Penelitian ini membahas pandangan Seyyed Hossein Nasr dan Fritjof Capra yang mengkritik sains modern danmemberikan pandangan baru dalam sains. Penulis juga melakukan kritik terhadap pandangan kedua tokohtersebut. Penelitian ini menggunakan teknik dokumenter. Kemudian penulis memaparkan dan menganalisapokok-pokok pemikiran dan kritik Seyyed Hossein Nasr dan Fritjof Capra dari data tersebut menggunakanmetode deskriptif analisis. Kemudian penulis menganalisis menggunakan teori hubungan agama dan sains IanBarbour. Seyyed Hossein Nasr dalam tradisonalismenya berusaha mengintegrasikan agama dan sains.Sedangkan Fritjof Capra berusaha melakukan independensi lalu menuju dialog antara agama dan sains. Penelitian ini menyimpulkan bahwa Seyyed Hossein Nasr dan Fritjof Capra mengkritik empat hal dalam sainsmodern yaitu, eksistensi tuhan, alam semesta, evolusi dan ekologi. Penulis juga mengkritisi pendapat dari seyyedHossein Nasr dan Fritjof Capra terhadap empat hal tersebut. Dari kritik tersebut diharapkan mampu membangunsains yang tidak hanya memperhatikan aspek tekonologi saja namun meliputi aspek teologi, psikologi sosiologidan ekologi.

---

The focus of this research are Seyyed Hossein Nasr's and Fritjof Capra's views which criticize modern scienceand reveal the new perspective in science. The writer also criticizes on the views of both Seyyed Hossein Nasrand Fritjof Capra. This research utilizes documentary technique. Afterwards, the writer tries to describe and thenanalyses the main points and critics of Seyyed Hossein Nasr and Fritjof Capra from the data applying thedescriptive analysis method. Afterwards, the writer analyzes them using Ian Barbour's theory of religion andscience's relation. Seyyed Hossein Nasr in his traditionalism tries to integrate religion and science. Meanwhile,Fritjof Capra attempts to make independence between religion and science and continue it into dialogue betweenboth of them.

This research concludes that Seyyed Hossein Nasr and Fritjof Capra criticize four points in modernscience which are god's existence, the universe, evolution and ecology. The writer also criticizes Seyyed HosseinNasr's and Fritjof Capra's opinion. From these critics, it is hoped that those critics could build the science whichdoes not only focus on technological aspect, but also theological, psychological, sociological and ecologicalaspects.