ABSTRAK
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menjelaskan dan menganalisis peraturanpembatalan putusan arbitrase internasional disertai praktek yang dilakukanlembaga peradilan di Indonesia berdasarkan teori-teori HPI. Penulismempergunakan metode penelitian yuridis normatif dengan studi kepustakaan.Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pengaturan mengenai pembatalan putusanarbitrase internasional dalam UU Arbitrase belum jelas dan lengkap. Hal tersebutdapat dilihat dalam perdebatan mengenai pengaturan pelaksanaan putusanarbitrase internasional dan alasan pembatalan putusan arbitrase. Lembagaperadilan di Indonesia pun pada prakteknya masih inkonsisten dalam menerapkanaturan-aturan tersebut. Sebagai contoh ialah kasus antara Yemen Airwaysmelawan PT Comarindo Tama Tour&Travel dan kasus antara PTPertamina(Persero) dan PT Pertamina EP melawan PT Lirik Petroleum

---

ABSTRACT
This research aimed to describe and analyze the regulation about annulment of

international arbitral award with the practice of Indonesian Court in accordance

with International Private Law. Author use juridical-normative research method

with literature studies. The research shows that the regulation about annulment of

international arbitral award in Law of Arbitration has not been clear and

sufficient. It can bee seen from the articles about the enforcement of international

arbitral award and the ground for annulment of arbitral award. In accordance

with that, Indonesian Court has been inconsistent to implement those regulations.

For examples is case between PT Comarindo Tama Tour&Travel v. Yemen

Airways and case between PT Pertamina (Persero) and PT Pertamina EP v. PT

Lirik Petroleum.