Conduct problems mengkhawatirkan masyarakat karena berdampak pada remaja dan orang orang di sekitarnya. Di Indonesia, conduct problems telah mengarah pada perilaku kriminal.Kondisi ini diperburuk dengan situasi pandemik akibat pelanggaran terhadap peraturan dalamupaya menangani wabah. Deteksi dini menjadi upaya untuk mengurangi risiko dari conductproblems. The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) telah digunakan secara luasuntuk mendeteksi conduct problems pada remaja. Penelitian lebih lanjut diperlukan untukmengevaluasi akurasi dari SDQ untuk mendeteksi conduct problems di Indonesia. Penelitianini bertujuan untuk mengevaluasi sensitivitas dan spesifisitas dari SDQ subskala conductproblems versi Bahasa Indonesia dan mengidentifikasi skor cut-off yang optimum untukskrining conduct problems pada remaja. Pengujian akurasi dilakukan dengan membandingkanhasil dari SDQ dengan wawancara diagnostik sebagai gold standard. Wawancara dilakukankepada 40 remaja dari tiga SMA di Jakarta yang dipilih menggunakan teknik double-blindberdasarkan hasil skrining. Analisis crosstabs menunjukkan bahwa SDQ subskala conductproblems memiliki nilai sensitivitas sebesar 77.3% dan nilai spesifisitas sebesar 83.3%.Analisis ROC menunjukkan bahwa skor cut-off sebesar 4 yang digunakan dalam penelitian iniideal untuk mengidentifikasi remaja dengan conduct problems. SDQ subskala conductproblems versi Bahasa Indonesia memiliki akurasi yang baik utnuk skrining conduct problems.Hasil temuan dalam penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa SDQ berpotensi untuk digunakan diIndonesia.

---

Conduct problems arise concerns in society because of the impacts on adolescents and the

people surrounding them. In Indonesia, conduct problems had led to criminal behaviors. The

condition is getting worse in the current pandemic situation by violating the order in efforts to

handle the outbreak. Early detection becomes an effort to reduce the risk of conduct problems.

The Strength and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) had widely used to detect conduct problems

in adolescents. Future studies are needed to evaluate the accuracy of the SDQ for detecting

conduct problems in Indonesia. This study aimed to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of

the Indonesian version of the SDQ conduct problems subscale and to identify an optimum cutoff

score for screening conduct problems in adolescents. The accuracy was examined by

comparing the result of the SDQ with the diagnostic interview as a gold standard. The interview

was conducted to 40 adolescents acquired from high schools in Jakarta selected by a doubleblind

technique based on the screening results. Crosstabs analysis showed that the SDQ conduct problems subscale has a sensitivity value of 77.3% and a specificity value of 83.3%. ROC analysis showed that the cut-off score of 4 used in this study is ideal to identify individuals with conduct problems. In conclusion, the Indonesian version of the SDQ conduct problems subscale has good accuracy for screening conduct problems. These findings show that the SDQ

has the potential to be utilized in Indonesia.