Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"Perjalanan pelaksanaan reformasi perpajakan di Indonesia tidak hanya terjadi pada tahun 1985 tetapi juga dilanjutkan dengan reformasi perpajakan dalam bidang organisasi Direktorat Jenderal Pajak. Pada dasarnya reformasi administrasi perpajakan yang dilakukan oleh Direktorat Jenderal Pajak pada tahun 1985, 1994, 1997 dan 2000 ternyata belum mengubah struktur organisasi yang lebih ramping tetapi hanya melakukan penambahan seksi dan sub seksi. Kelemahan administrasi perpajakan tersebut disebabkan oleh belum optimalnya upaya reformasi administrasi yang dilakukan khususnya berkaitan dengan reformasi struktur, prosedur, strategi dan budaya sehingga reformasi administrasi yang dilakukan selama ini masih terfokus pada reformasi administrasi dari aspek reorganisasi dengan memperbesar struktur organisasi, memperbanyak jumlah pegawai dan memperbesar jalur prosedur. Untuk menindaklanjuti hal tersebut di atas, pada awal tahun 2002 Direktorat Jenderal Pajak membentuk Kantor Wilayah dan Kantor Pelayanan Pajak (KPP) Wajib Pajak Besar (Large Taxpayer Office) yang merupakan prototype Kantor Wilayah dan KPP yang modern di masa mendatang. Hal ini menjadi pokok permasalahan dalam penelitian yang dilakukan oleh penulis.Tujuan penelitian ini yaitu menjelaskan dan menguraikan peran sistem administrasi perpajakan modern pada Kantor Pelayanan Pajak Wajib Pajak Besar Satu dalam upaya meningkatkan kepatuhan Wajib Pajak. Metodologi penelitian yang digunakan dalam penulisan tesis ini adalah metode deskriptif analisis, dengan teknik pengumpulan data berupa studi kepustakaan dan studi lapangan. Analisis yang dilakukan bersifat analisis kualitatif dan kuantitatif. Dari analisis diketahui pada tahun 2004 telah ditetapkan 9 (sembilan) Wajib Pajak patuh yang berhak memperoleh pengembalian pajak melalui penerbitan Surat Keputusan Pengembalian Pendahuluan Kelebihan Pajak. SPPP Selesai yang telah dilaksanakan oleh KPP Wajib Pajak Besar Satu sebanyak 200 atau sebesar 61,7% dibandingkan dengan SPT yang masuk. Persentase SPPP yang terbit dengan SPPP yang selesai sebanyak 82,6% (200 berbanding 242). Hal ini cukup efektif mengingat penyelesaiannya sangat besar yaitu di atas 70%. Petugas Pemeriksa Pajak atau Fiscal dapat menyelesaikan maksimal 15 SPPP dalam satu tahunnya. Hal ini mengindikasikan bahwa setiap bulannya minimal setiap Petugas Pemeriksa Pajak dapat menyelesaikan 1 laporan hasil pemeriksaan pajak. Hasil tambahan penerimaan dari pemeriksaan terhadap kepatuhan Wajib Pajak KPP Wajib Pajak Besar Satu Tahun 2003 adalah sebesar 9,2% dibandingkan dengan total penerimaan pajak.Kesimpulan dari hasil penelitian ini adalah Pelaksanaan sistem administrasi perpajakan modern mempunyai keunggulan dan perbedaan yang sangat besar. Adanya pemisahan fungsi yang jelas antara fungsi pelayanan, pengawasan, pemeriksaan, keberatan dan pembinaan.Saran dalam penelitian ini adalah dengan adanya penyesuaian terhadap struktur dan fungsi organisasi pada KPP Wajib Pajak Besar Satu, peran sistem administrasi perpajakan modern perlu ditingkatkan lebih optimal tanpa melupakan aspek penegakan hukum disertai dengan peningkatan sumber daya pemeriksa baik dari segi kuantitas dan kualitas.

---

Tax reform application period in Indonesia is not only held in 1985 but also continued by tax reform in organization section of tax directorate general. Basically, tax administration reform executed by Tax Directorate General in 1985, 1994, 1997 and 2000, in fact, it has not been changed to make simpler of organization structure but just adding sections and sub sections. Those tax administration weaknesses because of not optimizing effort of administration reform execution, especially relating to structure reform, procedure, strategy and culture, there for administration reform recently still focusing on administration reform from reorganization aspects and enlarging organization, structure, enlarging quantity of employees, and enlarging procedure line.

To follow the up at beginning of year 2002 tax directorate general formed district office tax service office (ISO) of large taxpayer office as prototype of modem district office and tax service office (TSO) in the future. It becomes a prime case in the research, which is being done by the author. The aim of research is explaining and analyzing the role of modern tax administration system at large taxpayer office one in the way of improving taxpayer compliance.

Research methodology used in writing the thesis is analysis descriptive method, by data collecting technique through bibliography study and field study. Analysis characteristics are qualitative and quantitative analysis.

