Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"The purposes of this study are to adapt and modify RFS (Religious Fundamentalism Scale) and IFS (Intratextual Fundamentalism Scale) and IFS (Intratextual Fundamentalism Scale) in order to develop ISFS (Islamic Fundamentalism Scale). Moreover, this study is to find the coefficient correlation between IFS and prejudice towards Christians. Data were derived from 311 Muslim participants where given a questionnaire. The results show that the items coefficient realibility of the ISFS is .86 and the items coefficient validity is between .37 and .64. Therefore, the ISFS is considered effective enough as an Islamic fundamentalism measuring tool. The research result also indicate that there is significant correlation between Islamic fundamentalism and towards Christians. Further, this research exhibits the Islamic fundamentalism as an independent variable in prejudice prediction towards Christians. Recommendations for further researches are about the relationship between Islamic fundamentalism and prejudice towards other believers, certain races and or ethnicities, homesexuals, and other psychological variables such as social identities, social dominance orientation, and authoritarianism in prejudice."

"Across the Muslim world, religion plays an increasingly prominent role in both the lives of over a billion people. Observers of these changes struggle to understand the consequences of an Islamic resurgence in a democratizing world. Will democratic political participation by an increasingly religious population lead to victories by Islamists at the ballot box? Will more conspicuously pious Muslims participate in politics and markets in a fundamentally different way than they had previously? Will a renewed attention to Islam lead Muslim democracies to reevaluate their place in the global community of states, turning away from alignments with the West or the Global South and towards an Islamic civilizational identity? "