu, untuk mengoptimalkan target penerimaan pajak. Namun, hal ini tentu saja tidak berarti mengabaikan kelompok - kelompok perusahaan yang lain."

"Fokus dari penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui justifikasi pemerintah dalam menetapkan kebijakan Pajak Penghasilan Pasal 22 atas Barang Sangat Mewah. berikutnya juga membahas mengenai dasar pemikiran dalam penetapan objek dari pajak ini dan juga meninjau Pajak Penghasilan Pasal 22 atas Barang Sangat Mewah ini apabila dilihat dari konsepsi penggolongan pajak. Penelitian ini menggunakan kualitatif pada pertanyaan pertama dan kedua, sedangkan untuk pertanyaan ketiga menggunakan pendekatan kuantitatif. Pengumpulan data yang dilakukan dalam penelitian ini adalah dengan studi literatur, penelitian lapangan dan juga dengan wawancara mendalam.Hasil dari penelitian ini adalah justifikasi pemerintah dalam kebijakan ini adalah didasari karena rendahnya kesadaran Wajib Pajak dalam memenuhi kewajiban perpajakannya. Dalam penentuan objek pajaknya yang menjadi pertimbangan pemerintah adalah efek barang tersebut terhadap pasar apabila barang tersebut dijadikan objeknya dan juga beberapa pertimbangan dari sifat barang-barang yang akan dikenakan seperti harga, konsumen barang tersebut, keberadaan barang tersebut di pasaran dan sebagainya. Sedangkan dalam pengujiannya terhadap konsepsi penggolongan pajak kebijakan ini tidak memenuhi karakteristik Pajak Langsung yang merupakan dasar dari Pajak Penghasilan dan Pajak Penghasilan Pasal 22 atas Barang Sangat Mewah ini lebih cocok dan memenuhi kriteria dari cukai (Excise).

---

The focus of this research is to know the justification of government in the Income Tax Policy Article 22 on Very Luxurious Goods. The next focus is to know the government consideration in determining an object of the Income Tax Article 22, and to observe this policy toward the conception of classifying tax. These researches use a qualitative approach for the first and second questions, whereas the third questions use a quantitative approach. The collecting data method which is used in this research is study literature, field research and indepth interview. Base at it?s purposive, this research includes in descriptive research.

The result from this research is, in this policy the justification of government based on the low of consciousness taxpayer to complete their tax duty. In determining the tax object which becomes the government consideration is the effect of those goods toward a market if those goods become an object and also some consideration from the goods characteristic which imposition like price, the consumer, the existence of goods in market and etc. While, the test toward classifying tax conception policy is unqualified to the direct tax which become the basic from Income Tax and Income Tax Policy Article 22 about very luxurious goods is more suitable and qualify the criteria from excise."