From the analysis is known that in 2004, the LTD One has determined 9 golden Taxpayers who are given an exclusive right to claim tax refund without prior audit by the issuance of Decision Letter on Prepayment of Refund. Completed SPPP, which has done by large taxpayer office one, is 2000 or equal to 61,7% compared with in coming SPT. SPPP percentage issued with SPPP completed is 82,6% (200 compared with 242). It is quite effective reminding that is a very big finalization to reach above 70% tax audit officer or Fiscal could finish maximum 15 SPPP in each year. It identifies that each month of each tax audit office could finish minimum I report of tax audit result. Revenue additional result from auditing to tax payer compliance at large taxpayer office one in 2003 is 9,2% compared with total of tax revenue.

The summary of research is about implementing modem tax administration system has very big superiorities and differences. There are very clear function separations among service function, controlling, auditing, complaining and developing.

Suggestion in the research one by adjusting to structure and organization function to tax service office of large tax payer office one, role of modem taxpayer administration system need to improve more optimum without eliminating law. Upholding aspects as long with audit human resources improvement, withes at quantity and quality side."

"Dalam upayanya untuk meningkatkan penerimaan pajak, pemerintah melakukan ekstensifikasi Wajib Pajak dan intensifikasi obyek pajak. Salah satu usaha ekstensifikasi dan intensifikasi tersebut adalah pemberian Nomor Pokok Wajib Pajak di lokasi usaha terhadap Orang Pribadi Pengusaha Tertentu yang mempunyai lokasi usaha di sentra perdagangan atau perbelanjaan atau pertokoan atau mal atau plaza atau kawasan industri atau sentra lainnya, serta kewajiban untuk membayar Pajak Penghasilan Pasal 25 sebesar 2% dari peredaranusaha tiap bulan di masing-masing lokasi usaha tersebut, di mana pembayaran ini diperlakukan sebagai pajak final.Penelitian ini dilakukan untuk mengetahui apakah kebijakan ini telah memenuhi azas keadilan. Di samping itu juga ditujukan untuk mengetahui bagaimana implementasi kebijakan ini pada Kantor Pelayanan Pajak Pratama Jakarta Gambir Dua. Pembuatan suatu kebijakan perpajakan harus memperhatikan azas-azas perpajakan. Salah satu azas perpajakan yang harus dipegang teguh adalah azas keadilan. Suatu pemungutan pajak adalah adil, apabila orang-orang yang berada dalam keadaan ekonomis yang sama dikenakan pajak yang sama, sedang orang-orang yang keadaan ekonomisnya tidak sama diperlakukan tidak sama, setara dengan ketidaksamaannya itu. Apabila azas keadilan ingin diterapkan dalam sistem pajak penghasilan, maka baik syarat keadilan horizontal maupun syarat keadilan vertikal harus dipenuhi. Tingkat keadilan (fairness) yang tinggi dalam sistem perpajakan akan memicu setiap individu untuk patuh secara sukarela.Penelitian ini menggunakan metode kualitatif deskriptif. Pengumpulan data primer dilakukan melalui wawancara terhadap para informan yang mempunyai pengetahuan dan pengalaman terhadap Wajib Pajak Orang Pribadi pengusaha Tertentu. Informan dipilih dari pihak fiskus dan Wajib Pajak. Dari pihak fiskus wawancara dilakukan dengan Kepala Kantor Pelayanan Pajak Pratama Jakarta Gambir Dua, Kepala Seksi Pengawasan dan Konsultasi, Kepala Seksi Ekstensifikasi, dan salah seorang petugas seksi ekstensifikasi. Selain itu kajian dokumentasi yang merupakan data sekunder juga dilakukan terhadap berbagai dokumen yang relevan. Kewajiban pendaftaran di setiap lokasi usaha bagi Wajib Pajak orang pribadi pengusaha tertentu sebenarnya sudah tepat dan dapat membawa pada keadilan, tetapi adanya pengecualian bagi pedagang kendaraan bermotor dan restoran menyebabkan timbulnya ketidakadilan. Selanjutnya pengenaan Pajak Penghasilan Pasal 25 yang ditetapkan sebesar 2% dari peredaran bruto serta diperlakukan sebagai pajak final juga tidak memenuhi azas keadilan dengan tidak terpenuhinya lima syarat keadilan horizontal dan dua syarat keadilan vertikal.Pada tingkat implementasi, ketidakadilan tersebut membawa kepada banyaknya ketidakpatuhan pada kebijakan ini. Dari sisi kantor pajak, lemahnya law enforcement, yang antara lain ditandai dengan tidak adanya sanksi bagi Wajib Pajak yang tidak memenuhi kewajibannya sesuai kebijakan ini, juga memiliki andil dalam membuat ketidakpatuhan Wajib Pajak. Selanjutnya ketidakpatuhan ini dapat membawa pada ketidakadilan dalam implementasi peraturan, karena Wajib Pajak yang berada dalam kondisi sama mendapat perlakuan perpajakan yang berbeda.

