Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui hubungan antara Kepemimpinan diri dan Perilaku kerja inovatif serta efektivitas pelatihan Mastering Self-leadership untuk meningkatkan Kepemimpinan diri dan Perilaku kerja inovatif. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan action research dengan dua desain penelitian, yaitu cross-sectional (n = 144) dan before-and-after study (n = 9). Alat ukur yang digunakan adalah kuesioner Perilaku kerja inovatif (Jassen, 2000) yang kemudian diadaptasi ke dalam bahasa Indonesia oleh Etikariena dan Muluk (2014) dan kuesioner The Revised Self-Leadership Questionnaire (Marques-Quinteiro, Curral, & Passos, 2012). Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa terdapat hubungan positif yang signifikan antara Kepemimpinan diri dan Perilaku kerja inovatif (r = .44, R2 = .20, p < .05). Artinya, peningkatan Kepemimpinan diri dapat turut serta meningkatkan Perilaku kerja inovatif secara signifikan dan Kepemimpinan diri memprediksi 20% variance Perilaku kerja inovatif. Constructive thought strategies merupakan dimensi Kepemimpinan diri yang memiliki hubungan tertinggi dengan Perilaku kerja inovatif (r = .41). Berdasarkan hasil uji perbedaan sebelum dan sesudah pelatihan, dapat disimpulkan bahwa pelatihan Mastering Self-leadership efektif disarankan menjadi kegiatan untuk meningkatkan Kepemimpinan diri dan Perilaku kerja inovatif.

---

This research aims to determine the relationship between Self-leadership and Innovative Work Behavior as well as how effective the Mastering Self-leadership training to increase Self-leadership and Innovative Work Behavior.

The study used action research with two research designs which are cross sectional (n = 144) and before-and-after study (n = 9). Measuring instrument used is Innovative Work Behavior Questionnaire (Jassen, 2000) which then translated into Indonesian language by Etikariena and Muluk (2014) and The Revised Self-Leadership Questionnaire (Marques-Quinteiro, Curral & Passos, 2012).

The result showed that there is a significant positive correlation between Self-Leadership and Innovative Work Behavior (r = .44, R2 = .20 (p< .05). It means that the more increase Selfleadership is, the more Work Innovative Behavior increases significantly and then, Self-leadership explained 20% variance of Work Innovative Behavior. Moreover, among the three dimensions of Self-leadership, the Constructive thought strategies is the most related dimension to the Work Innovative Behavior (r = .41).

Based on the result of the difference between pre-test and post-test, it concludes that the intervention of Mastering Self-Leadership training is effectively advised as an activity to increase Self-leadership and Innovative Work Behavior.