ABSTRAKPenelitian ini disusun untuk melihat perlindungan hukum yang didapat olehdebitur (nasabah pegadaian) dalam melakukan perjanjian dengan PT Pegadaianmelalui surat bukti kredit (SBK) yang didalamnya terdapat pencantuman klausulabaku apabila PT Pegadaian melakukan tindakan wanprestasi yang menyebabkanhilang atau rusaknya barang yang digadaikan oleh debitur. Untuk melihat adanyakesesuaian antara pengaturan dan praktek, dapat dilihat dari studi kasus PutusanMahkamah Agung No. 480 K/Pdt.Sus/2012 dan Putusan Pengadilan NegeriMedan Nomor : 235/Pdt.G/2011/PN.Mdn terkait perlindungan hukum yangdidapat oleh debitur atau mengenai ganti rugi yang akan diterima debitur jikabarang yang digadaikan hilang atau rusak selama masih berada di PT Pegadaian.

---

ABSTRACTThis research is prepared to see the legal protection acquired by the debtors inagreement between PT Pegadaian and the debtors. Viewing that there is astandard clause in the mortgage agreement between PT Pegadaian with theconsumers that is contained in the Credit Evidence Letter (SBK) which could befound that PT Pegadaian can do some breach of contract in case the mortgagedgoods are lost or damaged as long as the goods are still in PT Pegadaian. To seethe compatibility between the regulations and practice, it can be seen from casestudy of Supreme Court’s Decision No. 480 K/Pdt.Sus/2012 and Court DecisionNo. 235/Pdt.G/2011/PN.Mdn related to the legal protection obtained by thedebtors or concerning the indemnification that would be received by the debtors incase the mortgaged goods are lost or damaged as long as the goods are still in PTPegadaian.