---

In its effort to increase the income tax, the government has conducted taxpayers expansion and tax base intensification. One of the expansion and intensification effort is to give Taxpayer Identification Number (NPWP) to each of certain entrepreneur person having shop in a trading or shopping centre or stores or mall or plaza or industrial area or other centre, as well as the obligation to pay income tax Article 25 at 2% of gross revenue per month in respective business location. The payment is treated as final tax.This research is made to find out whether this policy has met the requirement of equity principle. In addition it is also aimed to recognize how the implementation of this policy at Pratama District Tax Office of Jakarta Gambir Dua. Determining a tax policy should comply with taxation principles. One of the tax principles that must be obeyed is the equity principle. A tax collection is considered fair if those who are in equal economic condition were imposed with equal tax, while those who are in unequal economic condition were treated unequal, relative to its difference. If equity principle would be applied in income tax system, then both horizontal equity requirements and vertical equity requirements should be fulfilled. The high fairness level in tax system will motivate every taxpayer to comply voluntarily.This research used descriptive qualitative method. Primary data collection was conducted through interview with informants having knowledge and experience on individual taxpayer of certain enterpreneurs. Informants were selected from tax officers and taxpayers. Interview with the tax officers were conducted with the Head Officer of KPP Pratama Jakarta Gambir Dua, head of supervision and consultancy section, head of expansion section, and one of the expansion section officer. In addition documentation evaluation representing secondary data was also conducted on various documents. The obligation to register for each business location for individual taxpayer of certain entrepreneur actually is proper and can direct to equal treatment, but the fact that motor vehicle and restaurant enterpreneu were excluded from this obligation make it become unfair. Further the imposition of income tax Article 25 at 2% of gross revenue and treated as final tax does not fulfill equity principle, in the way that it does not fulfill five requirements of horizontal equity and two requirements of vertical equity.In implementation level, the inequality can caused much incompliance with this policy. From the tax office side, the weakness of law enforcement, among of them s indicated by none penalty for the tax violator pursuant to this policy, also contribute in creating taxpayer incompliance. Further this incompliance may caused unfairness in policy implementation, because taxpayer in similar condition get different treatment in tax area."

"Income Tax Section 21 is lease to the employment income accepted by foreign employees and laboring local employees in the foreign delegation or its branch.

Employment Income in wide divided to become two type of income, that is (1) obtained income as employees in relation work with employer which in referred International Taxation Literature also as "labor income"; in Ordinance Pay As You Earn 1935, this income is referred as fee, and (2) income from free work or self-employed income or professional income.

The research method conducted is base on the qualitative research method with the type of research of analytical descriptive and the collecting method is through interview with the interlocked parties; they are tax officer, tax consultant, and tax payers. This research was also conducted on the on the interlocked documents, they are law of income tax, thesis, tax article, books, and data of tax auditing.

Withholding of Income Tax Section 21 represent program of payment during year applying to employment income. Income which withheld by Income Tax ection 21 represent imposed income or lease representing lease object pursuant to rule law material.

Rule arranging withholding to the production from work is The Law of Income Tax Section 21. As for imposed income tax section 21 is production from referring to work, accepted activity or service or obtained by personal Taxpayer. Income Tax Section 21 arrange only production of personal Taxpayer home affair, while hitting personal Taxpayer abroad arranged by Income Tax Section 26.

At withholding by other party, withholder pays salary or fee to taxpayer and obliged to arrest the amount of tax which debt from amount of paid to the order income of taxpayer and pay for the amount of income tax of the taxpayer to Exchequer.

According to data in Permanent Establishment and Foreigner Tax Office the amount of Tax Wit holder which enough fluctuative from year to year, in meaning amount Taxpayer mobility which high enough. With high mobility level and rely on self assessment system representing one of the factor needed for high compliance from the Taxpayer, also to be able to accept tax with rule of legislation.

Pursuant to result research of writer concerning, level compliance of Taxpayer with reference to existence of obligation of forwarding of Annual Tax Return Income Tax Section 21, there are big percentage enough to the uncompliance of Taxpayer in remit and report Income Tax Section 2las according to real situation and amount which because of intention and also negligence from Taxpayer. To the things hence causing delaying of tax money which step into Exchequer, so that affect also to acceptance of tax.

The level compliance of Taxpayer in submitting Annual Tax Return Income Tax Section 21 from year 2000 up to year 2003 continuing to experience of degradation because Taxpayer incapable of reporting Annual Tax Return Income Tax Section 21 punctually because of unfinished of his financial statement, its time at the same time with forwarding of Annual Tax Return of Income Tax Section 25 and other reason like difficulty of cash-flow, and Taxpayer have nothing like because have do not operate again.

From result of this research, Writer try to analyze causes the happening of uncompliance and try to look for resolving so that Taxpayer progressively growing obedient in done duty taxation. The writer also suggests Tax Office better urge to submit Annual Tax Return before tax year ended so Taxpayer can prepare all calculation of his income tax section 21 with time enough and is not hurried. Annual tax Return which is less payee require to be conducted by a accurate research why happened lacking of payee as payment of Income Tax Section 21 ought to have been done at a period of income accepted by employees."